Carotid Artery Injuries

颈动脉损伤
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:这项多中心研究检查了穿透性颈动脉损伤(PCAI)的当代管理,以确定管理趋势,结果,并确定中风和死亡的预后因素。
    方法:回顾性分析了南非三个大型城市创伤中心2012年至2020年接受PCAI治疗的患者的数据。
    结果:在149名确定的患者中,包括137名积极管理的患者。24例(17.9%)出现昏迷,12例(9.0%)出现定位体征(LS)。120例(87.6%)患者入院时进行了CT血管造影。30例患者(21.9%)接受非手术治疗,87(63.5%)开腹手术,20(14.6%)血管内支架置入术。18名患者(13.1%)死亡,15例(12.6%)存活患者出现卒中.结扎与死亡和再灌注存活显著相关。枪伤机制,闭塞性损伤,受威胁的气道,收缩压<90mmHg,血管损伤的硬迹象,低GCS,昏迷,显示梗塞的CT脑,高损伤严重程度评分和休克指数,低pH或HCO3和乳酸升高是死亡的重要独立预后因素.所有严重神经功能缺损患者的结扎均无法存活,而再灌注手术导致63%(12/19)的昏迷患者和78%(7/9)的LS患者存活,尽管卒中发生率很高(昏迷:25.0%,LS:85.7%)。
    结论:PCAI的结果,包括严重的神经功能缺损和中风患者,再灌注时更好。再灌注具有生存的最佳希望,结扎应保留用于技术上无法进入的出血损伤。
    BACKGROUND: This multicenter study examines the contemporary management of penetrating carotid artery injury (PCAI) to identify trends in management, outcomes, and to determine prognostic factors for stroke and death.
    METHODS: Data from three large urban trauma centers in South Africa were retrospectively reviewed for patients who presented with PCAI from 2012 to 2020.
    RESULTS: Of 149 identified patients, 137 actively managed patients were included. Twenty-four patients (17.9%) presented in coma and 12 (9.0%) with localizing signs (LS). CT angiography was performed on admission for 120 (87.6%) patients. Thirty patients (21.9%) underwent nonoperative management, 87 (63.5%) open surgery, and 20 (14.6%) endovascular stenting. Eighteen patients (13.1%) died, and 15 (12.6%) surviving patients had strokes. Ligation was significantly related to death and reperfusion to survival. A mechanism of gunshot wound, occlusive injuries, a threatened airway, a systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg, hard signs of vascular injury, a low GCS, coma, a CT brain demonstrating infarct, a high injury severity score and shock index, a low pH or HCO3, and an elevated lactate were significant independent prognostic factors for death. Ligation was unsurvivable in all patients with severe neurological deficits, whereas reperfusion procedures resulted in survival in 63% (12/19) patients with coma and 78% (7/9) with LS although with high stroke rates (coma: 25.0%, LS: 85.7%).
    CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes in PCAI, including patients with severe neurological deficit and stroke, are better when reperfused. Reperfusion holds the best promise of survival and ligation should be reserved for technically inaccessible bleeding injuries.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:钝性颈部血管损伤(BCVI)是指颈部直接损伤或颈部血管剪切后颈动脉和/或椎管的非穿透性损伤。尽管它有可能危及生命,BCVI的重要临床特征,例如每种创伤机制共同发生损伤的典型模式,尚不为人所知。为了解决这个知识差距,我们描述了BCVI患者的特征,以确定常见创伤机制共同发生的损伤模式.
    方法:这是一项描述性研究,使用2004年至2019年的日本全国创伤登记处。我们纳入了年龄≥13岁的急诊(ED)患者,定义为对以下任何血管的钝性创伤:颈总/颈内动脉,颈外动脉,椎动脉,颈外静脉,和颈内静脉.我们根据三个受损血管(颈总动脉/颈内动脉,椎动脉,和其他人)。此外,我们将网络分析应用于通过四种常见创伤机制(车祸,摩托车/自行车事故,简单的秋天,并从高处坠落)。
    结果:在311,692例因钝性外伤而就诊的患者中,454例(0.1%)患者有BCVI。患有颈总动脉/颈内动脉损伤的患者出现严重症状(例如,格拉斯哥昏迷评分中位数为7),住院死亡率很高(45%),而椎动脉损伤患者的生命体征相对稳定。网络分析显示,头-脊椎-颈椎损伤在四种创伤机制中是常见的(车祸,摩托车/自行车事故,简单的秋天,并从高处坠落),颈椎和椎动脉的共同损伤是最常见的跌倒损伤。此外,在车祸患者中,颈总动脉/颈内动脉损伤与胸部和腹部损伤相关.
    结论:根据对全国创伤登记的分析,我们发现BCVI患者有4种创伤机制共同发生的不同类型的损伤.我们的观察结果为钝性创伤的初步评估提供了重要依据,并可能支持BCVI的管理。
    Blunt cervical vascular injury (BCVI) is a non-penetrating trauma to the carotid and/or vertebral vessels following a direct injury to the neck or by the shearing of the cervical vessels. Despite its potentially life-threatening nature, important clinical features of BCVI such as typical patterns of co-occurring injuries for each trauma mechanism are not well known. To address this knowledge gap, we described the characteristics of patients with BCVI to identify the pattern of co-occurring injuries by common trauma mechanisms.
    This is a descriptive study using a Japanese nationwide trauma registry from 2004 through 2019. We included patients aged ≥13 years presenting to the emergency department (ED) with BCVI, defined as a blunt trauma to any of the following vessels: common/internal carotid artery, external carotid artery, vertebral artery, external jugular vein, and internal jugular vein. We delineated characteristics of each BCVI classified according to three damaged vessels (common/internal carotid artery, vertebral artery, and others). In addition, we applied network analysis to unravel patterns of co-occurring injuries among patients with BCVI by four common trauma mechanisms (car accident, motorcycle/bicycle accident, simple fall, and fall from a height).
    Among 311,692 patients who visited the ED for blunt trauma, 454 (0.1%) patients had BCVI. Patients with common/internal carotid artery injuries presented to the ED with severe symptoms (e.g., the median Glasgow Coma Scale was 7) and had high in-hospital mortality (45%), while patients with vertebral artery injuries presented with relatively stable vital signs. Network analysis showed that head-vertebral-cervical spine injuries were common across four trauma mechanisms (car accident, motorcycle/bicycle accident, simple fall, and fall from a height), with co-occurring injuries of the cervical spine and vertebral artery being the most common injuries due to falls. In addition, common/internal carotid artery injuries were associated with thoracic and abdominal injuries in patients with car accidents.
    Based on analyses of a nationwide trauma registry, we found that patients with BCVI had distinct patterns of co-occurring injuries by four trauma mechanisms. Our observations provide an important basis for the initial assessment of blunt trauma and could support the management of BCVI.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Observational Study
    背景:数字减影血管造影(DSA)是钝性脑血管损伤(BCVI)的金标准放射学模式。然而,计算机断层扫描血管造影(CTA)主要用于现代实践,CTA广泛使用,并且使用CTA可降低卒中发生率。BCVI中DSA的频率和指示是未定义的。我们假设在颈内动脉(ICA)BCVI中使用DSA很少见,并且取决于放射学特征。
    方法:这是对EAST多中心的事后分析,prospective,16个创伤中心对BCVI卒中因素的观察性试验。ICABCVI分为接受DSA和未接受DSA(无DSA)的患者。仅包括ICABCVI。
    结果:包括332个ICABCVI,221(66.6%)无DSA和111(33.4%)DSA。降低医院创伤量,非城市环境,非学术状态与DSA使用相关(均P≤0.001)。BCVI分级(P=.02)和管腔狭窄的存在(P=.005)与DSA的使用相关,而假性动脉瘤的存在则不相关。DSA的中位时间为1小时。血管造影最常见的指征是确定71(64%)ICABCVI中是否存在损伤,其次是确定损伤等级16(14.4%)和有关影像学特征12(10.8%)。初始成像和DSA的BCVI等级与94(84.7%)ICABCVI相当。
    结论:DSA常用于ICABCVI,主要在住院早期进行损伤诊断和等级判定。DSA主要由医院类型驱动,BCVI等级,和管腔狭窄。
    BACKGROUND: Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is the gold standard radiologic modality in blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI). However, computerized tomography angiography (CTA) is primarily used in modern practice with CTA\'s widespread availability and the decreased stroke rate with CTA use. The frequency and indications for DSA in BCVI is undefined. We hypothesized that DSA use in internal carotid artery (ICA) BCVI would be infrequent and dependent on radiologic features.
    METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis of an EAST multicenter, prospective, observational trial of 16 trauma centers for stroke factors in BCVI. ICA BCVI was divided into those undergoing DSA and not undergoing DSA (no-DSA). Only ICA BCVI was included.
    RESULTS: 332 ICA BCVI were included, 221 (66.6%) no-DSA and 111 (33.4%) DSA. Lower hospital trauma volume, non-urban environment, and non-academic status were associated with DSA use (all P ≤ .001). BCVI grade (P = .02) and presence of luminal stenosis (P = .005) were associated with DSA use while pseudoaneurysm presence was not. Median time to DSA was 1 hour. The most common indication for angiography was to determine the presence of injury in 71 (64%) ICA BCVI, followed by determining grade of injury in 16 (14.4%) and concerning imaging characteristics in 12 (10.8%). BCVI grade on initial imaging and on DSA were equivalent in 94 (84.7%) ICA BCVI.
    CONCLUSIONS: DSA is frequently used in ICA BCVI, primarily early in the hospital course for injury diagnosis and grade determination. DSA appears primarily driven by hospital type, BCVI grade, and luminal stenosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Multicenter Study
    背景:较高的钝性脑血管损伤(BCVI)等级和缺乏药物治疗与中风有关。了解特定于个人等级的中风危险因素可能有助于根据特定的损伤特征定制BCVI治疗。
    方法:对16个中心的事后分析,prospective,纳入1级颈内动脉(ICA)BCVI的观察性试验(2018-2020).重复成像仅被认为是第二次成像发生。
    结果:包括145个1级ICABCVI,8人(5.5%)中风。合并卒中的1级ICABCVI更常接受混合抗凝和抗血小板治疗(75.0%vs9.6%,P<.001)和较不常见的抗血小板治疗(25.0%vs82.5%,P=.001)与没有中风的伤害相比。在有中风的8个1级ICABCVI中,4人(50.0%)在药物治疗开始后出现卒中。在将具有重复成像分辨率的伤害与没有重复成像的伤害进行比较时,卒中发生在7例(15.9%)无缓解损伤和0例(0%)有缓解损伤(P=.005).在1级ICABCVI伴中风的重复成像中,伤害等级为1级/2,三级受伤中的二级,1伤3级,5级受伤。
    结论:虽然1级ICABCVI的卒中发生率总体较低,损伤持续性似乎会增加卒中风险。尽管开始了药物治疗,但仍发生了一些中风。在1级ICABCVI中需要重复成像以评估损伤进展或分辨率。
    BACKGROUND: Higher blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) grade and lack of medical therapy are associated with stroke. Knowledge of stroke risk factors specific to individual grades may help tailor BCVI therapy to specific injury characteristics.
    METHODS: A post-hoc analysis of a 16 center, prospective, observational trial (2018-2020) was performed including grade 1 internal carotid artery (ICA) BCVI. Repeat imaging was considered the second imaging occurrence only.
    RESULTS: From 145 grade 1 ICA BCVI included, 8 (5.5%) suffered a stroke. Grade 1 ICA BCVI with stroke were more commonly treated with mixed anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy (75.0% vs 9.6%, P <.001) and less commonly antiplatelet therapy (25.0% vs 82.5%, P = .001) compared to injuries without stroke. Of the 8 grade 1 ICA BCVI with stroke, 4 (50.0%) had stroke after medical therapy was started. In comparing injuries with resolution at repeat imaging to those without, stroke occurred in 7 (15.9%) injuries without resolution and 0 (0%) injuries with resolution (P = .005). At repeat imaging in grade 1 ICA BCVI with stroke, grade of injury was grade 1 in 2 injuries, grade 2 in 3 injuries, grade 3 in 1 injury, and grade 5 in one injury.
    CONCLUSIONS: While the stroke rate for grade 1 ICA BCVI is low overall, injury persistence appears to heighten stroke risk. Some strokes occurred despite initiation of medical therapy. Repeat imaging is needed in grade 1 ICA BCVI to evaluate for injury progression or resolution.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:使用血管内介入(EI)治疗钝性脑血管损伤(BCVI)尚无共识指南。在全国范围内进行EI的BCVI的EI使用率和影像学特征尚不清楚。
    方法:对前瞻性,我们于2018年至2020年在美国16个创伤中心进行了观察性研究.纳入颈内动脉(ICA)BCVI。主要结果是EI使用。对EI使用的预测因子进行多变量逻辑回归。
    结果:包括332个ICABCVI,21人(6.3%)接受了EI。0/145(0%)1级,8/101(7.9%)2级,12/51(23.5%)3级和1/20(5.0%)4级ICABCVI接受EI。卒中发生在6/21(28.6%)ICABCVI接受EI和33/311(10.6%)未接受EI(P=0.03),所有使用EI的笔划在EI之前或与EI同时发生。管腔狭窄的百分比(37.75vs20.29%,P=0.01)和中位假性动脉瘤大小(9.00mmvs3.00mm,P=0.01)在接受EI的ICABCVI中更大。在逻辑回归中,只有假性动脉瘤大小与EI相关(比值比1.205,95%CI1.035-1.404,P=.02).在接受EI的8名2级ICABCVI中,在EI之前,3/8是2级,5/8是3级。在接受EI的12名3级ICABCVI中,11/12是3级,1/12是EI之前的2级ICABCVI。
    结论:假性动脉瘤大小与ICABCVI使用EI相关。卒中在有EI的ICABCVI中更为常见,但在使用EI后未发生。
    BACKGROUND: Use of endovascular intervention (EI) for blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) is without consensus guidelines. Rates of EI use and radiographic characteristics of BCVI undergoing EI nationally are unknown.
    METHODS: A post-hoc analysis of a prospective, observational study at 16 U.S. trauma centers from 2018 to 2020 was conducted. Internal carotid artery (ICA) BCVI was included. The primary outcome was EI use. Multivariable logistic regression was performed for predictors of EI use.
    RESULTS: From 332 ICA BCVI included, 21 (6.3%) underwent EI. 0/145 (0%) grade 1, 8/101 (7.9%) grade 2, 12/51 (23.5%) grade 3, and 1/20 (5.0%) grade 4 ICA BCVI underwent EI. Stroke occurred in 6/21 (28.6%) ICA BCVI undergoing EI and in 33/311 (10.6%) not undergoing EI (P = .03), with all strokes with EI use occurring prior to or at the same time as EI. Percentage of luminal stenosis (37.75 vs 20.29%, P = .01) and median pseudoaneurysm size (9.00 mm vs 3.00 mm, P = .01) were greater in ICA BCVI undergoing EI. On logistic regression, only pseudoaneurysm size was associated with EI (odds ratio 1.205, 95% CI 1.035-1.404, P = .02). Of the 8 grade 2 ICA BCVI undergoing EI, 3/8 were grade 2 and 5/8 were grade 3 prior to EI. Of the 12 grade 3 ICA BCVI undergoing EI, 11/12 were grade 3 and 1/12 was a grade 2 ICA BCVI prior to EI.
    CONCLUSIONS: Pseudoaneurysm size is associated with use of EI for ICA BCVI. Stroke is more common in ICA BCVI with EI but did not occur after EI use.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    钝性脑血管损伤(BCVI)后中风的危险因素尚不明确。我们假设与BCVI中风相关的因素将包括药物治疗(即,阿司匹林),射线照相特征,和护理的原型化。
    东方创伤手术协会赞助,16中心,prospective,进行了观察性试验.分别分析椎动脉(VA)和颈内动脉(ICA)BCVI的卒中危险因素。钝性脑血管损伤按标准1至5级进行分级。数据仅来自最初的住院。
    包括777个BCVI。所有BCVI的卒中率为8.9%,ICABCVI的卒中发生率为11.7%,VABCVI的卒中发生率为6.7%。使用管理协议(p=0.01),由创伤服务部门管理(p=0.04),住院期间的抗血小板治疗(p<0.001),与有卒中患者相比,在无卒中的ICABCVI中,特别是在住院期间使用阿司匹林治疗(p<0.001)更为常见。住院期间的抗血小板治疗(p<0.001)和住院期间的阿司匹林治疗(p<0.001)在无卒中的VABCVI中比卒中更常见。卒中的ICABCVI(p=0.002)和VABCVI(p<0.001)的管腔狭窄百分比均较高。管腔狭窄百分比降低(p<0.001),管腔内血栓的分辨率(p=0.003),新的腔内血栓(p=0.001)在有卒中的ICABCVI中比没有更常见,而管腔内血栓(p=0.03)和新的管腔内血栓(p=0.01)的消退在有卒中的VABCVI中比没有卒中的情况更常见。
    创伤服务的协议驱动管理,抗血小板治疗(特别是阿司匹林),较低的管腔狭窄百分比与较低的卒中发生率相关,而管腔内血栓的消退和发展与较高的卒中发生率相关。需要进一步的研究将这些危险因素纳入病变特异性BCVI管理。
    预后和流行病学,四级。
    Stroke risk factors after blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) are ill-defined. We hypothesized that factors associated with stroke for BCVI would include medical therapy (i.e., Aspirin), radiographic features, and protocolization of care.
    An Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma-sponsored, 16-center, prospective, observational trial was undertaken. Stroke risk factors were analyzed individually for vertebral artery (VA) and internal carotid artery (ICA) BCVI. Blunt cerebrovascular injuries were graded on the standard 1 to 5 scale. Data were from the initial hospitalization only.
    Seven hundred seventy-seven BCVIs were included. Stroke rate was 8.9% for all BCVIs, with an 11.7% rate of stroke for ICA BCVI and a 6.7% rate for VA BCVI. Use of a management protocol (p = 0.01), management by the trauma service (p = 0.04), antiplatelet therapy over the hospital stay (p < 0.001), and Aspirin therapy specifically over the hospital stay (p < 0.001) were more common in ICA BCVI without stroke compared with those with stroke. Antiplatelet therapy over the hospital stay (p < 0.001) and Aspirin therapy over the hospital stay (p < 0.001) were more common in VA BCVI without stroke than with stroke. Percentage luminal stenosis was higher in both ICA BCVI (p = 0.002) and VA BCVI (p < 0.001) with stroke. Decrease in percentage luminal stenosis (p < 0.001), resolution of intraluminal thrombus (p = 0.003), and new intraluminal thrombus (p = 0.001) were more common in ICA BCVI with stroke than without, while resolution of intraluminal thrombus (p = 0.03) and new intraluminal thrombus (p = 0.01) were more common in VA BCVI with stroke than without.
    Protocol-driven management by the trauma service, antiplatelet therapy (specifically Aspirin), and lower percentage luminal stenosis were associated with lower stroke rates, while resolution and development of intraluminal thrombus were associated with higher stroke rates. Further research will be needed to incorporate these risk factors into lesion specific BCVI management.
    Prognostic and Epidemiologic, Level IV.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: The incidence of blunt cerebrovascular injuries (BCVIs) in children is unknown. We aimed to determine the rate and consequences of BCVIs in pediatric blunt trauma patients.
    METHODS: We queried the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) for all blunt trauma patients between 2007 and 2014. BCVI patients were identified by ICD-9 codes. Demographic, emergency room, and concomitant injury data were analyzed.
    RESULTS: There were 732,702 blunt trauma patients, and 1682 BCVIs were identified (0.23%). 791 (47%) sustained carotid artery injuries (CAIs), 957 (57%) had vertebral artery injuries (VAIs), and 4% of patients sustained both. A majority of the injuries occurred in white patients (61%) and in motor vehicle accidents (53%). The average age was 12.1 ± 5.4 years. CAIs had more skull base fractures (55% vs 35%, p < 0.0001), and cervical spine fractures were more common in VAIs (26 vs 11%, p < 0.0001). Intensive care length of stay was longer in the CAI patients (9.2 vs 7.9 days, p = 0.03), as was length of stay (12.5 vs 9.7 days, p = 0.0002). 5% of CAI patients were coded for stroke, versus 2% of VAIs (p = 0.002).
    CONCLUSIONS: BCVIs are rare in children. Vertebral injuries are more common. Carotid injuries are associated with a longer length of stay and higher stroke rates.
    METHODS: Retrospective cohort study.
    METHODS: III.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    A significant incidence of Posterior Vessel Wall Puncture (PVWP) was reported during ultrasound guidance (USG) for internal jugular vein (IJV) catheterization. We studied a new technique of USGIJV cannulation to minimize or avoid PVWP, thereby decreasing overall complication rate, irrespective of the operators\' experience level.
    After ethical approval, a prospective study was conducted on adult patients of either gender between 18-65 years of age, belonging to the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status I-III, undergoing general anesthesia and requiring USG-guided IJV cannulation. After induction of general anesthesia and intubation, USG-guided IJV cannulation was done using technique of \"proximal pen-holding method\" in patients placed in supine position with neck rotated in 15° rotation to the opposite side. The primary outcome was defined as success rate of USG-guided IJV cannulation and incidence of PVWP. The secondary outcome was the incidences of complications such as arterial puncture, adjacent tissue damage, and performer\'s ease of the procedure (0-10 scale; 0 denoting no ease and extreme difficulty and 10 denoting extreme ease and no difficulty).
    In 135 patients, right IJV puncture, guidewire, and central line insertion were achieved in single attempt without any PVWP by nine operators which included two anesthesia consultants and seven senior registrars. No complications were reported and ease of procedure were rated as median (interquartile range) of 10 (10).
    The \"proximal pen-holding method\" for real-time USG-IJV cannulation helped in avoiding PVWP with lesser complication rate and greater performer\'s ease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: Periosteal releasing incision (PRI) techniques are often used with guided bone regeneration procedures. As complications such as intra- and postoperative bleeding have been noticed, we aimed to study and clarify these as related to the PRI, especially on the mandibular buccal periosteum.
    METHODS: Fourteen sides from seven fresh-frozen Caucasian cadaveric heads were used in this study. The seven cadavers were derived from two females and five males. The mean age at the time of death was 75.9 ± 10.8 years. The PRI was made using a no. 15c blade using a surgical microscope. Subsequently, the fat tissue lateral to the periosteum was slightly dissected. The diameter of the facial artery (or its branch) and closest relationship between the tooth and position of the artery was recorded. Finally, the artery was traced back proximally to clarify its origin.
    RESULTS: On all sides, the inferior labial artery (ILA) was identified in the fat tissue lateral to and close to the periosteum. The ILA was closest to the periosteum at the midpoint of the PRI (approximately between the first and second molar teeth area or 10 mm mesial to the apex of the retromolar pad). The mean diameter of the ILA was 2.72 ± 0.26 mm.
    CONCLUSIONS: This anatomical finding should encourage dentists to make the PRI incision without invading the tissue underneath the periosteum.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    虽然C1螺钉固定越来越流行,只有少数研究讨论了C1螺钉并发症的危险因素和模式.
    探讨C1螺钉并发症的发生率,分析C1螺钉并发症的危险因素。
    分析了180例连续患者中358枚C1螺钉的C1螺钉并发症。螺钉错位,枕骨神经痛,主要并发症,并对C1螺钉总并发症进行分析。
    C1螺钉入口点的分布如下:下侧质量,317个螺钉(88.5%);后弓(PA),38个螺钉(10.7%);和上侧块,3个螺钉(0.8%)。我们为127个螺钉(35.5%)牺牲了C2根部。C1仪器引起3.1%螺钉错位,6.4%枕神经痛,0.6%血管损伤,和3.4%的主要并发症。在多变量分析中,畸形(赔率比[OR]:2.10,P=0.003),创伤性病理学(OR:4.97,P=.001),和PA进入点(OR:3.38,P=.001)是C1螺钉错位的独立因素。C2根切除可降低C1螺钉错位的发生率(OR:0.38,P=.012),但它是枕神经痛的危险因素(OR:2.62,P=0.034)。先进的手术经验(OR:0.09,P=0.020)与较少的主要并发症相关。
    C1螺钉并发症的发生率可能并不少见,畸形或创伤性病理和PA进入点可能是C1螺钉总并发症的危险因素。PA螺钉引起更多的错位,但枕骨神经痛较少。C2根切除可以减少螺钉错位,而是增加枕骨神经痛.
    Although C1 screw fixation is becoming popular, only a few studies have discussed about the risk factors and the patterns of C1 screw complications.
    To investigate the incidence of C1 screw complications and analyze the risk factors of the C1 screw complications.
    A total of 358 C1 screws in 180 consecutive patients were analyzed for C1 screw complications. Screw malposition, occipital neuralgia, major complications, and total C1 screw complications were analyzed.
    The distribution of C1 screw entry point is as follows: inferior lateral mass, 317 screws (88.5 %); posterior arch (PA), 38 screws (10.7 %); and superior lateral mass, 3 screws (0.8 %). We sacrificed the C2 root for 127 screws (35.5 %). C1 instrumentation induced 3.1 % screw malposition, 6.4 % occipital neuralgia, 0.6 % vascular injury, and 3.4 % major complications. In multivariate analysis, deformity (odds ratio [OR]: 2.10, P = .003), traumatic pathology (OR: 4.97, P = .001), and PA entry point (OR: 3.38, P = .001) are independent factors of C1 screw malposition. C2 root resection can decrease the incidence of C1 screw malposition (OR: 0.38, P = .012), but it is a risk factor of occipital neuralgia (OR: 2.62, P = .034). Advanced surgical experience (OR: 0.09, P = .020) correlated with less major complication.
    The incidence of C1 screw complications might not be uncommon, and deformity or traumatic pathology and PA entry point could be the risk factors to total C1 screw complications. The PA screw induces more malposition, but less occipital neuralgia. C2 root resection can reduce screw malposition, but increases occipital neuralgia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号