The aim of this study was to compare a traditional fronto-orbital remodeling and advancement (FORA) with the dynamic cranioplasty for trigonocephaly (DCT). The authors analyzed patients who underwent surgery for trigonocephaly. Perioperative data were compared. Parents were asked to use a visual analog scale to evaluate the pre- and postoperative distance between the eyes, the forehead shape, and the global appearance of the face. A panel of observers was asked to grade pre- and postoperative photographs using a similar visual analog scale. Pre- and postoperative anthropometric data were collected and analyzed in a subset of the study population aged 9 years or older. The total sample size was 51 patients (DCT n = 39; FORA n = 12). Durations of surgery and anesthesia were shorter in the DCT group (115 vs 194 min, p = 0.001; 226 vs 289 min, p = 0.001). Patients in the DCT group received similar preoperative ratings to those in the FORA group, but significantly higher postoperative ratings by parents for all three questions. There were no significant differences in postoperative ratings by the panel or postoperative anthropometric data. DCT is safe and effective. It is preferred over FORA because it is associated with shorter durations of surgery and anesthesia, while providing higher degrees of parental satisfaction and similar aesthetic and anthropometric outcomes.

Sagittal craniosynostosis (SC) is a congenital condition whereby the newborn skull develops abnormally owing to the premature ossification of the sagittal suture. Spring-assisted cranioplasty (SAC) is a minimally invasive surgical technique to treat SC, where metallic distractors are used to reshape the newborn\'s head. Although safe and effective, SAC outcomes remain uncertain owing to the limited understanding of skull-distractor interaction and the limited information provided by the analysis of single surgical cases. In this work, an SC population-averaged skull model was created and used to simulate spring insertion by means of the finite-element analysis using a previously developed modelling framework. Surgical parameters were varied to assess the effect of osteotomy and spring positioning, as well as distractor combinations, on the final skull dimensions. Simulation trends were compared with retrospective measurements from clinical imaging (X-ray and three-dimensional photogrammetry scans). It was found that the on-table post-implantation head shape change is more sensitive to spring stiffness than to the other surgical parameters. However, the overall end-of-treatment head shape is more sensitive to spring positioning and osteotomy size parameters. The results of this work suggest that SAC surgical planning should be performed in view of long-term results, rather than immediate on-table reshaping outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the refractive outcome and strabismus at 5 years of age, in children operated for various types of non-syndromic craniosynostosis, and further analyse the refractive and strabismic development over time.
METHODS: Eighty-nine children, who had undergone operations for non-syndromic craniosynostosis, were examined at 5 years of age. These children also underwent ophthalmological examination preoperatively and up to 1 year after the operation. An age-matched control group including 32 healthy children was also recruited. Strabismus and eye motility were registered. Refraction was measured in cycloplegia.
RESULTS: There was a difference regarding the refractive outcome between the different types of craniosynostosis. Higher values of hypermetropia were found in the metopic craniosynostosis group on both eyes. In the unicoronal craniosynostosis group, high values of hypermetropia and a higher degree of astigmatism were found on the side contralateral to the craniosynostosis. Strabismus was found in 11/88 children of whom 10/11 had unicoronal craniosynostosis. A vertical deviation on the side ipsilateral to the fused suture was highly prevalent (6/10 cases). Ophthalmological dysfunctions were rare in children operated for sagittal craniosynostosis.
CONCLUSIONS: Ocular manifestations such as strabismus, astigmatism and anisometropia were highly prevalent in children operated for unilateral coronal craniosynostosis. Children operated for metopic craniosynostosis had higher rates of hypermetropia. The screening and follow-up protocols need to be tailored with regard to the type of craniosynostosis.

BACKGROUND: Cleft Lip and/or Palate (CLP) are the most common congenital orofacial anomalies. Those involved in CLP care may extend beyond the core members of the Cleft multidisciplinary team (MDT) with a variety of medical healthcare professionals destined to contribute to the management of CLP patients at some point during their respective careers. Therefore, it seems essential that a basic understanding of CLP, CLP-associated problems, and potential avenues for direct or indirect involvement in CLP care be introduced at undergraduate level.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate penultimate and final year undergraduate medical student CLP knowledge and exposure obtained whilst at medical school.
METHODS: An online questionnaire was distributed to penultimate and final year medical students throughout the UK.
RESULTS: A total of 3102 responses were received from 35 medical schools. 44.3% (n  =  1374) of respondents had no exposure to CLP teaching up until their current year of education. 61.3% (n  =  1903) of respondents had never been involved in the care of a CLP patient. 53.6% (n  =  1662) of respondents were not confident in their current knowledge of CLP. 78.5% (n  =  2257) of respondents indicated a desire to be involved in the care of CLP patients in their future career.
CONCLUSIONS: More than half of the medical student survey respondents were not confident in their current knowledge of CLP and had limited involvement in CLP care. This may translate to a delay in diagnosis when students qualify. Improving CLP education and exposure during undergraduate training can help achieve national CLP standards for early diagnosis.

The objective of this study was to investigate the accuracies of three-dimensional (3D) facial scanning mobile phone applications as compared to professional 3D facial imaging systems.
A manikin head model was used as the subject for comparing six 3D facial imaging systems which comprised three professional 3D scanners (3dMDface, Artec Eva and Vectra H2) and three mobile phone applications (Bellus3D, ScandyPro and Hedges). For each system, five scans were taken to analyse (1) linear accuracy using 9 measurements (2) global and (3) regional 3D accuracy of the scanned surface by root mean square (RMS) and colour map analysis. Another set of five scans was repeated by a second operator to evaluate the inter-operator reproducibility for each system.
All the facial imaging systems had absolute errors lesser than 1.0 mm for the linear measurements. The technical error of measurement (TEM) for inter-examiner and intra-examiner linear measurements were within acceptable limits. Artec Eva, Vectra H2 and Scandy Pro had poor global 3D trueness (RMS > 1.0 mm) but good 3D regional trueness (RMS < 1.0 mm). 3dMDface, Bellus3D Face App and Heges had good global and regional 3D trueness. All the facial imaging systems had good global and regional 3D precision and reproducibility (RMS < 1.0 mm).
This study demonstrated that mobile phone 3D scanning applications had comparable trueness, precision and reproducibility to professional systems. Colour map analysis supplemented the use of the RMS value to demonstrate facial regions of significant deviation. Clinicians should also consider the specific area or region of inaccuracies for each system to determine whether the chosen system is appropriate for the clinical condition or procedure.
Mobile phone 3D facial imaging applications may be as accurate as 3D professional facial scanning systems for craniomaxillofacial purposes. However, the choice of the system may vary depending on the specific area of interest.

OBJECTIVE: Apert syndrome (AS) is a rare congenital craniofacial disorder that requires a multidisciplinary approach to treatment and multiple surgeries. Given that cleft palate (CP) is presented in some of these cases, this poses an additional risk of aggravating obstructed airways after closure. The timing and outcome of CP repair in these patients remains disputed and requires additional attention.
METHODS: This retrospective analysis included patients diagnosed with CP and AS, born between 1950 and 2020, and treated at our institution. Data were collected from medical records and evaluated using descriptive statistics.
METHODS: Data analyses were conducted at Sahlgrenska University Hospital in Gothenburg, Sweden.
METHODS: A registry of 83 patients with AS resulted in a cohort of 26 patients also presenting with CP.
METHODS: Postoperative complications, requirement for intensive care, and reoperations following CP repair.
RESULTS: CP incidence among all registered patients was 31%. Patients undergoing CP repair at low age (mean: 22.5 months) tended to experience more frequent postoperative complications and requirements for intensive care. Among the evaluated cohort with medical records describing CP repair (n = 14), 29% experienced postoperative complications, all of which involved aggravation of obstructed airways.
CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the importance of airway assessment before and after CP repair in AS. The findings suggest that surgical outcomes might benefit from postponing CP repair, avoiding combined surgeries, and operating in two stages when indicated. However, additional and larger studies are required.

OBJECTIVE: The study primarily aimed to compare satisfaction with lip appearance among adults treated for unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) with Skoog\'s primary lip repair procedure to those without clefts. The secondary aim was to determine whether satisfaction with lip appearance and the desire to change the lip/face appearance correlated with the number of secondary lip revisions performed.
METHODS: Long-term follow-up.
UNASSIGNED: All UCLP patients treated at the Uppsala University Hospital born between 1960- and 1987 (n  =  109) were invited. At an average of 37 years following the primary lip repair, the participation rate was 76% (n  =  83). A control group of adults without cleft (n  =  67) completed the same study protocol for comparison.
METHODS: Satisfaction with appearance was measured with The Satisfaction with Appearance Questionnaire (SWA) and a modified version of the Body Cathexis -Scale was used to assess the desire to change the lip and facial appearance.
RESULTS: UCLP patients were less satisfied with their lip, face, and overall appearance and reported a greater desire to change the appearance of their lips and face than non-cleft controls (p < 0.001). Dissatisfaction with lip appearance correlated to a greater willingness to change the appearance of the lip and face. No correlation was found between satisfaction with appearance and the number of the previously performed secondary lip revisions.
CONCLUSIONS: Adults treated for UCLP are less satisfied with the appearance of their lips compared to the non-cleft population. The number of secondary revisions does not necessarily correlate to greater satisfaction with lip appearance.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a method of measuring the change in palatal length and shape following maxillary advancement using synchronous lateral videofluoroscopy and voice recording in order to understand how movement of the maxilla may affect VPI risk in patients with cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P).
METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of children with cleft lip and/or palate.
METHODS: Single center, tertiary children\'s hospital.
METHODS: Patients with cleft lip and/or palate who underwent maxillary advancement between 2016-21 inclusive.
METHODS: Maxillary advancement surgery, including those who underwent concurrent mandibular procedures.
METHODS: The length of the soft palate and the genu angle were measured throughout palatal dynamic range. Pre- and post-operative measurements were compared using a one sided T-test, with subgroup analysis for patients with clinical VPI.
RESULTS: Ten patients were examined. The mean distance of maxillary advancement was 10.5 mm. The average increase in pre-genu soft palate length was 2.8 mm in the resting position and 2.9 mm in the closed position. The genu angle decreased in the closed position by 16.3 degrees.
CONCLUSIONS: The soft palate showed limited ability to lengthen following maxillary advancement and this may explain the risk of VPI. There was partial compensation by the muscle sling of the palate as demonstrated by a more acute post-operative genu angle and this suggests one reason for the variability of VPI reported. Future research is required to investigate how length and shape changes measured using this method can predict VPI risk.

BACKGROUND: Augmented reality (AR) allows the overlapping and integration of virtual information with the real environment. The camera of the AR device reads the object and integrates the virtual data. It has been widely applied to medical and surgical sciences in recent years and has the potential to enhance intraoperative navigation.
METHODS: In this study, the authors aim to assess the accuracy of AR guidance when using the commercial HoloLens 2 head-mounted display (HMD) in pediatric craniofacial surgery. The Authors selected fronto-orbital remodeling (FOR) as the procedure to test (specifically, frontal osteotomy and nasal osteotomy were considered). Six people (three surgeons and three engineers) were recruited to perform the osteotomies on a 3D printed stereolithographic model under the guidance of AR. By means of calibrated CAD/CAM cutting guides with different grooves, the authors measured the accuracy of the osteotomies that were performed. We tested accuracy levels of ±1.5 mm, ±1 mm, and ±0.5 mm.
RESULTS: With the HoloLens 2, the majority of the individuals involved were able to successfully trace the trajectories of the frontal and nasal osteotomies with an accuracy level of ±1.5 mm. Additionally, 80% were able to achieve an accuracy level of ±1 mm when performing a nasal osteotomy, and 52% were able to achieve an accuracy level of ±1 mm when performing a frontal osteotomy, while 61% were able to achieve an accuracy level of ±0.5 mm when performing a nasal osteotomy, and 33% were able to achieve an accuracy level of ±0.5 mm when performing a frontal osteotomy.
CONCLUSIONS: despite this being an in vitro study, the authors reported encouraging results for the prospective use of AR on actual patients.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety, effectiveness and perioperative costs of endonasal endoscopic approach in brain invasive malignant sinonsal tumours patients.
METHODS: This was a case series bidirectional study; that included 30 brain invasive malignant sinonsal tumours patients treated by endonasal endoscopic approach (2015-2017) and 53 by open surgery (2010-2015). Propensity score matching was used to compensate the prognostic factors; in a sample of 50 patients (25 per group). Primary response variables was local control and 3-years overall survival. Perioperative cost variables were analyzed.
RESULTS: A number of 50 patients were included after matching (25 in each therapeutic group). The age average was 55 years and male proportion was 62%. Squamous cell carcinoma and grade II lesions were the most represented in the sample. Endonasal endoscopic approach reduced surgical time in 1 h 20 min, transfusion needs in 5.5 fold and hospitalization in 19 days; in comparison with open technique. Oncologic control based on surgical free margins, local control, overall survival and progression free survival after three years was higher when the resection was performed endoscopically. Functional status was enhanced and complications diminished by using endoscopic approach. Saving was estimated in $7 355.18 per patient.
CONCLUSIONS: Endonasal endoscopic approach represents a safe, effective and economic procedure in selected patients with malignant sinonasal tumors and brain invasion.