{Reference Type}: Case Reports {Title}: Progesterone, cervical cerclage or cervical pessary to prevent preterm birth: a decision-making analysis of international guidelines. {Author}: Putora K;Hornung R;Kinkel J;Fischer T;Putora PM; {Journal}: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth {Volume}: 22 {Issue}: 1 {Year}: Apr 2022 23 {Factor}: 3.105 {DOI}: 10.1186/s12884-022-04584-4 {Abstract}: OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate guidelines on preterm birth, analyze decision-criteria, and to identify consensus and discrepancies among these guidelines.
METHODS: Objective consensus analysis of guidelines.
METHODS: Ten international guidelines on preterm birth.
METHODS: Relevant decision criteria were singleton vs. twin pregnancy, history, cervical length, and cervical surgery / trauma or Mullerian anomaly. Eight treatment recommendations were extracted. For each decision-making criteria the most commonly recommended treatment was identified, and the level of consensus was evaluated.
METHODS: Consensus and Discrepancies among recommendations.
RESULTS: In a case of singleton pregnancies with no history of preterm birth and shortened cervix, most guidelines recommend progesterone. In singleton pregnancies with a positive history and shortened cervix, all guidelines recommend a cerclage as an option, alternative or conjunct to progesterone. The majority of the guidelines advise against treatment in twin pregnancies.
CONCLUSIONS: A shortened cervix and a history of preterm birth are relevant in singleton pregnancies. In twins, most guidelines recommend no active treatment. Among international guidelines a shortened cervix and a history of preterm birth are relevant in singleton pregnancies. With no history of preterm birth and with a shortened cervix most guidelines recommend progesterone treatment.