Bilateral scaphoid fractures are rare lesions, warranting a review to synthesize current knowledge, identify gaps, and suggest research directions. Two authors, adhering to PRISMA guidelines, in January 2024 identified 16 case reports (1976-2023). Data extraction included demographics, injury mechanisms, associated injuries, fracture sites, treatments, and outcomes. Among 121 initial outcomes, 16 articles met the criteria, predominantly affecting young people (93.75% males, mean age 22 years). High-energy traumas (75%) often caused associated wrist injuries (68.75%). Most fractures required surgical intervention (68.75%), primarily headless compression screws. Bilateral scaphoid fractures, which are rare but associated with high-energy traumas, commonly involve wrist injuries. Surgical management is often necessary, yielding better outcomes with fewer complications. Further research is essential to understand the epidemiology, optimal management, and long-term results. Early diagnosis and appropriate treatment are crucial for preventing complications and ensuring favorable patient outcomes.

BACKGROUND: In wrist salvage, proximal row carpectomy (PRC) has increasingly shown superior outcomes to four-corner fusion (4CF). Furthermore, PRC with resurfacing capitate pyrocarbon implants (PRC + RCPIs) provides a treatment option that may allow patients to avoid 4CF or wrist arthrodesis and help restore natural joint function and distribute loads evenly across the implant, though RCPI has yet to be evaluated on a large scale. We aimed to compare outcomes between PRC and PRC + RCPI for the treatment of scapholunate advanced collapse (SLAC) and scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse (SNAC) wrists.
METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane were queried for articles on PRC and PRC + RCPI performed for SLAC and SNAC wrist with minimum 12-month follow-up. Primary outcomes included wrist range of motion (ROM), grip strength, and outcome scores including Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) and QuickDASH scores, Patient-Rated Wrist and Hand Evaluation (PRWHE), and visual analog scale pain scores.
RESULTS: Twenty-two studies reporting on 1,804 wrists were included (1,718 PRC alone, 86 PRC + RCPI). PRC + RCPI was associated with greater postoperative radial deviation, but poorer flexion. PRC + RCPI also had significantly lower postoperative QuickDASH (less disability and symptoms) and postoperative PRWHE (lower pain and disability) scores and an improvement in PRWHE compared with PRC. There was no significant difference in grip strength.
CONCLUSIONS: PRC + RCPI demonstrated similar postoperative ROM to PRC alone. While PRC + RCPI was associated with more favorable outcome scores, further research is needed to confirm these findings and assess the incidence and profile of complications related to RCPIs.
METHODS: Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

OBJECTIVE: Although proximal row carpectomy (PRC) has increasingly been shown to have superior features to four-corner fusion (4CF), individual surgeons may remain convinced of the superiority of one procedure based on personal experience and individual biases. Hence, we sought to perform an updated meta-analysis with some of the largest studies to date to compare outcomes and complications between these procedures in the treatment of scapholunate advanced collapse and scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse wrists.
METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane were queried for articles on PRC and 4CF performed for scapholunate advanced collapse and scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse wrist. Primary outcomes included wrist range of motion; grip strength; outcome measures, including Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand and Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores, Patient-Rated Wrist and Hand Evaluation, and visual analog scale pain scores; and surgical complications.
RESULTS: Sixty-one studies reported on 3,174 wrists, of which 54% were treated with PRC and 46% were treated with 4CF. The weighted mean follow-up was 61 months (range, 12-216 months). Meta-analysis comparing PRC and 4CF demonstrated that PRC had significantly greater postoperative extension; ulnar deviation; postoperative improvement in extension, flexion, ulnar deviation; and visual analog scale score. No comparisons showed significant differences in grip strength. The percentage of wrists requiring arthrodesis was 5.2% for PRC and 11% for 4CF. There was an 8.9% (57/640 wrists) 4CF nonunion rate and 2.2% (17/789) hardware removal rate after 4CF.
CONCLUSIONS: In the treatment of scapholunate advanced collapse and scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse wrists, PRC results in better outcomes and a lower complication rate compared to 4CF.
METHODS: Therapeutic IV.

BACKGROUND: dislocations of carpal bones without associated fractures are considered a rare injury, the most common mechanism of injury being axial loading with wrist in extension plus ulnar deviation. The literature reports a wide variety of complex carpal injuries, even so, it is possible to identify previously undescribed injuries.
OBJECTIVE: to present an atypical case of a patient with an injury to the midcarpal stabilizing mechanism and the stabilizing mechanism of the proximal row of the wrist following trauma to the hand that required carpectomy as definitive surgical treatment.
METHODS: a 48 year old male patient is presented who is admitted to our hospital unit after presenting injury to the left hand after being run over by a motor vehicle, with axial load mechanism, presenting deformity in the left thoracic extremity, fracture of the proximal metaphysis of the second phalanx of the third finger as well as dislocation of the proximal interphalangeal joint, with traumatic amputation of the second phalanx of the fourth finger plus extensor injury in zone V of the fifth finger with loss of skin coverage of the fourth and fifth finger, attending our hospital unit 24 hours after the injury.
CONCLUSIONS: carpal bone dislocations are an orthopedic emergency, with 20% going unnoticed in trauma centers. Early closed reduction is the initial treatment to avoid severe complications, however, surgical treatment is the gold standard for fixation. Carpectomy is considered a mostly adequate sequelae management treatment, however it is well accepted for complex injuries to the wrist stabilization mechanisms, as it can be performed in a short surgical time and early rehabilitation can be initiated and functional ranges of motion can be achieved with low sequelae.
UNASSIGNED: las luxaciones de los huesos del carpo sin presentar fracturas asociadas se considera una lesión infrecuente; el mecanismo de lesión más común es la carga axial con muñeca en extensión más desviación cubital. La literatura reporta una gran variedad de lesiones complejas del carpo; aun así, es posible identificar lesiones no descritas previamente.
OBJECTIVE: presentar caso atípico de paciente con lesión a nivel del mecanismo estabilizador medio-carpiana y estabilizador de la fila proximal de la muñeca posterior a traumatismo en mano que requirió carpectomía como tratamiento quirúrgico definitivo.
UNASSIGNED: paciente masculino de 48 años de edad, quien ingresa a nuestra unidad hospitalaria tras sufrir lesión en mano izquierda posterior a ser arrollado por vehículo automotor, con mecanismo de carga axial, presentando en extremidad torácica izquierda deformidad hacia volar, fractura de metáfisis proximal de segunda falange del tercer dedo así como luxación de articulación interfalángica proximal, con amputación traumática de segunda falange del cuarto dedo más lesión extensora en zona V del quinto dedo con pérdida de cobertura cutánea del cuarto y quinto dedos. Acude a nuestra unidad hospitalaria 24 horas después de la lesión.
CONCLUSIONS: las luxaciones en huesos del carpo es una urgencia ortopédica, pasando desapercibidas en 20% en centros de traumatología. La reducción cerrada temprana es el tratamiento inicial para evitar complicaciones severas; sin embargo, el tratamiento quirúrgico es el estándar de oro para la fijación de las mismas. La carpectomía se considera un tratamiento mayoritariamente para el manejo adecuado de secuelas; sin embargo, es bien aceptado para las lesiones complejas que se presentan en los mecanismos estabilizadores de la muñeca, dado a que se puede realizar en un tiempo quirúrgico y se puede iniciar una rehabilitación temprana, con lo que se pueden alcanzar rangos de movimientos funcionales y con bajo grado de secuelas.

Scaphoid fractures are a common wrist injury accounting for 2-7% of all adult fractures. Nonunion is described in 5-12% of cases leading to osteoarthritis. Several classifications have been developed focused on this pathology and its complication. We present a case of a 28 years old male patient with a scaphoid fracture and nonunion who spontaneously consolidates without treatment. We performed a literature review to recognize this pathology, its common evolution and possible treatment options.
Las fracturas de escafoides son una lesión frecuente de la muñeca y representan de 2-7% de todas las fracturas en adultos. La no unión se describe en 5-12% de los casos y conduce a la osteoartritis. Se han desarrollado varias clasificaciones centradas en esta patología y su complicación. Presentamos el caso de un paciente varón de 28 años con fractura y no unión de escafoides que consolida espontáneamente sin tratamiento. Realizamos una revisión bibliográfica para reconocer esta patología, su evolución habitual y las posibles opciones de tratamiento.

OBJECTIVE: Several limited midcarpal arthrodeses have been used in the treatment of midcarpal osteoarthritis as part of scapholunate advanced collapse and scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse. There is no consensus on whether two-carpal arthrodesis (2CA), three-carpal arthrodesis (3CA), bicolumnar arthrodesis, or four-carpal arthrodesis (FCA) results in the best outcomes. The objective of this study was to determine whether there is a difference in outcomes in patients undergoing FCA, 3CA, 2CA, or bicolumnar arthrodesis for midcarpal osteoarthritis.
METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed in multiple databases following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies reporting the four surgical techniques were included. The primary outcomes were postoperative visual analog scale pain score, the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score, and the Mayo Wrist Score. The secondary outcomes were active range of motion, grip strength, and reported complications.
RESULTS: Of 2,270 eligible studies, 80 articles were selected, including a total of 2,166 wrists. The visual analog scale pain scores for both the 2CA and FCA groups reached an adequate pain reduction based on the Patient Acceptable Symptom Scale. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score was also comparable between these two groups. The 2CA group also showed a significantly better active range of motion than the FCA group for both flexion-extension and radioulnar deviation arc. The incidence of nonunion was 6.9% in the FCA group compared with 10.0% in the 2CA group.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the 2CA procedure has a theoretical advantage over the FCA method, the analysis of data showed that generally, these techniques have similar outcomes and complications. Therefore, both (2CA and FCA) are good options for midcarpal osteoarthritis in scapholunate advanced collapse and scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse wrists.
METHODS: Therapeutic IV.

A systematic literature review was performed on 84 articles from 2000 to 2020 on proximal row carpectomy (PRC) or four-corner arthrodesis (FCA) in patients with posttraumatic wrist osteoarthritis. Qualitative assessment was conducted on 14 articles. Pain, range of motion (ROM), grip strength and complications were analyzed using weighted average means. Meta-analysis with a random effects model was performed for the flexion-extension arc and grip strength. A total of 1,066 PRCs and 2,771 FCAs were analyzed, with a mean follow-up of 9 and 7 years respectively. Mean flexion after PRC and FCA respectively was 36.2 ° and 31.1 °, mean extension 41.4 ° and 32.4 °, and mean grip strength 26.4 kg and 27.5 kg. PRC had a larger flexion-extension arc than FCA, with a standard mean difference (SMD) of 0.41 (range, 0.02-0.81). No significant difference was found for grip strength. Osteoarthritis occurred in 42.2% of PRC cases, independently of capitate shape. Conversion to wrist arthrodesis was performed in 10.1% of failed PRCs. Revision was chosen in 4.7% of FCAs and conversion to wrist arthrodesis in 4.6%. We conclude that the functional results of both techniques are similar, but prefer PRC to FCA because of the lower complications rate.

Intercarpal arthrodesis is a well-established option to treat various disorders of the carpus, such as localized osteoarthritis, carpal instability, and Kienböck\'s disease. This is a non-conservative procedure aimed at obtaining a stable and congruent interface between the radius and the proximal carpal row, which restores wrist function by minimizing pain and restoring grip strength. These procedures generally yield good predictable results that are maintained over time. However, all intracarpal arthrodesis procedures cause a loss of wrist range of motion. To optimize outcomes and minimize complications, especially nonunion, this surgery may require a learning curve. A precise surgical technique for preparing the bone surfaces, bringing enough bone graft, and using reliable fixation is essential. Since the late 1960s, several intracarpal arthrodesis procedures have been described. Commonly used fusions target the scaphotrapeziotrapezoid, scaphocapitate, four corners, capitolunate or capitohamatolunate regions. Lesser used fusions focus on specific lesions such as the scapholunate, scapholunocapitate, lunotriquetral and triquetrohamate. Here, we propose a systematic review of the various types of intercarpal arthrodesis procedures described in the literature. After having described each arthrodesis, we specify their indications, the variations of the surgical techniques, and then present an overview of the results and complications. Finally, we discuss how these surgeries affect wrist biomechanics. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Radiocarpal fractures and dislocations are rarely described in the literature. However, the consequences at the functional level are severe, with the loss of almost half of the articular amplitude. The most widespread classification is that of Dumontier, which divides the injury into two categories according to the presence or absence of a fracture. Currently, no classification considers fracture-dislocations in a global and multi-tissue manner; therefore, no therapeutic strategy has been reported.
We conducted an exhaustive bibliographic search for cohort or case report articles concerning radiocarpal fracture-dislocations published between 1990 and the present. Only descriptions of the injury were identified (noting the type of fracture, direction of displacement and carpal injuries).
In all, data were collected from 14 retrospective series and 16 case reports involving 218 patients. Thirty-five and 183 cases involved anterior and posterior displacement, respectively. A fracture of the distal radius was found in 183 cases and 35 cases had a dislocation only, with no significant fracture. Among the posterior displacements, 44 isolated styloid fractures, 62 styloid and posterior marginal fractures, 29 bimarginal fractures (large anterior fragment and small posterior fragment) and 31 fractures of all the fragments described by Medoff with impaction of the central pavement were found. Anterior displacement fractures were found in 17 cases (styloid and/or anterior marginal fracture). We were able to group the different traumatic clinical forms according to a six-category classification.
A review of the literature highlighted three major components in the management of radiocarpal fracture-dislocations: the bone component, the ligament component and the associated intracarpal lesions. These three components were included in our classification and allowed us to accurately describe all types of radiocarpal fracture-dislocations published in the literature. Authors currently agree on management of the bone component but disagree on that of the ligament component. Particular attention should be paid to intracarpal lesions, which lead to poor outcomes if ignored. Based on our biographical research, we propose a management plan for these complex injuries.
VI.

Although midcarpal instability was first described almost 45 years ago, this uncommon condition is still poorly understood by most clinicians today. Adding to the confusion, it is known by 2 different names: midcarpal instability and carpal instability nondissociative. In this article, we describe the history of the recognition of instability of the midcarpal joint, including its pathomechanics, classification, and treatment. We hope that a more complete understanding of the etymology and kinematics of the disorder will facilitate its future recognition and assist in appropriate treatment decision making.