目标:专注于感知的交叉点,诊断,污名,以及肥胖管理中的体重偏倚,并就改善肥胖者护理的可操作步骤达成共识。
方法:美国临床内分泌学协会(AACE)召开了跨学科医疗保健专业人员的共识会议,讨论使用基于肥胖的慢性病(ABCD)命名法诊断肥胖与分期之间的相互作用。体重柱头,和内化权重偏倚(IWB),并制定可操作的指导,以帮助临床医生在这种情况下减轻IWB和污名。
结果:提出了以下肯定和紧急的概念:(1)肥胖是ABCD,这些术语可以以不同的方式进行交流;(2)肥胖的分类类别应使用特定种族的BMI范围和腰围(WC)在体重指数(BMI)的范围内改善命名法;(3)根据ABCD并发症的存在和严重程度对肥胖的临床严重程度进行分期,可能会减少以体重为中心对体重和IWB的贡献;(4)体重污名和内在化偏见既是生活质量的驱动因素容易患心理障碍,并损害治疗干预措施的有效性;(5)应在所有患者中评估污名化和IWB的存在和情况,并将其纳入ABCD严重程度的分期;(6)最佳护理将需要提高对解决IWB和污名化问题的医疗保健专业人员的认识并开发教育和干预工具。
结论:共识小组提出了一种整合偏见和污名化的方法,心理健康,和健康的社会决定因素在一个分期系统的ABCD严重程度,以帮助患者管理。为了在肥胖患者的慢性护理模式中有效解决污名和IWB问题,有必要的卫生保健系统,准备提供基于证据,以人为中心的治疗;了解肥胖是一种慢性疾病并有权寻求护理和参与行为治疗的患者;以及促进无偏见同情护理政策和基础设施的社会,获得基于证据的干预措施,和疾病预防。
OBJECTIVE: To focus on the intersection of perception, diagnosis, stigma, and weight bias in the management of obesity and obtain
consensus on actionable steps to improve care provided for persons with obesity.
METHODS: The American Association of Clinical Endocrinology (AACE) convened a
consensus conference of interdisciplinary health care professionals to discuss the interplay between the diagnosis of obesity using adiposity-based chronic disease (ABCD) nomenclature and staging, weight stigma, and internalized weight bias (IWB) with development of actionable guidance to aid clinicians in mitigating IWB and stigma in that context.
RESULTS: The following affirmed and emergent concepts were proposed: (1) obesity is ABCD, and these terms can be used in differing ways to communicate; (2) classification categories of obesity should have improved nomenclature across the spectrum of body mass index (BMI) using ethnic-specific BMI ranges and waist circumference (WC); (3) staging the clinical severity of obesity based on the presence and severity of ABCD complications may reduce weight-centric contribution to weight stigma and IWB; (4) weight stigma and internalized bias are both drivers and complications of ABCD and can impair quality of life, predispose to psychological disorders, and compromise the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions; (5) the presence and of stigmatization and IWB should be assessed in all patients and be incorporated into the staging of ABCD severity; and (6) optimal care will necessitate increased awareness and the development of educational and interventional tools for health care professionals that address IWB and stigma.
CONCLUSIONS: The
consensus panel has proposed an approach for integrating bias and stigmatization, psychological health, and social determinants of health in a staging system for ABCD severity as an aid to patient management. To effectively address stigma and IWB within a chronic care model for patients with obesity, there is a need for health care systems that are prepared to provide evidence-based, person-centered treatments; patients who understand that obesity is a chronic disease and are empowered to seek care and participate in behavioral therapy; and societies that promote policies and infrastructure for bias-free compassionate care, access to evidence-based interventions, and disease prevention.