Controlled Before-After Studies

对照前后研究
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:术后疼痛延迟下床活动,延长住院时间,降低了恢复的可能性,并增加长期功能损害的风险。髋部骨折患者的疼痛管理对医疗团队构成了挑战。老年人更容易受到阿片类药物相关副作用的影响,因此最基本的是尽量减少他们对阿片类药物的接触。对乙酰氨基酚与阿片类药物的使用减少有关,因此我们需要关注对乙酰氨基酚在一线镇痛中的使用。
    方法:我们进行了一项前后对照研究,以评估由护士建立的审核和反馈(A&F)干预措施的能力,以提高骨科病房(实验组)与传统骨科病房(无A&F干预)住院的老年髋部骨折患者的围手术期疼痛管理质量。主要终点是在术后三天接受3克/天对乙酰氨基酚的患者百分比,A&F干预前后。次要终点包括护士对医疗处方的依从性,与患者相关的临床数据,最后是与干预相关的因素。统计学分析的显著性水平为0.05。
    结果:我们研究了397例患者的数据(平均年龄89岁,75%女性)。在术后期间,在A&F干预前,实验组中有16%的患者接受了3g/天的对乙酰氨基酚;干预后的百分比达到60%。与对照组相比,实验组在术后期间接受3g/天的对乙酰氨基酚和坚持对乙酰氨基酚的药物处方的可能性显着增加。A&F干预后,患者出院时的功能状态(通过日常生活活动评分评估)显著改善,住院时间显著缩短。
    结论:我们的前后对照研究表明,A&F干预显著改善了因髋部骨折住院的老年人的围手术期疼痛管理。让团队参与继续教育计划对于提高疼痛管理质量和确保护士坚持医疗处方至关重要。
    BACKGROUND: Postoperative pain delays ambulation, extends hospital stay, reduces the probability of recovery, and increases risk of long-term functional impairment. Pain management in hip fractured patients poses a challenge to the healthcare teams. Older adults are more vulnerable to opioid-associated side effect and it is primordial to minimize their exposure to opioids. Acetaminophen is associated with reduced opioid use so we need to focus on acetaminophen use in first-line analgesia.
    METHODS: We conducted a controlled before/after study to assess the ability of an audit and feedback (A&F) intervention built with nurses to improve the quality of perioperative pain management in older patients hospitalized for hip fracture in an orthogeriatric unit (experimental group) versus a conventional orthopedic unit (no A&F intervention). The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients who received 3 g/day of acetaminophen during the three postoperative days, before and after the A&F intervention. Secondary endpoints included nurses\' adherence to medical prescriptions, clinical data associated with patients and finally factors associated with intervention. The significative level was set at 0.05 for statistical analysis.
    RESULTS: We studied data from 397 patients (mean age 89 years, 75% female). During the postoperative period, 16% of patients from the experimental group received 3 g/day of acetaminophen before the A&F intervention; the percentage reached 60% after the intervention. The likelihood of receiving 3 g/day of acetaminophen during the postoperative period and adhering to the medical prescription of acetaminophen were significantly increased in the experimental group as compared with the control group. The patient\'s functional status at discharge (assessed by Activities of Daily Living scores) was significantly better and the length of hospital stay significantly reduced after the A&F intervention.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our controlled before/after study showed that an A&F intervention significantly improved perioperative pain management in older adults hospitalized for hip fracture. Involving teams in continuous education programs appears crucial to improve the quality of pain management and ensure nurses\' adherence to medical prescriptions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:在COVID-19大流行期间,在家庭护理的背景下,评估远程护理作为老年人及其护理人员护理过渡的支持技术。
    方法:准实验前后,非随机研究,有219名老人和家庭护理服务的护理人员,分为干预组131例和对照组88例。分析处理,进行了描述性和推断性统计。
    结果:拨打了1691次电话,1515至干预组,176至对照组。据观察,在第一次呼叫中,更需要干预以促进健康,并且该数量在整个呼叫中减少,具有显著结果(p值<0.001)。分析的结果是住院,死亡,出院或继续家庭护理服务,观察到干预组出院的机会大9倍。家庭护理服务的连续性和电话结束后的出院也很重要(p值<0.001)。
    结论:远程护理是一种支持护理的技术,主要用于健康促进和家庭护理服务的出院。
    OBJECTIVE: to evaluate telenursing as a support technology in the transition of care for elderly people and their caregivers in the context of home care during the COVID-19 pandemic.
    METHODS: quasi-experimental before-after, non-randomized study, with 219 elderly people and caregivers from the home care service, divided into 131 in the intervention groups and 88 in the control group. Analytical treatment, descriptive and inferential statistics were carried out.
    RESULTS: 1691 calls were made, 1515 to the intervention group and 176 to the control group. It was observed that in the first call there is a greater need for interventions to promote health and this quantity decreases throughout the calls with a significant result (p-value < 0.001). The outcomes analyzed were hospitalization, death, discharge or continuation of the home care service and it was observed that the chance of discharge from the service was nine times greater in the intervention group. Continuity of care from the home care service and discharge after the end of the calls were also significant (p-value < 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: telenursing was a technology to support care, mainly for health promotion and discharge from home care services.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:早期给予肾上腺素与院外心脏骤停(OHCA)后生存率的提高相关。血管通路延迟可能会影响肾上腺素的及时输送。在血管进入前施用肾上腺素的新方法可以提高存活率。这项研究的目的是确定初始肌内(IM)肾上腺素剂量,然后是标准IV/IO肾上腺素是否与OHCA后生存率的提高有关。
    方法:研究设计我们进行了实施早期,成人OHCA的第一剂IM肾上腺素EMS方案。干预前阶段发生在2010年1月至2019年10月之间。干预后的时期是2019年11月至2024年5月。设置单中心城市,两级EMS代理。参与者成人,非创伤性OHCA符合肾上腺素使用干预标准单剂量(5mg)IM肾上腺素。所有其他护理,包括随后的IV或IO肾上腺素,遵循国际准则。主要结果和措施主要结果是生存至出院。次要结果是从EMS到达到第一剂肾上腺素的时间,存活到入院,出院时神经功能良好。
    结果:在1450个OHCA中,372(29.9%)接受IM肾上腺素治疗,985(70.1%)接受常规治疗。52名患者在干预后期间通过IV或IO途径接受了第一剂肾上腺素,并被纳入标准护理组分析。IM肾上腺素组年龄较小,旁观者CPR较高。IM和标准护理队列之间的所有其他特征相似。IM队列的肾上腺素给药时间更快[(中位数4.3分钟(IQR3.0-6.0)与7.8分钟(IQR5.8-10.4)]。与标准护理相比,IM肾上腺素与住院生存率提高相关(37.1%vs.31.6%;aOR1.37,95%CI1.06-1.77),住院生存率(11.0%vs7.0%;aOR1.73,95%CI1.10-2.71)和出院时良好的神经系统状况(9.8%vs6.2%;aOR1.72,95%CI1.07-2.76)。
    结论:在这项单中心前后实施研究中,作为标准治疗的辅助治疗的初始IM剂量的肾上腺素与入院后的生存率改善相关,存活到出院,功能性生存。需要一项随机对照试验来全面评估IM肾上腺素在OHCA中的潜在益处。
    BACKGROUND: Early administration of adrenaline is associated with improved survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Delays in vascular access may impact the timely delivery of adrenaline. Novel methods for administering adrenaline before vascular access may enhance survival. The objective of this study was to determine whether an initial intramuscular (IM) adrenaline dose followed by standard IV/IO adrenaline is associated with improved survival after OHCA.
    UNASSIGNED: We conducted a before-and-after study of the implementation of an early, first-dose IM adrenaline EMS protocol for adult OHCAs. The pre-intervention period took place between January 2010 and October 2019. The post-intervention period was between November 2019 and May 2024.
    METHODS: Single-center urban, two-tiered EMS agency.
    METHODS: Adult, nontraumatic OHCA meeting criteria for adrenaline use.
    METHODS: Single dose (5 mg) IM adrenaline. All other care, including subsequent IV or IO adrenaline, followed international guidelines.
    METHODS: The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes were time from EMS arrival to the first dose of adrenaline, survival to hospital admission, and favorable neurologic function at discharge.
    RESULTS: Among 1405 OHCAs, 420 (29.9%) received IM adrenaline and 985 (70.1%) received usual care. Fifty-two patients received the first dose of adrenaline through the IV or IO route within the post-intervention period and were included in the standard care group analysis. Age was younger and bystander CPR was higher in the IM adrenaline group. All other characteristics were similar between IM and standard care cohorts. Time to adrenaline administration was faster for the IM cohort [(median 4.3 min (IQR 3.0-6.0) vs. 7.8 min (IQR 5.8-10.4)]. Compared with standard care, IM adrenaline was associated with improved survival to hospital admission (37.1% vs. 31.6%; aOR 1.37, 95% CI 1.06-1.77), hospital survival (11.0% vs 7.0%; aOR 1.73, 95% CI 1.10-2.71) and favorable neurologic status at hospital discharge (9.8% vs 6.2%; aOR 1.72, 95% CI 1.07-2.76).
    CONCLUSIONS: In this single-center before-and-after implementation study, an initial IM dose of adrenaline as an adjunct to standard care was associated with improved survival to hospital admission, survival to hospital discharge, and functional survival. A randomized controlled trial is needed to fully assess the potential benefit of IM adrenaline delivery in OHCA.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of specialized training for nurses on selective screening for undetected HIV infection in the emergency department.
    METHODS: The intervention group was comprised of 6 emergency departments that had been participating in a screening program (the \"Urgències VIHgila\" project) for at least 3 months. Nurses on all shifts attended training sessions that emphasized understanding the circumstances that should lead to suspicion of unidentified HIV infection and the need to order serology. Two studies were carried out: 1) a quasi-experimental pre-post study to compare the number of orders for HIV serology in each time period and measures of sensitivity, and 2) a case-control study to compare the changes made in the 6 hospitals where specialized training was provided (cases) vs 6 control hospitals in the HIV screening program where no training was given.
    RESULTS: A total of 280 HIV serologies were ordered for the 81015 patients (0.3%) attended during the period before training; 331 serologies were ordered for the 79620 patients in the period after training (0.4%). The relative increase in serologies was 20.3% (95% CI, 2.9% to 34.5%; P = .022). The relative increase in measures of sensitivity ranged between 19% and 39%, consistent with the main comparison. Serologies in the control group decreased between periods, from 0.9% to 0.8%, indicating a relative decrease of 15.7% (95% CI, -25.1% to -6.2%; P = .001). The absolute number of patients tested in the training group was 0.2% higher in the training hospitals (95% CI, 0.11% to 0.31%; P .001) than in the control hospitals.
    CONCLUSIONS: Training nurses to screen for undetected HIV infection in the emergency department increased the number of patients tested, according to the pre-post and case-control comparisons.
    OBJECTIVE: Evaluar el impacto de una formación específica para enfermería en el servicio urgencias (SU) sobre el despistaje selectivo de infección por VIH oculta.
    METHODS: Participaron 6 SU adheridos al programa “Urgències VIHgila” con un mínimo de 3 meses y se realizaron sesiones formativas para los diferentes turnos. Las sesiones enfatizaban en qué circunstancias debía sospecharse infección oculta VIH y la necesidad de solicitar serología. Se realizaron dos estudios: 1) cuasiexperimental pre/post, que comparó la tasa de solicitudes VIH entre ambos periodos, con diversos análisis de sensibilidad; 2) caso-control, que comparó el cambio entre periodos de los 6 SU con formación (caso) con el cambio en otros 6 SU que no tuvieron formación (control).
    RESULTS: Se realizaron serologías de VIH a 280 de los 81.015 pacientes atendidos durante el periodo preintervención (0,3%) y a 331 de los 79.620 del periodo posintervención (0,4%). El incremento relativo fue del 20,3% (IC 95% de +2,9% a +34,5%; p = 0,022). Los análisis de sensibilidad mostraron incrementos relativos congruentes con el análisis principal (entre 19% y 39%). En el grupo control hubo descenso de solicitudes entre periodos, del 0,9% al 0,8% (descenso relativo del 15,7%, IC 95% de –25,1% a–6,2%; p = 0,001). El grupo caso, en relación con el grupo control, tuvo un incremento absoluto de 0,2% (IC 95% de +0,11 a +0,31%, p 0,001) de pacientes testados.
    CONCLUSIONS: La formación de enfermería para despistaje de la infección VIH oculta en urgencias incrementa el número de pacientes investigados, tanto comparado con el periodo previo a la formación como comparado con SU sin formación específica para enfermería.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    儿童的医疗复杂性(CMC)代表了一个小,但成长,所有儿童的比例。不管他们的潜在诊断如何,根据定义,所有CMC都有相似的功能限制和高医疗保健需求.有人建议,改善CMC的医疗保健服务方面可以改善儿童及其家庭的健康和生活质量,并减少与医疗保健相关的支出。因此,许多医院已经建立了专门的综合护理计划,以满足CMC的需求;然而,目前尚不清楚这些方案是否有效。
    我们的主要目标是评估旨在改善CMC的护理协调和其他方面的综合护理计划的有效性,并评估此类计划的有效性是否根据计划的设置和结构而有所不同。我们旨在评估它们在儿童和父母健康方面的有效性,功能,和生活质量,护理质量,医疗保健遭遇的数量,未满足的医疗保健需求,以及与医疗保健相关的总费用。
    我们搜索了中央,MEDLINE,Embase,2023年5月和CINAHL。我们还搜索了参考列表,审判登记处,灰色文学。
    随机和非随机试验,控制前后研究,和中断的时间序列研究被包括在内。纳入了将全面护理方案的入学人数与未照常接受此类方案/治疗人数进行比较的研究。参与者是符合CMC定义标准的儿童,即:患有(i)慢性疾病,(二)功能限制,(iii)增加健康和其他服务需求,(四)医疗费用增加。包括以下类型结果的研究包括:健康;护理质量;利用,覆盖面和获取;资源使用和成本;公平;和不利结果。
    两位综述作者独立提取数据,评估了每项纳入研究的偏倚风险,并根据等级标准评估证据的确定性。在可能的情况下,数据以森林地块表示并汇总。我们无法对比较和结果进行荟萃分析,所以我们使用了结构化的综合方法。
    我们纳入了四项研究,共有912项CMC作为参与者。所有纳入的研究都是在美国或加拿大的医院进行的随机对照试验。参与者在纳入的研究中有所不同;然而,所有4项研究均包括患有复杂和慢性疾病和高医疗保健需求的儿童.虽然在所有四项研究中干预的主要目的是相似的,干预措施的组成部分有所不同:在四项研究中,干预涉及护理协调的一些因素;在其中两项研究中,它涉及到接受多学科小组护理的儿童,在一项研究中,干预主要集中在获得高级执业护士护理协调员,另一项研究涉及与家庭合作的执业护士-儿科医生双联。四项研究中的偏见风险因领域而异,主要与参与者缺乏盲目性有关的问题,人员,和结果评估员,分配隐藏不足,和不完整的结果数据。与常规护理相比,CMC的全面护理对儿童健康几乎没有影响,功能,和12个月或24个月时的生活质量(3项研究包含404名参与者),我们评估了该类结局(儿童健康相关生活质量和功能状态)的证据,认为其确定性较低.对于CMC,全面的护理可能对父母的健康影响很小或没有影响,功能,和12个月时与常规治疗相比的生活质量(一项研究有117名参与者),我们评估了这一结局的证据具有中等确定性。与常规护理相比,CMC的综合护理可能会稍微提高儿童和家庭的满意度,和感知,12个月时的护理和服务提供(三项研究,453名参与者);然而,我们将这些结局的证据评估为低确定性.对于CMC,与12个月时的常规护理(三项研究,668名参与者)相比,全面护理可能对医疗保健遇到的次数(急诊科就诊)和住院天数(住院)几乎没有影响。我们对这些结果的证据进行了评估,认为它们具有中等的确定性。纳入的研究中有三项(668名参与者)报告了成本结果,结果相互矛盾。一项研究报告说,与对照组相比,干预组12个月时的医疗费用显着降低,一个报告组间没有差异,另一项研究报告,与对照组相比,干预组的总医疗费用增加更大。总的来说,全面护理可能对CMC的整体医疗保健成本影响很小或没有影响;然而,用于衡量医疗总费用的方法因研究而异,与这一结局相关的证据的确定性较低.没有研究评估家庭的成本。
    由于可纳入的已发表研究的数量和质量有限,因此应谨慎对待本综述的发现。总的来说,CMC综合护理有效性的证据的确定性在不同结局中从低到中等不等,目前没有足够的证据可以得出有力的结论.需要更多高质量的随机试验,目标人群和干预成分一致。报告结果的方法,和随访期,以及全面成本分析,同时考虑到家庭成本和医疗保健系统成本。
    Children with medical complexity (CMC) represent a small, but growing, proportion of all children. Regardless of their underlying diagnosis, by definition, all CMC have similar functional limitations and high healthcare needs. It has been suggested that improving aspects of healthcare delivery for CMC improves health- and quality of life-related outcomes for children and their families and reduces healthcare-related expenditure. As a result, dedicated comprehensive care programmes have been established at many hospitals to meet the needs of CMC; however, it is unclear if such programmes are effective.
    Our main objective was to assess the effectiveness of comprehensive care programmes that aim to improve care coordination and other aspects of health care for CMC and to assess whether the effectiveness of such programmes differs according to the programme setting and structure. We aimed to assess their effectiveness in relation to child and parent health, functioning, and quality of life, quality of care, number of healthcare encounters, unmet healthcare needs, and total healthcare-related costs.
    We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL in May 2023. We also searched reference lists, trial registries, and the grey literature.
    Randomised and non-randomised trials, controlled before-after studies, and interrupted time series studies were included. Studies that compared enrolment in a comprehensive care programme with non-enrolment in such a programme/treatment as usual were included. Participants were children that met the criteria for the definition of CMC, which is: having (i) a chronic condition, (ii) functional limitations, (iii) increased health and other service needs, and (iv) increased healthcare costs. Studies that included the following types of outcomes were included: health; quality of care; utilisation, coverage and access; resource use and costs; equity; and adverse outcomes.
    Two review authors independently extracted data, assessed the risk of bias in each included study, and evaluated the certainty of evidence according to GRADE criteria. Where possible, data were represented in forest plots and pooled. We were unable to undertake a meta-analysis for comparisons and outcomes, so we used a structured synthesis approach.
    We included four studies with a total of 912 CMC as participants. All included studies were randomised controlled trials conducted in hospitals in the USA or Canada. Participants varied across the included studies; however, all four studies included children with complex and chronic illness and high healthcare needs. While the primary aim of the intervention was similar across all four studies, the components of the interventions differed: in the four studies, the intervention involved some element of care coordination; in two of the studies, it involved the child receiving care from a multidisciplinary team, while in one study, the intervention was primarily centred on access to an advanced practice nurse care coordinator and another study involved nurse a practitioner-paediatrician dyad partnering with families. The risk of bias in the four studies varied across domains, with issues primarily relating to the lack of blinding of participants, personnel, and outcome assessors, inadequate allocation concealment, and incomplete outcome data. Comprehensive care for CMC compared to usual care may make little to no difference to child health, functioning, and quality of life at 12 or 24 months (three studies with 404 participants) and we assessed the evidence for the outcomes in this category (child health-related quality of life and functional status) as being of low certainty. For CMC, comprehensive care probably makes little or no difference to parent health, functioning, and quality of life compared to usual care at 12 months (one study with 117 participants) and we assessed the evidence for this outcome as being of moderate certainty. Comprehensive care for CMC compared to usual care may slightly improve child and family satisfaction with, and perceptions of, care and service delivery at 12 months (three studies with 453 participants); however, we assessed the evidence for these outcomes as being of low certainty. For CMC, comprehensive care probably makes little or no difference to the number of healthcare encounters (emergency department visits) and the number of hospitalised days (hospital admissions) compared to usual care at 12 months (three studies with 668 participants), and we assessed the evidence for these outcomes as being of moderate certainty. Three of the included studies (668 participants) reported cost outcomes and had conflicting results, with one study reporting significantly lower healthcare costs at 12 months in the intervention group compared to the control group, one reporting no differences between groups, and the other study reporting a greater increase in total healthcare costs in the intervention group compared to the control group. Overall, comprehensive care may make little or no difference to overall healthcare costs in CMC; however, the methods used to measure total healthcare costs varied across studies and the certainty of the evidence relating to this outcome is low. No studies assessed the costs to the family.
    The findings of this review should be treated with caution due to the limited amount and quality of the published research that was available to be included. Overall, the certainty of the evidence for the effectiveness of comprehensive care for CMC ranged from low to moderate across outcomes and there is currently insufficient evidence on which to draw strong conclusions. There is a need for more high-quality randomised trials with consistency of the target population and intervention components, methods of reporting outcomes, and follow-up periods, as well as full cost analyses, taking into account both costs to the family and costs to the healthcare system.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:确定下腰痛的分层初级护理(SPLIT计划)在减少初级护理中的下腰痛(LBP)患者的背部相关残疾方面的作用。
    方法:我们进行了一项前后研究。我们比较了2个连续的健康相关结果,在葡萄牙7个初级保健病房招募的LBP患者的独立队列.第一项前瞻性队列研究以常规护理(UC)为特征,并收集了2018年2月至9月的数据。第二次是在SPLIT计划实施时进行的,并收集了2018年11月至2021年10月的数据。在队列之间,物理治疗师接受了SPLIT计划实施方面的培训,使用STarTBack筛查工具对患者进行分类以进行匹配治疗。我们比较了背部相关的残疾(罗兰-莫里斯残疾问卷,0-24分),疼痛(数字疼痛评定量表,0-10分),治疗的感知效果(全球感知效果量表,-5至+5分),和健康相关的生活质量(EuroQoL5维度3水平指数,0-1分)。
    结果:我们共招募了447名患者:UC队列115名(大部分接受药物治疗)和SPLIT队列332名(均为物理治疗干预计划)。在6个月的研究期间,SPLIT计划中的患者在背部相关残疾方面表现出显著更大的改善(β,-2.94;95%CI,-3.63至-2.24;P≤.001),疼痛(β,-0.88;95%CI,-1.18至-0.57;P≤.001),感知的治疗效果(β,1.40;95%CI,0.97至1.82;P≤.001),和健康相关的生活质量(β,0.11;95%CI,0.08至0.14;P≤0.001)与UC相比。
    结论:与接受UC的患者相比,SPLIT计划中的LBP患者在健康相关结局方面表现出更大的益处。
    OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of stratified primary care for low back pain (SPLIT program) in decreasing back-related disability for patients with low back pain (LBP) in primary care.
    METHODS: We conducted a before-and-after study. We compared health-related outcomes for 2 sequential, independent cohorts of patients with LBP recruited at 7 primary care units in Portugal. The first prospective cohort study characterized usual care (UC) and collected data from February to September 2018. The second was performed when the SPLIT program was implemented and collected data from November 2018 to October 2021. Between cohorts, physical therapists were trained in the implementation of the SPLIT program, which used the STarT Back Screening Tool to categorize patients for matched treatment. We compared back-related disability (Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, 0-24 points), pain (Numeric Pain Rating Scale, 0-10 points), perceived effect of treatment (Global Perceived Effect Scale, -5 to +5 points), and health-related quality of life (EuroQoL 5 dimensions 3 levels index, 0-1 points).
    RESULTS: We enrolled a total of 447 patients: 115 in the UC cohort (mostly treated with pharmacologic treatment) and 332 in the SPLIT cohort (all referred for a physical therapy intervention program). Over the study period of 6 months, patients in the SPLIT program showed significantly greater improvements in back-related disability (ß, -2.94; 95% CI, -3.63 to -2.24; P ≤ .001), pain (ß, -0.88; 95% CI, -1.18 to -0.57; P ≤ .001), perceived effect of treatment (ß, 1.40; 95% CI, 0.97 to 1.82; P ≤ .001), and health-related quality of life (ß, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.14; P ≤ .001) compared with UC.
    CONCLUSIONS: Patients in the SPLIT program for LBP showed greater benefits regarding health-related outcomes than those receiving UC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    使用非药物干预(NPI),比如封锁,社会距离和学校关闭,针对COVID-19疫情的争论,特别是对弱势群体可能产生的负面影响,包括儿童和青少年。因此,本研究旨在量化与前3年相比,NPI对2年大流行期间儿科住院趋势的影响。还根据采用的NPI类型考虑了两个大流行阶段。
    这是一个多中心,在艾米利亚-罗马涅地区的12家医院进行的准实验性前后研究,意大利北部,以NPI实施为干预事件。在NPI开始实施之前的3年(2020年3月)构成了大流行前阶段。随后的两年进一步细分为学校关闭阶段(截至2020年9月)和随后的缓解措施阶段,限制不那么严格。选择关闭学校作为划界,因为它特别关系到年轻人。应用中断时间序列(ITS)回归分析来计算表现出最大变化的诊断类别的住院率比率(HRR)。ITS允许估计可归因于干预的变化,在即时(水平变化)和持续(斜率变化)效应方面,同时考虑干预前的长期趋势。
    总的来说,在60个月的研究中有84,368例。与大流行前的几年相比,在学校关闭期间和以下缓解措施阶段,住院率在统计上显著下降了35%和19%,分别。最大的减少记录为“呼吸系统疾病,“而“精神障碍”类别在缓解措施期间显着增加。ITS分析证实,在学校关闭期间,呼吸系统疾病的水平变化有较高的降低(HRR0.19,95CI0.08-0.47),在制定缓解措施时,水平变化的降低类似但较小。在学校关闭期间,精神障碍的水平变化显着降低(HRR0.50,95CI0.30-0.82),但在缓解措施期间增加了28%(HRR1.28,95CI0.98-1.69)。
    我们的研究结果提供了有关COVID-19NPI影响的信息,这些信息可能会在未来的健康危机中为公共卫生政策提供信息,计划有效的控制和预防干预措施,并在需要时提供目标资源。
    The use of Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions (NPIs), such as lockdowns, social distancing and school closures, against the COVID-19 epidemic is debated, particularly for the possible negative effects on vulnerable populations, including children and adolescents. This study therefore aimed to quantify the impact of NPIs on the trend of pediatric hospitalizations during 2 years of pandemic compared to the previous 3 years, also considering two pandemic phases according to the type of adopted NPIs.
    This is a multicenter, quasi-experimental before-after study conducted in 12 hospitals of the Emilia-Romagna Region, Northern Italy, with NPI implementation as the intervention event. The 3 years preceding the beginning of NPI implementation (in March 2020) constituted the pre-pandemic phase. The subsequent 2 years were further subdivided into a school closure phase (up to September 2020) and a subsequent mitigation measures phase with less stringent restrictions. School closure was chosen as delimitation as it particularly concerns young people. Interrupted Time Series (ITS) regression analysis was applied to calculate Hospitalization Rate Ratios (HRR) on the diagnostic categories exhibiting the greatest variation. ITS allows the estimation of changes attributable to an intervention, both in terms of immediate (level change) and sustained (slope change) effects, while accounting for pre-intervention secular trends.
    Overall, in the 60 months of the study there were 84,368 cases. Compared to the pre-pandemic years, statistically significant 35 and 19% decreases in hospitalizations were observed during school closure and in the following mitigation measures phase, respectively. The greatest reduction was recorded for \"Respiratory Diseases,\" whereas the \"Mental Disorders\" category exhibited a significant increase during mitigation measures. ITS analysis confirms a high reduction of level change during school closure for Respiratory Diseases (HRR 0.19, 95%CI 0.08-0.47) and a similar but smaller significant reduction when mitigation measures were enacted. Level change for Mental Disorders significantly decreased during school closure (HRR 0.50, 95%CI 0.30-0.82) but increased during mitigation measures by 28% (HRR 1.28, 95%CI 0.98-1.69).
    Our findings provide information on the impact of COVID-19 NPIs which may inform public health policies in future health crises, plan effective control and preventative interventions and target resources where needed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial
    本研究的目的是通过基于UHPLC-Q-TOF/MS的代谢组学方法验证柴胡桂枝甘姜汤(CGGD)治疗慢性非萎缩性胃炎(CNAG)伴胆囊热脾冷综合征(GHSC)的有效性并探讨其作用机制。
    进行了一项观察性对照前后研究,以验证CGGD在2023年1月至6月用GHSC治疗CNAG的有效性,招募了27名患者,服用CGGD28天。30名健康志愿者作为对照。通过比较中医证候和CNAG评分评价疗效,治疗前后的临床参数。采用ELISA法采集血浆中与胃肠功能相关的激素水平。使用基于UHPLC-Q-TOF/MS的代谢组学方法探索CGGD用GHSC治疗CNAG的机制。
    接受CGGD治疗的患者在中医证候和CNAG评分方面有统计学上的显着改善(p<0.01)。CGGD治疗引起了15种生物标志物的浓度变化,富含甘油磷脂代谢,和支链氨基酸的生物合成途径。此外,CGGD治疗减轻了胃肠激素水平的异常,并显着增加了胃蛋白酶原水平。
    该临床试验首次提供了有关临床参数的详细数据,这些数据证明了CGGD在治疗CNAG伴GHSC患者中的有效性。这项研究还提供了支持性证据,表明CNAG与GHSC患者的支链氨基酸代谢和甘油磷脂水平紊乱有关。提示基于中医证候积分的CNAG治疗是合理的,也为CGGD提供了潜在的药理作用机制。
    UNASSIGNED: The aim of this study was to verify the effectiveness and explore the mechanism of Chaihu-Guizhi-Ganjiang decoction (CGGD) in the treatment of chronic non-atrophic gastritis (CNAG) with gallbladder heat and spleen cold syndrome (GHSC) by metabolomics based on UHPLC-Q-TOF/MS.
    UNASSIGNED: An observational controlled before-after study was conducted to verify the effectiveness of CGGD in the treatment of CNAG with GHSC from January to June 2023, enrolling 27 patients, who took CGGD for 28 days. 30 healthy volunteers were enrolled as the controls. The efficacy was evaluated by comparing the traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) syndrome and CNAG scores, and clinical parameters before and after treatment. The plasma levels of hormones related to gastrointestinal function were collected by ELISA. The mechanisms of CGGD in the treatment of CNAG with GHSC were explored using a metabolomic approach based on UHPLC-Q-TOF/MS.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients treated with CGGD experienced a statistically significant improvement in TCM syndrome and CNAG scores (p < 0.01). CGGD treatment evoked the concentration alteration of 15 biomarkers, which were enriched in the glycerophospholipid metabolism, and branched-chain amino acids biosynthesis pathways. Moreover, CGGD treatment attenuated the abnormalities of the gastrointestinal hormone levels and significantly increased the pepsinogen level.
    UNASSIGNED: It was the first time that this clinical trial presented detailed data on the clinical parameters that demonstrated the effectiveness of CGGD in the treatment of CNAG with GHSC patients. This study also provided supportive evidence that CNAG with GHSC patients were associated with disturbed branched-chain amino acid metabolism and glycerophospholipid levels, suggesting that CNAG treatment based on TCM syndrome scores was reasonable and also provided a potential pharmacological mechanism of action of CGGD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:阐明使用分层剂量的注射泵的新型催产素方案与将催产素放入袋中的常规做法相比的临床影响。
    方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究。我们收集了2019年6月至2020年5月在神经轴麻醉下进行择期剖宫产的患者数据。根据催产素给药方法将患者分为两组;对照组(主治麻醉师将催产素5-10单位放入输液袋中并在分娩后手动调整)和方案组(催产素方案根据PPH风险给予催产素推注1或3单位,然后通过注射泵进行5或10单位h-1)。我们比较了产后24小时内催产素的总量,估计失血量,两组产后24h内不良临床事件。
    结果:在研究期间,包括262名产妇。术中和术后的催产素剂量在方案组中明显较低(9.7vs.11.7个单位,术中,15.9vs.18个单位,术后)。亚组分析显示,低PPH风险的影响比高PPH风险的影响更显著。多元线性回归分析也证实了差异。各组在失血量方面无显著差异,需要额外的子宫内膜,和其他不良事件。
    结论:我们的催产素输注方案显著降低了神经轴麻醉下择期剖宫产的催产素需求,而不增加失血量。然而,我们没有发现新方案的其他临床益处.
    OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the clinical impact of the novel oxytocin protocol using a syringe pump with a stratified dose compared with the conventional practice of putting oxytocin into the bag.
    METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study. We collected the data of the patients who underwent elective cesarean delivery under neuraxial anesthesia between June 2019 and May 2020. The patients were allocated to two groups according to oxytocin administration methods; the control group (the attending anesthesiologist put oxytocin 5-10 units in the infusion bag and adjusted manually after childbirth) and the protocol group (the oxytocin protocol gave oxytocin bolus 1 or 3 units depending on the PPH risk, followed by 5 or 10 unit h-1 via a syringe pump). We compared the total amount of oxytocin within 24 h postpartum, estimated blood loss, and adverse clinical events within 24 h postpartum between the two groups.
    RESULTS: During the study period, 262 parturients were included. Oxytocin doses of intraoperative and postoperative were significantly lower in the protocol group (9.7 vs. 11.7 units, intraoperative, 15.9 vs. 18 units, postoperative). The subgroup analyses showed that the impact was more remarkable in the low PPH risk than in the high PPH risk. The multivariate linear regression analyses also confirmed the difference. The groups had no significant difference in blood loss, requirement of additional uterotonics, and other adverse events.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our oxytocin infusion protocol significantly reduced oxytocin requirements in elective cesarean delivery under neuraxial anesthesia without increasing blood loss. However, we could not find other clinical benefits of the novel protocol.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:2019年在法国发布了新的皮肤和软组织感染(SSTI)指南,改变抗生素治疗的推荐持续时间。本研究的目的是评估2019年法国SSTIs指南的发布对丹毒抗生素处方持续时间的影响。
    方法:在一项前后研究中(4月1日之前一年和之后一年,2019),我们纳入了兰斯大学医院内科病房和急诊科所有确诊为丹毒的成年患者.我们回顾性检索了患者医疗档案中的抗生素处方持续时间。
    结果:在“之前”组中的50名患者和“之后”组中的39名患者中,在“后”组中,抗生素处方的平均持续时间显着缩短(9.4±2.8vs.12.4±3.8天,p=0.0001)。
    结论:实施这些指南后,丹毒抗生素处方的持续时间减少了25%,为抗生素管理政策提供有用的信息。
    BACKGROUND: New skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI) guidelines were published in 2019 in France, changing the recommended duration for antibiotic treatment. The objective of the present study was to assess the impact of the publication of the 2019 French guidelines on SSTIs on the duration of antibiotic prescription for erysipelas.
    METHODS: In a before-after study (a year before and a year after April 1st, 2019), we included all adult patients diagnosed with erysipelas in Reims University Hospital medical wards and the emergency department. We retrospectively retrieved antibiotic prescription duration in the patients\' medical files.
    RESULTS: Among 50 patients in the \"before\" and 39 in the \"after\" group, the mean duration of antibiotic prescription was significantly shorter in the \"after\" group (9.4 ± 2.8 vs. 12.4 ± 3.8 days, p = 0.0001).
    CONCLUSIONS: A 25% decrease in the duration of antibiotic prescription for erysipelas was observed following the implementation of these guidelines, providing useful information for an antibiotic stewardship policy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号