Cough/Mechanisms/Pharmacology

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:患有神经肌肉疾病的患者通常由于呼吸肌无力而咳嗽无力且无效。一种治疗选择是机械吹气-排气(MI-E),也称为咳嗽辅助,已知会增加咳嗽强度。然而,一些患者对MI-E有喉部反应,这会使治疗无效。目前,唯一的评估方法是通过鼻内窥镜检查,同时使用MI-E。某些MI-E设备具有板载安全数据(SD)卡,这允许波形的可视化。我们假设波形可用于识别喉部对MI-E的反应。
    方法:参与者将完成肺活量测定的基线评估,峰值咳嗽流量和嗅探鼻吸气压力。鼻内窥镜将用于通过带有钻孔的面罩在同时MI-E期间可视化喉。MI-E将由经验丰富的物理治疗师交付。将提供一系列处方的四个周期的MI-E。MI-E波形将下载到CareOrchestratorEssence软件(飞利浦,Murraysville)。将前瞻性地收集数据,并在描述性背景下进行审查,与鼻内窥镜视频相比,提供描述波形的趋势和潜在理由。
    背景:该协议已由英格兰东部-剑桥中央研究伦理委员会审查,给予了有利的伦理意见。该研究于2022年1月开始招募,旨在于2024年6月公布试验结果。
    背景:NCT05189600。
    BACKGROUND: Patients with neuromuscular disease often have a weak and ineffective cough due to respiratory muscle weakness. One treatment option is mechanical insufflation-exsufflation (MI-E), also known as cough assist, which is known to increase cough strength. However, some patients have a laryngeal response to MI-E, which can make the treatment ineffective. Currently, the only method for assessing this is via nasal endoscopy while using MI-E. Some MI-E devices have onboard secure data (SD) cards, which allow the visualisation of waveforms. We hypothesise that the waveforms can be used to identify laryngeal responses to the MI-E.
    METHODS: Participants will complete baseline assessments of spirometry, peak cough flow and sniff nasal inspiratory pressure. A nasal endoscope will be used to visualise the larynx during simultaneous MI-E via a mask with a drilled hole. MI-E will be delivered by an experienced physiotherapist. Four cycles of MI-E at a range of prescriptions will be delivered. MI-E waveforms will be downloaded into Care Orchestrator Essence software (Philips, Murraysville). Data will be collected prospectively and reviewed in a descriptive context, providing trends and potential rationales describing the waveforms in comparison to the nasal endoscope videos.
    BACKGROUND: This protocol has been reviewed by the East of England-Cambridge Central Research Ethics Committee, who have granted a favourable ethical opinion. The study opened to recruitment in January 2022 and aims to publish trial results in June 2024.
    BACKGROUND: NCT05189600.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:慢性支气管炎(CB),慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的表型,以持续咳嗽和粘液分泌过多为特征,尽管以指南为基础的治疗,但与不良结局相关。使用RheOx系统的支气管流变成形术(BR)将非热脉冲电场传递到下气道上皮和粘膜下层,以减少粘液产生细胞。包括1年随访在内的早期临床试验表明,气道杯状细胞增生减少,CB症状改善。
    方法:当前的多中心观察性BR研究在美国六个中心招募了21名CB患者,双侧治疗和2年随访。进入标准包括COPD评估测试(CAT)的咳嗽和痰评分升高,一秒钟的用力呼气量<80%。通过24个月的严重不良事件(SAE)发生率评估安全性。使用CAT的变化评估临床效用,圣乔治呼吸问卷(SGRQ),并通过比较干预前后的恶化率。
    结果:未发生手术相关或器械相关的严重不良事件。在12个月和24个月时,CAT相对于基线的平均(SD)变化分别为-9.0(6.7)(p<0.0001)和-5.6(7.1)(p<0.0047),在SGRQ中分别为-16.6(13.2)(p<0.0001)和-11.8(19.2)(p<0.0227),分别。与治疗前一年相比,中度COPD加重事件减少34%,重度COPD加重事件减少64%。
    结论:这项研究扩展了以前可行性研究的发现,证明BR可以安全地进行,并且可以显着改善CB患者的症状和与健康相关的生活质量,直至24个月。
    背景:NCT03631472。
    Chronic bronchitis (CB), a phenotype of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) characterised by persistent cough and mucus hypersecretion, is associated with poor outcomes despite guideline-based treatment. Bronchial rheoplasty (BR) with the RheOx system delivers non-thermal pulsed electric fields to the lower airway epithelium and submucosa to reduce mucus producing cells. Early phase clinical trials including 1-year follow-up have demonstrated reduction in airway goblet cell hyperplasia and improvement in CB symptoms.
    The current multicentre observational BR study enrolled 21 patients with CB at six centres in the USA, with bilateral treatment and 2-year follow-up. Entry criteria included elevated cough and sputum scores from COPD Assessment Test (CAT) and forced expiratory volume in one second<80% predicted. Safety was assessed by serious adverse event (SAE) incidence through 24 months. Clinical utility was evaluated using changes in the CAT, the St. George\'s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) and by comparing exacerbation rates before and following intervention.
    No procedure-related or device-related SAEs occurred. Mean (SD) changes from baseline in CAT at 12 and 24 months were -9.0 (6.7) (p<0.0001) and -5.6 (7.1) (p<0.0047) and in SGRQ were -16.6 (13.2) (p<0.0001) and -11.8 (19.2) (p<0.0227), respectively. There was a 34% reduction in moderate and a 64% reduction in severe COPD exacerbation events compared with the year prior to treatment.
    This study extends the findings from previous feasibility studies, demonstrating that BR can be performed safely and may significantly improve symptoms and health-related quality of life for patients with CB through 24 months.
    NCT03631472.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial, Phase I
    背景:口服吡非尼酮可降低特发性肺纤维化(IPF)患者的肺功能下降和死亡率。全身暴露会有明显的副作用,包括恶心,皮疹,光敏性,体重减轻和疲劳。减少的剂量在减缓疾病进展方面可能是次优的。
    方法:此阶段1b,随机化,开放标签,在六个国家/地区的25个地点进行的剂量反应试验(澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心(ANZCTR)注册号ACTRN12618001838202)评估了安全性,吸入吡非尼酮(AP01)在IPF中的耐受性和疗效。5年内确诊的患者,预测用力肺活量(FVC)40%-90%,不宽容,我们将不愿意或不适合口服吡非尼酮或尼达尼布的患者按1:1的比例随机分配至每天1次雾化治疗AP0150mg或每天2次雾化治疗100mg,疗程长达72周.
    结果:我们提供了第24周的主要终点和第48周的结果,以与已发表的抗纤维化药物试验具有可比性。第72周的数据将作为与正在进行的开放标签扩展研究合并的单独分析报告。从2019年5月至2020年4月,招募了91名患者(每天一次50mg:n=46,每天两次100mg:n=45)。最常见的治疗相关不良事件(频率,%的患者)均为轻度或中度,包括咳嗽(14,15.4%),皮疹(11,12.1%),恶心(8,8.8%),喉咙刺激(5,5.5%),疲劳(4,4.4%)和味觉障碍,头晕和呼吸困难(各三个,3.3%)。预测24周和48周FVC%的变化,分别,每天一次的50mg组中为-2.5(95%CI-5.3至0.4,-88mL)和-4.9(-7.5至-2.3,-188mL),每天两次的100mg组中为0.6(-2.2至3.4,10mL)和-0.4(-3.2至2.3,-34mL)。
    结论:在其他临床试验中与口服吡非尼酮相关的副作用在AP01中的发生率较低。在100mg每天两次的组中,预测的平均FVC%保持稳定。AP01的进一步研究是必要的。
    背景:ACTRN12618001838202澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册。
    Oral pirfenidone reduces lung function decline and mortality in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Systemic exposure can have significant side effects, including nausea, rash, photosensitivity, weight loss and fatigue. Reduced doses may be suboptimal in slowing disease progression.
    This phase 1b, randomised, open-label, dose-response trial at 25 sites in six countries (Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) registration number ACTRN12618001838202) assessed safety, tolerability and efficacy of inhaled pirfenidone (AP01) in IPF. Patients diagnosed within 5 years, with forced vital capacity (FVC) 40%-90% predicted, and intolerant, unwilling or ineligible for oral pirfenidone or nintedanib were randomly assigned 1:1 to nebulised AP01 50 mg once per day or 100 mg two times per day for up to 72 weeks.
    We present results for week 24, the primary endpoint and week 48 for comparability with published trials of antifibrotics. Week 72 data will be reported as a separate analysis pooled with the ongoing open-label extension study. Ninety-one patients (50 mg once per day: n=46, 100 mg two times per day: n=45) were enrolled from May 2019 to April 2020. The most common treatment-related adverse events (frequency, % of patients) were all mild or moderate and included cough (14, 15.4%), rash (11, 12.1%), nausea (8, 8.8%), throat irritation (5, 5.5%), fatigue (4, 4.4%) and taste disorder, dizziness and dyspnoea (three each, 3.3%). Changes in FVC % predicted over 24 and 48 weeks, respectively, were -2.5 (95% CI -5.3 to 0.4, -88 mL) and -4.9 (-7.5 to -2.3,-188 mL) in the 50 mg once per day and 0.6 (-2.2 to 3.4, 10 mL) and -0.4 (-3.2 to 2.3, -34 mL) in the 100 mg two times per day group.
    Side effects commonly associated with oral pirfenidone in other clinical trials were less frequent with AP01. Mean FVC % predicted remained stable in the 100 mg two times per day group. Further study of AP01 is warranted.
    ACTRN12618001838202 Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景:振荡呼气正压(OPEP)装置旨在促进痰液清除并减少咳嗽,但是它们在COPD中的有效性的证据有限,或指导患者选择。我们旨在评估OPEP治疗对慢性阻塞性肺病患者生活质量的影响以及咳嗽和睡眠障碍的客观指标。
    方法:我们招募了COPD稳定期患者,每天或大多数天报告痰液产生的人,变成了一个盲人评估员,平行组,比较3个月使用Acapella装置与常规护理(包括使用主动呼吸周期技术)的随机对照试验。主要结局是使用莱斯特咳嗽问卷(LCQ)测量的咳嗽相关生活质量。次要结果包括疲劳(慢性疾病治疗的功能评估,FACIT评分)和一般生活质量(EuroQol-5维度,EQ-5D)。在一项子研究(n=45)中,还可以对睡眠期间的咳嗽和干扰/运动进行客观监测。
    结果:招募了122名参与者(61/61OPEP/对照),40%是女性,17%的吸烟者,FEV138(25-56)%预测,年龄62±10岁。103完成研究(55/48OPEP/对照)。与对照组相比,使用OPEP与LCQ的改善有关;MD(95%CI)1.03(0.71至2.10);(p=0.03),FACIT评分4.68(1.34至8.02);(p<0.001)和EQ-5D4.00(0.49至19.75);(p=0.04)。咳嗽频率也有改善-60(-43至-95)咳嗽/24小时(p<0.001),但未发现对睡眠障碍有统计学意义的影响。
    结论:定期使用Acapella装置可改善每天或大部分时间产生痰的COPD患者的症状和生活质量。
    背景:ISRCTN44651852。
    Oscillatory positive expiratory pressure (OPEP) devices are intended to facilitate sputum clearance and reduce cough, but there is limited evidence for their effectiveness in COPD, or to guide patient selection. We aimed to assess the impact of OPEP therapy on quality of life and objective measures of cough and sleep disturbance in patients with COPD with regular sputum production.
    We enrolled stable patients with COPD, who reported sputum production every day or most days, into an assessor-blind, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial comparing 3 months of using an Acapella device against usual care (including use of the active cycle of breathing technique). The primary outcome was cough-related quality of life measured using the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ). Secondary outcomes included fatigue (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy, FACIT score) and generic quality of life (EuroQol-5 Dimensions, EQ-5D). In a substudy (n=45), objective monitoring of cough and disturbance/movement during sleep were also available.
    122 participants (61/61 OPEP/control) were recruited, 40% female, 17% smokers, FEV1 38 (25-56)% predicted, and age 62±10 years. 103 completed the study (55/48 OPEP/control). Use of OPEP was associated with an improvement in LCQ compared with controls; MD (95% CI) 1.03 (0.71 to 2.10); (p=0.03), FACIT score 4.68 (1.34 to 8.02); (p<0.001) and EQ-5D 4.00 (0.49 to 19.75); (p=0.04). There was also an improvement in cough frequency -60 (-43 to -95) coughs/24 hours (p<0.001), but no statistically significant effect on sleep disturbance was identified.
    Regular use of an Acapella device improves symptoms and quality of life in people with COPD who produce sputum daily or most days.
    ISRCTN44651852.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    澳大利亚原住民的慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患病率高于非土著澳大利亚人。然而,没有研究调查澳大利亚土著居民对COPD疾病的认知和知识.在这项研究中,我们评估了澳大利亚北领地高端卫生服务地区土著和非土著患者对COPD疾病的认知.
    在总共100名成年人的便利样本中,86名患者同意在15个月的时间内参与这项研究。进行了结构化访谈,以确定参与者对COPD的知识水平,药物,自我管理,医疗保健互动和利用。
    大多数(69%)参与者是土著和男性(52%)。土著患者明显年轻(平均56岁vs68岁p<0.001),偏远居住和目前吸烟的比例较高。整个队列的COPD知识较低,68%的土著和19%的非土著参与者报告他们“一无所知/从未听说过COPD”。大多数患者自我报告使用了河豚/吸入器,并能够确定使用的药物;然而,仅有18%的患者坚持治疗.呼吸短促是医院就诊时最常见的症状(83%),69%的土著患者报告在恶化期间寻求医疗救助。自我管理和COPD行动计划执行不力。相当比例(49%)的人在过去12个月内报告了≥2次住院。在恶化期间,尽管大多数土著患者是从偏远社区转移到三级中心的,患者的偏好是在各自的当地社区进行管理。
    在这个队列中,对COPD的认识和理解在几个领域都很低。需要为患者和卫生专业人员量身定制和文化上适当的举措,以改善土著居民的COPD疾病管理。这不仅可以改善生活质量,而且可以减少反复住院,医疗保健成本和利用率。
    The prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is higher among Indigenous Australians than that of non-Indigenous Australians. However, no studies have investigated COPD disease awareness and knowledge among Indigenous Australians. In this study, we assessed the COPD disease awareness among Indigenous and non-Indigenous patients in the Top End Health Service region of the Northern Territory of Australia.
    Of a total convenience sample of 100 adults, 86 patients consented to participate in this study over a 15-month period. A structured interview was conducted to identify participant\'s level of knowledge about COPD, medications, self-management, healthcare interaction and utilisations.
    Most (69%) participants were Indigenous and men (52%). Indigenous patients were significantly younger (mean 56 vs 68 years p<0.001), with a higher proportion of remote residence and current smoking. COPD knowledge across the cohort was low, with 68% of Indigenous and 19% of non-Indigenous participants reporting they \'know nothing/had never heard of COPD\'. Most patients self-reported use of puffers/inhalers and were able to identify medication used; however, adherence to therapy was observed in only 18%. Shortness of breath was the most common symptom for hospital presentation (83%) and 69% of Indigenous patients reported seeking medical attention during an exacerbation. Self-management and COPD action plans were poorly implemented. A significant proportion (49%) reported ≥2 hospital admissions in the preceding 12 months. During exacerbation, although the majority of Indigenous patients were transferred to a tertiary centre from remote communities, patient\'s preference was to be managed in their respective local communities.
    Awareness and understanding of COPD are low in this cohort on several domains. Tailored and culturally appropriate initiatives for both patients and health professionals alike are required to improve COPD disease management among Indigenous population. This will not only improve quality of life but also reduce recurrent hospitalisation, healthcare cost and utilisation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    物理治疗,言语和语言治疗是难治性慢性咳嗽的新兴非药物治疗方法。我们的目的是研究物理治疗的疗效,言语和语言治疗干预(PSALTI)可改善难治性慢性咳嗽患者的健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)并减少咳嗽频率。
    在这项多中心随机对照试验中,难治性慢性咳嗽患者被随机分为4周1:1的PSALTI课程,包括教育,喉部卫生和水合作用,咳嗽抑制技术,呼吸练习和心理教育咨询或控制干预,包括健康的生活方式建议。我们使用莱斯特咳嗽问卷(LCQ)评估了第4周HRQoL的变化。次要疗效结果包括24小时客观咳嗽频率(莱斯特咳嗽监测仪)和咳嗽反射敏感性。主要分析使用针对意向治疗群体的基线测量值进行校正的协方差分析。这项研究在英国临床研究网络(UKCRNID10678)注册。
    在2011年12月至2014年4月之间,我们随机分配了75名接受基线评估的参与者(34名PSALTI和41名对照)。在观察到的案例分析中,PSALTI组的HRQoL(LCQ)平均比对照组提高1.53(95%CI0.21至2.85)点(p=0.024)。与对照组相比,PSALTI组的咳嗽频率降低了41%(95%CI36%至95%)(p=0.030)。PSALTI组的改善持续3个月。引起五次或更多次咳嗽的辣椒素浓度在各组之间没有显着差异。
    PSALTI干预观察到HRQoL和咳嗽频率的更大改善。我们的发现支持PSALTI用于难治性慢性咳嗽患者。
    UKCRNID10678和ISRCTN73039760;结果。
    Physiotherapy, and speech and language therapy are emerging non-pharmacological treatments for refractory chronic cough. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of a physiotherapy, and speech and language therapy intervention (PSALTI) to improve health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and to reduce cough frequency in patients with refractory chronic cough.
    In this multicentre randomised controlled trial, patients with refractory chronic cough were randomised to four weekly 1:1 sessions of either PSALTI consisting of education, laryngeal hygiene and hydration, cough suppression techniques, breathing exercises and psychoeducational counselling or control intervention consisting of healthy lifestyle advice. We assessed the change in HRQoL at week 4 with the Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ). Secondary efficacy outcomes included 24-hour objective cough frequency (Leicester Cough Monitor) and cough reflex sensitivity. The primary analysis used an analysis of covariance adjusted for baseline measurements with the intention-to-treat population. This study was registered at UK Clinical Research Network (UKCRN ID 10678).
    Between December 2011 and April 2014, we randomly assigned 75 participants who underwent baseline assessment (34 PSALTI and 41 controls). In the observed case analysis, HRQoL (LCQ) improved on average by 1.53 (95% CI 0.21 to 2.85) points more in PSALTI group than with control (p=0.024). Cough frequency decreased by 41% (95% CI 36% to 95%) in PSALTI group relative to control (p=0.030). The improvements within the PSALTI group were sustained up to 3 months. There was no significant difference between groups in the concentration of capsaicin causing five or more coughs.
    Greater improvements in HRQoL and cough frequency were observed with PSALTI intervention. Our findings support the use of PSALTI for patients with refractory chronic cough.
    UKCRN ID 10678 and ISRCTN 73039760; Results.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号