CyberKnife

射波刀
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    介绍射波刀(CK)放射外科是前庭神经鞘瘤(VS)的治疗策略。目的评价CK后的听力保护(HP)。数据综合本研究是根据系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)声明的首选报告项目进行的。并在国际前瞻性系统审查登记册(PROSPERO,在编号CRD42021250300下)。纳入标准基于人群,干预,比较,结果,时间和研究设计(PICOTS)策略:人群-VS患者;干预-CK;比较-无;结果-Gardner和Robertson定义为I级或II级的可服务HP,或由美国耳鼻咽喉科和头颈外科学会作为A类或B类;时间-平均随访时间超过1年;和研究设计-回顾性或前瞻性研究。排除标准为:非英文发表的研究;2000年1月之前和2021年10月之后发表的研究;以及仅包括2型神经纤维瘤病患者或接受过先前治疗的患者的研究。PubMed/MEDLINE,EMBASE,WebofScience,科克伦图书馆,LILACS,和IBECS数据库被使用,最后一次搜索是在10月27日,2021年。使用I2统计数据评估统计异质性。评估清单用于评估纳入研究中的偏倚风险。共分析了222项研究,和13个被包括在合成中,这代表了493名参与者在干预前的可用听力。在平均随访42.96个月时,使用随机效应模型的CK后平均HP率为68%(95%置信区间[95CI]:59-76%)。结论在定性合成中,CK放射外科治疗VS后,随访时间越长,HP率越低。
    Introduction  CyberKnife (CK) radiosurgery is a treatment strategy for vestibular schwannoma (VS). Objectives  To evaluate hearing preservation (HP) after CK for VS. Data Synthesis  The study was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, and it was registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO, under number CRD42021250300). The inclusion criteria were based on the population, intervention, comparison, outcome, timing and study design (PICOTS) strategy: population - patients with VS; intervention - CK; Comparison - none; Outcome - serviceable HP defined by Gardner and Robertson as grades I or II, or by the American Academy of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery as classes A or B; timing - mean follow-up longer than 1 year; and study design - retrospective or prospective studies. The exclusion criteria were: studies not published in English; studies published before January 2000 and after October 2021; and studies only including patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 or submitted to a previous treatment. The PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, LILACS, and IBECS databases were used and last searched on October 27th, 2021. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using I 2 statistics. The appraisal checklist was used to assess the risk of bias in the included studies. A total of 222 studies were analyzed, and 13 were included in the synthesis, which represents 493 participants with serviceable hearing before intervention. The mean HP rate after CK using a random effects model was of 68% (95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 59-76%) at a mean follow-up of 42.96 months. Conclusion  The longer follow-up period was associated with a lower HP rate after CK radiosurgery for VS in the qualitative synthesis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:滑膜肉瘤(SS)是一种相对罕见的软组织肉瘤,通常通过手术治疗,辐射,化疗,和姑息治疗。立体定向放射外科(SRS)是一种新兴的方法,在治疗中枢神经系统疾病中显示出希望,但尚未对SS进行研究。作者提出了一个系统的综述,探讨了不同治疗方法的有效性,专注于SRS,用于管理脊髓SS。
    方法:进行了系统的PubMed搜索,涵盖了1964年至2022年的研究,产生了70项相关研究。纳入标准包括原发性和转移性脊柱SS,各种治疗方式,患者年龄17岁或以上,英语语言研究,回顾性系列,和病例报告。基于这些标准,26项研究被纳入本综述,44项被排除。
    结果:在纳入的研究中,来自9项研究的15例患者接受手术干预,然后进行常规放疗(RT)和化疗,来自10项研究的10例患者接受了手术治疗,然后接受RT治疗,5项研究包括8例患者,仅接受手术治疗,3项研究中有5例采用手术加联合化疗治疗,2项研究中的4例患者接受了SRS治疗,只有1项研究报告了没有手术,化疗和RT的治疗。在接受SRS治疗的患者中观察到的中位无进展生存期和总生存期分别为37个月和60个月。分别,高于任何其他治疗方法或组合使用的方法。
    结论:作者的研究提供了对脊柱SS治疗的全面回顾。他们希望这将有助于临床医生做出明智的决策,以获得更好的患者结果。
    OBJECTIVE: Synovial sarcoma (SS) is a relatively rare type of soft-tissue sarcoma that is commonly treated with surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, and palliative care. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an emerging approach that shows promise in treating CNS conditions, but it has not been studied for SS. The authors present a systematic review that explores the effectiveness of different treatments, with a focus on SRS, for managing spinal SS.
    METHODS: A systematic PubMed search was conducted that covered studies from 1964 to 2022, yielding 70 relevant studies. Inclusion criteria encompassed primary and metastatic spinal SS, various treatment modalities, patient age 17 years or older, English-language studies, retrospective series, and case reports. Based on these criteria, 26 studies were included in this review and 44 were excluded.
    RESULTS: Of the included studies, 15 patients from 9 studies were treated with surgical intervention followed by both conventional radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy, 10 patients from 10 studies were treated with surgery followed by RT, 5 studies comprising 8 patients were exclusively treated with surgery, 5 cases in 3 studies were treated with surgery plus concomitant chemotherapy, 4 patients in 2 studies were treated with SRS, and only 1 study reported treatment without surgery and with chemotherapy and RT. The median progression-free survival and overall survival periods observed in the SRS-treated patients were 37 months and 60 months, respectively, which were higher than those of any other treatment method or combination used.
    CONCLUSIONS: The authors\' study offers a thorough review of spinal SS treatments. They are hopeful that this will aid clinicians in informed decision-making for better patient outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    目的:平滑肌肉瘤(LMS)是一种罕见的,侵袭性软组织肉瘤,很少扩散到骨骼。脊柱可以是LMS骨性转移的部位或原发肿瘤部位。脊髓LMS的最佳治疗方案仍不清楚。作者介绍了一组接受前期手术或前期Cyberknife立体定向放射外科(SRS)治疗的脊柱LMS患者。
    方法:作者回顾性研究了2004年至2020年间在其机构接受治疗的17例脊柱LMS患者的临床和放射学结果。手术或SRS被用作前期治疗。评估临床和放射学结果。还对文献进行了系统回顾。
    结果:在17例患者(20例脊柱病变)中,12名(70.6%)为女性。患者年龄中位数为61岁(范围41-80岁)。十名患者的脊柱病变进行了前期手术,和7个有前期的射波刀放射手术。中位随访时间为11个月(0.3-130个月)。整个队列的中位总生存期(OS)为13个月(范围0.3-97个月)。在亚组分析中,手术组的中位OS较低(13个月,范围0.3-50个月),而SRS组的中位OS为15个月(范围5-97个月)(p=0.5).接受手术治疗的患者中有40%(n=4)在中位6.7个月(范围0.3-36个月)出现局部复发,而用射波刀治疗的患者中只有14%(n=1)在5个月后出现局部复发。局部肿瘤控制率(LTC)在6-,12-,18个月的随访率为72%,58%,43%,分别,对于SRS组和40%,30%,20%,分别,手术组(p<0.05)。文献综述包括35篇论文,其中70例患者患有脊髓LMS;只有2例患者接受了SRS治疗。文献综述证实了手术组的临床和放射学结果,而SRS的数据是轶事。
    结论:作者介绍了文献中最大的脊髓LMS系列和第一个关于脊髓LMS的SRS系列。这项研究表明,接受前期SRS而不是手术的患者的LTC在统计学上明显更好。两组之间的操作系统似乎没有差异。
    OBJECTIVE: Leiomyosarcoma (LMS) is a rare, aggressive soft-tissue sarcoma that seldom spreads to the bone. The spine can be either the site of LMS osseous metastases or the primary tumor site. The optimal treatment option for spinal LMS is still unclear. The authors present a cohort of patients with spinal LMS treated with either upfront surgery or upfront CyberKnife stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS).
    METHODS: The authors retrospectively studied the clinical and radiological outcomes of 17 patients with spinal LMS treated at their institution between 2004 and 2020. Either surgery or SRS was used as the upfront treatment. The clinical and radiological outcomes were assessed. A systematic review of the literature was also conducted.
    RESULTS: Of the 17 patients (20 spinal lesions), 12 (70.6%) were female. The median patient age was 61 years (range 41-80 years). Ten patients had upfront surgery for their spinal lesions, and 7 had upfront CyberKnife radiosurgery. The median follow-up was 11 months (range 0.3-130 months). The median overall survival (OS) for the entire cohort was 13 months (range 0.3-97 months). In subgroup analysis, the median OS was lower for the surgical group (13 months, range 0.3-50 months), while the median OS for the SRS group was 15 months (range 5-97 months) (p = 0.5). Forty percent (n = 4) of those treated with surgery presented with local recurrence at a median of 6.7 months (range 0.3-36 months), while only 14% (n = 1) of those treated with CyberKnife radiosurgery had local recurrence after 5 months. Local tumor control (LTC) rates at the 6-, 12-, and 18-month follow-ups were 72%, 58%, and 43%, respectively, for the SRS group and 40%, 30%, and 20%, respectively, for the surgery group (p < 0.05). The literature review included 35 papers with 70 patients harboring spinal LMS; only 2 patients were treated with SRS. The literature review confirms the clinical and radiological outcomes of the surgical group, while data on SRS are anecdotal.
    CONCLUSIONS: The authors present the largest series in the literature of spinal LMS and the first on SRS for spinal LMS. This study shows that LTC is statistically significantly better in patients receiving upfront SRS instead of surgery. The OS does not appear different between the two groups.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:三叉神经痛(TN)是一种阵发性,单边,brief,三叉神经≥1个分区的休克样疼痛。它可能是由多种原因造成的;然而,继发于中风的TN非常罕见。
    方法:我们介绍了在保守治疗失败之前,使用递增剂量的神经性疼痛药物治疗>5年的脑桥梗死继发TN的案例。然后,他接受了立体定向放射外科(SRS)治疗。此外,我们使用标准PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)指南对1976年至2022年的所有TN伴脑干卒中病例进行了系统评价.
    结果:我们的患者是一名82岁的男性。磁共振成像显示脑桥病变与中风一致。巴罗神经研究所(BNI)在演示时得分为5。他接受60Gy的边缘剂量至80%等剂量线,以单个部分的体积为0.05cm3。治疗后即刻BNI评分为0,持续3个月保持在0,当他经历了复发。复发采用奥卡西平治疗。使用较低剂量的奥卡西平,他的疼痛得到了很好的控制,随访1年,BNI评分为3分,无不良反应.该系统评价确定了21例病例报告,其中25例合并脑卒中继发TN患者。只有3名患者接受了SRS治疗,其中2人在随访6个月和8个月时报告症状改善,无不良事件。
    结论:我们的病例和文献综述证明了SRS的持久有效治疗,这可以被认为是卒中相关TN患者安全有效的治疗选择。
    Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a paroxysmal, unilateral, brief, shock-like pain in ≥1 divisions of the trigeminal nerve. It can result from multiple causes; however, TN secondary to stroke is very rare.
    We present the case of TN secondary to pontine infarction treated with incremental doses of neuropathic pain medication for >5 years before conservative management failed. He was then treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Additionally, we conducted a systematic review using standard PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) guidelines for all the cases of TN with brainstem stroke from 1976 to 2022.
    Our patient was an 82-year-old man. Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated a pontine lesion consistent with stroke. The Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) score at presentation was 5. He received a marginal dose of 60 Gy to the 80% isodose line in a single fraction to a volume of 0.05 cm3. The immediate post-treatment BNI score was 0 and remained at 0 for 3 months, when he experienced recurrence. The recurrence was treated with oxcarbazepine. His pain remained well controlled with a lower dose of oxcarbazepine, and he had no adverse effects at 1 year of follow-up with a BNI score of 3. The systemic review identified 21 case reports with a combined cohort of 25 patients with TN secondary to stroke. Only 3 patients were treated with SRS, 2 of whom reported symptom improvement at 6 months and 8 months of follow-up with no adverse events.
    Our case and literature review demonstrate durable and effective treatment with SRS, which can be considered a safe and effective treatment option for patients with stroke-associated TN.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Review
    背景:朗格汉斯细胞组织细胞增生症(LCH)是一种罕见的特发性疾病,其特征是朗格汉斯组织细胞在身体各个部位的克隆性增殖,并能够导致器官损伤和肿瘤形成。成人中颅骨LCH的报告极为罕见。尽管手术仍然是局部LCH病变的首选选择,立体定向放射外科(SRS)的作用正在显现.
    目的:回顾性回顾一个罕见病例系列,以确定局部颅骨LCH患者SRS的安全性和有效性。
    方法:我们回顾性回顾了2005年1月至2022年9月在我们研究所接受SRS治疗的成人人群的组织病理学证实的局部颅骨LCH病例。5名患者的中位年龄为34岁(19-54岁)。3例患者肿瘤部位在垂体柄,一个病人的轨道,还有一个病人的顶叶头骨.中值目标体积为2.8cc(范围:0.37-6.11)。4例患者接受了一次治疗(中位边缘剂量为8Gy,范围:7-10Gy)和1例患者的3个部分(22.5Gy)。中位随访时间为12年(范围:4-17)。在SRS之前或之后,没有患者需要开颅手术进行肿瘤缩小。
    结果:病灶的局部肿瘤控制率为100%。所有3例垂体柄LCH患者在最初表现时都有尿崩症,并在SRS后出现全垂体功能减退。SRS后尿崩症无改善。另外2例患者没有出现不良放射效应。在文献综述的基础上,我们的病例系列是最大的局部颅骨LCHSRS回顾性系列,中位随访时间最长。
    结论:在本病例系列中,对局部颅骨LCH患者的SRS是一种安全有效的治疗方式。鼓励更大的研究来验证SRS在局部颅骨LCH治疗中的作用。
    Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) is a rare idiopathic disease characterized by the clonal proliferation of Langerhans histiocytes in various parts of the body and capable of leading to organ damage and tumor formation. Reports of cranial LCH in the adult population are extremely rare. Although surgery remains the preferred option for localized LCH lesions, the role of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is emerging.
    To retrospectively review a rare case series to determine the safety and effectiveness of SRS for patients with localized cranial LCH.
    We retrospectively reviewed histopathologically confirmed cases of localized cranial LCH treated with SRS at our institute in the adult population between January 2005 and September 2022. Five patients were identified with a median age of 34 years (19-54 years). The tumor location was in the pituitary stalk in 3 patients, the orbit in one patient, and the parietal skull in one patient. The median target volume was 2.8 cc (range: 0.37-6.11). Treatment was delivered in a single fraction in 4 patients (median margin dose of 8 Gy, range: 7-10 Gy) and in 3 fractions (22.5 Gy) in 1 patient. The median follow-up was 12 years (range: 4-17). None of the patients required craniotomy for tumor debulking before or after SRS.
    The local tumor control rate for the lesions was 100%. All 3 patients with LCH in the pituitary stalk had diabetes insipidus at the initial presentation and developed panhypopituitarism after SRS. Diabetes insipidus was not improved after SRS. The other 2 patients presented no adverse radiation effects. Based on the literature review, our case series was the largest retrospective series on SRS for localized cranial LCH, with the longest median follow-up.
    SRS for patients with localized cranial LCH was a safe and effective treatment modality in this case series. Larger studies are encouraged to validate the role of SRS in the treatment of localized cranial LCH.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    伽玛刀放射外科被认为是治疗难治性三叉神经痛(TN)的有效干预措施。赛波刀,最近的无框和非等中心放射外科替代方案,尚未对这种情况进行广泛的研究。这项研究旨在评估医学难治性TN患者的首次射波刀放射外科(CKRS)治疗的临床结果。
    对2009年至2021年在蒙特利尔大学医院中心治疗的166例难治性TN患者(168例手术)进行了回顾性队列研究。使用射波刀进行治疗(G4型,VSI,或M6)。治疗中位最大剂量为80(范围70.0-88.9)Gy。
    充分缓解疼痛,使用巴罗神经病学研究所疼痛量表评分(I-IIIb)进行评估,146例(86.9%)。充分缓解疼痛之前的中位潜伏期为35天(范围0-202天)。疼痛复发的患者疼痛缓解的中位持续时间为8.3个月(范围0.6-85.0个月)。从治疗日期起12、36和60个月时保持疼痛缓解的精算率为77.0%,62.5%,50.2%,分别。44例(26.2%)出现面部麻木新发或加重。这种面部麻木预示着疼痛缓解的更好维持(p<0.001)。与多发性硬化症相关的病例相比,特发性病例维持适当的疼痛缓解时间更长(MS;p<0.001)。
    在作者的经验中,用于难处理TN的CKRS是高效和安全的。治疗后面部感觉减退的发作或加重预示着疼痛的持续缓解。与MS相关病例相比,特发性病例的疼痛缓解更持久。
    Gamma Knife radiosurgery is recognized as an efficient intervention for the treatment of refractory trigeminal neuralgia (TN). The CyberKnife, a more recent frameless and nonisocentric radiosurgery alternative, has not been studied as extensively for this condition. This study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes of a first CyberKnife radiosurgery (CKRS) treatment in patients with medically refractory TN.
    A retrospective cohort study of 166 patients (168 procedures) with refractory TN treated from 2009 to 2021 at the Centre Hospitalier de l\'Université de Montréal was conducted. The treatment was performed using a CyberKnife (model G4, VSI, or M6). The treatment median maximum dose was 80 (range 70.0-88.9) Gy.
    Adequate pain relief, evaluated using Barrow Neurological Institute pain scale scores (I-IIIb), was achieved in 146 cases (86.9%). The median latency period before adequate pain relief was 35 (range 0-202) days. The median duration of pain relief for cases with a recurrence of pain was 8.3 (range 0.6-85.0) months. The actuarial rates of maintaining adequate pain relief at 12, 36, and 60 months from the treatment date were 77.0%, 62.5%, and 50.2%, respectively. There was new onset or aggravation of facial numbness in 44 cases (26.2%). This facial numbness was predictive of better maintenance of pain relief (p < 0.001). The maintenance of adequate pain relief was sustained longer in idiopathic cases compared with cases associated with multiple sclerosis (MS; p < 0.001).
    In the authors\' experience, CKRS for refractory TN is efficient and safe. The onset or aggravation of facial hypoesthesia after treatment was predictive of a more sustained pain relief, and idiopathic cases had more sustained pain relief in comparison with MS-related cases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    这项回顾性研究的目的是比较经活检证实的颅底脊索瘤患者的生存率,这些患者接受了立体定向放射外科手术(SRS),但没有接受分割放射治疗(RT)。
    从数据库开始到2021年9月的相关文章是从PubMed检索的,Scopus,WebofScience,和Cochrane数据库对治疗方案进行系统评价。包括以下情况的研究:1)涉及经组织学和放射学证实位于斜坡颅底区域内并接受SRS治疗的成人患者(年龄≥18岁);2)报告的临床特征数据,SRS协议,和结果;和3)用英语写的。如果研究1)是文献综述,则将其排除在外,病例报告,技术说明,摘要,或尸检报告;2)没有明确区分脊索瘤患者的数据与不同肿瘤患者的数据或颅底以外位置的脊索瘤患者的数据;或3)缺乏组织学确认或治疗和结果数据。提取的数据包括:研究作者和发表年份,患者年龄和性别,症状,颅神经受累,入侵的结构,病变大小,治疗方式,手术细节,组织病理学类型,RT模态,SRS参数,并发症,术后结果,并发症,和生存结果。
    在选择过程之后,15篇文章描述了130名符合研究资格标准的患者,包括94例接受手术后SRS(NoRT组)和36例接受手术后分割RT和后续SRS(RT组)的患者.NoRT和RT组的年龄相当(51.3岁vs47.4岁,分别),性别(57.1%vs男性58.3%),肿瘤体积(9.5对11.2cm3),SRS治疗参数(最大剂量:35.4对42.2Gy,边际剂量:19.6vs20.6Gy,治疗等剂量线:60.2%vs65.2%),和SRS不良反应(10.9%vs17.6%)。对于整个队列,3-,5-,10年无进展生存率(PFS)为23%,9%,3%,分别,总生存率(OS)为94%,82%,76%,分别。在NoRT组中,38例(40.4%)患者在手术切除后接受SRS辅助治疗,10例(10.6%)单独切除复发肿瘤的抢救治疗,和46(48.9%)中未指定。在RT组中,9例患者(25.0%)接受SRS强化治疗,复发后的抢救治疗22例(61.1%),而在5中未指定(13.9%)。两组间PFS中位数无差异(24.0个月[Q134.0,Q315.0]vs23.8个月[34.0,18.0],分别为;p=0.8)或中位OS(293.0个月[未达到,137.4]vs未达到[未达到,48.0],分别为;p=0.36)。两组之间的辐射不良反应发生率相当(10.9%vs17.6%,分别为;p=0.4)。
    SRS在颅底脊索瘤治疗中的作用仍在不断发展。对活检证实的脊索瘤的系统文献回顾显示,脊索瘤手术后单纯SRS的肿瘤控制率和生存率并不逊于SRS加分割RT后的肿瘤控制率和生存率。
    The objective of this retrospective study was to compare the survival of patients with biopsy-proven skull base chordoma who had undergone stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with versus without prior fractionated radiation therapy (RT).
    Relevant articles from database inception to September 2021 were retrieved from the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases for a systematic review of treatment protocols. Studies were included if they 1) involved adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) with histologically and radiologically confirmed chordomas located within the clival skull base region and treated with SRS; 2) reported data on clinical features, SRS protocols, and outcomes; and 3) were written in the English language. Studies were excluded if they 1) were literature reviews, case reports, technical notes, abstracts, or autopsy reports; 2) did not clearly differentiate the data of patients with chordomas from the data of patients with different tumors or the data of patients with chordomas in locations other than the skull base; or 3) lacked histological confirmation or treatment and outcome data. Extracted data included the following: study author and publication year, patient age and sex, symptoms, cranial nerve involvement, invaded structures, lesion size, treatment modality, surgical details, histopathological type, RT modality, SRS parameters, complications, postradiosurgery outcomes, complications, and survival outcomes.
    After the selection process, 15 articles describing 130 patients met the study eligibility criteria, including 94 patients who had undergone postresection SRS (NoRT group) and 36 who had undergone postresection fractionated RT and subsequent SRS (RT group). The NoRT and RT groups were comparable in age (51.3 vs 47.4 years, respectively), sex (57.1% vs 58.3% male), tumor volume (9.5 vs 11.2 cm3), SRS treatment parameters (maximum dose: 35.4 vs 42.2 Gy, marginal dose: 19.6 vs 20.6 Gy, treatment isodose line: 60.2% vs 65.2%), and SRS adverse effects (10.9% vs 17.6%). For the entire cohort, the 3-, 5-, and 10-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 23%, 9%, and 3%, respectively, and the overall survival (OS) rates were 94%, 82%, and 76%, respectively. In the NoRT group, SRS was adjuvant treatment after resection in 38 patients (40.4%), salvage treatment for recurrent tumor treated with resection alone in 10 (10.6%), and not specified in 46 (48.9%). In the RT group, SRS was boost treatment in 9 patients (25.0%), salvage treatment after recurrence in 22 (61.1%), and not specified in 5 (13.9%). There was no difference between the two groups in terms of median PFS (24.0 months [Q1 34.0, Q3 15.0] vs 23.8 months [34.0, 18.0], respectively; p = 0.8) or median OS (293.0 months [not reached, 137.4] vs not reached [not reached, 48.0], respectively; p = 0.36). The adverse radiation effect rates were comparable between the groups (10.9% vs 17.6%, respectively; p = 0.4).
    The role of SRS in the management of skull base chordomas is still evolving. This systematic literature review of biopsy-proven chordoma revealed that tumor control and survival rates for SRS alone after chordoma surgery were not inferior to those encountered after SRS plus fractionated RT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:副神经节瘤是一种罕见的血管神经内分泌肿瘤,发生在肾上腺神经节外组织。它们最常见于颈动脉分叉处,它们被称为颈动脉体瘤。大多数副神经节瘤是良性的,当地的侵略性,浸润性肿瘤.约10%的副神经节瘤患者发生远处转移,10%存在多发或双侧肿瘤(主要是颈动脉体瘤),10%有副神经节瘤家族史。6%的病例报道了颈动脉体瘤的恶性转化。
    方法:我们介绍了一名64岁的高加索女性,颈部巨大的胶体瘤块。咨询前20年,患者尝试切除肿块失败。在过去的3年里,患者感觉到肿块以增加的速度增大,几乎是以前的两倍。血管造影磁共振成像显示,左子宫颈有9厘米的气管旁肿块,横向移位了胸锁乳突肌和2cm的气管。由于肿瘤行为的改变,Ruber国际医院的颌面团队决定在栓塞后手术切除肿瘤。在手术过程中,将肿瘤从颈动脉轻轻解剖,并从颈动脉分叉处顺利取出。将两个紧密粘附于颈内动脉外膜的小结节和后部撕裂孔留在原处,以避免任何可能危及生命的并发症。最终活检证实了颈动脉体副神经节瘤的初步诊断,并显示Ki-67表达为19%。由于肿瘤的侵袭性生长行为和高Ki-67表达,患者被转诊至Ruber国际医院射波刀科治疗其余淋巴结.
    结论:宫颈副神经节瘤的治疗是困难的,仍然是一个挑战。尽管手术或放射治疗控制肿瘤的可能性很高,我们目前对最佳治疗方案缺乏共识.然而,在选定的复杂案例中,比如我们提出的案例,手术和放射外科的结合可以使局部肿瘤完全控制,发病率最低。
    BACKGROUND: Paragangliomas are rare vascular neuroendocrine tumors that develop in the extra-adrenal paraganglion tissue. They occur most commonly at the carotid bifurcation, where they are known as carotid body tumors. Most paragangliomas are benign, locally aggressive, infiltrative tumors. Approximately 10% of patients with paragangliomas develop distant metastases, 10% present with multiple or bilateral tumors (mostly carotid body tumors), and 10% have a family history of paragangliomas. The malignant transformation of carotid body tumors has been reported in 6% of cases.
    METHODS: We present the case of a 64 year-old Caucasian woman with a gigantic glomic tumor mass in the neck. Twenty years before the consultation, the patient had undergone an unsuccessful attempt to remove the mass. Over the last 3 years, the patient had felt enlargement of the mass at an increased rate, almost doubling the prior size. Angio magnetic resonance imaging showed a 9 cm paratracheal mass on the left cervical side that laterally displaced the sternocleidomastoid muscle and 2 c m of the trachea. Due to the change in the tumor behavior, the maxillofacial team at Ruber International Hospital decided to remove the tumor surgically after embolization. During the surgery the tumor was gently dissected from the carotid an removed from the carotid bifurcation uneventfully. Two small nodes adhering tightly to the internal carotid adventitia and the posterior torn hole were left in place to avoid any potentially life-threatening complications. The final biopsy confirmed the initial diagnosis of carotid body paraganglioma and showed a Ki-67 expression of 19%. Due to the aggressive growth behavior and high Ki-67 expression of the tumor, the patient was referred to the CyberKnife Unit of Ruber International Hospital for treatment of the remaining nodes.
    CONCLUSIONS: The management of cervical paragangliomas is difficult and remains a challenge. Although the likelihood of tumor control is high with surgical or radiotherapeutic treatments, we currently lack consensus regarding the best treatment option. Nevertheless, in selected complex cases, such as the case we present, the combination of surgery and radiosurgery may allow complete local tumor control with minimal morbidity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:基于Cyberknife的机器人放射外科(RRS)由于其高精度,是一种广泛用于成人中枢神经系统(CNS)各种良性和恶性肿瘤的治疗方式,良好的安全性,和功效。尽管RRS在小儿神经肿瘤学中正在出现,治疗适应症的科学证据,处理参数,和病人的结果是稀缺的。本系统综述总结了RRS和机器人立体定向放射治疗(RSRT)在小儿神经肿瘤学中的当前经验和证据。
    方法:我们基于OvidMedline数据库进行了系统综述,Embase,科克伦图书馆,和PubMed以确定有关小儿神经肿瘤学中RRS和RSRT治疗的研究和发表的文章。本文应用了系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目。如果他们描述了RRS和RSRT在小儿神经肿瘤患者中的应用,则包括文章。使用原始和改编版本的纽卡斯尔渥太华质量评估量表(NOS),根据其证据水平和偏倚风险来评估文章的质量。仅包含在2021年8月1日之前发表的文章。
    结果:在最终审查和删除重复后,共纳入23篇文章。文章报道了具有各种治疗适应症的各种CNS实体。大多数出版物缺乏大量样本量和前瞻性研究设计。几份报告包括成年患者,从而限制了儿科患者数据提取和分析的可能性。RRS和RSRT主要用于佐剂的设置,姑息治疗,和抢救治疗,具有良好的局部控制率和可接受的短期至中期毒性。然而,随访时间有限。所有研究的证据水平均为IV;NOS评分介于4到6之间,而总体偏倚风险为中等至较低.
    结论:关于RRS和RSRT及其在小儿神经肿瘤学中的应用的出版物很少见,并且缺乏关于实体相关治疗标准和长期结局的高质量证据。有限的数据表明RRS和RSRT可能是有效的治疗方式,特别是对于不适合手术的儿童,患有肿瘤复发,或者需要姑息治疗。然而,选择此类治疗时,必须牢记潜在的短期和长期不良事件.前瞻性研究对于确定RRS和RSRT在小儿神经肿瘤学中的实际用途是必要的。
    BACKGROUND: CyberKnife-based robotic radiosurgery (RRS) is a widely used treatment modality for various benign and malignant tumors of the central nervous system (CNS) in adults due to its high precision, favorable safety profile, and efficacy. Although RRS is emerging in pediatric neuro-oncology, scientific evidence for treatment indications, treatment parameters, and patient outcomes is scarce. This systematic review summarizes the current experience and evidence for RRS and robotic stereotactic radiotherapy (RSRT) in pediatric neuro-oncology.
    METHODS: We performed a systematic review based on the databases Ovid Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and PubMed to identify studies and published articles reporting on RRS and RSRT treatments in pediatric neuro-oncology. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were applied herein. Articles were included if they described the application of RRS and RSRT in pediatric neuro-oncological patients. The quality of the articles was assessed based on their evidence level and their risk for bias using the original as well as an adapted version of the Newcastle Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale (NOS). Only articles published until 1 August 2021, were included.
    RESULTS: A total of 23 articles were included after final review and removal of duplicates. Articles reported on a broad variety of CNS entities with various treatment indications. A majority of publications lacked substantial sample sizes and a prospective study design. Several reports included adult patients, thereby limiting the possibility of data extraction and analysis of pediatric patients. RRS and RSRT were mostly used in the setting of adjuvant, palliative, and salvage treatments with decent local control rates and acceptable short-to-intermediate-term toxicity. However, follow-up durations were limited. The evidence level was IV for all studies; the NOS score ranged between four and six, while the overall risk of bias was moderate to low.
    CONCLUSIONS: Publications on RRS and RSRT and their application in pediatric neuro-oncology are rare and lack high-quality evidence with respect to entity-related treatment standards and long-term outcomes. The limited data suggest that RRS and RSRT could be efficient treatment modalities, especially for children who are unsuitable for surgical interventions, suffer from tumor recurrences, or require palliative treatments. Nevertheless, the potential short-term and long-term adverse events must be kept in mind when choosing such a treatment. Prospective studies are necessary to determine the actual utility of RRS and RSRT in pediatric neuro-oncology.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    颈静脉球瘤(GJT)是颈静脉孔的良性副神经节瘤。这些肿瘤的传统治疗包括手术切除;然而,考虑到这些肿瘤靠近重要的神经血管,立体定向放射外科(SRS)可能是需要考虑的一种合适的非侵入性治疗方法.这项荟萃分析的目的是评估SRS作为GJT的治疗选择。
    使用PubMed进行在线搜索,WebofScience,Scopus,和Cochrane数据库于2019年3月进行了有关GJT放射外科治疗的文章.筛选过程遵循系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目。
    最终分析包括23项研究,包括460名患者。平均耳鸣率,听力损失,出现症状时的下颅神经缺损为56%(95%置信区间[CI],46%-66%),56%(95%CI,44%-68%),和42%(95%CI,31%-54%),分别。治疗后总体临床状况改善率为47%(95%CI,37%-57%)。耳鸣的比率,听力损失,治疗后和下颅神经改善为54%(95%CI,44%-63%),28%(95%CI,19%-40%),和22%(95%CI,11%-39%),分别。所有研究的平均随访时间为47个月(范围,4-268个月)。随访时的总肿瘤控制率为95%(95%CI,93%-97%)。
    肿瘤控制率为95%,症状改善为47%,这表明SRS可能是这些高血管颅底肿瘤的合适治疗方式。未来的研究有必要进一步评估SRS在GJT管理中的潜在作用。
    Glomus jugulare tumors (GJTs) are benign paragangliomas of the jugular foramen. Traditional management of these tumors involves surgical resection; however, considering the proximity of these tumors to important neurovasculature, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) may be an appropriate noninvasive treatment to consider. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate SRS as a treatment option for GJTs.
    An online search using PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane databases was performed in March 2019 for articles on radiosurgery treatment of GJTs. The screening process followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.
    The final analysis comprised 23 studies including 460 patients. Average rates of tinnitus, hearing loss, and lower cranial nerve deficit as presenting symptoms were 56% (95% confidence interval [CI], 46%-66%), 56% (95% CI, 44%-68%), and 42% (95% CI, 31%-54%), respectively. Overall clinical status improvement rate after treatment was 47% (95% CI, 37%-57%). Rates of tinnitus, hearing loss, and lower cranial nerve improvement after treatment were 54% (95% CI, 44%-63%), 28% (95% CI, 19%-40%), and 22% (95% CI, 11%-39%), respectively. The mean follow-up time across studies was 47 months (range, 4-268 months). The aggregate tumor control rate at the time of follow-up was 95% (95% CI, 93%-97%).
    The tumor control rate of 95% and 47% symptomatic improvement suggest that SRS may be a suitable treatment modality for these hypervascular skull base tumors. Future studies are warranted to further evaluate the potential role of SRS in management of GJTs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号