CAP

CAP
  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    据推测,听神经(AN)功能会随着年龄和噪声暴露而恶化。这里,我们对已发表的研究进行了系统回顾,发现与年龄相关的AN功能缺陷的证据在文献中基本一致,但噪声暴露史的研究结果不一致。Further,来自动物研究的证据表明,在暴露于噪声的老年小鼠中发现了AN响应幅度的最大缺陷,但是尚未在人类中进行年龄和噪声暴露对AN功能的影响之间的相互作用的测试。我们报告了一项我们自己的研究,在大量人类参与者(63名18-30岁的年轻成年人,有和没有自我报告的噪声暴露史的年轻人和老年人之间,复合动作电位N1(CAPN1)的反应幅度的差异,103名50-86岁的老年人)。老年人的CAPN1反应幅度小于年轻人。噪声暴露历史似乎无法预测CAPN1响应幅度,噪声暴露史的影响与年龄也没有交互作用。然后,我们将我们的结果纳入两个已发表的关于年龄和噪声暴露历史对神经典型人类样本中AN响应幅度的影响的研究的荟萃分析。荟萃分析发现,不同研究的年龄效应是稳健的(r=-0.407),但噪声暴露效应较弱(r=-0.152)。我们得出的结论是,噪声暴露效应可能是高度可变的,具体取决于样本特征,研究设计,和统计方法,研究人员在解释结果时应该谨慎。与年龄相关和噪声引起的AN功能变化的潜在病理学在活体人类中很难确定,需要对整个生命周期中AN功能的变化进行纵向研究,并从死后收集的颞骨对AN进行组织学检查。
    Auditory nerve (AN) function has been hypothesized to deteriorate with age and noise exposure. Here, we perform a systematic review of published studies and find that the evidence for age-related deficits in AN function is largely consistent across the literature, but there are inconsistent findings among studies of noise exposure history. Further, evidence from animal studies suggests that the greatest deficits in AN response amplitudes are found in noise-exposed aged mice, but a test of the interaction between effects of age and noise exposure on AN function has not been conducted in humans. We report a study of our own examining differences in the response amplitude of the compound action potential N1 (CAP N1) between younger and older adults with and without a self-reported history of noise exposure in a large sample of human participants (63 younger adults 18-30 years of age, 103 older adults 50-86 years of age). CAP N1 response amplitudes were smaller in older than younger adults. Noise exposure history did not appear to predict CAP N1 response amplitudes, nor did the effect of noise exposure history interact with age. We then incorporated our results into two meta-analyses of published studies of age and noise exposure history effects on AN response amplitudes in neurotypical human samples. The meta-analyses found that age effects across studies are robust (r = -0.407), but noise exposure effects are weak (r = -0.152). We conclude that noise exposure effects may be highly variable depending on sample characteristics, study design, and statistical approach, and researchers should be cautious when interpreting results. The underlying pathology of age-related and noise-induced changes in AN function are difficult to determine in living humans, creating a need for longitudinal studies of changes in AN function across the lifespan and histological examination of the AN from temporal bones collected post-mortem.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Preprint
    据推测,听神经(AN)功能会随着年龄和噪声暴露而恶化。这里,我们对已发表的研究进行了系统回顾,发现与年龄相关的AN功能缺陷的证据在文献中基本一致,但噪声暴露史的研究结果不一致。Further,来自动物研究的证据表明,在暴露于噪声的老年小鼠中发现了AN响应幅度的最大缺陷,但是尚未在人类中进行年龄和噪声暴露对AN功能的影响之间的相互作用的测试。我们报告了一项我们自己的研究,在大量人类参与者(63名18-30岁的年轻成年人,有和没有自我报告的噪声暴露史的年轻人和老年人之间,复合动作电位N1(CAPN1)的反应幅度的差异,103名50-86岁的老年人)。老年人的CAPN1反应幅度小于年轻人。噪声暴露历史似乎无法预测CAPN1响应幅度,噪声暴露史的影响与年龄也没有交互作用。然后,我们将我们的结果纳入两个已发表的关于年龄和噪声暴露历史对神经典型人类样本中AN响应幅度的影响的研究的荟萃分析。荟萃分析发现,不同研究的年龄效应是稳健的(r=-0.407),但噪声暴露效应较弱(r=-0.138)。我们得出的结论是,噪声暴露效应可能是高度可变的,具体取决于样本特征,研究设计,和统计方法,研究人员在解释结果时应该谨慎。与年龄相关和噪声引起的AN功能变化的潜在病理学在活体人类中很难确定,需要对整个生命周期中AN功能的变化进行纵向研究,并从死后收集的颞骨对AN进行组织学检查。
    Auditory nerve (AN) function has been hypothesized to deteriorate with age and noise exposure. Here, we perform a systematic review of published studies and find that the evidence for age-related deficits in AN function is largely consistent across the literature, but there are inconsistent findings among studies of noise exposure history. Further, evidence from animal studies suggests that the greatest deficits in AN response amplitudes are found in noise-exposed aged mice, but a test of the interaction between effects of age and noise exposure on AN function has not been conducted in humans. We report a study of our own examining differences in the response amplitude of the compound action potential N1 (CAP N1) between younger and older adults with and without a self-reported history of noise exposure in a large sample of human participants (63 younger adults 18-30 years of age, 103 older adults 50-86 years of age). CAP N1 response amplitudes were smaller in older than younger adults. Noise exposure history did not appear to predict CAP N1 response amplitudes, nor did the effect of noise exposure history interact with age. We then incorporated our results into two meta-analyses of published studies of age and noise exposure history effects on AN response amplitudes in neurotypical human samples. The meta-analyses found that age effects across studies are robust (r=-0.407), but noise-exposure effects are weak (r=-0.152). We conclude that noise-exposure effects may be highly variable depending on sample characteristics, study design, and statistical approach, and researchers should be cautious when interpreting results. The underlying pathology of age-related and noise-induced changes in AN function are difficult to determine in living humans, creating a need for longitudinal studies of changes in AN function across the lifespan and histological examination of the AN from temporal bones collected post-mortem.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们旨在通过2009年1月至2019年12月住院成年患者的单中心回顾性队列,评估中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比率(NLR)在社区获得性肺炎(CAP)中的预后作用。将患者分为较低的NLR(≤12)和较高的NLR(>12)。主要结果是死亡率。ICU入院和无ICU天数是次要结局。还测试了肺炎严重度指数(PSI)和NLR预测结果的能力。在2513例(62.2%)患者中观察到NLR≤12,在1526例(37.8%)中观察到>12。调整PSI后,NLR与住院死亡率无关(比值比[OR]1.115;95%置信区间[CI]0.774,1.606;p=0.559),但与ICU入住风险较高相关(OR1.405;95%CI1.216,1.624;p<0.001).PSI显示出可接受的死亡率差异(接受者工作特征曲线下面积[AUC]0.78;95%CI0.75,0.82),其通过添加NLR(AUC0.78;95%CI0.75,0.82,p=0.4476)没有改善。PSI在预测ICU入院方面的表现也是可以接受的(AUC0.75;95%CI0.74,0.77),并且通过包括NLR(AUC0.76,95%CI0.74,0.77,p=0.008),虽然临床意义有限。在预测住院CAP患者的死亡率方面,NLR并不优于PSI。
    We aimed to assess the prognostic role of the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) via a single-center retrospective cohort of hospitalized adult patients from 1/2009 to 12/2019. Patients were dichotomized into lower NLR (≤12) and higher NLR (>12). The primary outcome was mortality. ICU admission and hospital- and ICU-free days were secondary outcomes. The pneumonia severity index (PSI) and the NLR\'s ability to predict outcomes was also tested. An NLR ≤12 was observed in 2513 (62.2%) patients and >12 in 1526 (37.8%). After adjusting for PSI, the NLR was not associated with hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR] 1.115; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.774, 1.606; p = 0.559), but it was associated with a higher risk of ICU admission (OR 1.405; 95% CI 1.216, 1.624; p < 0.001). The PSI demonstrated acceptable discrimination for mortality (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] 0.78; 95% CI 0.75, 0.82) which was not improved by adding the NLR (AUC 0.78; 95% CI 0.75, 0.82, p = 0.4476). The PSI\'s performance in predicting ICU admission was also acceptable (AUC 0.75; 95% CI 0.74, 0.77) and improved by including the NLR (AUC 0.76, 95% CI 0.74, 0.77, p = 0.008), although with limited clinical significance. The NLR was not superior to the PSI for predicting mortality in hospitalized CAP patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD)在HIV(PLWH)感染者中非常普遍,一些microRNA的表达可作为诊断NAFLD的生物标志物。这项研究的目的是确定PLWH中microRNA的差异表达模式,并评估其对NALFD的诊断价值。
    用PLWH进行发现病例对照研究。使用HTGEdgeSeq技术确定miRNA的表达。病例定义为重度NAFLD患者,对照组定义为无NAFLD患者。使用受控衰减参数(CAP)表征。病例和对照组的年龄为1:1,性别,BMI,CD4+淋巴细胞计数,活动性HCV感染,和ART方案。
    使用HTG技术分析血清2,083个同时的microRNA转录本,并在病例和对照之间进行比较。45名患者,23例,22名对照纳入研究.在2,083个microRNAs的表达模式分析中,在纳入研究的两组患者之间未发现差异表达模式.
    对重度NAFLD的非肥胖型PLWH的microRNA转录组分析与无NAFLD的患者没有差异。因此,microRNA可能不能作为预测该人群中严重NALFD的适当生物标志物。
    Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is highly prevalent in people living with HIV (PLWH) and the expression of some microRNAs could be useful as biomarkers for the diagnosis of NAFLD. The aim of this study was to identify patterns of differential expression of microRNAs in PLWH and assess their diagnostic value for NALFD.
    A discovery case-control study with PLWH was carried out. The expression of miRNAs was determined using HTG EdgeSeq technology. Cases were defined as patients with severe NAFLD and controls as patients without NAFLD, characterized using the controlled attenuation parameter (CAP). Cases and controls were matched 1:1 for age, sex, BMI, CD4+ lymphocyte count, active HCV infection, and ART regimen.
    Serum 2,083 simultaneous microRNA transcripts were analyzed using HTG technology and compared between cases and controls. Forty-five patients, 23 cases, and 22 controls were included in the study. In the analysis of the expression pattern of the 2,083 microRNAs, no differential expression patterns were found between both groups of patients included in the study.
    Analysis of the microRNA transcriptome profile of nonobese PLWH with severe NAFLD did not appear to differ from that of patients without NAFLD. Thus, microRNA might not serve as a proper biomarker for predicting severe NALFD in this population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在缺血性中风中,选择性冷却缺血半暗带可能导致神经保护,同时避免全身并发症。由于半影组织减少了脑血流量,体内脑温度测量仍然具有挑战性,不同的低温治疗方法对半影温度的影响尚不清楚。我们使用COMSOLMultiphysics®软件对缺血性卒中治疗性低温的一系列病例进行建模。开发了四种缺血性卒中模型,其缺血性核心和/或半影体积在33-300mL之间。对每个模型进行了四个实验,包括无冷却,动脉内,静脉注射,和主动导电头冷却。非缺血大脑的稳态温度,缺血半暗带,无冷却的缺血核心为37.3°C,37.5-37.8°C,和38.9-39.4°C。动脉内,静脉内和主动传导头冷却可将非缺血性脑温度降低4.3°C,2.1°C,和0.7-0.8°C分别。动脉内,静脉内和头部冷却可使缺血半影的温度降低3.9-4.3°C,1.9-2.1°C,和1.2-3.4°C。主动传导头冷却是选择性降低半影温度的唯一方法。需要进行临床研究来测量接受低温治疗的缺血性中风患者的脑温度,以验证这些假设产生的发现。
    In ischemic stroke, selectively cooling the ischemic penumbra might lead to neuroprotection while avoiding systemic complications. Because penumbral tissue has reduced cerebral blood flow and in vivo brain temperature measurement remains challenging, the effect of different methods of therapeutic hypothermia on penumbral temperature are unknown. We used the COMSOL Multiphysics® software to model a range of cases of therapeutic hypothermia in ischemic stroke. Four ischemic stroke models were developed with ischemic core and/or penumbra volumes between 33-300 mL. Four experiments were performed on each model, including no cooling, and intraarterial, intravenous, and active conductive head cooling. The steady-state temperature of the non-ischemic brain, ischemic penumbra, and ischemic core without cooling was 37.3 °C, 37.5-37.8 °C, and 38.9-39.4 °C respectively. Intraarterial, intravenous and active conductive head cooling reduced non-ischemic brain temperature by 4.3 °C, 2.1 °C, and 0.7-0.8 °C respectively. Intraarterial, intravenous and head cooling reduced the temperature of the ischemic penumbra by 3.9-4.3 °C, 1.9-2.1 °C, and 1.2-3.4 °C respectively. Active conductive head cooling was the only method to selectively reduce penumbral temperature. Clinical studies that measure brain temperature in ischemic stroke patients undergoing therapeutic hypothermia are required to validate these hypothesis-generating findings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    COVID-19一直是诊断和治疗的挑战。在考虑其他类型的肺炎病因时,它标志着范式的转变。通过对358例肺炎患者的病例对照研究,我们分析了COVID-19与社区获得性肺炎(CAP)相比与内皮损伤和免疫血栓形成相关的生物标志物(179例COVID-19住院患者与179与CAP住院相匹配)。内皮损伤标志物(内皮素和肾上腺髓质素原),中性粒细胞胞外陷阱(NETs)(瓜氨酸化-3组蛋白,无细胞DNA),测定血小板活化(可溶性P-选择素)。评估住院和1年随访结果。内皮损伤,血小板活化,与COVID-19相比,CAP和NET生物标志物明显更高。与CAP相比,COVID-19的住院死亡率更高,而CAP的1年死亡率和心血管并发症更高。在单变量分析(OR95%CI)中,proADM和内皮素与住院死亡率相关(proADM:CAP3.210[1.698-6.070],COVID-198.977[3.413-23.609];内皮素:CAP1.014[1.006-1.022],COVID-191.024[1.014-1.034]),住院CVE(proADM:CAP1.323[1.080-2.439],COVID-192.146[1.186-3.882];内皮素:CAP1.005[1.000-1.010],COVID-191.010[1.003-1.018]),和1年死亡率(proADM:CAP2.590[1.644-4.080],COVID-1913.562[4.872-37.751];内皮素:CAP1.008[1.003-1.013],COVID-191.026[1.016-1.037])。总之,COVID-19和CAP表现出不同的内皮损伤和NETs表达。ProADM和内皮素与短期和长期死亡率相关。
    COVID-19 has been a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. It has marked a paradigm shift when considering other types of pneumonia etiology. We analyzed the biomarkers related to endothelial damage and immunothrombosis in COVID-19 in comparison to community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) through a case-control study of 358 patients with pneumonia (179 hospitalized with COVID-19 vs. 179 matched hospitalized with CAP). Endothelial damage markers (endothelin and proadrenomedullin), neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) (citrullinated-3 histone, cell-free DNA), and platelet activation (soluble P-selectin) were measured. In-hospital and 1-year follow-up outcomes were evaluated. Endothelial damage, platelet activation, and NET biomarkers are significantly higher in CAP compared to COVID-19. In-hospital mortality in COVID-19 was higher compared to CAP whereas 1-year mortality and cardiovascular complications were higher in CAP. In the univariate analysis (OR 95% CIs), proADM and endothelin were associated with in-hospital mortality (proADM: CAP 3.210 [1.698-6.070], COVID-19 8.977 [3.413-23.609]; endothelin: CAP 1.014 [1.006-1.022], COVID-19 1.024 [1.014-1.034]), in-hospital CVE (proADM: CAP 1.623 [1.080-2.439], COVID-19 2.146 [1.186-3.882]; endothelin: CAP 1.005 [1.000-1.010], COVID-19 1.010 [1.003-1.018]), and 1-year mortality (proADM: CAP 2.590 [1.644-4.080], COVID-19 13.562 [4.872-37.751]; endothelin: CAP 1.008 [1.003-1.013], COVID-19 1.026 [1.016-1.037]). In conclusion, COVID-19 and CAP showed different expressions of endothelial damage and NETs. ProADM and endothelin are associated with short- and long-term mortality.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:社区获得性肺炎(CAP)是导致住院的主要原因之一,并对医疗保健的经济负担产生重大影响。这项研究的目的是确定与住院时间(LOHS)相关的因素,因CAP入院的患者的再住院率和死亡率。
    方法:对2019年1月至2019年12月期间到瑞士公立医院就诊的患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。进行零截断负二项和多变量逻辑回归分析以评估危险因素。
    结果:共分析了300例患者(中位数为78岁,IQR[67.56,85.50]和53%的男性),平均LOHS为7天(IQR[5.00,9.00])。在300名患者中,31.6%(97/300)在6个月内再次住院,2.7%(8/300)在30天内死亡,11.7%(35/300)在1年内死亡。结果显示,性别(IRR=0.877,95%CI=0.776-0.992,p值=0.036),年龄(IRR=1.007,95%CI=1.002-1.012,p值=0.003),qSOFA评分(IRR=1.143,95%CI=1.049-1.246,p值=0.002)和非典型肺炎(IRR=1.357,95%CI=1.012-1.819,p值=0.04)可预测LOHS。糖尿病(OR=2.149,95%CI=1.104-4.172,p值=0.024),较高的qSOFA评分(OR=1.958,95%CI=1.295-3.002,p值=0.002)和出院后康复(OR=2.222,95%CI=1.017-4.855,p值=0.044)与在6个月内再次住院的机会较高相关,而30天内和1年内死亡率均与年龄(OR=1.248,95%CI=1.056-1.562,p值=0.026和OR=1.073,95%CI=1.025-1.132,p值=0.005)和是否存在癌症诊断(OR=32.671,95%CI=4.787-369.1,p值=0.001和OR=4.408-1.68,95%CI=2,p=
    结论:这项研究确定了LOHS的常规预测因子,CAP患者的再住院和死亡率,这可以进一步增进我们对CAP的理解,从而改善患者管理,出院计划和住院费用。
    BACKGROUND: Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) represents one of the leading causes of hospitalization and has a substantial impact on the financial burden of healthcare. The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with the length of hospital stay (LOHS), rehospitalization and mortality of patients admitted for CAP.
    METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted with patients presenting to a Swiss public hospital between January 2019 and December 2019. Zero-truncated negative binomial and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to assess risk factors.
    RESULTS: A total of 300 patients were analyzed (median 78 years, IQR [67.56, 85.50] and 53% males) with an average LOHS of 7 days (IQR [5.00, 9.00]). Of the 300 patients, 31.6% (97/300) were re-hospitalized within 6 months, 2.7% (8/300) died within 30 days and 11.7% (35/300) died within 1 year. The results showed that sex (IRR = 0.877, 95% CI = 0.776-0.992, p-value = 0.036), age (IRR = 1.007, 95% CI = 1.002-1.012, p-value = 0.003), qSOFA score (IRR = 1.143, 95% CI = 1.049-1.246, p-value = 0.002) and atypical pneumonia (IRR = 1.357, 95% CI = 1.012-1.819, p-value = 0.04) were predictive of LOHS. Diabetes (OR = 2.149, 95% CI = 1.104-4.172, p-value = 0.024), a higher qSOFA score (OR = 1.958, 95% CI = 1.295-3.002, p-value = 0.002) and rehabilitation after discharge (OR = 2.222, 95% CI = 1.017-4.855, p-value = 0.044) were associated with a higher chance of being re-hospitalized within 6 months, whereas mortality within 30 days and within one year were both associated with older age (OR = 1.248, 95% CI = 1.056-1.562, p-value = 0.026 and OR = 1.073, 95% CI = 1.025-1.132, p-value = 0.005, respectively) and the presence of a cancer diagnosis (OR = 32.671, 95% CI = 4.787-369.1, p-value = 0.001 and OR = 4.408, 95% CI = 1.680-11.43, p-value = 0.002, respectively).
    CONCLUSIONS: This study identified routinely available predictors for LOHS, rehospitalization and mortality in patients with CAP, which may further advance our understanding of CAP and thereby improve patient management, discharge planning and hospital costs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Multicenter Study
    背景:许多因素决定了社区获得性肺炎(CAP)的经验性抗生素治疗。我们旨在描述急性住院的经验抗生素治疗CAP患者,并确定当前的治疗算法是否提供了针对肺炎军团菌的特定和足够的覆盖范围。肺炎支原体,和肺炎嗜铬杆菌(LMC)。
    方法:描述性横截面,对2016年1月至2018年3月在丹麦南部地区进行急性住院就诊的所有成人进行多中心研究.利用医疗记录,我们回顾性确定了CAP患者的经验性抗生素治疗和微生物学病因.包括在入院后24小时内使用抗生素并具有确定的细菌病原体的CAP患者。确定了规定的经验性抗生素治疗及其提供针对LMC肺炎的特定和足够覆盖范围的能力。
    结果:在诊断为CAP的19,133例患者中,1590例(8.3%)患者纳入本研究。哌拉西林-他唑巴坦和β-内酰胺酶敏感性青霉素是最常用的经验性治疗方法,515(32%)和388(24%),分别。我们的分析表明,42(37%,95%CI:28-47%)113例LMC肺炎患者中开了LMC覆盖的抗生素,和42(12%,95%CI:8-15%)的364例LMC覆盖的抗生素患者患有LMC肺炎。
    结论:哌拉西林他唑巴坦,一种广谱抗生素,推荐用于不确定的感染病灶,是最常见的CAP治疗,每三分之一的患者都有处方。此外,对于LMC肺炎,目前经验性抗生素治疗的准确性较低.因此,未来的研究应该集中在更快的诊断工具上,以确定感染重点和精确的微生物检测。
    BACKGROUND: Many factors determine empirical antibiotic treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). We aimed to describe the empirical antibiotic treatment CAP patients with an acute hospital visit and to determine if the current treatment algorithm provided specific and sufficient coverage against Legionella pneumophila, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, and Clamydophila pneumoniae (LMC).
    METHODS: A descriptive cross-sectional, multicenter study of all adults with an acute hospital visit in the Region of Southern Denmark between January 2016 and March 2018 was performed. Using medical records, we retrospectively identified the empirical antibiotic treatment and the microbiological etiology for CAP patients. CAP patients who were prescribed antibiotics within 24 h of admission and with an identified bacterial pathogen were included. The prescribed empirical antibiotic treatment and its ability to provide specific and sufficient coverage against LMC pneumonia were determined.
    RESULTS: Of the 19,133 patients diagnosed with CAP, 1590 (8.3%) patients were included in this study. Piperacillin-tazobactam and Beta-lactamase sensitive penicillins were the most commonly prescribed empirical treatments, 515 (32%) and 388 (24%), respectively. Our analysis showed that 42 (37%, 95% CI: 28-47%) of 113 patients with LMC pneumonia were prescribed antibiotics with LMC coverage, and 42 (12%, 95% CI: 8-15%) of 364 patients prescribed antibiotics with LMC coverage had LMC pneumonia.
    CONCLUSIONS: Piperacillin-tazobactam, a broad-spectrum antibiotic recommended for uncertain infectious focus, was the most frequent CAP treatment and prescribed to every third patient. In addition, the current empirical antibiotic treatment accuracy was low for LMC pneumonia. Therefore, future research should focus on faster diagnostic tools for identifying the infection focus and precise microbiological testing.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:社区获得性肺炎(CAP)通常诊断为儿童,呼吸标本的类型至关重要。尚未评估诱导痰(IS)和支气管肺泡灌洗液(BALF)之间病原体检测的差异。
    方法:2018年,对有支气管肺泡灌洗(BAL)指征的CAP住院患儿的配对痰和BALF样本进行多重PCR,检测11种常见呼吸道病原体。
    结果:共对142名痰和BALF配对的儿童进行了测试。痰液的总阳性率为85.9%(122/142),BALF的总阳性率为80.3%(114/142)。这两个标本在肺炎支原体的检测之间几乎完全一致,甲型流感,乙型流感,博卡病毒和RSV。相比之下,腺病毒的κ值最低,为0.156,假阴性率(FNR)为66.7%。鼻病毒的假阳性率(FPR)最高,为18.5%。学龄儿童的一致率明显高于1岁以下儿童(p=0.005)。BALF标本中细菌共感染占14.8%(21/142)。在11对不和谐的标本中,以腺病毒为主的痰液(+)/BALF(-)9例。
    结论:我们的研究结果表明,痰液和BALF结果的一致性是病原体特异性的。当儿童年幼或怀疑与细菌共感染时,需要仔细考虑痰液是否可以用作BALF的替代品。
    BACKGROUND: Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is usually diagnosed in children, and the type of respiratory specimen is critical. Differences in pathogens detection between induced sputum (IS) and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) have not been evaluated.
    METHODS: In 2018, paired sputum and BALF samples from CAP hospitalised children with indications for bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) were subjected to multiplex PCR for the detection of 11 common respiratory pathogens.
    RESULTS: A total of 142 children with paired sputum and BALF were tested. The overall positivity rate was 85.9% (122/142) for sputum and 80.3% (114/142) for BALF. The two specimens presented almost perfect agreement between the detection on M. pneumoniae, influenza A, influenza B, bocavirus and RSV. In contrast, adenovirus had the lowest kappa value of 0.156, and a false negative rate (FNR) of 66.7%. Rhinovirus had the highest false positive rate (FPR) as 18.5%. The consistent rate was significantly higher in school-age children than those under 1 year old (p = .005). Bacterial co-infection in BALF specimens were observed in 14.8% (21/142). Of the 11 discordant pairs of specimens, 9 cases were sputum(+)/BALF(-) with adenovirus predominating.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the consistency of results between sputum and BALF is pathogen specific. Careful consideration needs to be given to whether sputum can be used as a substitute for BALF when children are young or co-infections with bacteria are suspected.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    指南推荐以1-2g/d的剂量静脉注射头孢曲松作为社区获得性肺炎(CAP)住院的成人的经验性治疗,加入大环内酯。我们检查了静脉注射1g/d头孢曲松是否与2g/d的临床结局相似。这是一个单一的中心,回顾性,2015年至2018年在拉宾医学中心住院的所有成人患者的队列研究。主要结果是30天全因死亡率。通过单变量和多变量分析确定30天全因死亡率的危险因素,采用Logistic回归分析。计算具有95%置信区间(CIs)的赔率比(ORs)。总共2045例患者接受静脉注射头孢曲松1g/d治疗,并与1944例接受2g/d治疗的患者进行比较。两组的基线特征和临床表现具有可比性。两组之间的30天全因死亡率相似(301/2045(14.7%),1g/d与312/1944(16.0%),2g/d,p=0.24)。1g/d与2g/d相比,艰难梭菌感染率(CDI)显着降低(4/2045(0.2%)与12/1944(0.6%),p=0.03),并且住院时间显着缩短(中位数4天的四分位距(IQR)3-7vs.5天IQR3-8,p=0.02)。肺炎链球菌的血液分离株均未对青霉素或头孢曲松耐药。对于住院的CAP患者,静脉注射头孢曲松1g/d与静脉注射头孢曲松2g/d的死亡率相似,CDI率降低,住院时间缩短。头孢曲松1g/d可能足以治疗耐药肺炎链球菌患病率低的国家的CAP患者。
    Guidelines recommend intravenous (IV) ceftriaxone at a dose of 1-2 g/d as empirical treatment in adults hospitalized with community acquired pneumonia (CAP), with the addition of macrolide. We examined whether 1 g/d of IV ceftriaxone is associated with similar clinical outcomes to those of 2 g/d. This is a single-center, retrospective, cohort study of all adult patients hospitalized at Rabin Medical Center between 2015 and 2018 with CAP. The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality. Risk factors for 30-day all-cause mortality were identified by univariable and multivariable analyses, using logistic regression analysis. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. A total of 2045 patients were treated with IV ceftriaxone 1 g/d and were and compared to 1944 patients who were treated with 2 g/d. The groups were comparable in their baseline characteristics and their clinical presentation. The 30-day all-cause mortality rate was similar between the groups (301/2045 (14.7%) for 1 g/d vs. 312/1944 (16.0%) for 2 g/d, p = 0.24). The rate of C. difficile infection (CDI) was significantly decreased with 1 g/d compared to 2 g/d (4/2045 (0.2%) vs. 12/1944 (0.6%), p = 0.03) and the length of stay was significantly shorter (median 4 days interquartile range (IQR) 3-7 vs. 5 days IQR 3-8, p = 0.02). None of the blood isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae were penicillin or ceftriaxone resistant. For hospitalized patients with CAP, IV ceftriaxone 1 g/d was associated with similar mortality rates as IV ceftriaxone 2 g/d, with a decreased rate of CDI and shorter length of stay. Ceftriaxone 1 g/d may be sufficient to treat patients with CAP in countries with low prevalence of drug resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号