UNASSIGNED: Cervical cerclage (CC) represents one of the few effective measures currently available for the prevention of preterm delivery caused by cervical insufficiency, thus contributing in the reduction of neonatal morbidity and mortality rates.
UNASSIGNED: The aim of this study was to review and compare the most recently published major guidelines on the indications, contraindications, techniques, and timing of placing and removal of CC.
UNASSIGNED: A descriptive review of guidelines from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG), the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC), and the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) on CC was carried out.
UNASSIGNED: There is a consensus among the reviewed guidelines regarding the recommended techniques, the indications for rescue CC, the contraindications, as well as the optimal timing of CC placement and removal. All medical societies also agree that ultrasound-indicated CC is justified in women with history of prior spontaneous PTD or mid-trimester miscarriage and a short cervical length detected on ultrasound. In addition, after CC, serial sonographic measurement of the cervical length, bed rest, and routine use of antibiotics, tocolysis, and progesterone are unanimously discouraged. In case of established preterm labor, CC should be removed, according to ACOG, RCOG, and SOGC. Furthermore, RCOG and SOGC agree on the prerequisites that should be met before attempting CC. These 2 guidelines along with FIGO recommend history-indicated CC for women with 3 or more previous preterm deliveries and/or second trimester pregnancy miscarriages, whereas the ACOG suggests the use of CC in singleton pregnancies with 1 or more previous second trimester miscarriages related to painless cervical dilation or prior CC due to painless cervical dilation in the second trimester. The role of amniocentesis in ruling out intra-amniotic infection before rescue CC remains a matter of debate.
UNASSIGNED: Cervical cerclage is an obstetric intervention used to prevent miscarriage and preterm delivery in women considered as high-risk for these common pregnancy complications. The development of universal international practice protocols for the placement of CC seems of paramount importance and will hopefully improve the outcomes of such pregnancies.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the adherence of German perinatal specialist units and those of basic obstetric care to the national guideline we compared data from a nation-wide survey on the practice of maintenance tocolysis, tocolysis in preterm premature rupture of membranes and in the perioperative setting of cervical cerclage, and bedrest during and after tocolysis with recommendations from the current German Guideline 015/025 \"Prevention and Treatment of Preterm Birth\".
METHODS: A total of 632 obstetric clinics in Germany were approached and received a link to an online questionnaire. Data were descriptively analyzed by performing measures of frequency. To compare two or more groups Fisher\'s exact test was used.
RESULTS: The response rate was 19%; 23 (19.2%) of respondents did not perform maintenance tocolysis, while 97 (80.8%) conducted maintenance tocolysis; 30 (25.0%) of obstetric units performed cervical cerclage without tocolysis and 90 (75.0%) combined cervical cerclage with tocolysis; 11 (9.2%) of respondents did not use tocolytics in patients with preterm premature rupture of membranes, while 109 (90.8%) conducted tocolysis in these patients; 69 (57.5%) of obstetric units did not recommend bed rest during tocolysis, whereas 51 (42.5%) favored bedrest. Perinatal care centers of basic obstetric care recommend bed arrest during tocolysis statistically significant more often to their patients than those of higher perinatal care levels (53.6 vs. 32.8%, p=0.0269).
CONCLUSIONS: The results of our survey are in accordance to others from different countries and reveal considerable discrepancies between evidence-based guideline recommendations and daily clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate guidelines on preterm birth, analyze decision-criteria, and to identify consensus and discrepancies among these guidelines.
METHODS: Objective consensus analysis of guidelines.
METHODS: Ten international guidelines on preterm birth.
METHODS: Relevant decision criteria were singleton vs. twin pregnancy, history, cervical length, and cervical surgery / trauma or Mullerian anomaly. Eight treatment recommendations were extracted. For each decision-making criteria the most commonly recommended treatment was identified, and the level of consensus was evaluated.
METHODS: Consensus and Discrepancies among recommendations.
RESULTS: In a case of singleton pregnancies with no history of preterm birth and shortened cervix, most guidelines recommend progesterone. In singleton pregnancies with a positive history and shortened cervix, all guidelines recommend a cerclage as an option, alternative or conjunct to progesterone. The majority of the guidelines advise against treatment in twin pregnancies.
CONCLUSIONS: A shortened cervix and a history of preterm birth are relevant in singleton pregnancies. In twins, most guidelines recommend no active treatment. Among international guidelines a shortened cervix and a history of preterm birth are relevant in singleton pregnancies. With no history of preterm birth and with a shortened cervix most guidelines recommend progesterone treatment.

暂无摘要。

OBJECTIVE: Cerclage operation is one of the most common obstetric controversies. The aim of this study was to compare the perinatal outcomes and placental inflammation of cerclage performed adherent and non-adherent to international guidelines.
METHODS: This study included all consecutive women with singleton deliveries who underwent cerclage. According to the current American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) guideline, we designated our study population into two groups: the adherent-to-guideline and non-adherent groups. Each group was categorized into two groups according to cervical length (CL) at the time of cerclage (<2.0 cm vs. ≥2.0 cm). We evaluated the reasons for cerclage, maternal characteristics, perioperative variables, pregnancy and neonatal outcomes, and placental inflammatory pathology according to the criteria proposed by the Society of Pediatric Pathology.
RESULTS: Among 310 women with cerclage, we excluded patients (n = 21) with indicated preterm delivery (PTD), major fetal anomaly, fetal death in-utero, and missing information for reason of cerclage. We also excluded patients who underwent physical examination-indicated cerclage (n = 53) and with missing information of CL at the time of cerclage (n = 52). A total of 184 women were eventually analyzed. In women with CL < 2.0 cm, the non-adherent group showed similar PTD (<28 weeks, <34 weeks) and neonatal composite morbidity rates compared to the adherent-to-guideline group. However, in women with CL ≥ 2.0 cm, the non-adherent group manifested significantly higher PTD (<28 weeks; 16.7% vs. 4.4%, p = 0.04, <34 weeks; 23.8% vs. 5.8%, p = 0.006) and neonatal composite morbidity (20.5% vs. 5.9%, p = 0.028) rates than the adherent-to-guideline group despite similar perioperative variables and lower PTD history rates. The non-adherent group with CL ≥ 2 cm at the time of cerclage was also associated with severe histologic chorioamnionitis (p = 0.033).
CONCLUSIONS: Cerclage performed beyond the current guidelines in pregnant women with CL ≥ 2.0 cm may confer an additional risk of perinatal complications in association with severe placental inflammation.

• To assess the association between sonography-derived cervical length measurement and preterm birth. • To describe the various techniques to measure cervical length using sonography. • To review the natural history of the short cervix. • To review the clinical uses, predictive ability, and utility of sonography-measured short cervix.
Reduction in rates of prematurity and/or better identification of those at risk, as well as possible prevention of unnecessary interventions.
Clinicians involved in the obstetrical management or cervical imaging of patients at increased risk of a short cervix.
Women at increased risk of a short cervix or at risk of preterm birth.
Literature published up to June 2019 was retrieved through searches of PubMed and the Cochrane Library using appropriate controlled vocabulary and key words (preterm labour, ultrasound, cervix, cervical insufficiency, transvaginal, transperineal, cervical length, fibronectin). Results were restricted to general and systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, controlled clinical trials, and observational studies. There were no date or language restrictions. Grey (unpublished) literature was identified through searching the websites of health technology assessment agencies, clinical practice guideline collections, clinical trial registries, and national and international medical specialty societies.
The evidence and this guideline were reviewed by the Diagnostic Imaging Committee of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada, and the recommendations were made and graded according to the rankings of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (Online Appendix Table A1).
Preterm birth is a leading cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality. Use of the sonographic technique reviewed in this guideline may help identify women at risk of preterm birth and, in some circumstances, lead to interventions that may reduce the rate of preterm birth. SUMMARY STATEMENTS (CANADIAN TASK FORCE ON PREVENTIVE HEALTH CARE GRADING IN PARENTHESES): RECOMMENDATIONS (CANADIAN TASK FORCE ON PREVENTIVE HEALTH CARE GRADING IN PARENTHESES).

UNASSIGNED: Preterm birth is a major contributor to perinatal morbidity and mortality. The most common intervention performed to improve perinatal outcomes for a woman experiencing cervical dilation in the second trimester without signs or symptoms of preterm labor is the cerclage.
UNASSIGNED: We sought to review and compare available national guidelines on cerclage use.
UNASSIGNED: We performed a descriptive review of 3 national guidelines on cerclage: The American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Practice Bulletin on \"Cerclage for the Management of Cervical Insufficiency,\" Green-top Guideline from the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists entitled \"Cervical Cerclage,\" and the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada Clinical Practice Bulletin entitled \"Cervical Insufficiency and Cervical Cerclage.\" Guidelines were compared, and the following aspects of cerclage use for prevention of preterm delivery were summarized: indications and contraindications, risk factors for cervical insufficiency, perioperative considerations, and timing of removal. Recommendations and strength of evidence were reviewed based on each guideline\'s method of reporting. The references were compared with regard to the total number of randomized control trials, Cochrane Reviews, and systematic reviews/meta-analyses cited.
UNASSIGNED: The variations highlighted in the guidelines reflect the heterogeneity of the literature contributing to guidelines and the challenges of diagnosing and managing cervical insufficiency.
UNASSIGNED: A cohesive international guideline may improve safety and quality and optimize patient outcomes.
UNASSIGNED: Obstetricians and gynecologists, family physicians.
UNASSIGNED: After completing this activity, the learner should be better able to outline variations in indications and contraindications for cervical cerclage use by international guideline, identify variation in perioperative considerations for cervical cerclage use by international guideline, and recognize variation in timing of removal by international guideline.

暂无摘要。