Cerebral Infarction

脑梗死
  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血可能是一种毁灭性的疾病,住院死亡率高达20%。美国心脏协会/美国中风协会2023年动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血指南基于对干预证据的系统评价,对2012年指南进行了全面更新。准则范围广,涵盖院前护理,动脉瘤治疗模式,医疗并发症,迟发性脑缺血的检测和治疗,和恢复。这里,我们评论了动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血护理的突出方面,将这些指南与2023年神经重症监护动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血指南进行比较,并审查相关更新。
    Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage can be a devastating disease, with an in-hospital mortality rate of up to 20%. The American Heart Association/American Stroke Association 2023 Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Guidelines provide a comprehensive update to the 2012 Guidelines based on a systematic review of the intervening evidence. The guidelines are broad in scope, covering prehospital care, aneurysm treatment modality, medical complications, detection and treatment of delayed cerebral ischemia, and recovery. Here, we comment on salient aspects of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage care, compare these guidelines with the 2023 Neurocritical Care aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage guidelines, and review relevant updates.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    抗血小板治疗是中风二级预防的主要手段之一。这篇叙述性综述旨在强调抗血小板治疗预防中风的当前证据和建议。我们进行了抗血小板治疗的高级文献检索。综述了评价抗血小板治疗用于二级卒中预防的标志性研究和随机对照试验。Cochrane系统评价结果,讨论了汇总数据分析和荟萃分析。单一抗血小板治疗(SAPT)与阿司匹林,阿司匹林/缓释双嘧达莫或氯吡格雷可降低非心源性缺血性卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)患者复发性缺血性卒中的风险.在轻度急性非心源性缺血性卒中或高危TIA患者中,使用阿司匹林和氯吡格雷或替格瑞洛进行21-30天的双重抗血小板治疗(DAPT)比SAPT更有效。与SAPT相比,长期使用DAPT与更高的出血风险相关,而不会减少中风复发。与安慰剂相比,阿司匹林可使卒中复发的相对风险降低约22%.阿司匹林/双嘧达莫和西洛他唑优于阿司匹林,但伴有明显的副作用。对于颅内狭窄患者,西洛他唑或替格瑞洛可能比阿司匹林或氯吡格雷更有效。SAPT适用于非心源性缺血性卒中或TIA患者的二级卒中预防。对于轻度急性非心源性栓塞性卒中或高危TIA患者,建议使用阿司匹林和氯吡格雷或替格瑞洛进行DAPT治疗21-30天,然后进行SAPT。选择合适的抗血小板治疗也应基于依从性,药物耐受性或耐药性。
    Antiplatelet therapy is one of the mainstays for secondary stroke prevention. This narrative review aimed to highlight the current evidence and recommendations of antiplatelet therapy for stroke prevention.We conducted advanced literature search for antiplatelet therapy. Landmark studies and randomised controlled trials evaluating antiplatelet therapy for secondary stroke prevention are reviewed. Results from Cochrane systematic review, pooled data analysis and meta-analysis are discussed.Single-antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) with aspirin, aspirin/extended-release dipyridamole or clopidogrel reduces the risk of recurrent ischaemic stroke in patients with non-cardioembolic ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA). Dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and clopidogrel or ticagrelor for 21-30 days is more effective than SAPT in patients with minor acute noncardioembolic ischaemic stroke or high-risk TIA. Prolonged use of DAPT is associated with higher risk of haemorrhage without reduction in stroke recurrence than SAPT. Compared with placebo, aspirin reduces the relative risk of recurrent stroke by approximately 22%. Aspirin/dipyridamole and cilostazol are superior to aspirin but associated with significant side effects. Cilostazol or ticagrelor might be more effective than aspirin or clopidogrel in patients with intracranial stenosis.SAPT is indicated for secondary stroke prevention in patients with non-cardioembolic ischaemic stroke or TIA. DAPT with aspirin and clopidogrel or ticagrelor for 21-30 days followed by SAPT is recommended for patients with minor acute noncardioembolic stroke or high-risk TIA. Selection of appropriate antiplatelet therapy should also be based on compliance, drug tolerance or resistance.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管迟发性脑缺血(DCI)通常会使动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血(aSAH)幸存者的康复复杂化,其病理生理学尚未完全了解。以前的研究检查DCI和血小板计数的相关性已经证明了矛盾的结果。本研究旨在使用2010年DCI的共识定义来调查aSAH患者队列中的这种关联。
    我们对2010年1月至2014年12月入住重症监护病房的连续成人aSAH患者进行了回顾性单中心观察性研究。在入院后的前14天每天进行血小板计数和DCI评估。DCI是根据2010年共识标准定义的。
    共纳入340名患者进行分析。DCI发生率为37.1%。血小板计数与任何一天的DCI的发生都没有显着相关。平均血小板计数在aSAH后第3天最低,然后在第6天增加到超过入院时的计数。治疗方式和双重抗血小板治疗的使用与DCI无关。
    根据2010年共识标准的定义,血小板计数与DCI无关。需要遵循2010年DCI共识定义的未来研究来阐明血小板和血小板功能在DCI病理生理学中的作用。
    Although delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) commonly complicates recovery in survivors of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH), its pathophysiology is incompletely understood. Previous studies examining the association of DCI and platelet count have demonstrated contradictory results. This study aimed to investigate this association in a cohort of aSAH patients using the 2010 consensus definition of DCI.
    We conducted a retrospective single-center observational study of consecutive adult aSAH patients admitted to the intensive care unit from January 2010 to December 2014. Platelet count and DCI evaluations were performed daily in the first 14 days after admission. DCI was defined according to the 2010 consensus criteria.
    A total of 340 patients were included for analysis. DCI incidence was 37.1%. Platelet count was not significantly associated with occurrence of DCI on any day. Mean platelet count was lowest on day 3 after aSAH and then increased to exceed the count at admission on day 6. Treatment modality and use of dual antiplatelet therapy were not associated with DCI.
    Platelet count was not associated with DCI as defined by the 2010 consensus criteria. Future studies adhering to the 2010 consensus definition of DCI are needed to clarify the role of platelets and platelet function in DCI pathophysiology.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    芪龙胶囊是中医益气活血理论的代表性中成药,具有鲜明的中医临床应用特色。包装说明书上的芪龙胶囊适应症为缺血性中风(脑梗塞),这是一种复杂的疾病,有许多病理联系。各个阶段的处理原则和方法不同。干预时间不当,剂量和疗程难以充分发挥疗效,还会引起不良反应,比如出血。为了促进齐龙胶囊的合理使用,项目组邀请了一线临床专家,我国各地的药学专家和循证医学方法学家形成了共识。共识基于临床研究证据和专家经验的结合,在证据支持下对临床问题提出建议,在没有证据支持的情况下对临床问题提出专家共识建议。共识建议,干预的时机,剂量,疗程,芪龙胶囊临床应用的联合用药及禁忌症,并介绍了它的安全特性,为了指导临床医务工作者(涉及中医,西医,中西医结合)合理使用芪龙胶囊治疗脑梗死。
    Qilong Capsules is the representative Chinese patent medicine of the theory of " invigorating Qi and activating blood circulation" in traditional Chinese medicine( TCM),with distinct characteristics of TCM in clinical application. Qilong Capsules indication on package insert is ischemic stroke( cerebral infarction),which is a complex disease and has many pathological links. The treatment principles and methods at various stages are different. Inappropriate time of intervention,dosage and course of treatment make it difficult to give full play to the efficacy,but also cause adverse reactions,such as bleeding. In order to promote the rational use of Qilong Capsules,the project team invited frontline clinical experts,pharmaceutical experts and methodologist of evidence-based medicine around China to develop the consensus. The consensus is based on a combination of clinical research evidence and expert experi-ence to give recommendations for clinical problems with evidence support and expert consensus suggestions for clinical problems without evidence support. The consensus recommends the indication,timing of intervention,dosage,course of treatment,combined medication and contraindications of Qilong Capsules in clinical application,and introduced its safety characteristics,in order to guide clinical medical workers( involving Chinese medicine,Western medicine,combining traditional Chinese and Western medicine) to use Qilong Capsules reasonably in the treatment of cerebral infarction.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Danshen Chuanxiongqin Injection is a commonly used medicine in cerebral infarction and coronary heart disease,which is recommended by many disease guidelines/consensus for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. However,there are irrational drug using in clinic,which affects the efficacy and brings safety risks. Based on clinical research evidence and expert experience,recommendations/consensus suggestion are determined through the nominal group method. The expert consensus recommends the indications,intervention time for treatment,route of drug administration,usage and dosage,course of treatment and introduces the safety in clinical application,which could provide reference for clinical use of Danshen Chuanxiongqin Injection.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    碟脉灵~®苦碟子注射液(DKI)广泛应用于脑梗死的治疗,冠心病和心绞痛。长期临床应用及相关研究证据表明,DKI在改善心脑血管疾病临床症状方面具有良好的疗效。然而,这种注射尚未纳入任何临床实践指南.近年来,在临床实践中发现DKI的使用是错误的。因此,邀请全国心脑血管疾病领域的临床专家编写本专家共识,以指导临床医生。分级系统用于根据退化因素根据不同的结果对证据质量进行分级。然后通过名义组方法形成建议或共识建议。专家共识的形成主要考虑六个因素:证据质量、经济,功效,不良反应,患者的可接受性和其他。基于这六个方面,如果证据充分,形成有证据支持的“建议”,并采用分级网格投票规则。如果证据不足,将形成“共识建议”,使用多数投票规则。在这个共识中,临床适应症,功效,DKI的安全证据和相关初步数据以简洁明了的格式进行了系统全面的总结,为DKI的临床应用提供有价值的参考。该共识已获得中国中药协会批准,编号为GS/CACM202-2019。
    Diemailing~® Kudiezi Injection( DKI) is widely used in the treatment of cerebral infarction,coronary heart disease and angina pectoris. Long-term clinical application and related research evidence showed that DKI has a good effect in improving the clinical symptoms of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. However,this injection has not been included in any clinical practice guideline. It has been found that the use of DKI is in wrong way in clinical practice in recent years. Therefore,clinical experts from the field of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases nationwide are invited to compile this expert consensus in order to guide clinicians.GRADE system is used to grade the quality of evidence according to different outcomes according to degrading factors. Then it forms the recommendation or consensus suggestion through the nominal group method. The formation of expert consensus mainly considers six factors: quality of evidence,economy,efficacy,adverse reactions,patient acceptability and others. Based on these six aspects,if the evidence is sufficient,a \" recommendation\" supported by evidence is formed,and GRADE grid voting rule is adopted. If the evidence is insufficient,a \" consensus suggestions\" will be formed,using the majority voting rule. In this consensus,the clinical indications,efficacy,safety evidences and related preliminary data of DKI were systematically and comprehensively summarized in a concise and clear format,which could provide valuable reference for the clinical use of DKI. This consensus has been approved by China association of Chinese medicine which is numbered GS/CACM 202-2019.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Endovascular recanalization therapy (ERT) has been a standard of care for patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large artery occlusion (LAO) within 6 hours after onset, since five landmark ERT trials conducted by 2015 demonstrated its clinical benefit. Recently, two randomized clinical trials demonstrated that ERT, even in the late time window of up to 16 hours or 24 hours after last known normal time, improved the outcome of patients who had a target mismatch, defined as either clinical-core mismatch or perfusion-core mismatch, which prompted the update of national guidelines in several countries. Accordingly, to provide evidence-based and up-to-date recommendations for ERT in patients with acute LAO in Korea, the Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee of the Korean Stroke Society decided to revise the previous Korean Clinical Practice Guidelines of Stroke for ERT. For this update, the members of the writing group were appointed by the Korean Stroke Society and the Korean Society of Interventional Neuroradiology. After thoroughly reviewing the updated evidence from two recent trials and relevant literature, the writing members revised recommendations, for which formal consensus was achieved by convening an expert panel composed of 45 experts from the participating academic societies. The current guidelines are intended to help healthcare providers, patients, and their caregivers make well-informed decisions and to improve the quality of care regarding ERT. The ultimate decision for ERT in a particular patient must be made in light of circumstances specific to that patient.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Guideline
    Endovascular recanalization therapy (ERT) has been a standard of care for patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large artery occlusion (LAO) within 6 hours after onset, since five landmark ERT trials conducted by 2015 demonstrated its clinical benefit. Recently, two randomized clinical trials demonstrated that ERT, even in the late time window of up to 16 hours or 24 hours after last known normal time, improved the outcome of patients who had a target mismatch, defined as either clinical-core mismatch or perfusion-core mismatch, which prompted the update of national guidelines in several countries. Accordingly, to provide evidence-based and up-to-date recommendations for ERT in patients with acute LAO in Korea, the Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee of the Korean Stroke Society decided to revise the previous Korean Clinical Practice Guidelines of Stroke for ERT. For this update, the members of the writing group were appointed by the Korean Stroke Society and the Korean Society of Interventional Neuroradiology. After thoroughly reviewing the updated evidence from two recent trials and relevant literature, the writing members revised recommendations, for which formal consensus was achieved by convening an expert panel composed of 45 experts from the participating academic societies. The current guidelines are intended to help healthcare providers, patients, and their caregivers make well-informed decisions and to improve the quality of care regarding ERT. The ultimate decision for ERT in a particular patient must be made in light of circumstances specific to that patient.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Neonatal arterial ischemic stroke (NAIS) is a rare event that occurs in approximately one in 5000 term or close-to-term infants. Most affected infants will present with seizures. Although a well-recognized clinical entity, many questions remain regarding diagnosis, risk factors, treatment, and follow-up modalities. In the absence of a known pathophysiological mechanism and lack of evidence-based guidelines, only supportive care is currently provided. To address these issues, a French national committee set up by the French Neonatal Society (Société française de néonatologie) and the national referral center (Centre national de référence) for arterial ischemic stroke in children drew up guidelines based on an HAS (Haute Autorité de santé [HAS]; French national authority for health) methodology. The main findings and recommendations established by the study group are: (1) among the risk factors, male sex, primiparity, caesarean section, perinatal hypoxia, and fetal/neonatal infection (mainly bacterial meningitis) seem to be the most frequent. As for guidelines, the study group recommends the following: (1) the transfer of neonates with suspected NAIS to a neonatal intensive care unit with available equipment to establish a reliable diagnosis with MRI imaging and neurophysiological monitoring, preferably by continuous video EEG; (2) acute treatment of suspected infection or other life-threatening processes should be addressed immediately by the primary medical team. Persistent seizures should be treated with a loading dose of phenobarbital 20mg/kg i.v.; (3) MRI of the brain is considered optimal for the diagnosis of NAIS. Diffusion-weighted imaging with apparent diffusion coefficient is considered the most sensitive measure for identifying infarct in the neonatal brain. The location and extent of the lesions are best assessed between 2 and 4 days after the onset of stroke; (4) routine testing for thrombophilia (AT, PC PS deficiency, FV Leiden or FII20210A) or for detecting other biological risk factors such as antiphospholipid antibodies, high FVIII, homocysteinemia, the Lp(a) test, the MTHFR thermolabile variant should not be considered in neonates with NAIS. Testing for FV Leiden can be performed only in case of a documented family history of venous thromboembolic disease. Testing neonates for the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies should be considered only in case of clinical events arguing in favor of antiphospholipid syndrome in the mother; (5) unlike childhood arterial ischemic stroke, NAIS has a low 5-year recurrence rate (approximately 1 %), except in those children with congenital heart disease or multiple genetic thrombophilia. Therefore, initiation of anticoagulation or antithrombotic agents, including heparin products, is not recommended in the newborn without identifiable risk factors; (6) the study group recommends that in case of delayed motor milestones or early handedness, multidisciplinary rehabilitation is recommended as early as possible. Newborns should have physical therapy evaluation and ongoing outpatient follow-up. Given the risk of later-onset cognitive, language, and behavioral disabilities, neuropsychological testing in preschool and at school age is highly recommended.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号