Chronic neck pain

慢性颈痛
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    比较使用多颜色套管(MTC)和常规套管(CC)治疗慢性颈痛的颈内侧支射频神经切开术(CMBRFN)的手术特点和临床疗效。
    预期,双盲随机对照试验。
    对双重内侧支传导阻滞缓解≥75%疼痛的患者随机接受MTC或CC的RFN。主要结果:程序性疼痛,程序持续时间,透视时间和辐射剂量。次要结果:在3、6和12个月时报告数字评分量表降低≥50%和颈部残疾指数降低≥30%的患者比例。
    42名患者接受了治疗。MTC组和CC组之间的手术疼痛没有差异(NRS4.7±2.0vs.4.2±1.8,p=0.465),但有三个病人,都在CC组中,由于疼痛无法完成手术。MTC组的CMBRFN明显快于CC组(35.5±7.3分钟vs.58.2±14.8分钟,p<0.001),透视时间较短(167.6±76.4svs.260.8±123.5s,p=0.004)。MTC组的辐射剂量为8.95±7.9mGy,CC组为11.53±10.3mGy(p=0.36)。在3个月时,两组的NRS降低≥50%的比率没有显著差异。但是在6个月和12个月的时候,CC组明显较高.在3、6和12个月时,CC组NDI降低≥30%的比率显著高于对照组.
    与CC相比,MTC对操作员和患者都具有技术优势。然而,与传统插管相比,使用多染色插管的CMBRFN治疗颈部疼痛的效果似乎较差。
    UNASSIGNED: Compare procedural characteristics and clinical efficacy of cervical medial branch radiofrequency neurotomy (CMBRFN) using a multi-tined cannula (MTC) versus a conventional cannula (CC) to treat chronic neck pain.
    UNASSIGNED: Prospective, double-blinded randomized controlled trial.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients who responded to dual medial branch blocks with ≥75% pain relief were randomized to receive RFN with either the MTC or the CC. Primary outcomes: procedural pain, procedure duration, fluoroscopy time and radiation dose. Secondary outcomes: proportion of patients reporting ≥50% numerical rating scale reduction and ≥30% neck disability index reduction at 3, 6 and 12 months.
    UNASSIGNED: Forty-two patients underwent treatment. There was no difference in procedural pain between the MTC and CC groups (NRS 4.7 ± 2.0 vs. 4.2 ± 1.8, p = 0.465), but three patients, all in the CC group, could not complete the procedure due to pain. CMBRFN in the MTC group was significantly faster than in the CC group (35.5 ± 7.3 min vs. 58.2 ± 14.8 min, p < 0.001), with less fluoroscopy time (167.6 ± 76.4 s vs. 260.8 ± 123.5 s, p = 0.004). Radiation dose was 8.95 ± 7.9 mGy in the MTC group and 11.53 ± 10.3 mGy in the CC group (p = 0.36). Rates of ≥50% NRS reduction were not significantly different between the two groups at 3 months, but at 6 and 12 months, they were significantly higher in the CC group. At 3, 6 and 12 months, rates of ≥30% NDI reduction were significantly higher in the CC group.
    UNASSIGNED: The MTC offers technical advantages compared to the CC for both the operator and the patient. However, CMBRFN with the multi-tined cannula seems less effective to treat neck pain than with the conventional cannula.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    脊髓刺激(SCS)是一种越来越多的介入治疗方式,适用于保守治疗难以治疗的顽固性疼痛患者。许多手术后持续的慢性腰腿痛患者发现疼痛缓解,更多的证据表明,慢性上肢和颈部疼痛可能对这种疗法反应良好。然而,异物的放置,例如SCS线索,在硬膜外腔可以成为深部脊柱内感染的来源。
    我们介绍了一名49岁的健壮男性,他接受了一项临时宫颈SCS试验,并在拔除导线的第9天被诊断为硬膜外脓肿。试验阶段因立即和长时间的术后疼痛而变得复杂。在临床表现后不久就诊断为硬膜外脓肿,无神经功能缺损或疼痛加剧,但新发发热。经过广泛的椎板切除术和抗生素治疗,他完全康复。
    延长SCS试验长度的决定提出了一个关于潜在感染并发症与疼痛缓解的风险与获益的问题。在SCS试验阶段继续抗生素治疗是一种可能的策略,但益处不确定。
    麻醉学,疼痛管理。
    UNASSIGNED: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a growing interventional treatment modality in patients experiencing intractable pain refractory to conservative treatments. Many patients with chronic low back and leg pain that persists after surgery have found pain relief, and more evidence is suggesting that chronic upper limb and neck pain may respond just as well to this therapy. However, the placement of foreign body, for instance SCS leads, in the epidural space can become the source for deep intra-spinal infection.
    UNASSIGNED: We present a 49-year-old robust male who underwent a temporary cervical SCS trial and was diagnosed with epidural abscess on the day 9 when the leads were pulled. The trial phase was complicated by immediate and prolonged post procedure pain. The diagnosis of epidural abscess was made soon after clinical presentation with no neurological deficits or escalation in pain but new onset fever. He made a complete recovery after extensive laminectomy and antibiotic treatment.
    UNASSIGNED: The decision to extend the SCS trial length poses a question of risk versus benefit in regards to potential infectious complications versus pain relief. Continuing antibiotic therapy during a SCS trial phase is a possible strategy but of uncertain benefit.
    UNASSIGNED: Anesthesiology, Pain Management.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本横断面研究的目的是检查心率变异性(HRV)与颈椎活动范围之间的关系,残疾,疼痛强度,痛苦的灾难,以及慢性病患者的生活质量,非特异性颈部疼痛。35个病人,20-48岁,慢性非特异性颈部疼痛,完成关于颈部疼痛强度的验证问卷,疼痛相关的残疾,灾难性的想法,和生活质量。使用数字测角仪评估颈椎运动的范围。HRV指数记录在三个位置(仰卧,坐着,和站立)通过智能手机应用程序。观察到HRV指数与颈部疼痛残疾之间存在一些显着相关性,灾难的无助因素,颈部旋转,和生活质量。这些相关性仅在站立姿势中观察到。疼痛灾难化与主动颈部运动时的残疾和疼痛强度呈正相关(Pearsonr=0.544,p<0.01;Pearsonr=0.605,p<0.01)。生活质量与主动运动时疼痛强度呈负相关(Pearsonr=-0.347,p<0.05)。HRV指数与颈部疼痛的心理和生理领域相关。在一些先前的研究中,这些心脏指数与颈部疼痛变量有关。需要进一步的研究来证实这种关系在不同的日常条件。
    The purpose of the present cross-sectional study was to examine the relationship between heart rate variability (HRV) and the range of cervical motion, disability, pain intensity, pain catastrophizing, and quality of life in patients with chronic, non-specific neck pain. Thirty-five patients, aged 20-48 years, with chronic non-specific neck pain, completed validated questionnaires regarding neck pain intensity, pain-associated disability, catastrophic thoughts, and quality of life. The range of cervical motion was assessed using a digital goniometer. HRV indices were recorded in three positions (supine, sitting, and standing) through a smartphone application. Several significant correlations were observed between HRV indices and neck pain disability, the helplessness factor of catastrophizing, neck rotation, and quality of life. These correlations were only observed in the standing position. Pain catastrophizing was positively correlated with disability and pain intensity during active neck movement (Pearson r = 0.544, p < 0.01; Pearson r = 0.605, p < 0.01, respectively). Quality of life was negatively correlated with pain intensity during active movement (Pearson r = -0.347, p < 0.05). HRV indices were correlated with the psychological and physical domains of neck pain. These cardiac indices have been related to neck pain variables in some previous studies. Further research is needed to confirm this relationship in different daily conditions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究旨在评估剪切波弹性成像(SWE)在无症状对照和慢性颈部疼痛患者中测量颈部多裂(CM)肌肉刚度的检查者间可靠性。进行了一项纵向观察研究,以评估手术的诊断准确性。SWE图像,遵循先前测试的详细过程,由两名审查员(一名新手和一名经验丰富)获得,以计算剪切波速度(SWS)和杨氏模量。对实验病例检查疼痛侧,而随机选择对照组检查侧。数据分析计算类内相关系数(ICC),审查员之间的绝对误差,测量的标准误差,和最小的可检测的变化。总共分析了125名参与者(n=54名对照和n=71例)。在无症状组(两者,p>0.05)和慢性颈痛组(两者,p>0.05)。尽管如此,在颈部疼痛患者的剪切波速度测量的检查者之间的绝对误差中观察到明显的区别,其中记录了显著差异(p=0.045),指出受慢性颈痛影响的测量一致性的敏感性。ICC在两组中都表现出中等到良好的可靠性,无症状个体的ICC值报告为>0.8。在慢性颈痛患者中,ICC值略低(>0.780)。这项研究揭示了中等到良好的一致性,突出SWE的实用性和通用性。
    This study aimed to evaluate the inter-examiner reliability of shear wave elastography (SWE) for measuring cervical multifidus (CM) muscle stiffness in asymptomatic controls and patients with chronic neck pain. A longitudinal observational study was conducted to assess the diagnostic accuracy of a procedure. SWE images, following a detailed procedure previously tested, were acquired by two examiners (one novice and one experienced) to calculate the shear wave speed (SWS) and Young\'s modulus. The painful side was examined for the experimental cases while the side examined in the control group was selected randomly. Data analyses calculated the intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs), absolute errors between examiners, standard errors of measurement, and minimal detectable changes. A total of 125 participants were analyzed (n = 54 controls and n = 71 cases). The Young\'s modulus and SWS measurements obtained by both examiners were comparable within the asymptomatic group (both, p > 0.05) and the chronic neck pain group (both, p > 0.05). Nonetheless, a notable distinction was observed in the absolute error between examiners for shear wave speed measurements among patients with neck pain, where a significant difference was registered (p = 0.045), pointing to a sensitivity in measurement consistency affected by the presence of chronic neck pain. ICCs demonstrated moderate-to-good reliability across both groups, with ICC values for asymptomatic individuals reported as >0.8. Among the chronic neck pain patients, ICC values were slightly lower (>0.780). The study revealed moderate-to-good consistency, highlighting the practicality and generalizability of SWE.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:慢性颈痛(CNP)是全球性的公共卫生问题,患病率和缺勤率高。中枢致敏(CS)作为慢性疼痛的基础,可能在其发展和进展中起重要作用。它通常与低条件性疼痛调制(CPM)效应并存,认知,和心理问题。
    目的:本研究的目的是(1)探讨疼痛相关认知与心理因素之间的关系,CPM效应,和中央敏感性清单(CSI)得分;(2)确定认知和心理因素是否可以预测CNP个体的CSI得分和CPM效应。
    方法:本横断面研究招募了54名CNP患者。评估了以下结果指标:将CSI(筛选工具)与冷加压试验(CPT)进行比较,这是用于评估CPM的心理物理测试;使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)的颈部疼痛强度,以及使用自我报告问卷的疼痛相关认知(包括运动恐惧症和疼痛灾难化)和心理状态(包括焦虑和抑郁)。
    结果:CSI评分与CPM效应无关(r=0.257,p>0.05),认知或心理因素与CPM无相关性(p>0.05),CSI评分与运动恐惧症呈中度正相关(r=0.554,p<0.01),与疼痛灾难化(r=0.332,p=0.017)和焦虑(r=0.492,p<0.01)呈低正相关,但不是抑郁(r=0.207,p=0.132)。多元线性回归分析显示,运动恐惧症(B=1.308,p<0.01)和焦虑(B=1.806,p=0.02)是CSI评分的显著正预测因子。
    结论:这些发现证实了我们的一些假设。因此,研究结果推断,CSI似乎对CNP患者的CPM效应没有有效反应.此外,CSI评分与认知和心理因素相关,其中运动恐惧症和焦虑是有效的预测因素。在临床实践中,应充分考虑与疼痛相关的认知和心理因素,以有效地控制颈部疼痛。
    BACKGROUND: Chronic neck pain (CNP) is a global public health problem, with high prevalence and absenteeism rates. Central sensitization (CS) as a basis for chronic pain may play an essential role in its development and progression. It is often comorbid with low conditioned pain modulation (CPM) effects, cognitions, and psychological problems.
    OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this study were to (1) explore the relationship between pain-related cognitions and psychological factors, CPM effects, and the central sensitization inventory (CSI) scores; and (2) determine whether cognitions and psychological factors can predict CSI scores and CPM effects in individuals with CNP.
    METHODS: Fifty-four individuals with CNP were recruited for this cross-sectional study. The following outcome measures were evaluated: The CSI (screening tool) was compared with the cold pressor test (CPT), which was the psychophysical test used to assess the CPM; neck pain intensity using the visual analogue scale (VAS), as well as pain-related cognitions (including kinesiophobia and pain catastrophization) and psychological states (including anxiety and depression) using self-report questionnaires.
    RESULTS: CSI score was not associated with the CPM effect (r = 0.257, p > 0.05), and no cognitions or psychological factors were associated with CPM (p > 0.05), but CSI score was moderately positively correlated with kinesiophobia (r = 0.554, p < 0.01), lowly positively correlated with pain catastrophization (r = 0.332, p = 0.017) and anxiety (r = 0.492, p < 0.01), but not depression (r = 0.207, p = 0.132). Multiple linear regression analysis showed that kinesiophobia (B = 1.308, p < 0.01) and anxiety (B = 1.806, p = 0.02) were significant positive predictors of CSI score.
    CONCLUSIONS: The findings confirm some of our hypotheses. Accordingly, the findings inferred that the CSI does not seem to respond to CPM effect in patients with CNP effectively. In addition, CSI score was associated with cognitions and psychological factors, of which kinesiophobia and anxiety were effective predictors. In clinical practice, pain-related cognitions and psychological factors should be fully considered to manage neck pain efficiently.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    为了比较麦肯齐颈部锻炼和颈颈屈屈(CCF)锻炼对颈深屈肌(DNF)肌肉的力量和耐力的有效性,疼痛,残疾,慢性颈部疼痛患者的头颅角(CVA)。
    将40名慢性颈痛患者随机分配到McKenzie颈或CCF运动组。每个小组每天在家进行锻炼。在基线测量DNF肌肉的力量和耐力,第一次练习结束后,每周随访6周。在基线和6周的每周随访时测量过去一周的平均疼痛。在基线和六周结束时测量残疾和CVA。
    在六周时,两组在所有结局变量中均表现出显著改善(p<0.001),但组间无差异(p>0.05).早在每次干预的第二周就观察到DNF肌肉强度与基线的显着差异(p≤0.001)。早在CCF运动组的第一周(p<0.05)和McKenzie颈部运动组的第二周(p<0.05)观察到DNF肌肉耐力与基线的显着差异。在McKenzie颈部运动组的第一周后观察到疼痛强度从基线的显着降低(p<0.001),而在CCF运动组的第二周后(p<0.05)。
    McKenzie颈部锻炼和CCF锻炼在增强DNF肌肉的力量和耐力方面都产生了相似的效果,减轻疼痛,缓解颈部残疾,改善CVA。
    UNASSIGNED: To compare the effectiveness of McKenzie neck exercise and cranio-cervical flexion (CCF) exercise on strength and endurance of deep neck flexor (DNF) muscles, pain, disability, and craniovertebral angle (CVA) in individuals with chronic neck pain.
    UNASSIGNED: Forty individuals with chronic neck pain were randomly allocated to the McKenzie neck or CCF exercise group. Each group performed exercises at home daily. The strength and endurance of DNF muscles were measured at baseline, immediately after the first exercise session, and each week follow-up for six weeks. Average pain over the past week was measured at baseline and each week follow-up for six weeks. Disability and CVA were measured at baseline and the end of six weeks.
    UNASSIGNED: At six weeks, both groups exhibited significant improvements across all outcome variables (p < 0.001) but there were no differences between groups (p > 0.05). The significant difference from baseline in the strength of DNF muscles was observed as early as the second week of each intervention (p ≤ 0.001). The significant difference from baseline in the endurance of DNF muscles was observed as early as the first week in the CCF exercise group (p < 0.05) and the second week in the McKenzie neck exercise group (p < 0.05). A significant decrease in pain intensity from baseline was observed after the first week in the McKenzie neck exercise group (p < 0.001) while it was after the second week in the CCF exercise group (p < 0.05).
    UNASSIGNED: Both the McKenzie neck exercise and CCF exercise produced similar effects in enhancing the strength and endurance of the DNF muscles, decreasing pain, alleviating neck disability, and improving the CVA.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项随机对照试验的目的是评估肌筋膜释放技术(MRT)以及认知行为疗法(CBT)对疼痛的有效性。颅骨角度(CVA),患有慢性颈部疼痛和前头姿势的大学生的颈部残疾。共有66名符合资格的慢性颈部疼痛和前头部姿势参与者被随机分为肌筋膜释放治疗(MRT)组(n=33)和MRT和认知行为治疗(CBT)组(n=33)。临床结果包括使用数字疼痛评定量表测量的颈部疼痛,通过颈部残疾指数测量颈部残疾,和通过颅骨角度测量的向前头部姿势。在基线和干预后4周和8周评估结果。两组患者疼痛强度均有显著改善,CVA,干预后的颈部残疾。然而,CBT组比MRT组表现出更大的改善.两组之间的结果差异具有统计学意义。肌筋膜松解术联合CBT是治疗慢性颈痛和前头姿势的有效方法。
    The purpose of this randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the effectiveness of the Myofascial Release Technique (MRT) along with Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) on pain, craniovertebral angle (CVA), and neck disability in university students with chronic neck pain and forward head posture. A total of sixty-six eligible participants with chronic neck pain and forward head posture were randomized into the Myofascial Release Therapy (MRT) group (n = 33) and MRT and Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT) group (n = 33). Clinical outcomes included neck pain measured using the numerical pain rating scale, neck disability measured through the neck disability index, and forward head posture measured through the cranial vertebral angle. The outcomes were assessed at baseline and the four and eight weeks after the intervention. Both groups showed significant improvement in pain intensity, CVA, and neck disability after the intervention. However, the CBT group demonstrated greater improvements than the MRT group. The difference in outcomes between the groups was statistically significant. Myofascial Release Therapy combined with CBT is an effective treatment method for patients with chronic neck pain and forward head posture.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial Protocol
    背景:导音疗法(DT),一种具有数千年历史的古老治疗方法,传统上被用来解决肌肉骨骼疼痛和心身疾病。然而,DT在慢性颈痛(CNP)中的应用在现有文献中受到的关注有限,在这种情况下,系统随机临床试验(RCT)仍然很少。该手稿概述了一种RCT协议,旨在调查DT与其他干预措施相比是否更有效地减轻成年人的CNP。
    方法:进行为期12周的RCT,参与者随机分为三组:DT,冥想+健身运动(M+FE),或对照组。DT和MFE组的参与者每周三次参加各自的培训课程,为期12周。对照组要求参与者每2周参加一次健康教育研讨会。在12周的干预期之后,所有参与者在第16周接受随访评估.结果测量包括简体中文颈部疼痛和残疾量表(SC-NPAD)和疼痛评估的视觉模拟量表(VAS),静态颈部姿势评估(SNPA)评估颈部和肩部的姿势和功能,简表36(SF-36)评估生活质量,和血液检测5-羟色胺(5-HT),去甲肾上腺素/去甲肾上腺素(NE/NA),γ-氨基丁酸(GABA),肾上腺皮质激素(ACTH),β-内啡肽(β-EP),和降钙素基因相关肽(CGRP)水平通过高效液相色谱(HPLC),化学发光免疫分析(CLIA),酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA),和放射免疫分析(RIA)。通过MRI扫描监测脑活动变化。重复测量方差分析(ANOVA)将用于评估基线时的结果,在第12周,在第16周。广义估计方程(GEE)模型将用于分析结果随时间的变化以及组间差异。
    结论:本试验旨在评估DT与其他干预措施相比的疗效,并探讨其在成人CNP患者中的神经内分泌机制。如果干预措施和程序证明了可行性和可接受性,有计划进行更广泛的对照试验。这可能为数字孪生更广泛的应用铺平道路,不仅在CNP的背景下,而且在其他慢性疾病的背景下。
    背景:该试验已在中国临床试验注册中心注册(注册ID:[ChiCTR2400079571])。
    BACKGROUND: Daoyin therapy (DT), an ancient therapeutic approach with a history spanning thousands of years, has traditionally been employed to address musculoskeletal pain and psychosomatic disorders. However, the application of DT for chronic neck pain (CNP) has received limited attention in the existing literature, and systematic randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in this context remain scarce. This manuscript outlines an RCT protocol designed to investigate whether DT is more effective at alleviating CNP in adult individuals compared to other interventions.
    METHODS: A 12-week RCT was conducted, with participants undergoing randomization into one of three groups: DT, Meditation + Fitness Exercise (M+FE), or a control group. Participants in the DT and M + FE groups attended their respective training classes three times per week for 12 weeks. Participants in the control group were required to attend health education workshops every 2 weeks. Following the 12-week intervention period, all participants underwent follow-up assessments at the 16th week. Outcome measures encompassed the Simplified Chinese Neck Pain and Disability Scale (SC-NPAD) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain assessment, Static Neck Posture Assessment (SNPA) to evaluate neck and shoulder posture and function, Short Form-36 (SF-36) to assess quality of life, and blood tests measuring 5-Hydroxytryptamine (5-HT), Norepinephrine/Noradrenaline (NE/NA), γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), Adreno-Cortico-Tropic-Hormone (ACTH), β-Endorphin (β-EP), and Calcitonin-Gene-Related Peptide (CGRP) levels via high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and radioimmunoassay (RIA). Brain activity changes were monitored through MRI scans. Repeated measures analyses of variance (ANOVAs) will be used to evaluate the outcomes at baseline, at the 12th week, and at the 16th week. Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE) models will be applied to analyze changes in outcomes over time and differences between groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: This trial aims to evaluate the efficacy of DT in comparison to other interventions and explore the neuroendocrine mechanisms underlying its effects in adults with CNP. If the intervention and procedures demonstrate feasibility and acceptability, there are plans to conduct a more extensive controlled trial. This could potentially pave the way for the broader application of DT, not only in the context of CNP but also for other chronic diseases.
    BACKGROUND: This trial has been registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (Registration ID: [ChiCTR2400079571]).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Observational Study
    背景:抑郁症和慢性疼痛是经常同时发生的普遍病症。据推测,肌筋膜连续体对这两种情况都有贡献。然而,关于筋膜特性与慢性疼痛和抑郁之间的特定关联的研究有限。
    目的:本研究旨在探讨斜方肌深层筋膜的性质及其与抑郁的关系,慢性颈部疼痛,和颈椎活动。
    方法:本研究比较了两组的筋膜特性:抑郁症和慢性颈痛患者,和健康的个体。筋膜厚度,弹性,使用标准化技术,如超声成像和依从性仪,测量硬度作为主要结局.进行统计分析以确定两组之间筋膜特性的潜在差异和相关性。
    结果:刚度出现显著差异,tone,深筋膜的筋膜厚度,除了确定的抑郁症之间的相关性,慢性疼痛,和这些变量。
    结论:该研究强调了抑郁症和慢性疼痛对筋膜特性的影响,强调需要在这一领域进行进一步的研究,以解开复杂的联系和对治疗策略的潜在影响。
    BACKGROUND: Depressive disorder and chronic pain are prevalent conditions that often co-occur. The myofascial fascial continuum has been hypothesized to contribute to both conditions. However, limited research exists on the specific association between fascial properties and chronic pain and depression.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate the properties of the deep fascia of the M. trapezius and their relationship with depression, chronic neck pain, and cervical spine mobility.
    METHODS: This study compared fascial properties between two groups: individuals with depression and chronic neck pain, and healthy individuals. Fascial thickness, elasticity, and stiffness were measured as primary outcomes using standardized techniques such as ultrasound imaging and compliance meter. Statistical analyses were conducted to identify potential differences and correlations in fascial properties between the two groups.
    RESULTS: Significant differences emerge in stiffness, tone, and fascia thickness in the deep fascia, alongside identified correlations between depression, chronic pain, and these variables.
    CONCLUSIONS: The study highlights the impact of depression and chronic pain on fascial properties, emphasizing the need for further research in this domain to unravel the intricate connections and potential implications for treatment strategies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    虽然宫颈本体感觉缺陷被认为是导致慢性非特异性颈痛(CNSNP)临床后果的一个因素,解决此类损伤对姿势控制策略的影响仍未被探索。这项研究的目的是比较姿势控制系统对CNSNP与无症状个体的感觉传入改变的反应。此外,我们检查了本体感觉训练是否会产生优于常规物理治疗的结果,以改善姿势控制,疼痛和残疾。
    在任何本体感觉特异性或常规物理治疗组中均匀分布的60名CNSNP患者的压力中心(CoP)变量,在四种条件下评估了30名无症状参与者:1)正常,2)泡沫,3)颈椎伸展/睁眼和4)颈椎伸展/闭眼站立。
    在条件2下,患者的CoP前后范围和前后和中外侧速度明显高于对照组(P<0.05)。在条件2和4下,患者的前后Lyapunov指数也较低(P<0.05)。两种干预措施均显着降低了前后范围和前后速度(P<0.05)。在条件2下,前后李雅普诺夫指数也增加(P<0.05)。.干预之后,本体感觉运动组的CoP前后范围和前后速度明显低于常规理疗组(P<0.05)。本体感觉运动组前后李雅普诺夫指数也明显高于对照组(P<0.05)。尽管干预后这些患者和对照组参与者在任何CoP变量上都没有显着差异。
    我们的结果拒绝了以下假设:在存在CNSNP的情况下,颈部本体感觉受损是通过过度加权其他感觉传入信息来源来补偿的。研究结果还表明,虽然本体感受练习成功地将CNSNP患者的姿势策略恢复到无症状参与者的姿势策略,它们不会增加这些患者的临床恢复。
    UNASSIGNED: While cervical proprioception deficit has been suggested as a contributing factor to clinical consequences of chronic non-specific neck pain (CNSNP), the effect of addressing such impairments on postural control strategies has remained unexplored. The aim of this study was to compare the response of the postural control system to alteration of sensory afferents in CNSNP with asymptomatic individuals. Furthermore, we examined whether proprioceptive training would yield superior outcomes to routine physiotherapy for improvement of postural control, pain and disability.
    UNASSIGNED: Center of pressure (CoP) variables of sixty CNSNP patients equally distributed in any of the proprioception-specific or conventional physiotherapy groups and 30 asymptomatic participants were evaluated under four standing conditions:1) normal, 2) foam, 3) cervical extension/eyes open and 4) cervical extension/eyes closed standing.
    UNASSIGNED: CoP anteroposterior range and anteroposterior and mediolateral velocity in patients were significantly higher than the control group under condition 2 (P<0.05). Patients also demonstrated lower anteroposterior lyapunov exponent under conditions 2 and 4 (P<0.05). Both interventions significantly decreased anteroposterior range and anteroposterior velocity(P<0.05). Anteroposterior lyapunov exponent also increased under condition 2 (P<0.05).. After the interventions, CoP anteroposterior range and anteroposterior velocity were significantly lower in the proprioceptive exercise group than the conventional physiotherapy group (P<0.05). Anteroposterior lyapunov exponent was also significantly higher in the proprioceptive exercise group (P<0.05).This while there was no significant difference between these patients and control group participants in any of the CoP variables after intervention.
    UNASSIGNED: Our results rejected the hypothesis that impaired neck proprioception in the presence of CNSNP is compensated by overweighting other sources of sensory afferent information. The findings also revealed that while proprioceptive exercises successfully returned postural strategies of CNSNP patients to those in asymptomatic participants, they do not add to clinical recovery of these patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号