We aimed to summarize the cancer risk among patients with indication of group I pharmaceuticals as stated in monographs presented by the International Agency for Research on Cancer working groups. Following the PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was conducted using the PubMed database. Pharmaceuticals with few studies on cancer risk were identified in systematic reviews; those with two or more studies were subjected to meta-analysis. For the meta-analysis, a random-effects model was used to calculate the summary relative risks (SRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Heterogeneity across studies was presented using the Higgins I square value from Cochran\'s Q test. Among the 12 group I pharmaceuticals selected, three involved a single study [etoposide, thiotepa, and mustargen + oncovin + procarbazine + prednisone (MOPP)], seven had two or more studies [busulfan, cyclosporine, azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, methoxsalen + ultraviolet (UV) radiation therapy, melphalan, and chlorambucil], and two did not have any studies [etoposide + bleomycin + cisplatin and treosulfan]. Cyclosporine and azathioprine reported increased skin cancer risk (SRR = 1.32, 95% CI 1.07-1.62; SRR = 1.56, 95% CI 1.25-1.93) compared to non-use. Cyclophosphamide increased bladder and hematologic cancer risk (SRR = 2.87, 95% CI 1.32-6.23; SRR = 2.43, 95% CI 1.65-3.58). Busulfan increased hematologic cancer risk (SRR = 6.71, 95% CI 2.49-18.08); melphalan was associated with hematologic cancer (SRR = 4.43, 95% CI 1.30-15.15). In the systematic review, methoxsalen + UV and MOPP were associated with an increased risk of skin and lung cancer, respectively. Our results can enhance persistent surveillance of group I pharmaceutical use, establish novel clinical strategies for patients with indications, and provide evidence for re-categorizing current group I pharmaceuticals into other groups.

It is unclear whether there is a difference in outcomes with treosulfan or busulfan-based conditioning in pediatric patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). We reviewed the evidence on this topic through a systematic review and meta-analysis, the comparison between treosulfan and busulfan-based conditioning in pediatric patients undergoing HSCT for instance. Six studies were included. Meta-analysis showed that there was no difference in the incidence of acute graft versus host disease (odds ratio [OR]: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.57, 1.61), grade II to IV acute graft versus host disease (OR: 1.19; 95% CI: 0.83, 1.72), chronic GVHD (OR: 1.18; 95% CI: 0.70, 2.00), and veno-occlusive disease (OR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.22, 3.85) between treosulfan and busulfan groups. Pooled analysis indicated marginally better survival with treosulfan-based conditioning (OR: 1.57; 95% CI: 1.00, 2.44), however, these results were unstable on sensitivity analysis. A meta-analysis found no difference in transplant-related mortality (OR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.34, 1.42) between the two groups. Retrospective data from a heterogenous population indicates that there is no difference in the rate of GVHD after treosulfan versus busulfan-based conditioning for pediatric HSCT. A marginal improvement in survival was noted with treosulfan but the results remained unstable. Future randomized controlled trials are needed to provide better evidence.

Busulfan is commonly used in the chemotherapy prior to hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Busulfan has a narrow therapeutic window and a well-established exposure-response relationship with important clinical outcomes. Model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) based on population pharmacokinetic (popPK) models has been implemented in the clinical settings. We aimed to systematically review existing literature on popPK models of intravenous busulfan.
We systematically searched Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science databases from inception to December 2022 to identify original popPK models (nonlinear mixed-effect modeling) of intravenous busulfan in HCT population. Model-predicted busulfan clearance (CL) was compared using US population data.
Of the 44 eligible popPK studies published since 2002, 68% were developed predominantly in children, 20% in adults, and 11% in both children and adults. The majority of the models were described using first-order elimination or time-varying CL (69% and 26%, respectively). All but three included a body-size descriptor (e.g., body weight, body surface area). Other commonly included covariates were age (30%) and GSTA1 variant (15%). Median between-subject and between-occasion variabilities of CL were 20% and 11%, respectively. Between-model variabilities in predicted median CL were < 20% in all of the weight tiers (10-110 kg) in the simulation based on US population data.
Busulfan PK is commonly described using a first-order elimination or time-varying CL. A simple model with limited covariates were generally sufficient to attain relatively small unexplained variabilities. However, therapeutic drug monitoring may still be necessary to attain a narrow target exposure.

OBJECTIVE: This review aimed to summarize the available data and offer a practical recommendation regarding the optimal regimen of levetiracetam (LEV) for the prevention of busulfan-induced seizure (BIS) in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).
METHODS: Published articles by searching databases (PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect) were reviewed. All types of original studies performed in pediatric and adult populations have been investigated and required data was extracted.
METHODS: Eleven articles were eligible to be included in this review. A loading dose was not used in any of the studies. LEV had been started from 6 to 48 h before busulfan (Bu) initiation and continued up to 24 to 48 h after its termination. The dose range of LEV was 10 to 20 mg/kg/day divided every 12 h in pediatrics and 500 to 1000 mg twice daily in adults. Both oral and intravenous (IV) routes of administration were used. Except for three studies, no seizure had occurred in patients who had received LEV.
CONCLUSIONS: Considering the available evidence, LEV with the dose range from 500 to 1000 mg twice daily in adults and 10 mg/kg twice daily (20 mg/kg/day in 2 divided doses) in children orally or IV started from 6 to 24 h before Bu initiation up to 24 to 48 h after the last dose of Bu seems to prevent BIS appropriately. More prospective clinical trials with a larger population are needed to validate the optimal dosing of LEV for BIS prophylaxis in patients undergoing HSCT.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) is indicated in pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) who have relapsed or are at a very high risk of relapse during first complete remission. Two types of myeloablative conditioning are employed before allogeneic HSCT: total body irradiation (TBI)-based regimens and chemotherapy (CHT) alone. This study compares the efficacy and safety of TBI-based regimens and CHT-based conditioning in pediatric, adolescent, and young adult patients with ALL (0-24 years old). TBI-based and CHT-conditioning regimens were evaluated in 4262 and 1367 patients, respectively, from 15 studies. Compared to CHT alone, TBI-based regimens were associated with better overall survival (OS), relative risk (RR) 1.21, better event-free survival (RR 1.34), and a reduced risk of relapse (RR 0.69). Both approaches had comparable risk of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), grades 3 to 4 acute GVHD, chronic GVHD, and nonrelapse mortality (NRM). In the subgroup analysis for patients in first complete remission, TBI-based regimens and CHT alone had comparable OS and NRM. Our results demonstrate the superiority of TBI-based regimens compared to CHT alone in pediatric patients with ALL.

BACKGROUND: Consolidation therapy has improved the outcome of newly diagnosed PCNSL patients. Whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) was the first consolidation strategy used and represented the gold standard for many years, but at the expense of a high risk of neurotoxicity. Thus, alternative strategies are being investigated in order to improve disease outcomes and to spare the neurocognitive side effects due to WBRT.
METHODS: We reviewed published studies on PCNSL patients treated with HDC/ASCT, focusing on the efficacy and safety of the conditioning regimens. Prospective and retrospective studies, published in the English language from 1992 to 2022, in high-quality international journals were identified in PubMed.
RESULTS: Consolidation with HDC containing highly CNS-penetrating agents (thiotepa, busulfan or BCNU) followed by ASCT provided long-term disease control and survival in PCNSL patients. Two prospective randomized studies, comparing HDC/ASCT versus WBRT, reported similar progression-free survival (PFS) and similar results on the decline in neurocognitive functions in a substantial proportion of patients after WBRT but not after HDC-ASCT. A recent randomized study comparing HDC/ASCT versus non-myeloablative consolidation reported a longer PFS in transplanted patients.
CONCLUSIONS: ASCT conditioned with regimens, including highly CNS-penetrating agents, represents, to date, the best choice among the available consolidation strategies for fit newly diagnosed PCNSL patients.

OBJECTIVE: Modeling methods for busulfan-induced oligoasthenozoospermia are controversial. We aimed to systematically review the modeling method of busulfan-induced oligospermia and asthenozoospermia, and analyze changes in various evaluation indicators at different busulfan doses over time.
METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed databases, Web of Science, the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, and the Chinese Biomedical Literature Service System until April 9, 2022. Animal experiments of busulfan-induced spermatogenesis dysfunction were included and screened. The model mortality and parameters of the evaluation indicators were subjected to meta-analysis.
RESULTS: Twenty-nine animal studies were included (control/model: 669/1829). The mortality of mice increased with busulfan dose. Significant spermatogenesis impairment occurred within 5 weeks, regardless of busulfan dose (10-40 mg/kg). Testicular weight (weighted mean difference [WMD]: - 0.04, 95% CI: - 0.05, - 0.03), testicular index (WMD: - 2.10, 95% CI: - 2.43, - 1.76), and Johnsen score (WMD: - 4.67, 95% CI: - 5.99, - 3.35) were significantly decreased. The pooled sperm counts of the model group were reduced by 32.8 × 106/ml (WMD: - 32.8, 95% CI: - 44.34, - 21.28), and sperm motility decreased by 37% (WMD: - 0.37, 95% CI: - 0.47, - 0.27). Sperm counts decreased slightly (WMD: - 3.03, 95% CI: - 3.42, - 2.64) in an intratesticular injection of low-dose busulfan (4 - 6 mg/kg), and the model almost returned to normal after one seminiferous cycle.
CONCLUSIONS: The model using low-dose busulfan (10 - 20 mg/kg) returned to normal after 10 - 15 weeks. However, in some spermatogenesis cycles, testicular weight reduction and testicular spermatogenic function damage were not proportional to busulfan dose. Sperm counts and motility results in different studies had significant heterogeneity. Standard protocols for sperm assessment in animal models were needed to reduce heterogeneity between studies.

Serine/threonine kinase 4 (STK4) deficiency is a combined immunodeficiency (CID) characterized by early onset recurrent bacterial, viral, and fungal infections. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a curative therapy for CID; however, little is known about the necessity and benefits of HSCT in patients with STK4 deficiency.
We report two siblings with STK4 deficiency transplanted from two unrelated donors with the same conditioning regimen.
In the conditioning regimen, rituximab was given on Day -11 (375 mg/m2 ), and sirolimus was added on the same day. Busulfan was administered at a myeloablative dose (3.2 mg/kg; Days -7 to -4) with 150 mg/m2 of fludarabine (Days -7 to -3). They were transplanted with peripheral blood stem cells, and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis was administered with 10 mg/m2 methotrexate on Days 1, 3, and 6. In addition, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was started on Day 1 with ongoing use of sirolimus. We did not encounter veno-occlusive disease (VOD), high-grade acute GVHD, or significant organ toxicity in either patient. Both patients were well at the end of the first year after HSCT with complete donor chimerism.
Serine/threonine kinase 4 deficiency is a disease with high mortality post-HSCT; therefore, the conditioning regimen and GVHD prophylaxis strategies are important considerations in these patients. In our opinion, the conditioning regimen, which includes rituximab and busulfan and fludarabine (BU-FLU), GVHD prophylaxis with sirolimus and MMF, and short-term methotrexate, offers favorable outcomes and is well tolerated in our STK4-deficient patients.

The optimal myeloablative conditioning (MAC) regimens in adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) undergoing allogeneic hemopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in complete remission (CR) remain unclear. We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis to compare the effects of different MAC regimens. Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed using WinBUGS version 1.4.3. The commonly used MAC regimen Bu/Cy (4-day busulfan for toal 16 mg/kg orally or 12.8 mg/kg intravenously, plus 2-day cyclophosphamide for toal 120 mg/kg intravenously) is chosen as the common comparator. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with the associated 95% credibility interval (95% CrI) are obtained for all comparisons. We included 19 eligible studies, involving 8104 AML patients and 9 MAC regimens. Compared with Bu/Cy, 3-day busulfan plus fludarabine and thiotepa (Bu3/Flu/TT) is associated with significantly better overall survival (HR, 0.70; 95% CrI, 0.51 to 0.96) and lower risk of relapse (HR, 0.59; 95% CrI, 0.35 to 0.98). Bu3/Flu/TT is also associated with superior overall survival than Cy/TBI (cyclophosphamide plus total body irradiation), and lower risk of relapse than Bu4/Flu (4-day busulfan plus fludarabine). These results suggest that thiotepa-based new MAC regimen Bu3/Flu/TT is associated with improved outcomes in AML patients undergoing allo-HSCT in CR and worth further investigation.

To observe the therapeutic effect and the incidence of adverse reactions of total body irradiation plus cyclophosphamide (TBI/CY) and busulfan plus cyclophosphamide (BU/CY) in the treatment of pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
By searching the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Knowledge, Embase, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), and screening randomized controlled trials (RCTs), quality evaluation and data extraction were performed for the included literature, and meta-analysis was performed for RCTs included at using Review Manager 5.2 software.
A total of 10160 patients were enrolled in 15 RCTs, including 5211 patients in the TBI/CY group and 4949 patients in the BU/CY group. Meta-analysis showed that there was a statistical difference in transplant failure rate (OR = 1.56, 95% CI (1.23, 1.97), P = 0.0002, I 2 = 56%, Z = 3.69), transplant mortality (OR = 1.45, 95% CI (1.24, 1.68), P < 0.00001, I 2 = 76%, Z = 4.80), transplantation long-term disease-free survival rate (OR = 1.52, 95% CI (1.09, 2.12), P = 0.01, I 2 = 0%, Z = 2.50), and transplantation adverse reactions (OR = 1.28, 95% CI (1.08, 1.52), P = 0.004, I 2 = 0%, Z = 2.85).
Meta-analysis showed that TBI/CY combined pretreatment regimen was more effective than BU/CY regimen alone in the treatment of pediatric hematologic transplantation, with a lower incidence of adverse reactions and significant long-term survival efficacy.