未经批准:社会援助,人道主义救济,和灾难响应越来越多的重叠,特别是在反复发生的危机和持续的冲突盛行的地方。在这种情况下,风险和不确定性之间的区别变得尤为重要。对于政策和实践来说,从关注风险评估和管理转向拥抱不确定性至关重要。
UNASIGNED:本文评估了危机复发和冲突持续存在的两种社会援助和人道主义救济方法的适当性:风险评估和管理;拥抱不确定性和无知。
联合国:本文回顾了社会援助的不同方法,人道主义救济,和灾难响应,问他们是怎么陷害的。它借鉴了提供社会援助的方案的经验,人道主义救济,和灾难响应,突出专业,官僚主义,以及影响方案设计和运作的机构特征。将这些方法与部署在其他关键基础设施中的“高可靠性”方法进行比较,例如水和能源供应。
未经评估:主流方法侧重于风险评估和管理,假设可预测性和稳定性。这是有问题的,特别是在危机和冲突的环境中,可能没有有效的社会援助和救济提供系统。这篇文章重点介绍了主流风险导向方法的替代方案,强调学习,合作,适应,和灵活性。这些方法必须建立在道德经济的嵌入式实践基础上,集体行动,和相互关怀,并通过产生可靠性的专业和机构能力得到支持。
联合国助理秘书长:这篇文章提出了社会救助交叉的新议程,人道主义救济,和灾难响应,这使得不确定性成为重新思考大规模反应的焦点,特别是在受危机和冲突影响的环境中。
UNASSIGNED: Social assistance, humanitarian relief, and disaster response increasingly overlap, especially where recurrent crises and persistent conflicts prevail. In such situations, distinctions between risk and uncertainty become especially important. It is critical for policy and practice to shift from focusing on risk assessment and management to embracing uncertainty.
UNASSIGNED: The article assesses the appropriateness of two approaches to social assistance and humanitarian relief where crises recur and conflicts persist: risk assessment and management; and embracing uncertainty and ignorance.
UNASSIGNED: The article reviews different approaches to social assistance, humanitarian relief, and disaster response, and asks how they are framed. It draws on experiences from programmes offering social assistance, humanitarian relief, and disaster response, highlighting the professional, bureaucratic, and institutional features that influence programme design and functioning. These are compared with \"high-reliability\" approaches deployed in other critical infrastructure-such as water and energy supply.
UNASSIGNED: Mainstream approaches focus on risk assessment and management, assuming predictability and stability. This is problematic, especially in settings of crisis and
conflict where there may be no functioning delivery system for social assistance and relief. The article highlights alternatives to the mainstream risk-focused approaches, which emphasize learning, collaboration, adaptation, and flexibility. Such approaches must build on embedded practices of moral economy, collective action, and mutual care and be supported through professional and institutional capacities that generate reliability.
UNASSIGNED: The article suggests a new agenda for the intersection of social assistance, humanitarian relief, and disaster response, which makes uncertainty the focus for rethinking responses at scale, especially in settings affected by crisis and
conflict.