Coronary revascularization

冠状动脉血运重建
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    最近,关于血流储备分数(FFR)的疗效和有效性的问题在各种临床环境中都出现了.
    FFR指导的冠状动脉病变血运重建策略(HALE-BOPP)研究的临床结果是研究者发起的,多中心,国际前瞻性研究纳入对至少一条血管进行FFR测量的患者。按照决策工作流程和处理,血管分为三个亚组:(i)血管再血管化,(ii)FFR血运重建,(iii)FFR-递延。主要终点是目标血管衰竭的发生(TVF,心脏死亡,靶血管心肌梗死和缺血驱动的靶血管血运重建)。在血管和患者水平进行分析。
    1305名患有2422条病变血管的患者符合本分析的标准。电线相关的陷阱和一过性腺苷相关的副作用发生在0.8%(95%CI:0.4%-1.4%)和3.3%(95%CI:2.5%-4.3%)的病例中,分别。在FFR延迟的船只中,TVF的总发生率为0.024(95%CI:0.019-0.031)病变/年.经过3.6年的中位随访,TVF的发生率为6%,7%和11.7%的FFR递延,FFR血管重建和血管血管重建血管,分别。与血管重建血管相比,FFR引导的血管(FFR血运重建和FFR延迟血管)显示TVF病变/年发生率较低(0.029,95%CI:0.024-0.034vs.0.049,95%CI:分别为0.040-0.061,p=0.0001)。校正混杂因素和临床感兴趣的亚组后,结果是一致的。患者水平分析证实,在FFR阴性患者中,TVF的发生率较低。FFR阳性亚组。
    在一项大型前瞻性观察研究中,基于FFR的冠状动脉病变延迟治疗策略是一种可靠且安全的工具,与良好的结果相关。
    NCT03079739。
    UNASSIGNED: Recently, questions around the efficacy and effectiveness of Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) have arisen in various clinical settings.
    UNASSIGNED: The Clinical Outcome of FFR-guided Revascularization Strategy of Coronary Lesions (HALE-BOPP) study is an investigator-initiated, multicentre, international prospective study enrolling patients who underwent FFR measurement on at least one vessel. In accordance with the decision-making workflow and treatment, the vessels were classified in three subgroups: (i) angio-revascularized, (ii) FFR-revascularized, (iii) FFR-deferred. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of target vessel failure (TVF, cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction and ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization). The analysis was carried out at vessel- and patient-level.
    UNASSIGNED: 1305 patients with 2422 diseased vessels fulfilled the criteria for the present analysis. Wire-related pitfalls and transient adenosine-related side effects occurred in 0.8% (95% CI: 0.4%-1.4%) and 3.3% (95% CI: 2.5%-4.3%) of cases, respectively. In FFR-deferred vessels, the overall incidence rate of TVF was 0.024 (95% CI: 0.019-0.031) lesion/year. After a median follow-up of 3.6 years, the occurrence of TVF was 6%, 7% and 11.7% in FFR-deferred, FFR-revascularized and angio-revascularized vessels, respectively. Compared to angio-revascularized vessels, FFR-guided vessels (both FFR-revascularized and FFR-deferred vessels) showed a lower TVF incidence rate lesion/year (0.029, 95% CI: 0.024-0.034 vs. 0.049, 95% CI: 0.040-0.061 respectively, p = 0.0001). The result was consistent after correction for confounding factors and across subgroups of clinical interest. The patient-level analysis confirmed the lower occurrence of TVF in negative-FFR vs. positive-FFR subgroups.
    UNASSIGNED: In a large prospective observational study, an FFR-based strategy for the deferral of coronary lesions is a reliable and safe tool, associated with good outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: NCT03079739.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:甘油三酸酯葡萄糖(TyG)指数是一种新颖且可靠的胰岛素抵抗替代指标。先前的研究表明,TyG指数与心血管疾病和冠状动脉血运重建的心血管结局密切相关。然而,TyG指数与冠状动脉血运重建的肾脏结局之间的关系尚不清楚.目的探讨TyG指数与冠状动脉血运重建患者急性肾损伤(AKI)风险的相关性。
    方法:进行了一项回顾性队列研究,以选择在重症监护IV(MIMIC-IV)医疗信息集市中入住ICU的合格冠状动脉血运重建患者。根据TyG指数四分位数,这些患者分为四组(Q1-Q4).主要终点是AKI的发生率,次要终点包括AKI人群的28天死亡率和肾脏替代治疗(RRT)使用率.采用多因素Cox回归分析和限制性三次样条(RCS)分析TyG指数与AKI风险的相关性。进行Kaplan-Meier生存分析以评估四组中终点的发生率。
    结果:在这项研究中,纳入790例接受冠状动脉血运重建手术的患者,AKI发生率为30.13%。Kaplan-Meier分析显示,TyG指数高的患者AKI发生率显著增加(Log-rankP=0.0045)。多因素Cox回归分析显示,TyG指数是连续变量(HR1.42,95%CI1.06-1.92,P=0.018)还是分类变量(Q4:HR1.89,95%CI1.12-3.17,P=0.017),在冠状动脉血运重建患者中,TyG指数与AKI之间存在独立关联.RCS曲线显示,在该特定人群中,较高的TyG指数与AKI之间呈线性关系(P=0.078)。此外,Kaplan-Meier分析显示,基于TyG指数的四分位数(P=0.029),部分AKI患者应用RRT的风险显着增加。
    结论:TyG指数与冠状动脉血运重建患者AKI风险增加和不良肾脏结局显著相关。这一发现表明,TyG指数可能有助于识别冠状动脉血运重建患者的AKI高危人群和肾脏预后不良人群。
    BACKGROUND: The triglyceride glucose (TyG) index is a novel and reliable alternative marker for insulin resistance. Previous studies have shown that TyG index is closely associated with cardiovascular outcomes in cardiovascular diseases and coronary revascularization. However, the relationship between TyG index and renal outcomes of coronary revascularization is unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate the correlation between TyG index and the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients with coronary revascularization.
    METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted to select eligible patients with coronary revascularization admitted to ICU in the medical information mart for intensive care IV (MIMIC-IV). According to the TyG index quartile, these patients were divided into four groups (Q1-Q4). The primary endpoint was the incidence of AKI, and secondary endpoints included 28-day mortality and the rate of renal replacement therapy (RRT) use in the AKI population. Multivariate Cox regression analysis and restricted cubic splines (RCS) were used to analyze TyG index association with AKI risk. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to assess the incidence of endpoints in the four groups.
    RESULTS: In this study, 790 patients who underwent coronary revascularization surgery were included, and the incidence of AKI was 30.13%. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that patients with a high TyG index had a significantly increased incidence of AKI (Log-rank P = 0.0045). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that whether TyG index was a continuous variable (HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.06-1.92, P = 0.018) or a categorical variable (Q4: HR 1.89, 95% CI 1.12-3.17, P = 0.017), and there was an independent association between TyG index and AKI in patients with coronary revascularization. The RCS curve showed a linear relationship between higher TyG index and AKI in this particular population (P = 0.078). In addition, Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a significantly increased risk of RRT application in a subset of AKI patients based on quartiles of TyG index (P = 0.029).
    CONCLUSIONS: TyG index was significantly associated with increased risk of AKI and adverse renal outcomes in patients with coronary revascularization. This finding suggests that the TyG index may be useful in identifying people at high risk for AKI and poor renal outcomes in patients with coronary revascularization.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们旨在研究经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与药物洗脱支架和冠状动脉旁路移植术在接受透析患者中的比较效果。
    这是一项回顾性观察性队列研究。
    这项基于人群的研究在台湾国民健康保险研究数据库中确定了2009年1月1日至2015年12月31日因冠状动脉血运重建而住院的透析患者。
    与冠状动脉旁路移植术相比,患者接受药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。
    研究结果是全因死亡率,住院死亡率,并重复血运重建。
    使用倾向评分来匹配患者。建立Cox比例风险模型和逻辑回归模型,以检查血运重建策略与死亡率之间的关联。拟合区间Cox模型来估计不同时期的时变风险。
    共分析了1,840名接受透析的倾向评分匹配的患者。冠状动脉旁路移植术与更高的院内死亡率相关(冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗药物洗脱支架;粗死亡率12.5%vs3.3%;校正OR,5.22;95%CI,3.42-7.97;P<0.001)和更长的住院时间(中位数[IQR],20[14-30]天vs3[2-8]天;P<0.001)。放电后,重复血运重建,急性冠脉综合征,在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和药物洗脱支架组中,重复住院的发生率更高。重要的是,中位随访时间为2.8年,冠状动脉旁路移植术与全因总死亡率的高风险显著相关(调整后的HR,1.19;95%CI,1.05-1.35;P=0.006)在多变量Cox比例风险模型中。敏感性和亚组分析得出一致的结果。
    这是一项主要针对亚洲种族的观察性研究。
    在接受透析的患者中,使用药物洗脱支架的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗可能比冠状动脉旁路移植术具有更好的生存率。未来的研究有必要证实这一发现。
    尽管冠状动脉旁路移植术在普通人群中的长期生存率优于经皮冠状动脉介入治疗药物洗脱支架,接受透析的患者可能过于虚弱,无法耐受冠状动脉旁路移植术增加的围手术期死亡风险.在这项针对台湾接受透析的全国患者队列的回顾性研究中,与冠状动脉旁路移植术相比,采用药物洗脱支架的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与更低的院内死亡率和更好的长期生存率相关.随后的急性冠脉综合征,重复血运重建,在采用药物洗脱支架的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗组中,再次住院的频率更高.这些发现可能表明,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与药物洗脱支架作为透析患者的安全血运重建策略。
    UNASSIGNED: We aimed to study the comparative effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent and coronary artery bypass grafting in patients receiving dialysis.
    UNASSIGNED: This was a retrospective observational cohort study.
    UNASSIGNED: This population-based study identified patients receiving dialysis hospitalized for coronary revascularization between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2015, in the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients received percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent versus coronary artery bypass grafting.
    UNASSIGNED: The study outcomes were all-cause mortality, in-hospital mortality, and repeat revascularization.
    UNASSIGNED: Propensity scores were used to match patients. Cox proportional hazards models and logistic regression models were constructed to examine associations between revascularization strategies and mortality. Interval Cox models were fitted to estimate time-varying hazards during different periods.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 1,840 propensity score-matched patients receiving dialysis were analyzed. Coronary artery bypass grafting was associated with higher in-hospital mortality (coronary artery bypass grafting vs percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent; crude mortality rate 12.5% vs 3.3%; adjusted OR, 5.22; 95% CI, 3.42-7.97; P < 0.001) and longer hospitalization duration (median [IQR], 20 [14-30] days vs 3 [2-8] days; P < 0.001). After discharge, repeat revascularization, acute coronary syndrome, and repeat hospitalization all occurred more frequently in the percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent group. Importantly, with a median follow-up of 2.8 years, coronary artery bypass grafting was significantly associated with a higher risk of all-cause overall mortality (adjusted HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.05-1.35; P = 0.006) in the multivariable Cox proportional hazard model. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses yielded consistent results.
    UNASSIGNED: This was an observational study with mainly Asian ethnicity.
    UNASSIGNED: Percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent may be associated with better survival than coronary artery bypass grafting in patients receiving dialysis. Future studies are warranted to confirm this finding.
    Although coronary artery bypass grafting offers better long-term survival in the general population than percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent, patients receiving dialysis may be too frail to tolerate the increased perioperative mortality risk of coronary artery bypass grafting. In this retrospective study in a national cohort of patients receiving dialysis from Taiwan, percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent is associated with lower in-hospital mortality and better long-term survival when compared with coronary artery bypass grafting. Subsequent acute coronary syndrome, repeat revascularization, and rehospitalization were noted more frequently in the percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent group. These findings may suggest percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent as a safe revascularization strategy for patients receiving dialysis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影(CTA)衍生的血流储备分数(FFRCT)与新发作的稳定型心绞痛(SAP)和CTA狭窄患者复发性心绞痛风险之间的关系尚不确定。
    方法:多中心3年随访研究,对出现症状提示新发SAP的患者进行一线CTA评估和随后的标准治疗。所有患者至少有一个≥30%的冠状动脉狭窄。每位患者的最低FFRCT值≤0.80代表异常测试结果。根据血运重建的完整性对FFRCT≤0.80的患者进行分类:1)完全血运重建(CR-FFRCT),所有FFRCT≤0.80血管再血管化;或2)不完全血管再血管化(IR-FFRCT)≥1血管,FFRCT≤0.80非血管再血管化。使用西雅图心绞痛问卷评估复发性心绞痛。
    结果:769例患者(619[80%]狭窄≥50%,510[66%]FFRCT≤0.80),174例(23%)在随访中报告了复发性心绞痛。FFRCT≤0.80vs>0.80与复发性心绞痛风险增加相关,相对风险(RR):1.82;95%CI:1.31-2.52,p<0.001。CR-FFRCT(n​=135)复发心绞痛的风险与FFRCT>0.80的患者相似,13%vs15%,RR:0.93;95%CI:0.62-1.40,p=0.72,而IR-FFRCT(n=90)和FFRCT≤0.80(n=285)的非血运重建患者的风险增加,37%对15%RR:2.50;95%CI:1.68-3.73,p<0.001和30%对15%,RR:2.03;95%CI:1.44-2.87,p<0.001。不同研究组的抗心绞痛药物使用情况相似。
    结论:在接受标准护理指导治疗的SAP和冠状动脉狭窄患者中,FFRCT提供有关复发性心绞痛风险的信息。
    BACKGROUND: The association between coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) derived fractional flow reserve (FFRCT) and risk of recurrent angina in patients with new onset stable angina pectoris (SAP) and stenosis by CTA is uncertain.
    METHODS: Multicenter 3-year follow-up study of patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of new onset SAP who underwent first-line CTA evaluation and subsequent standard-of-care treatment. All patients had at least one ≥30 ​% coronary stenosis. A per-patient lowest FFRCT-value ≤0.80 represented an abnormal test result. Patients with FFRCT ≤0.80 who underwent revascularization were categorized according to completeness of revascularization: 1) Completely revascularized (CR-FFRCT), all vessels with FFRCT ≤0.80 revascularized; or 2) incompletely revascularized (IR-FFRCT) ≥1 vessels with FFRCT ≤0.80 non-revascularized. Recurrent angina was evaluated using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire.
    RESULTS: Amongst 769 patients (619 [80 ​%] stenosis ≥50 ​%, 510 [66 ​%] FFRCT ≤0.80), 174 (23 ​%) reported recurrent angina at follow-up. An FFRCT ≤0.80 vs ​> ​0.80 associated to increased risk of recurrent angina, relative risk (RR): 1.82; 95 ​% CI: 1.31-2.52, p ​< ​0.001. Risk of recurrent angina in CR-FFRCT (n ​= ​135) was similar to patients with FFRCT >0.80, 13 ​% vs 15 ​%, RR: 0.93; 95 ​% CI: 0.62-1.40, p ​= ​0.72, while IR-FFRCT (n ​= ​90) and non-revascularized patients with FFRCT ≤0.80 (n ​= ​285) had increased risk, 37 ​% vs 15 ​% RR: 2.50; 95 ​% CI: 1.68-3.73, p ​< ​0.001 and 30 ​% vs 15 ​%, RR: 2.03; 95 ​% CI: 1.44-2.87, p ​< ​0.001, respectively. Use of antianginal medication was similar across study groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: In patients with SAP and coronary stenosis by CTA undergoing standard-of-care guided treatment, FFRCT provides information regarding risk of recurrent angina.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:精神压力诱发的心肌缺血(MSIMI)经常发生在冠心病(CAD)患者中,在同时发生CAD和抑郁/焦虑的患者中更为常见。MSIMI似乎是CAD的不良预后因素,但有关抑郁/焦虑患者的现有数据有限.
    方法:这项队列研究将在2023年至2025年之间连续筛选2,647名CAD患者。纳入的受试者将需要已经接受冠状动脉血运重建,并且在基线时还具有抑郁和/或焦虑。这项研究将招募360名符合标准的受试者。在冠状动脉血运重建后1个月和1年时,对每位患者进行两次精神压力测试,使用Stroop颜色词测试。MSIMI将通过99m-Tc-sestamibi心肌灌注成像进行评估。内皮功能将通过EndoPAT评估。此外,我们将每3个月动态监测患者的健康状况和精神状况。平均随访时间为1年。主要终点是主要的不良心脏事件,全因死亡的复合,心脏死亡,心肌梗塞,中风,或计划外的血运重建。次要终点将包括整体健康和精神状况。还将包括用于检测MSIMI的精神压力与心肌灌注的可重复性以及冠状动脉狭窄和缺血节段之间的比较。
    结论:这项队列研究将提供关于在血运重建后也有抑郁/焦虑共病的CAD患者的MSIMI结局的信息。此外,了解MSIMI的长期动态以及冠状动脉狭窄与缺血之间的匹配将有助于深入了解MSIMI机制.
    背景:ChiCTR2200055792,2022.1.20,www.medresman.org.cn.
    Mental stress-induced myocardial ischemia (MSIMI) frequently occurs in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), and is even more common in patients with co-occurring CAD and depression/anxiety. MSIMI appears to be a poor prognostic factor for CAD, but existing data on depression/anxiety patients are limited.
    This cohort study will consecutively screen 2,647 CAD patients between 2023 and 2025. Included subjects will need to have received coronary revascularization and also have depression and/or anxiety at baseline. This study will enroll 360 subjects who meet the criteria. Two mental stress tests will be carried out in each patient at 1 month and 1 year timelines after coronary revascularization, using Stroop color word tests. MSIMI will be assessed by 99 m-Tc-sestamibi myocardial perfusion imaging. The endothelial function will be assessed by EndoPAT. Furthermore, we will dynamically monitor patients\' health and mental conditions every 3 months. The mean follow-up time will be 1 year. The primary endpoint is the major adverse cardiac events, a composite of all-cause death, cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or unplanned revascularization. Secondary endpoints will include overall health and mental conditions. The reproducibility of mental stress combined with myocardial perfusion for detecting MSIMI and comparisons between coronary stenosis and ischemic segments will also be included.
    This cohort study will provide information on MSIMI outcomes in CAD patients who also have comorbid depression/anxiety after revascularization. In addition, understanding the long-term dynamics of MSIMI and the match between coronary stenosis and ischemia will provide insight into MSIMI mechanisms.
    ChiCTR2200055792, 2022.1.20, www.medresman.org.cn.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    真实的冠状动脉分叉病变(CBL)代表了经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的挑战性场景,并且与靶病变失败(TLF)的高风险相关,特别是当两个支架植入。在主要分支中结合药物洗脱支架(DES)的混合策略,和侧分支中的药物涂层球囊可以通过减少总支架长度来改善结果,同时保持有效的抗增殖作用。在HYPER试验的这项子研究中,50例真正的CBL患者采用混合策略进行治疗:手术成功率为96%,我们报告了1例围手术期心肌梗死和1例TLF(DES治疗段)1年.这项研究表明,这种混合策略可能是真正的CBLPCI的安全有效选择,并需要进行更多的研究以比较结果与标准护理策略。
    True coronary bifurcation lesions (CBL) represent a challenging scenario for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), and are associated with a higher risk of target lesion failure (TLF), particularly when two stents are implanted. A hybrid strategy combining a drug-eluting stent (DES) in the main branch, and a drug-coated balloon in the side branch may improve outcomes by reducing the total stent length while maintaining an effective anti-prolipherative action. In this sub-study of the HYPER trial, 50 patients with true CBL were treated with a hybrid strategy: procedural success was 96%, one case of peri-procedural myocardial infarction and one case of TLF (in a DES-treated segment) at 1 year were reported. This study suggests that such a hybrid strategy may be a safe and effective option for true CBL PCI, and warrants additional investigations to compare outcomes with standard of care strategies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经证实:自发性冠状动脉夹层(SCAD)患者的冠状动脉血运重建具有挑战性。SCAD患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的适应症和结果尚不明确。
    未经评估:评估SCAD中PCI的适应症和结果。
    UNASSIGNED:西班牙国家卫生系统(2016-2019年)的最低基本数据集用于识别804例急性心肌梗死(AMI)和SCAD,医院内死亡率为3%。其中,368例(46.8%)患者在入院期间进行了PCI血运重建,而436例(54.2%)患者进行了保守治疗。
    UNASSIGNED:血运重建和院内死亡率在研究期间均有所下降(趋势均<0.05)。接受PCI治疗的SCAD患者年龄较大,更常见的是男性,患糖尿病的频率更高,ST段抬高型AMI和心源性休克,与保守管理的患者相比。接受PCI治疗的患者的住院死亡率较高(4.9%vs.1.4%;p=0.004)。然而,通过倾向评分(223对)校正后,两组的院内死亡率相似(调整OR:1.21;95CI:0.30~1.57;p=0.76).保守治疗的患者在30天再次入院较高(7.1vs.1.6%,p<0.001),并且在倾向评分调整后保持了这种差异(调整平均治疗效果:2%vs.12.2%;OR:0.15;95CI:0.04-0.45;p<0.001)。
    UNASSIGNED:在未选择的AMI和SCAD患者中经常使用血运重建,但其使用正在下降。接受PCI治疗的SCAD患者的院内死亡率较高,但这似乎可以通过其不良的基线临床特征来解释。
    UNASSIGNED: Coronary revascularization in patients with spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is challenging. Indications and results of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in SCAD patients are not well established.
    UNASSIGNED: To assess indications and results of PCI in SCAD.
    UNASSIGNED: The minimum basic data set of the Spanish National Health System (years 2016-2019) was used to identify 804 episodes of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and SCAD, with a crude in-hospital mortality rate of 3%. Of these, 368 (46.8%) patients were revascularized with PCI during admission whereas 436 (54.2%) were managed conservatively.
    UNASSIGNED: Revascularization and in-hospital mortality rates both declined over the study period (p for trend both < 0.05). SCAD patients treated with PCI were older, more frequently male, and had higher frequency of diabetes, ST-segment elevation AMI and cardiogenic shock, compared to patients managed conservatively. The crude in-hospital mortality rate was higher in patients treated with PCI (4.9% vs. 1.4%; p = 0.004). However, after adjusting by propensity score (223 pairs) the in-hospital mortality rate was similar in the two groups (Adj OR: 1.21; 95%CI: 0.30-1.57; p = 0.76). Readmissions at 30-days were higher in patients managed conservatively (7.1 vs. 1.6%, p < 0.001) and this difference was maintained after propensity score adjustment (Adj average treatment effect: 2% vs. 12.2%; OR: 0.15; 95%CI: 0.04-0.45; p < 0.001).
    UNASSIGNED: Revascularization is frequently used in unselected patients with AMI and SCAD but its use is declining. Patients with SCAD treated with PCI have a higher in-hospital mortality but this appears to be explained by their adverse baseline clinical characteristics.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:为了有效的长期心血管护理,二级预防是冠状动脉血运重建后的优先事项。冠心病是约旦的主要健康问题,但对目前二级预防的规定知之甚少。
    目的:本研究的目的是评估危险因素,并探讨在住院期间(时间1)和6个月后(时间2)两个时间点首次出现冠心病的患者中,目前是否提供了二次冠心病预防。在约旦的多中心设置中。
    方法:描述性,重复测量研究设计应用于180例首次冠心病患者的连续样本。从医疗档案中记录人口统计学和临床细节。研究人员开发的自我管理问卷用于测量与冠心病相关的二级预防信息,包括二级预防服务,收到的生活方式建议和医疗建议主题。国际身体活动问卷的简短形式用于测量身体活动。参与者在第1次和第2次进行评估。
    结果:在时间1和时间2给予患者的非结构化生活方式建议最常见的是与药物有关,吸烟,饮食和血脂控制建议主题,在第1次和第2次之间,患者的心血管危险因素没有统计学上的显着改善。
    结论:尽管该人群的危险因素患病率极高,约旦提供二级预防的情况很差,这需要紧急改进,应加强护士对二级预防的贡献。
    BACKGROUND: Secondary prevention is a priority after coronary revascularization for effective long-term cardiovascular care. Coronary Heart Disease is a major health problem in Jordan, but little is known about the current provision of secondary prevention.
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate risk factors and explore the current provision of secondary Coronary Heart Disease prevention among patients presenting with first-time Coronary Heart Disease at two time points: during hospitalization (Time 1) and 6 months later (Time 2), in multicentre settings in Jordan.
    METHODS: A descriptive, repeated measures research study design was applied to a consecutive sample of 180 patients with first-time Coronary Heart Disease. Demographic and clinical details were recorded from medical files. Self-administered questionnaires developed by the researchers were used to measure secondary prevention information related to Coronary Heart Disease, including secondary prevention services, lifestyle advice received and medical advice topics. A short form of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire was used to measure physical activity. Participants were assessed at Times 1 and 2.
    RESULTS: Unstructured lifestyle advice given to the patients at Times 1 and 2 most frequently related to medications, smoking, diet and blood lipids control advice topics, with no statistically significant improvement in cardiovascular risk factors among patients between Times 1 and 2.
    CONCLUSIONS: Despite an extremely high prevalence of risk factors in this population, the provision of secondary prevention is poor in Jordan, which requires urgent improvement, and the contribution of nurses\' to secondary prevention should be enhanced.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    已知生物标志物可预测主要不良心血管事件。然而,在血运重建时,生物标志物与复杂的冠状动脉血运重建手术或高危冠状动脉解剖结构之间的关联尚不清楚.
    我们研究了基线生物标志物与主要冠状动脉事件(MCE)和复杂血运重建程序之间的关联。
    FOURIER是前蛋白转化酶枯草杆菌蛋白酶-kexin9型抑制剂evolocumab与安慰剂在27,564例稳定动脉粥样硬化患者中的随机试验。我们分析了生物标志物之间的校正关联,MCE(冠状动脉死亡,心肌梗塞,或血运重建),和复杂血运重建(冠状动脉旁路移植术或复杂经皮冠状动脉介入术),使用多标志物评分,每个升高的生物标志物分配1分(高敏C反应蛋白≥2mg/L;N末端B型利钠肽前体≥450pg/mL;高敏肌钙蛋白I≥6ng/L;生长分化因子-15≥1,800pg/mL).
    当患者按升高的生物标志物数量分组时(0个生物标志物,n=6,444;1-2个生物标志物,n=12,439;≥3个生物标志物,n=2,761),生物标志物评分与MCE风险之间存在显著的分级关联(中间评分:HRadj:1.57[95%CI:1.38-1.78];高分:HRadj:2.90[95%CI:2.47-3.40]),和复杂的血运重建(中间:HRadj:1.33[95%CI:1.06-1.67];高分:HRadj:2.07[95%CI:1.52-2.83])及其组成部分(各Ptrend<0.05)。升高的生物标志物的数量也与左主干疾病的存在相关,多支血管疾病,或血运重建时的慢性完全闭塞(P<0.05)。
    基于生物标志物的策略可识别有冠状动脉事件风险的稳定患者,包括冠状动脉旁路移植术和复杂的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗,并预测血运重建时的高危冠状动脉解剖结构。这些发现提供了对心血管生物标志物之间关系的洞察,冠状动脉解剖复杂性,和偶然的临床事件。(在风险升高的受试者中使用PCSK9抑制的进一步心血管结果研究[FOURIER];NCT01764633)。
    Biomarkers are known to predict major adverse cardiovascular events. However, the association of biomarkers with complex coronary revascularization procedures or high-risk coronary anatomy at the time of revascularization is not understood.
    We examined the associations between baseline biomarkers and major coronary events (MCE) and complex revascularization procedures.
    FOURIER was a randomized trial of the proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 inhibitor evolocumab vs placebo in 27,564 patients with stable atherosclerosis. We analyzed adjusted associations among the biomarkers, MCE (coronary death, myocardial infarction, or revascularization), and complex revascularization (coronary artery bypass graft or complex percutaneous coronary intervention) using a multimarker score with 1 point assigned for each elevated biomarker (high-sensitivity C-reactive protein ≥2 mg/L; N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide ≥450 pg/mL; high-sensitivity troponin I ≥6 ng/L; growth-differentiation factor-15 ≥1,800 pg/mL).
    When patients were grouped by the number of elevated biomarkers (0 biomarkers, n = 6,444; 1-2 biomarkers, n = 12,439; ≥3 biomarkers, n = 2,761), there was a significant graded association between biomarker score and the risk of MCE (intermediate score: HRadj: 1.57 [95% CI: 1.38-1.78]; high score: HRadj: 2.90 [95% CI: 2.47-3.40]), and for complex revascularization (intermediate: HRadj: 1.33 [95% CI: 1.06-1.67]; high score: HRadj: 2.07 [95% CI: 1.52-2.83]) and its components (Ptrend <0.05 for each). The number of elevated biomarkers also correlated with the presence of left main disease, multivessel disease, or chronic total occlusion at the time of revascularization (P < 0.05 for each).
    A biomarker-based strategy identifies stable patients at risk for coronary events, including coronary artery bypass graft surgery and complex percutaneous coronary intervention, and predicts high-risk coronary anatomy at the time of revascularization. These findings provide insight into the relationships between cardiovascular biomarkers, coronary anatomical complexity, and incident clinical events. (Further Cardiovascular Outcomes Research With PCSK9 Inhibition in Subjects With Elevated Risk [FOURIER]; NCT01764633).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    冠状动脉血流容量(CFC)整合了定量的高血心肌血流(hMBF)和冠状动脉血流储备(CFR),以全面评估冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的生理严重程度。这项研究评估了通过系列[15O]H2O正电子发射断层扫描(PET)灌注成像评估的血运重建对CFC的影响。
    总共314例稳定型CAD患者在基线和心肌血运重建后接受了[15O]H2OPET成像,以评估hMBF的变化,CFR,和CFC在415血管重建的血管中。使用缺血和正常灌注的阈值,血管分为五类CFC:心肌盗血,CFC严重减少,适度减少的氟氯化碳,最低限度地减少CFC,正常流量。此外,研究了CFC升高与死亡和非致死性心肌梗死(MI)复合终点之间的相关性.血管特异性CFC在血运重建后有所改善(P<0.01)。此外,基线CFC是CFC增加的独立预测因子(P<0.01)。在基线CFC较低的血管中观察到ΔhMBF的最大变化(0.90±0.74、0.93±0.65、0.79±0.74、0.48±0.61和0.29±0.66mL/min/g)和ΔCFR(1.01±0.88、0.99±0.69、0.87±0.88、0.66±0.91和-0.01±1.06)(两者均P<0.01)。在3.5年(95%CI3.1-3.9)的中位随访期间,CFC的增加与死亡率和非致死性MI的降低独立相关(HR0.43,95%CI0.19-0.98,P=0.04).
    成功的血运重建导致CFC的增加。此外,基线CFC是hMBF变化的独立预测因子,CFR,随后是CFC。此外,CFC的增加与死亡和非致死性MI的有利结局相关.
    Coronary flow capacity (CFC) integrates quantitative hyperaemic myocardial blood flow (hMBF) and coronary flow reserve (CFR) to comprehensively assess physiological severity of coronary artery disease (CAD). This study evaluated the effects of revascularization on CFC as assessed by serial [15O]H2O positron emission tomography (PET) perfusion imaging.
    A total of 314 patients with stable CAD underwent [15O]H2O PET imaging at baseline and after myocardial revascularization to assess changes in hMBF, CFR, and CFC in 415 revascularized vessels. Using thresholds for ischaemia and normal perfusion, vessels were stratified in five CFC categories: myocardial steal, severely reduced CFC, moderately reduced CFC, minimally reduced CFC, and normal flow. Additionally, the association between CFC increase and the composite endpoint of death and non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI) was studied. Vessel-specific CFC improved after revascularization (P < 0.01). Furthermore, baseline CFC was an independent predictor of CFC increase (P < 0.01). The largest changes in ΔhMBF (0.90 ± 0.74, 0.93 ± 0.65, 0.79 ± 0.74, 0.48 ± 0.61, and 0.29 ± 0.66 mL/min/g) and ΔCFR (1.01 ± 0.88, 0.99 ± 0.69, 0.87 ± 0.88, 0.66 ± 0.91, and -0.01 ± 1.06) were observed in vessels with lower baseline CFC (P < 0.01 for both). During a median follow-up of 3.5 (95% CI 3.1-3.9) years, an increase in CFC was independently associated with lower rates of death and non-fatal MI (HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.19-0.98, P = 0.04).
    Successful revascularization results in an increase in CFC. Furthermore, baseline CFC was an independent predictor of change in hMBF, CFR, and subsequently CFC. In addition, an increase in CFC was associated with a favourable outcome in terms of death and non-fatal MI.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号