暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: Social media have been increasingly adopted by health agencies to disseminate information, interact with the public, and understand public opinion. Among them, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is one of the first US government health agencies to adopt social media during health emergencies and crisis. It had been active on Twitter during the 2016 Zika epidemic that caused 5168 domestic noncongenital cases in the United States.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to quantify the temporal variabilities in CDC\'s tweeting activities throughout the Zika epidemic, public engagement defined as retweeting and replying, and Zika case counts. It then compares the patterns of these 3 datasets to identify possible discrepancy among domestic Zika case counts, CDC\'s response on Twitter, and public engagement in this topic.
METHODS: All of the CDC-initiated tweets published in 2016 with corresponding retweets and replies were collected from 67 CDC-associated Twitter accounts. Both univariate and multivariate time series analyses were performed in each quarter of 2016 for domestic Zika case counts, CDC tweeting activities, and public engagement in the CDC-initiated tweets.
RESULTS: CDC sent out >84.0% (5130/6104) of its Zika tweets in the first quarter of 2016 when Zika case counts were low in the 50 US states and territories (only 560/5168, 10.8% cases and 662/38,885, 1.70% cases, respectively). While Zika case counts increased dramatically in the second and third quarters, CDC efforts on Twitter substantially decreased. The time series of public engagement in the CDC-initiated tweets generally differed among quarters and from that of original CDC tweets based on autoregressive integrated moving average model results. Both original CDC tweets and public engagement had the highest mutual information with Zika case counts in the second quarter. Furthermore, public engagement in the original CDC tweets was substantially correlated with and preceded actual Zika case counts.
CONCLUSIONS: Considerable discrepancies existed among CDC\'s original tweets regarding Zika, public engagement in these tweets, and actual Zika epidemic. The patterns of these discrepancies also varied between different quarters in 2016. CDC was much more active in the early warning of Zika, especially in the first quarter of 2016. Public engagement in CDC\'s original tweets served as a more prominent predictor of actual Zika epidemic than the number of CDC\'s original tweets later in the year.

We evaluated performance of 5 case definitions for Zika virus disease surveillance in a human cohort during an outbreak in Singapore, August 26-September 5, 2016. Because laboratory tests are largely inaccessible, use of case definitions that include rash as a required clinical feature are useful in identifying this disease.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the epidemiology and characteristics and to identify modifiable risk factors for community-associated (CA) MRSA colonisation in a region with high prevalence. A large patient population (n=2280) from two tertiary care centres in Athens (Greece) was evaluated. Demographics and potential risk factors for CA-MRSA colonisation were recorded prospectively. Presence of the Panton-Valentine Leukocidin (PVL) toxin and mecA gene was determined in all MRSA isolates. Two definitions for CA-MRSA were applied. Univariate and multivariate analyses to identify predictors of previously unknown CA-MRSA colonisation were performed. In total, 120 (5.3%) MRSA carriers were identified; in 67 the isolates were classified as CA-MRSA using criteria based on the CDC definition, compared with 35 based on a definition including PVL toxin positivity. Factors significantly associated with previously unknown CA-MRSA carriage (CDC definition) included being a child or adolescent (OR=3.6, 95% CI 1.5-8.6), belonging to the family of an index case (OR=2.4, 95% CI 1.2-4.8), and presence of any co-morbidity (OR=1.7, 95% CI 1.04-2.8) or chronic skin disease (OR=3.6, 95% CI=2.2-6.1). In multivariate analysis, presence of any co-morbidity was the only significant predictor (OR=4.9, 95% CI 1.07-22.5; P=0.04). No easily modifiable risk factor for previously unknown CA-MRSA colonisation was identified. The CDC-based epidemiological definition for CA-MRSA appears to be more sensitive in detection of CA-MRSA colonisation than a purely molecular definition based on presence of the PVL gene.

OBJECTIVE: Sexually transmitted infectious (STI) colitis often raises concern for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). In this study, we compare histologic features of IBD with STI colitis caused by syphilis and lymphogranuloma venereum.
METHODS: The STI colitis group included 10 unique colorectal biopsy specimens in patients with clinically confirmed syphilis and/or lymphogranuloma venereum. The STI biopsy specimens were compared with patients matched for age, sex, and site with Crohn disease (n = 10) or ulcerative colitis (n = 10). All IBD controls had an established history of IBD (up to 276 months of follow-up, mean follow-up = 102 months).
RESULTS: Discriminating features (P < .05) of STI colitis included its exclusive identification in human immunodeficiency virus-positive men who have sex with men, anal pain, and anal discharge. STI colitis contained the triad of (1) minimal active chronic crypt centric damage, (2) a lack of mucosal eosinophilia, and (3) submucosal plasma cells, endothelial swelling, and perivascular plasma cells. Nondiscriminating features (P > .05) included rectal bleeding, endoscopic appearance, skip lesions, ulcerations, aphthoid lesions, granulomata, foreign body giant cells, neural hyperplasia, fibrosis, and lymphoid aggregates.
CONCLUSIONS: While STI colitis shares many overlapping features with IBD, histologic and clinical discriminating features may be helpful when confronted with that differential diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: Due to the commitment by the Government of Kenya (GoK) and international donors to address HIV/AIDS, Kenya has some of Africa\'s most developed health infrastructure for tackling the crisis. Despite this commitment, significant gaps exist in the national HIV/AIDS monitoring and evaluation (M&E) system. To identify these gaps and opportunities for improvement, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention funded the Strengthening HIV Strategic Information in Kenya project, which conducted an organizational HIV M&E capacity rapid needs assessment (RNA).
METHODS: The project included an in-depth desk review of national documents, policies, tools, and international best practices. National, regional, and district officials from government agencies, development partners, and implementing partners participated in key informant interviews and focus group discussions. Given the large number of regions and districts, purposive sampling was used to select 16 facilities in 8 districts across 2 regions based on the general quality of the reported HIV data and the number of partners supporting the regions.
RESULTS: RNA findings revealed tremendous improvements at the national level and in the various subsystems that contribute to the overall HIV strategic information. There also were significant gaps, including in a lack of M&E guidelines, parallel reporting systems, feedback given to subnational levels, and data use and general data management and use capacity at subnational levels.
CONCLUSIONS: An urgent need exists for the development of national M&E guidelines and a comprehensive training curriculum. To ensure success further, capacity building for subnational levels should be conducted and feedback channels to subnational staff should be established and maintained.

In 1994, a magazine article, a newspaper article, and a segment of the television newsmagazine 60 Minutes presented information that cast doubt on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention\'s conclusion that a dentist in Florida had infected six of his patients with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). These reports were based on previously unavailable documentary evidence, which suggested that the infected patients had unreported or undetected risk factors for HIV infection and that the molecular analyses used to determine that the dentist and his patients had the same strains of HIV had potentially serious flaws. A recent article in this journal sought to dismiss the relevance of this information in the eyes of the scientific community. That report, however, failed to respond directly to many key pieces of evidence, and it offered no rebuttal beyond personal invective and a reassertion of previously published material. Although scientists and clinicians should not rely solely on media reports when drawing conclusions about this complex and controversial case, they deserve a chance to consider and reflect on this material in a meaningful way.