OBJECTIVE: Sleep difficulties are common in CDKL5 deficiency disorder (CDD), a developmental and epileptic encephalopathy (DEE). This study evaluated the factor structure of the Disorders of Initiating and Maintaining Sleep (DIMS), Disorders of Excessive Daytime Somnolence (DOES) and Sleep Breathing Disorders (SBD) domains of the Sleep Disturbance Scale for Children (SDSC) for CDD.
METHODS: A cross-sectional psychometric study design was used. Data were collected for 125 individuals aged 3 years or older who attended a US Centers of Excellence clinic or registered with the International CDKL5 Disorder Database.
RESULTS: The median age was 10.3 years (range 3.2 - 40.7 years) and 105 (84%) were female. Two of the three SBD items related were not observed by most respondents and analysis was restricted to the DIMS and DOES domains. Using all items in the initial confirmatory factor analysis, two items in the DIMS domain and one item in the DOES domain loaded poorly. After deleting these items and repeating the analysis, item loading (0.524-0.814) and internal consistency (DIMS: 0.78, DOES: 0.76) statistics were good. The square of the inter-domain correlation coefficient was 0.17, less than Average Variance Extracted values for both domains and indicating good discriminant validity. The Tucker-Lewis and Comparative Fit indices were slightly lower than the threshold of >0.9 for establishing goodness of fit.
CONCLUSIONS: The modified DIMS and DOES domains from the SDSC could be suitable clinical outcome assessments of insomnia and related impairments in CDD and potentially other DEE conditions.

UNASSIGNED: Dentatorubral-pallidoluysian atrophy (DRPLA) is a rare, neurodegenerative disorder with no disease-modifying treatments. There is a dearth of information in the literature about the patient and caregiver experience living with DRPLA.
UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to (1) understand symptoms experienced by adult- and juvenile-onset DRPLA populations and their impact on daily life and (2) explore patient and caregiver treatment goals and clinical trial participation preferences.
UNASSIGNED: The study was a qualitative interview study.
UNASSIGNED: Interviews were conducted remotely with adult patients with DRPLA and caregivers. Participants described patient symptoms and the impact of those symptoms on daily life, and they discussed treatment goals and potential clinical trial participation. There were 18 patients described in the interviews with two patients and seven caregivers. Some participants were caregivers to multiple patients with DRPLA.
UNASSIGNED: Interview transcripts were coded for themes, and reported symptoms were summarized with descriptive statistics. Adult-onset patients (N = 7) experienced difficulty with ataxia (100%), cognition (100%), fine motor skills (100%), gross motor skills (100%), speech (100%), personality changes (100%), and seizures (57%). Juvenile-onset patients (N = 11) experienced difficulty with ataxia (100%), sleep (100%), speech (100%), jerking/twitching (83%), behavior (82%), cognition (82%), fine motor skills (82%), gross motor skills (82%), sensory sensitivity (75%), and seizures (64%). When considering aspects of DRPLA to target for future treatment, patients prioritized ataxia/mobility (100%), juvenile-onset caregivers prioritized ataxia/mobility (60%) and independence (60%), and adult-onset caregivers prioritized personality (60%). Almost all patients (93%) would participate in a clinical trial if given the opportunity, but travel to a clinical site could pose a participation barrier for half.
UNASSIGNED: This study found that there are symptom domains that are relevant across the DRPLA population, but there is heterogeneity within each domain based on the age of symptom onset and disease stage, which has implications for clinical trial design.
Understanding dentatorubral-pallidoluysian atrophy (DRPLA) symptoms and impacts on daily life through interviews with patients and caregivers Why was the study done? Dentatorubral-pallidoluysian atrophy (DRPLA) is a rare and progressive brain disorder. Little is known about the patient and caregiver experience living with DRPLA and this lack of information has hindered the development of patient-focused treatments and the measurement of outcomes that are most meaningful to caregivers and patients. What did the researchers do? To address this problem, researchers conducted interviews with patients and caregivers of DRPLA to (1) better understand symptoms experienced by adult- and juvenile-onset DRPLA populations and their impact on daily life and (2) explore patient and caregiver treatment goals and clinical trial participation preferences. What did the researchers find? Eighteen patients were described in the interviews. Adult-onset patients (onset at age 20 or older) experienced difficulty with coordination, cognition, motor skills, speech, personality changes, and seizures. Juvenile-onset patients (onset before age 20) experienced difficulty with coordination, sleep, speech, jerking/twitching, behavior, cognition, motor skills, sensory sensitivity, and seizures. When considering symptoms to prioritize for future treatment, patients and caregivers identified coordination/mobility, independence, and personality as important. Nearly all participants indicated they would participate in a clinical trial if given an opportunity, however half expressed that travel to a clinical site could pose a barrier. What do the findings mean? This study provides a better understanding of the symptoms experienced by DRPLA patients and their impact on daily life. Additionally, it identifies important targets for treatment and considerations when designing clinical trials for DRPLA such as the barrier caused by travel to a clinical site.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Diary for Irritable Bowel Syndrome Symptoms-Constipation (DIBSS-C), which was developed to support primary and secondary endpoints in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) with predominant constipation (IBS-C) clinical trials.
METHODS: Observational data were collected from 108 adults with IBS-C using a smartphone-type device for 17 days. DIBSS-C data regarding bowel movements (BMs) were collected for each event (along with the Bristol Stool Form Scale); abdominal symptoms were rated each evening. Global status items and the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale-IBS were completed on day 10 and day 17 and the IBS-Symptom Severity Scale on day 17. Item-level performance, internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability, and construct validity were evaluated.
RESULTS: The Abdominal Symptoms Domain score demonstrated high internal consistency reliability (Cronbach\'s alpha week 1 = 0.98; week 2 = 0.96) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.93). Test-retest reliability was stronger for abdominal symptoms (ICC = 0.91-0.94) than for the frequency-based BM-related outcomes (ICC = 0.54-0.66). Key construct validity hypotheses were supported by moderate to strong correlations with the corresponding Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale-IBS, IBS-Symptom Severity Scale, and Bristol Stool Form Scale items. All known-groups comparisons were statistically significant for the abdominal symptom items and domain score; evidence for known-groups validity of BM-related outcomes was supportive when based on constipation severity.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study provided key psychometric evidence for the DIBSS-C, ultimately contributing to its qualification by the US Food and Drug Administration for use in IBS-C clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: In support of UCB pharmaceutical research programs, the aim of this research was to implement a novel process for patient involvement in a multidisciplinary research group to co-create a clinical outcome assessment strategy to accurately reflect the experience of people living with early-stage Parkinson\'s. Patient experts were an integral part of the decision-making process for patient-reported outcome (PRO) research and instrument development.
METHODS: In partnership with two patient organizations (Parkinson\'s UK and the Parkinson\'s Foundation), 6 patient experts were recruited into a multidisciplinary research group alongside clinical, patient engagement and involvement, regulatory science, and outcome measurement experts. The group was involved across two phases of research; the first phase identified what symptoms are cardinal to the experience of living with early-stage Parkinson\'s and the second phase involved the development of PRO instruments to better assess the symptoms that are important to people living with early-stage Parkinson\'s. Patient experts were important in performing a variety of roles, in particular, qualitative study protocol design, conceptual model development, and subsequent co-creation of two PRO instruments.
RESULTS: Involving people with Parkinson\'s in PRO research ensured that the expertise of these representatives from the Parkinson\'s community shaped and drove the research; as such, PRO instruments were being developed with the patient at the forefront. Working with patient experts required considerable resource and time allocation for planning, communication, document development, and organizing meetings; however, their input enriched the development of PRO instruments and was vital in developing PRO instruments that are more meaningful for people with Parkinson\'s and clinicians.
CONCLUSIONS: Conducting PRO research, in the context of clinical development involving pharmaceutical companies, requires balancing regulatory and scientific rigor with tight time constraints. Incorporating a multi-stakeholder perspective, which included patient experts as joint investigators, had a strong positive impact on our research, despite the logistical complexities of their involvement. Due to the input of patient experts, the innovative clinical outcome assessment strategy and the co-created novel PRO instruments were more relevant and holistic to the patient experience of early-stage Parkinson\'s.
Patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments allow people living with a disease and participating in a clinical study to describe the symptoms and experiences that they consider meaningful. PRO instruments use tools such as questionnaires and scales to capture patient perspectives on a treatment that might not be captured by a clinical measurement. It is recommended that the patient community and patient experts are included in the development of PRO instruments to accurately capture information that is important to them. Building on the experience of a recent PRO research project in support of UCB pharmaceutical programs, this article provides recommendations on how pharmaceutical companies can partner with patient organizations and involve patient experts as joint investigators in the co creation of PRO instruments. Despite the additional resource and time required, involving patient experts and patient organizations into the research collaboration had a strong positive impact and ensured that the PROs were meaningful to patients (in this instance, people living with early-stage Parkinson’s). Patient organizations facilitated patient engagement and recruitment in research activities, maintained communication with the pharmaceutical company’s research team, and built trust between collaborators by implementing patient engagement tools and best practices. Patient experts contributed to several parts of the PRO instrument development process: study design, identifying key symptoms and experiences, and developing individual PRO questions. Co-creation between the pharmaceutical company, patient experts, and patient organizations resulted in considerable improvements to typical PRO instrument development for use in clinical trials and is thus recommended.

UNASSIGNED: It has been reported that breast cancer (BC) with low expression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) might be a distinct subtype of BC. However, the prognostic effect of low HER2 expression on BC patients remains controversial. We aim to conduct this single-institution retrospective analysis to assess HER2-low-positive BC outcomes in Chinese women and the prognostic role of TILs in HER2-low-positive early-stage BC.
UNASSIGNED: We retrospectively enrolled 1,763 BC patients treated in a single institution from 2017 to 2018. TILs are regarded as continuous variables and are divided into low TILs (≤10%) and high TILs (>10%) for statistical analysis. Univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to test the associations between TILs and disease-free survival (DFS) with adjustment for clinicopathologic characteristics.
UNASSIGNED: High TIL levels (>10%) were associated with tumor size (>2 cm, p = 0.042), age at diagnosis (p = 0.005), Ki-67 index (>25%; p <0.001), HR (hormone receptor) status (positive, p <0.001), advanced pathological stage (p = 0.043), subtype (p <0.001), and HER2 status (p <0.001). The Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated that no significant difference in DFS (p = 0.83) could be found between HER2-positive, HER2-low-positive, and HER2-0 BC. The DFS of HER2-low-positive BC and HER2-nonamplified BC with high levels of TILs was statistically better than that of patients with low levels of TILs (p = 0.015; p = 0.047). In HER2-low-positive BC patients with high TIL levels (>10%), DFS was significantly improved in both the univariate (HR = 0.44, 95% CI 0.22-0.87, P = 0.018) and multivariate (HR = 0.47, 95% CI 0.23-0.95, P = 0.035) Cox models. For further subgroup analysis, HR (+)/HER2-low-positive BC with high TIL (>10%) levels was associated with improved DFS in both the univariate (HR = 0.41, 95% CI 0.19-0.90, P = 0.025) and multivariate (HR = 0.42, 95% CI 0.19-0.93, P = 0.032) Cox models. The HR (-)/HER2-0 BC with high TIL (>10%) level was not statistically significant in the univariate Cox model, but it was statistically significant in the multivariate (HR = 0.16, 95% CI 0.28-0.96, P = 0.045) Cox model.
UNASSIGNED: Among early-stage BC, no significant survival difference could be found between the HER2-positive, HER2-low-positive, and HER2-0 cohorts. High levels of TILs were significantly associated with improved DFS in HER2-low-positive patients, especially in the HR (+)/HER2-low-positive subtype.

For genetic conditions associated with neurodevelopmental disorder (GCAND), developmental domains such as motor ability, thinking and learning, social abilities, and communication are potential intervention targets. Performance on measures of developmental concepts can be expressed using several types of scores. Norm-referenced scores are intended for the diagnostic context, allowing for the identification of impairment relative to age-based expectations, and can exhibit dramatic floor effects when used in individuals with more significant limitations. Person ability scores, which are derived via Rasch analysis or item response theory, are available on many standardized tests and are intended to measure within-person change. However, they have not been used or evaluated as primary endpoints in GCAND clinical trials. In this study, we simulated a series of parallel-arm clinical trials under several chronological age and impairment conditions, to compare empirically the power and type I error rate of operationalizing test performance using ability scores rather than norm-referenced scores.
Using the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales as the example, we demonstrated an advantage in statistical power of ability scores over norm-referenced scores at extreme levels of impairment. This advantage was at least partially driven by floor effects in norm-referenced scores. For simulated conditions where impairment was less severe, ability scores outperformed norm-referenced scores, but they were more similar. The type I error rate closely approximated the nominal type I error rate of 5% for both scores.
The results of this simulation demonstrate a substantial power and interpretative advantage of ability scores over norm-referenced scores for studies of GCAND that will enroll participants with high levels of impairment. These results are expected to generalize to studies of developmental concepts, regardless of the etiology or specific test. However, the relative advantage of ability scores is expected to be even greater for tests with a higher floor than the Vineland.

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated psychometric properties of the Pediatric Narcolepsy Screening Questionnaire (PNSQ), developed in response to the difficulty of identifying pediatric narcolepsy.
METHODS: The initial PNSQ was updated following debriefing interviews with parents of children with suspected/diagnosed narcolepsy. Subsequently, newly recruited caregivers were categorized into groups: clinician-confirmed narcolepsy, other sleep problems (OSP), and no sleep problems (controls). Caregivers completed the 11-item PNSQ assessing narcolepsy symptomatology. PNSQ psychometric properties were evaluated; mean PNSQ Total Score (TS) was compared inter-group using analysis of variance.
RESULTS: The analysis population (N = 158) included patients with narcolepsy (n = 49), OSP (n = 55), and controls (n = 54); mean ± SD age was 13.8 ± 2.8, 10.2 ± 4.3, and 10.0 ± 3.8 years, respectively. Inter-item Pearson correlations (range, 0.22-0.75) indicated good construct validity. Principal component analysis confirmed unidimensionality. Item discriminative power was high for narcolepsy vs control (range, 0.693-0.936) and lower for narcolepsy vs OSP (range, 0.584-0.729). The latent trait was well covered (separation index = 0.868). Item 7 (vivid dreams/nightmares), having low discriminative power and specificity, was removed. Cronbach\'s alpha (final PNSQ) indicated high internal consistency reliability (raw alpha = 0.88). Mean ± SD PNSQ TS (range, 0-50) in the narcolepsy, OSP, and control groups were 34.98 ± 7.98, 25.20 ± 9.43, and 9.54 ± 9.38, respectively (nominal P < 0.0001). Classification by PNSQ TS was defined: PNSQ+ (likely narcolepsy, TS ≥ 29), PNSQ 0 (likely OSP, TS 19-28), and PNSQ- (narcolepsy unlikely, TS ≤ 18); patients with narcolepsy were classified as PNSQ+ (79.6%), PNSQ 0 (18.4%), and PNSQ- (2.0%).
CONCLUSIONS: The PNSQ demonstrated good psychometric properties and excellent performance discriminating narcolepsy, OSP, and control groups.

Aim: We undertook qualitative research to understand more about older people and their interactions with technology, specifically to evidence the question \"can older people (seniors) manage electronic patient-reported outcomes solutions in clinical trials?\". Methods: We undertook qualitative research interviews with older people and investigated the findings. Results: Seven of the ten participants had a smartphone and 3/10 had a feature phone (a mobile phone with buttons and no touchscreen). There was a shift from smartphone use by the younger participants to feature phone use by the oldest participants. Conclusion: The younger group of older individuals had similar experiences and attitudes toward touchscreen devices as the rest of the population. While the older participants expressed some reluctance toward unfamiliar technology, all participants were using technology and accepting of it.

Patients are participating more actively in health care decision-making with regard to their health, as well as in the broader realm of assessing the value of medical products and influencing decisions about their registration and reimbursement. There is an increasing trend to include patients\' perspectives throughout the stages of medical product development by broadening the traditional study-participant role to that of an active partner throughout the process. Including patients in the selection and development of clinical outcome assessments (COAs) to evaluate the benefit of treatment is particularly important. Still, despite widespread enthusiasm, there is substantial uncertainty regarding how and when to engage patients in this process.
This manuscript proposes a methodological framework for engaging patients at varying levels in the selection and development of COAs for medical product development.
The framework builds on the Food and Drug Administration\'s roadmap for patient-focused COA. Methods for engaging patients across each stage in this roadmap are summarized by levels of engagement. Opportunities and examples of patient engagement (PE) in the selection and/or development of COAs are summarized, together with best practices and practical considerations.
This paper offers a framework for understanding, planning, and implementing methods to advance PE in the selection and/or development of COAs for evaluating the benefit of medical products. The intent is to further this important discussion and enhance the process and outcome of PE in this context.