Inherited Metabolic Diseases (IMD) are rare genetic diseases, including both lysosomal and peroxisomal diseases. Lysosomal diseases are related to the deficiency of one or more lysosomal enzymes or transporter. Lysosomal diseases are progressive and involve several tissues with most often neurological damage. Among peroxisomal diseases, X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD) is a neurodegenerative disease combining neurological and adrenal damage. For these diseases, enzyme replacement therapy (ERT), allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) and gene therapy represent various possible treatment options, used alone or in combination. The purpose of this workshop is to describe the indications, modalities, and follow-up of allo-HCT as well as the use of ERT peri-transplant. All indications for transplant in these rare diseases are associated with comorbidities and are subject to criteria that must be discussed in a dedicated national multidisciplinary consultation meeting. There are some consensual indications in type I-H mucopolysaccharidosis (MPS-IH) and in the cerebral form of ALD. For other IMDs, no clear benefit from the transplant has been demonstrated. The ideal donor is a non-heterozygous HLA-identical sibling. The recommended conditioning is myeloablative combining fludarabine and busulfan. In MPS-IH, ERT has to be started at diagnosis and continued until complete chimerism and normal enzyme assay are achieved. The pre-transplant assessment and post-transplant follow-up are made according to the published recommendations (PNDS). Standard follow-up is carried out jointly by the transplant and referral teams.

暂无摘要。

暂无摘要。

Busulfan therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is often used to achieve target plasma exposures. Variability in busulfan plasma exposure units (BPEU) is a potential source for misinterpretation of publications and protocols and is a barrier to data capture by hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) registry databases. We sought to harmonize to a single BPEU for international use. Using Delphi consensus methodology, iterative surveys were sent to an increasing number of relevant clinical stakeholders. In survey 1, 14 stakeholders were asked to identify ideal properties of a BPEU. In survey 2, 52 stakeholders were asked (1) to evaluate BPEU candidates according to ideal BPEU properties established by survey 1 and local position statements for TDM and (2) to identify potential facilitators and barriers to adoption of the harmonized BPEU. The most frequently used BPEU identified, in descending order, were area under the curve (AUC) in μM × min, AUC in mg × h/L, concentration at steady state (Css) in ng/mL, AUC in μM × h, and AUC in μg × h/L. All respondents conceptually agreed on the ideal properties of a BPEU and to adopt a harmonized BPEU. Respondents were equally divided between selecting AUC in μM × min versus mg × h/L for harmonization. AUC in mg × h/L was finally selected as the harmonized BPEU, because it satisfied most of the survey-determined ideal properties for the harmonized BPEU and is read easily understood in the clinical practice environment. Furthermore, 10 major professional societies have endorsed AUC in mg × h/L as the harmonized unit for reporting to HCT registry databases and for use in future protocols and publications.

While no widely accepted standard treatment regimen exists for primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL), growing evidence supports an approach that incorporates autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) as consolidative therapy when feasible. In November 2011, the Alberta Hematology Tumor Team established a new clinical practice guideline (CPG) for PCNSL involving high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX)/cytarabine-based induction followed by ASCT for eligible patients using a thiotepa and busulfan (TBu) conditioning regimen that omitted cyclophosphamide from the regimen that was used before 2011. This retrospective study analyzed all 64 patients with PCNSL diagnosed consecutively in 3 Canadian centers between November 2011 and December 2017 to evaluate adherence to the 2011 CPG and associated outcomes. Of the 64 patients with PCNSL, 38 were initiated on the transplantation-eligible protocol, of whom 30 underwent successful ASCT, and 26 were deemed transplantation-ineligible, of whom only 7 completed the transplantation-ineligible HDMTX-based protocol. For the transplantation-eligible and -ineligible cohorts, the projected 3-year overall survival (OS) rates were 83.8% and 14.3% and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 78.1% and 0%, respectively. For the 30 patients who underwent TBu/ASCT, the 3-year OS and PFS rates were 92.7% and 88.9%, respectively, with no treatment-related mortality or significant neurotoxicity. These real-world results highlight the efficacy and tolerability of TBu/ASCT consolidation for PCNSL in patients young and fit enough for an intensive treatment program, along with the significant need for improved therapies for older or less fit patients with PCNSL.

In September 2016 in Lille, France, the Francophone Society of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (SFGM-TC) organized the 7th Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation Clinical Practices Harmonization Workshop Series. Our work group focused on chemotherapy drug dose adaptation for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients presenting a comorbidity. The purpose of this workshop was to provide recommendations on chemotherapy drug dose adaptation for patient populations receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplantation who also had the following comorbidities: obesity, chronic kidney disease and hepatopathy.

Busulfan (Bu) is a key component of conditioning regimens used before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT) in children. Different predictive methods have been used to calculate the first dose of Bu. To evaluate the necessity of further improvements, we retrospectively analyzed the currently available weight- and age-based guidelines to calculate the first doses in 101 children who underwent allogenic SCT in CHU Sainte-Justine, Montreal, after an intravenous Bu-containing conditioning regimen according to genetic and clinical factors. The measured areas under the curve (AUCs) were within target (900 to 1500 µM/min) in 38.7% of patients after the administration of the first dose calculated based on age and weight, as locally recommended. GSTA1 diplotypes linked to poor Bu metabolism (G3) and fludarabine-containing regimens were the only factors associated with AUC within target (OR, 4.7 [95% CI, 1.1 to 19.8, P = .04]; and OR, 9.9 [95% CI, 1.6 to 61.7, P = .01], respectively). From the 11 methods selected for dose calculation, the percentage of AUCs within the target varied between 16% and 74%. In some models G3 was associated with AUCs within the therapeutic and the toxic range, whereas rapid metabolizers (G1) were correlated with subtherapeutic AUCs when different methods were used. These associations were confirmed by clearance-prediction analysis, in which GSTA1 diplotypes consistently influenced the prediction errors of the methods. These findings suggest that these factors should be considered in Bu dose prediction in addition to the anthropometric data from patients. Furthermore, our data indicated that GSTA1 diplotypes was a factor that should be included in future population pharmacokinetic models, including similar conditioning regiments, to improve the prediction of Bu exposure after its initial dose.

The Practice Guidelines Committee of the American Society of Blood or Marrow Transplantation (ASBMT) sought to develop an evidence-based review about personalizing busulfan-based conditioning. The Committee sought to grade the relevant published studies (June 1, 2008 through March 31, 2016) according to criteria set forth by the Steering Committee for Evidence Based Reviews from ASBMT. Unfortunately, the published literature was too heterogeneous and lacked adequately powered and sufficiently controlled studies for this to be feasible. Despite this observation, the continued interest in this topic led the Practice Guidelines Committee to develop a list of most frequently asked questions (FAQs) regarding personalized busulfan dosing. This \"Considerations\" document is a list of these FAQs and their responses, addressing topics of practical relevance to hematopoietic cell transplantation clinicians.

暂无摘要。

Achievement of a busulfan area-under-the-concentration versus time curve (AUC) of 900 to 1500 μM·min is associated with improved hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) outcomes. Multiple pediatric busulfan dosing guidelines aim to achieve this target. The authors\' objective was to describe the AUCs achieved after simulated dosing using available pediatric i.v. busulfan dosing guidelines. The health records of children who received i.v. busulfan for HSCT conditioning at The Hospital for Sick Children were reviewed. Busulfan AUCs were calculated for each patient based on plasma busulfan concentrations using either a 1-compartment model or a validated limited-sampling strategy. Published pediatric busulfan dosing guidelines were identified. Initial busulfan doses were determined for all patients using each dosing guideline and total body weight (TBW). For overweight patients (TBW-to-ideal body weight [IBW] ≥ 1.25), initial busulfan doses were also determined using IBW and adjusted IBW (IBWadj). The resulting AUCs were simulated. The proportion of subjects (TBW/IBW < 1.25, TBW/IBW ≥ 1.25, and infants) with an AUC within target (900 to 1500 μM·min) after dosing simulation with each guideline was compared. One hundred eleven children (mean age, 6.2 years [SD, ±5.2]) who received i.v. busulfan were included. When dosing with each of the 12 i.v. busulfan dosing guidelines identified was simulated using TBW in 97 non-overweight patients, the proportion of patients with an AUC within the target range varied from 51% to 74% and from 45% to 64% in infants. Use of IBW or IBWadj to calculate initial busulfan doses in overweight children improved the performance of most guidelines. Current busulfan dosing guidelines vary in their ability to achieve AUCs within the target range. For children who are not overweight, we recommend 1 of 3 high-performing guidelines that allow individualization of the target busulfan AUC. Use of either IBW or IBWadj in overweight children improves the performance of most guidelines. Regardless of the guideline used, therapeutic drug monitoring is essential to verify achievement of the target AUC.