Computing Methodologies

计算方法
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:由于大多数州的立法,乳腺密度分类具有潜在的深远的影响,但根据BIRADS®指南仍然是主观的。我们旨在确定1)BI-RADS®第5版(第5版)与第4版(第4版)指南对读者关于密度评估协议的影响;2)第5版与第4版密度分布,视觉和定量评估协议;3)有经验的读者和经验不足的读者之间的协议。
    方法:在回顾性研究中,6名乳腺影像学放射科医师(BIR)(23-30年经验)使用第5版指南对2012年9月至2013年1月进行的200次筛查乳房X线照片的密度进行了目测评估.将结果与2016年相同读者的数据进行比较,这些读者在训练模块后使用第四版指南评估相同的乳房X线照片。按7名初级BIR(1-5年经验)进行的第5级密度分类与8名有经验的BIR进行了比较。纳尔逊等人。\'skappas(κm,κw),Fleiss\'κF,并计算了科恩的κ。将使用Volpara的定量密度与读者评估进行了比较。
    结果:使用第5版的读者间加权协议中等强度,0.73(κw,s.e.=0.01),类似于第四版,0.71(κw,s.e.=0.03)。内部读者科恩的κ为0.23-0.34,类似于第4版。二进制不密集与密集分类,使用第5版结果比第4版更密集(p<0.001)。第5级密度分布导致B/C类比第4级更高(p<0.001)。根据读者的经验,第5版的分布没有差异(p=0.09)。读者与定量加权协议是相似的(第5版,科恩κ=0.76-0.85;第四版,科恩κ=0.68-0.83)。
    结论:使用第5版指南对乳房X线密度进行视觉评估存在持续的主观性;经验与读者之间更好的一致性无关。
    OBJECTIVE: Due to most states\' legislation, mammographic density categorization has potentially far-reaching implications, but remains subjective based on BIRADS® guidelines. We aimed to determine 1) effect of BI-RADS® 5th edition (5th-ed) vs 4th-edition (4th-ed) guidelines on reader agreement regarding density assessment; 2) 5th-ed vs 4th-ed density distribution, and visual vs quantitative assessment agreement; 3) agreement between experienced vs less experienced readers.
    METHODS: In a retrospective review, six breast imaging radiologists (BIR) (23-30 years\' experience) visually assessed density of 200 screening mammograms performed September 2012-January 2013 using 5th-ed guidelines. Results were compared to 2016 data of the same readers evaluating the same mammograms using 4th-ed guidelines after a training module. 5th-ed density categorization by seven junior BIR (1-5 years\' experience) was compared to eight experienced BIR. Nelson et al.\'s kappas (κm, κw), Fleiss\' κF, and Cohen\'s κ were calculated. Quantitative density using Volpara was compared with reader assessments.
    RESULTS: Inter-reader weighted agreement using 5th-ed is moderately strong, 0.73 (κw, s.e. = 0.01), similar to 4th-ed, 0.71 (κw, s.e. = 0.03). Intra-reader Cohen\'s κ is 0.23-0.34, similar to 4th-ed. Binary not-dense vs dense categorization, using 5th-ed results in higher dense categorization vs 4th-ed (p < 0.001). 5th-ed density distribution results in higher numbers in categories B/C vs 4th-ed (p < 0.001). Distribution for 5th-ed does not differ based on reader experience (p = 0.09). Reader vs quantitative weighted agreement is similar (5th-ed, Cohen\'s κ = 0.76-0.85; 4th-ed, Cohen\'s κ = 0.68-0.83).
    CONCLUSIONS: There is persistent subjectivity of visually assessed mammographic density using 5th-ed guidelines; experience does not correlate with better inter-reader agreement.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    类似于革兰氏阴性菌,螺旋体是具有内膜和外膜的双膜生物。虽然外膜含有完整的膜蛋白,迄今为止,很少有疏螺旋体外膜蛋白(OMPs)被鉴定和表征。因此,我们利用共识计算网络分析来识别新的疏螺旋体OMP。
    使用一系列基于计算机的算法,我们选择了所有预测为OM定位和/或在疏螺旋体OM中形成β桶的蛋白质编码序列。使用这个系统,我们从B.burgdorferi鉴定了41个潜在的OMP,并表征了三个(BB0838,BB0405和BB0406),以确认我们基于计算机的方法确实如此,事实上,确定疏螺旋体OMP。TritonX-114相分配表明在洗涤剂相中发现BB0838,这是膜蛋白的预期。蛋白水解试验表明BB0838对蛋白酶K和胰蛋白酶均部分敏感,进一步表明BB0838是表面暴露的。与先前的研究一致,我们还确认BB0405是表面暴露的,并且与交界性OM相关。此外,我们已经证明BB0406,一个共同转录的下游基因的产物,还编码了一部小说,以前未表征的疏螺旋体OMP。有趣的是,虽然BB0406具有与OMP一致的几种物理化学性质,发现它对表面蛋白水解具有抗性。与BB0405和BB0406为OMP一致,发现两者都能够掺入脂质体并表现出孔形成活性,这表明这两种蛋白质都是孔蛋白。最后,我们扩展了我们的计算分析,以识别来自其他疏螺旋体生物的OMPs,包括莱姆病和复发性发热螺旋体。
    使用一致的计算机算法,我们生成了莱姆病和复发性发热螺旋体的候选OMPs列表,并确定了3种预测的伯氏螺旋体B.burgdorferi蛋白确实是新型的疏螺旋体OMPs.联合研究已经确定了推定的螺旋体OMPs,现在可以检查它们在毒力中的作用,生理学,和疾病的发病机理。重要的是,本报告中描述的研究提供了一个框架,通过该框架,可以对任何具有表皮超微结构的人类病原体的OMPs进行分类,以鉴定新的毒力因子和候选疫苗.
    Similar to Gram-negative organisms, Borrelia spirochetes are dual-membrane organisms with both an inner and outer membrane. Although the outer membrane contains integral membrane proteins, few of the borrelial outer membrane proteins (OMPs) have been identified and characterized to date. Therefore, we utilized a consensus computational network analysis to identify novel borrelial OMPs.
    Using a series of computer-based algorithms, we selected all protein-encoding sequences predicted to be OM-localized and/or to form β-barrels in the borrelial OM. Using this system, we identified 41 potential OMPs from B. burgdorferi and characterized three (BB0838, BB0405, and BB0406) to confirm that our computer-based methodology did, in fact, identify borrelial OMPs. Triton X-114 phase partitioning revealed that BB0838 is found in the detergent phase, which would be expected of a membrane protein. Proteolysis assays indicate that BB0838 is partially sensitive to both proteinase K and trypsin, further indicating that BB0838 is surface-exposed. Consistent with a prior study, we also confirmed that BB0405 is surface-exposed and associates with the borrelial OM. Furthermore, we have shown that BB0406, the product of a co-transcribed downstream gene, also encodes a novel, previously uncharacterized borrelial OMP. Interestingly, while BB0406 has several physicochemical properties consistent with it being an OMP, it was found to be resistant to surface proteolysis. Consistent with BB0405 and BB0406 being OMPs, both were found to be capable of incorporating into liposomes and exhibit pore-forming activity, suggesting that both proteins are porins. Lastly, we expanded our computational analysis to identify OMPs from other borrelial organisms, including both Lyme disease and relapsing fever spirochetes.
    Using a consensus computer algorithm, we generated a list of candidate OMPs for both Lyme disease and relapsing fever spirochetes and determined that three of the predicted B. burgdorferi proteins identified were indeed novel borrelial OMPs. The combined studies have identified putative spirochetal OMPs that can now be examined for their roles in virulence, physiology, and disease pathogenesis. Importantly, the studies described in this report provide a framework by which OMPs from any human pathogen with a diderm ultrastructure could be cataloged to identify novel virulence factors and vaccine candidates.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    There have been made many attempts on computerization of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), none have, however achieved any general application in clinical work practice. The objective of this paper is: (1) to raise awareness about the impact the design method used for computerization of CPGs have on the final solution and (2) to explore the potential benefits--and disadvantages--of participatory design (PD) as an approach to design. However, rather than attempting to comprehensively cover the whole field of PD pertinent to healthcare, we focus on providing details on three aspects of PD: PD as a design philosophy, PD as a toolbox and PD as a way to create a shared realm of understanding among IT-designers and health professionals as these are areas of utmost relevance for the design of computerized CPGs. Additionally, the application of PD for computerization of CPGs is illustrated by two cases. We conclude that PD is a beneficial approach for design of computerized CPGs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Clinical guidelines are a major tool in improving the quality of medical care. However, most guidelines are in free text, not in a formal, executable format, and are not easily accessible to clinicians at the point of care. We introduce a Web-based, modular, distributed architecture, the Digital Electronic Guideline Library (DeGeL), which facilitates gradual conversion of clinical guidelines from text to a formal representation in chosen target guideline ontology. The architecture supports guideline classification, semantic markup, context-sensitive search, browsing, run-time application, and retrospective quality assessment. The DeGeL hybrid meta-ontology includes elements common to all guideline ontologies, such as semantic classification and domain knowledge; it also includes four content-representation formats: free text, semi-structured text, semi-formal representation, and a formal representation. These formats support increasingly sophisticated computational tasks. The DeGeL tools for support of guideline-based care operate, at some level, on all guideline ontologies. We have demonstrated the feasibility of the architecture and the tools for several guideline ontologies, including Asbru and GEM.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    Evidence-based clinical guidelines have been developed in an attempt to decrease practice variation and improve patient outcomes. Although a number of studies and a few commercial products have attempted to measure guideline compliance, there still exists a strong need for an automated product that can take as input large amounts of data and create systematic and detailed profiles of compliance to evidence-based guidelines. The Guideline Compliance Assessment Tool is a product presently under development in our group that will accept as input medical and pharmacy claims data and create a guideline compliance profile that assesses provider practice patterns as compared to evidence-based standards. The system components include an episode of care grouper to standardize classifications of illnesses, an evidence-based guideline knowledge base that potentially contains information on several hundred distinct conditions, a guideline compliance scoring system that emphasizes systematic guideline variance rather than random variances, and an advanced data warehouse that would allow drilling into specific areas of interest. As provider profiling begins to shift away from a primary emphasis on cost to an emphasis on quality, automated methods for measuring guideline compliance will become important in measuring provider performance and increasing guideline usage, consequently improving the standard of care and the potential for better patient outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号