Infection by Leishmania spp. in patients diagnosed with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is rare. Considered endemic in the Mediterranean basin, its manifestations are almost exclusive of patients with impaired cellular immunity. Most of the evidence is found through case reports; without guidelines for its management in patients with IBD. In this study we present three cases of Leishmania infection in patients with IBD that lead us to carry out a review of the current literature. Immunosuppressive treatment contributes to this infection, which presents atypically, with a challenging diagnosis. Initial systemic treatment with withdrawal of the immunosuppressant drug seems to be the best therapeutic strategy. Studies are needed in endemic areas to determine its incidence in IBD patients, as well as its possible association with immunosuppressive therapy. The need for serological screening prior introduction of immunosuppressive drugs could be suggested.

BACKGROUND: pediatric patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) who qualify for biological therapy represent a group of severely ill patients. They have never been successful with conventional medication. Biologic medications in monotherapy are frequently used in the disease course, however they result in a 1-year remission, which can be maintained in approximately 40% of IBD patients.
METHODS: the present study aims to summarize the review of literature data on the use of therapy with a combination of two biological and small molecule drugs, anti-TNF (infliximab, adalimumab), vedolizumab and ustekinumab, as well as Janus kinase inhibitors (tofacitinib). The risks associated with the use of dual biological therapy and potential adverse effects are particularly important. The literature data was reviewed using the following terms: \"use of combination biologic in paediatric IBD\", \"combination biologics\", and \"dual biologic for treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease\".
CONCLUSIONS: the use of dual biological therapy is a new therapeutic option. In pediatric IBD, combining the different mechanisms of action of the two biological drugs seems to be safe and effective. Anti-TNF drugs with vedolizumab or ustekinumab may be a particularly beneficial combination. Nevertheless, the clarification and justification of potential advantages of combined biological therapies in further studies, such as randomized control trials, are needed.

OBJECTIVE: To review the effectiveness and safety of switching from an originator anti-TNF (Remicade®) to a biosimilar (CT-P13) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
METHODS: Electronic and manual search up to September 2017.
RESULTS: We identified 24 studies evaluating switching between Remicade® and CT-P13 in 1326 patients. Disease control (no worsening after switching) was confirmed in most of the patients (weighted mean, 88%; 95% CI=86-89%). No unexpected adverse effects were reported in any of the studies.
CONCLUSIONS: The risks of switching from Remicade® to a biosimilar seem to be purely theoretical and are not supported by the (still limited) real-world clinical practice experience. On the contrary, a steadily increasing number of publications have shown that there seem to be no safety or efficacy concerns about switching. Therefore, switching from originator to biosimilar infliximab in patients with IBD may be considered acceptable.

BACKGROUND: Probiotics may act as biological agents that modify the intestinal microbiota and certain cytokine profiles, which can lead to an improvement in certain gastrointestinal diseases.
OBJECTIVE: To conduct a review of the evidence of the role of probiotics in certain gastrointestinal diseases in adults.
METHODS: Review conducted using appropriate descriptors, filters and limits in the PubMed database (MEDLINE).
METHODS: The MeSH terms used were Probiotics [in the title] AND Gastrointestinal Diseases, with the following limits or filters: Types of study: Systematic Reviews, Meta-Analysis, Guideline, Practice Guideline, Consensus Development Conference (and Consensus Development Conference NIH), Randomized Controlled Trial, Controlled Clinical Trial and Clinical Trial; age: adults (19 or older); language: English and Spanish; in humans, and with at least one abstract.
METHODS: Full texts of all the Systematic Reviews and meta-analyses directly related to the review\'s objective were obtained, as well as the Randomised Controlled Trials of the studies that were considered relevant and of sufficient quality for this review.
RESULTS: Certain probiotics, different for each process, have proven to be effective and beneficial in cases of acute infectious diarrhoea, antibiotic-associated diarrhoea, Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea, pouchitis and Helicobacter pylori infection eradication.
CONCLUSIONS: Although some probiotics have not demonstrated any benefit, there are certain gastrointestinal diseases in which the use of probiotics, true biological agents, can be recommended.