Burnout, Psychological

倦怠,心理
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    医疗保健专业人员“工作中的心理健康会影响患者”的护理体验。然而,文献倾向于关注心理健康的消极方面,比如压力和倦怠,以及支持医疗保健专业人员福祉的干预措施效果有限。在COVID-19大流行之后,全球对医疗保健专业人员心理健康的担忧日益升级。迫切需要回顾有关医疗保健专业人员心理健康的最新文献,以确定我们知识的差距。此范围审查将有助于将未来的研究重点放在改善医护人员的心理健康上,从而改善患者的护理体验。
    这项范围界定审查旨在回答两个研究问题:1)我们对医疗保健专业人员和患者对医疗保健专业人员工作中的心理健康的看法有什么了解?2)医疗保健专业人员工作中的心理健康如何影响患者的护理经验?
    我们使用Arksey和O\'Malley(2005)和科尔库恩和奥布莱恩(2010)。我们全面的文献检索涵盖了PubMed2011-2021年的出版物,CINAHL,Scopus和PsychInfo,NIHR期刊,埃托斯,打开灰色,谷歌学者,以及卫生和社会关怀部和国王基金网站。我们还手工检索了纳入研究的参考列表。两名独立审稿人评估了研究的资格。
    我们收录了来自16个国家的56篇文章,大多数使用定性方法。我们确定了五个主题:1)医疗保健专业人员心理健康的定义;2)医疗保健专业人员心理健康与医疗保健工作性质之间的关系;3)组织文化在医疗保健专业人员心理健康中的作用以及组织文化的重要性;4)COVID-19大流行对医疗保健专业人员心理健康的影响;5)医疗保健专业人员心理健康与患者护理体验之间的联系。我们发现组织文化之间存在复杂的关系,医疗保健专业人员对心理健康的看法,和病人的护理经验。
    虽然目前在医疗保健专业人员的心理健康定义上没有达成共识,我们的综述强调了它与组织文化的关系及其对患者护理体验的影响。未来的研究应该包括患者的观点,并开发有意义的支持方式,发展,留住医疗保健专业人员。
    范围审查:对医疗保健专业人员的福祉知之甚少。必须首先满足基本需求,以支持员工照顾@KathrynBamforth。
    UNASSIGNED: Healthcare professionals\' psychological wellbeing at work affects patients\' experiences of care. However, the literature tends to focus on negative aspects of psychological wellbeing, such as stress and burnout, and interventions to support healthcare professionals\' wellbeing have limited effectiveness. The growing global concern over the psychological wellbeing of healthcare professionals has escalated following the COVID-19 pandemic. There is an urgent need to review the recent literature on healthcare professionals\' psychological wellbeing to identify gaps in our knowledge. This scoping review will help focus the future research to improve the psychological wellbeing of healthcare staff and thereby patients\' care experiences.
    UNASSIGNED: This scoping review aims to answer two research questions: 1) What do we know about healthcare professionals\' and patients\' perceptions of healthcare professionals\' psychological wellbeing at work? 2) How does the psychological wellbeing of healthcare professionals at work affect patients\' experiences of care?
    UNASSIGNED: We conducted a scoping review using frameworks developed by Arksey and O\'Malley (2005) and Levac, Colquhoun and O\'Brien (2010). Our comprehensive literature search covered publications dated 2011-2021 in PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus and PsychInfo, NIHR Journals, EThOS, Open Grey, Google Scholar, and the Department for Health and Social Care and Kings Fund websites. We also hand-searched the reference lists of included studies. Two independent reviewers assessed the eligibility of studies.
    UNASSIGNED: We included 56 articles from 16 countries, most using qualitative methods. We identified five themes: 1) The definition of healthcare professional psychological wellbeing; 2) The relationship between healthcare professionals\' psychological wellbeing and nature of healthcare work; 3) The role of organisational culture in healthcare professionals\' psychological wellbeing and the importance of organisational culture; 4) The impact the COVID-19 pandemic on of healthcare professionals\' psychological wellbeing; and 5) The link between healthcare professionals\' psychological wellbeing and patients\' experiences of care. We found a complex relationship between organisational culture, healthcare professionals\' perceptions of psychological wellbeing, and patients\' experiences of care.
    UNASSIGNED: While there is currently no consensus on the definition of psychological wellbeing in healthcare professionals, our review highlights its relation to organizational culture and its impact on patients\' experiences of care. Future research should include patients\' perspectives and develop meaningful ways to support, develop, and retain healthcare professionals.
    UNASSIGNED: Scoping review: wellbeing of healthcare professionals is poorly understood. Basic needs must be met first to support staff to care @KathrynBamforth.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景和目标:医学生是促进心理健康和心理健康的理想目标群体,暴露于特定的风险因素,比如医疗培训的内容,暴露于疾病和死亡,和紧张的学术例行公事。医学生报告高度愤世嫉俗和情绪疲惫,这代表了倦怠综合症的两个基本特征。在这次系统审查中,分析了通过全球验证工具评估医学生倦怠水平的研究。材料和方法:已经进行了系统评价,以确定研究:(1)关注医学生的样本;(2)使用经过验证的工具评估职业倦怠综合征;(3)提供职业倦怠的患病率数据;(4)用英语写。结果:在最初获得的5547篇论文中,64名最终纳入分析。样本量从51到2682名参与者不等。几乎所有研究都有横断面设计;Maslach倦怠量表及其相关版本是最常用的评估工具。职业倦怠的患病率,根据性别和学术阶段进行分层,范围从5.6%到88%。职业倦怠主要是由停止医学教育的想法来预测的,负面生活事件,缺乏支持,不满,动力不足。结论:医学生职业倦怠综合征的患病率相当异质性,在一些国家达到88%的峰值。然而,已经确定了几个预测因子,包括负面生活事件或不良动机。这些发现强调了开发针对下一代医生的预防性干预措施的必要性,以提高他们的应对策略和应变能力。
    Background and Objectives: Medical students represent the ideal target group for promoting mental health and mental wellbeing, being exposed to specific risk factors, such as the content of medical training, the exposure to sickness and death, and a stressful academic routine. Medical students report high levels of cynicism and emotional exhaustion, which represent two of the essential features of burnout syndrome. In this systematic review, studies assessing the levels of burnout among medical students through validated tools worldwide were analyzed. Materials and Methods: A systematic review has been performed in order to identify studies: (1) focusing on samples of medical students; (2) evaluating burnout syndrome using validated tools; (3) providing prevalence data on burnout; and (4) written in English. Results: Out of the 5547 papers initially obtained, 64 were finally included in the analysis. The sample sizes ranged from 51 to 2682 participants. Almost all studies had a cross-sectional design; the Maslach Burnout Inventory and its related versions were the most frequently used assessment tools. The prevalence of burnout, which was stratified based on gender and academic stage, ranged from 5.6 to 88%. Burnout was mostly predicted by thoughts of stopping medical education, negative life events, lack of support, dissatisfaction, and poor motivation. Conclusions: The prevalence of burnout syndrome in medical students is quite heterogeneous, reaching a peak of 88% in some countries. However, several predictors have been identified, including negative life events or poor motivation. These findings highlight the need to develop preventive interventions targeting the future generation of medical doctors, in order to improve their coping strategies and resilience styles.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:通常在受训者福祉和教育成果的背景下进行研究,以检查全科主管的福祉。
    目的:通过“主管福利”镜头来巩固有关GP主管福利的当前文献。
    方法:关于Embase的原始研究的文献综述,OvidMEDLINE,和OvidPsycINFO从成立到2022年12月。
    方法:Embase,OvidMEDLINE,和OvidPsycINFO数据库从开始到2022年12月进行了系统搜索。如果原始研究研究探索了健康或倦怠的任何方面,他们就有资格(也就是说,构造概念化,风险和保护因素,含义,或干预措施)在参与教育全科医生学员的全科医生中。使用QualSyst工具评估纳入研究的报告质量。纳入研究的结果进行了叙述综合。
    结果:回顾了来自26个独立样本的数据。倦怠通常使用Leiter和Maslach模型进行概念化。幸福在文献中定义不清,很大程度上是在个人心理学方面概念化的,在较小程度上,专业满意度。风险和保护因素被识别并分组为个体(例如,对教学能力的满意度)和外部(例如,自主性,大学关系,资源可用性)因素。GP主管的幸福感似乎会影响他们的工作绩效和保留率。本综述仅确定了两项评估干预措施以支持全科医生主管的健康的研究。
    结论:本综述强调缺乏概念上的明确性和对全科医生主管健康干预措施的研究。它为未来的研究提供指导,旨在最大限度地提高GP主管的福祉,并支持受训人员的福祉。
    BACKGROUND: Research examining general practice supervisor wellbeing has often been conducted within the context of trainee wellbeing and educational outcomes.
    OBJECTIVE: To consolidate the current literature regarding the wellbeing of GP supervisors through a \'supervisor-wellbeing\' lens.
    METHODS: Literature review of original research studies on Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, and Ovid PsycINFO from inception to December 2022.
    METHODS: The Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, and Ovid PsycINFO databases were systematically searched from inception to December 2022. Original research studies were eligible if they explored any aspect of wellbeing or burnout (that is, construct conceptualisations, risk and protective factors, implications, or interventions) among GPs involved in educating GP trainees. Reporting quality of included studies was assessed using the QualSyst tool. Results from included studies were narratively synthesised.
    RESULTS: Data from 26 independent samples were reviewed. Burnout was generally conceptualised using the Leiter and Maslach model. Wellbeing was poorly defined in the literature, largely being conceptualised in personal psychological terms and, to a lesser extent, professional satisfaction. Risk and protective factors were identified and grouped as individual (for example, satisfaction with capacity to teach) and external (for example, autonomy, collegial relationships, resource availability) factors. GP supervisors\' wellbeing appeared to affect their job performance and retention. This review identified only two studies evaluating interventions to support GP supervisors\' wellbeing.
    CONCLUSIONS: The present review highlights a lack of conceptual clarity and research examining interventions for GP supervisor wellbeing. It provides guidance for future research designed to maximise the wellbeing of GP supervisors and support the wellbeing of trainees.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    本系统综述旨在批判性地综合证据,以确定审核和反馈过程对护士和心理健康的专业作用的影响。关于审核和反馈过程对护士的职业角色和心理健康的正面或负面影响的程度知之甚少。进行了综合系统评价。使用Covidence系统审查软件管理筛选过程。数据抽取和方法学质量评价并行进行,并进行了叙事综合。护士对审计和反馈过程的参与和反应取决于自我感知的动机,内容,和交付;护士将其视为专业发展的机会。然而,据报道,审计对护士的心理健康产生了负面影响,对倦怠的影响,压力,和工作场所的积极性下降。定位框架,delivery,审核和反馈的内容对护士满意度和成功的质量改进至关重要。
    This systematic review aimed to critically synthesis evidence to identify the impact that audit and feedback processes have on the professional role of the nurse and psychological well-being. Little is known about the extent to which audit and feedback processes can positively or negatively impact the professional role of the nurse and psychological well-being. An integrative systematic review was conducted. Covidence systematic review software was used to manage the screening process. Data extraction and methodological quality appraisal were conducted in parallel, and a narrative synthesis was conducted. Nurse participation and responsiveness to audit and feedback processes depended on self-perceived motivation, content, and delivery; and nurses viewed it as an opportunity for professional development. However, audit was reported to negatively impact nurses\' psychological well-being, with impacts on burnout, stress, and demotivation in the workplace. Targeting framing, delivery, and content of audit and feedback is critical to nurses\' satisfaction and successful quality improvement.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这份手稿研究了在COVID-19期间使用宁静室和类似工具来改善护士和其他从业人员的工作场所。对文献进行了快速回顾,并从四个不同的数据库中完成,包括PubMed,CINAHL,科学直接,和学术搜索完成。通过使用单字符串布尔搜索来最大化返回的文章数量,完成了文献综述。由此产生的14篇相关文章产生了6个主持人主题和4个障碍主题。主持人主题包括:福利,辅助辅助,放松的地方,需要领导,可用性,和其他影响。障碍主题包括:缺乏领导力,对缺乏空间的担忧,整体关注,和消极的看法。这方面的文献研讨显著缺乏。审查的大多数文献显示,对于利用宁静室或类似工具减少护士和从业人员压力和倦怠的机构而言,取得了广泛的积极成果。这些工具的使用提高了护士和医生的同情心,保留,和弹性。
    This manuscript examines using serenity rooms and similar tools to improve the workplace during COVID-19 for nurses and other practitioners. A rapid review of the literature was conducted and completed from four different databases, including PubMed, CINAHL, Science Direct, and Academic Search Complete. The literature review was completed with the use of a single-string Boolean search to maximize the number of articles returned. The resulting 14 germane articles yielded six facilitator themes and four barrier themes. Facilitator themes included: benefits, assistive adjuncts, places of relaxation, leadership required, availability, and other effects. Barrier themes included: lacking leadership, concerns regarding lack of space, holistic concerns, and negative perceptions. There is a significant lack of research in the literature in this area. Most of the literature reviewed showed widely positive results for institutions that utilized serenity rooms or similar tools for decreasing nurse and practitioner stress and burnout. The use of these tools improved nurse and practitioner compassion, retention, and resiliency.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:育儿既复杂又紧张,所以父母有时会经历育儿倦怠。这项研究的主要目的是根据生态系统理论(EST)概述与至少有一个孩子的父母的一般父母倦怠(PB)相关的因素。
    方法:PubMed,WebofScience,EBSCO,使用从医学主题词中提取的关键词,如“育儿”,系统地搜索了CNKI和万方2010年至2023年7月发表的同行评审文章\"父母\",\"倦怠\",“心理倦怠”,“烧坏综合征”。如果他们描述了一般人群中0-18岁儿童父母的因素与PB之间的关联,并发表在英文或中文同行评审期刊上。采用多样化设计研究质量评估工具(QATSDD)评估纳入研究的偏倚风险。
    结果:在2037篇文章中,26条符合纳入标准。基于生态系统理论(EST),我们发现微系统-个体因素,如性别,教育水平,收入,父母人格,母性父母动机的内在化,未缓和的圣餐,自我同情和关心他人,述情障碍,焦虑和抑郁症状,父母完美主义,弹性,低自尊和高度需要控制,母亲的依恋风格被认为与育儿倦怠有关。中系统人际关系因素涉及亲子关系和婚姻满意度。外系统组织或社区因素包括家庭中儿童的数量,邻居和和孩子在一起的时间,孩子的疾病,孩子的行为问题和社会支持。宏观系统-社会/政策或文化因素主要是个人价值观和文化价值观。
    结论:本系统综述发现了与PB相关的几个因素。然而,大多数因素是由1-2项通常采用横断面设计的研究报告的.然而,我们仍然建议卫生政策制定者和管理者通过调整这些可改变的因素来减轻有孩子的父母的育儿倦怠。
    Parenting is both a complex and stressful endeavor, so parents sometimes experience parenting burnout. The main objective of this study was to provide an overview of factors related to general parental burnout (PB) among parents with at least one child based on the Ecological Systems Theory (EST).
    PubMed, Web of Science, EBSCO, CNKI and WanFang were systematically searched for studies published from 2010 to July 2023 for peer-reviewed articles using keywords extracted from Medical Subject Headings such as \"parenting\", \"parental\", \"burnout\", \"psychological burnout\", \"burn-out syndrome\". Studies were included if they described associations between factors and PB among parents of children aged 0-18 years old in the general population, and published in an English or Chinese language peer-reviewed journal. The Quality Assessment Tool for Studies with Diverse Designs (QATSDD) was employed to assess the risk of bias of included studies.
    Of 2037 articles, 26 articles met the inclusion criteria. Based on the Ecological Systems Theory (EST), we found that microsystem-individual factors such as gender, educational level, income, parental personality, internalization of maternal parental motivation, unmitigated communion, self-compassion and concern for others, alexithymia, anxiety and depressive symptoms, parental perfectionism, resilience, low self-esteem and high need for control, mother\'s attachment style were identified as being associated with parenting burnout. Mesosystem-interpersonal factors involve parent-child relationship and marital satisfaction. The exosystem-organizational or community factors include the number of children in the household, neighborhood and the number of hours spent with children, child\'s illness, child\'s behavior problems and social support. The macrosystem-society/policy or culture factors are mainly personal values and cultural values.
    This systematic review found several factors that have been investigated in relation to PB. However, the majority of the factors were reported by one or two studies often implementing a cross-sectional design. Nevertheless, we still recommend that health policymakers and administrators relieve parenting burnout among parents with children by adjusting these modifiable factors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    一般来说,大学生有倦怠的危险。这可能在COVID-19大流行期间加剧。我们的目的是调查COVID-19大流行期间大学生的倦怠患病率,并检查其在各国的分布情况,性别,研究领域,和时间段。PubMed,EMBASE,PsycINFO,世界卫生组织的全球COVID-19数据库,Scopus,认识论,搜索了ERIC和GoogleScholar(协议:https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF。IO/BYRXW)。研究是独立筛选和提取的。进行随机效应荟萃分析。对研究质量进行了评估,使用建议分级评估来评估证据的确定性,发展,和评价方法。我们确定了44个主要研究,包括26,500名学生。高情绪耗竭(EE)的全球患病率为56.3%,55.3%为高冷嘲热讽(CY),41.8%为低个人成就(PA)。EE的患病率,CY,PA领域在不同的研究领域差异很大,各国、世卫组织和世界银行区域,但不是性。所有研究都证明了良好的内部有效性,尽管研究之间存在很大的异质性。证据的确定性被评为中等。考虑到其潜在的严重后果,倦怠是一个重要的公共卫生问题。在组织和个人层面上制定和实施基于证据的本地化干预措施对于减轻职业倦怠是必要的。
    Generally, university students are at risk of burnout. This likely was exacerbated during the COVID-19 pandemic. We aimed to investigate burnout prevalence among university students during the COVID-19 pandemic and examine its distribution across countries, sexes, fields of study, and time-period. PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, World Health Organization\'s Global COVID-19 database, Scopus, Epistemonikos, ERIC and Google Scholar were searched (protocol: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/BYRXW ). Studies were independently screened and extracted. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed. Study quality was appraised, and certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. We identified 44 primary studies comprising 26,500 students. Global prevalence rates were 56.3% for high emotional exhaustion (EE), 55.3% for high cynicism (CY) and 41.8% for low personal accomplishment (PA). Prevalence of EE, CY, and PA domains varied significantly across fields of study, countries and WHO and World Bank regions, but not sex. All studies demonstrated good internal validity, although substantial heterogeneity existed between studies. The certainty of evidence was rated as moderate. Considering its potentially severe consequences, burnout is a significant public health concern. The development and implementation of evidence-based localized interventions at organizational and individual levels are necessary to mitigate burnout.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    在缺乏国际公认的标准化标准的情况下,已经开发了几种患者报告的结局指标(PROM)来衡量职业倦怠.这项研究的目的是将我们对5个PROM的心理测量效度的2021年审查扩展到Shirom-Melamed倦怠测量(SMBM)和倦怠评估工具(BAT)。为此,我们在MEDLINE进行了系统的文献检索,PsycINFO,和Embase数据库遵循我们以前的方法学框架和基于COSIN的健康测量仪器选择标准(COSMIN)。我们使用建议分级来评估证据水平,评估,发展,和评估(等级)指南。我们确定了SMBM上的694篇出版物和BAT上的421篇出版物,但最终审查包括八篇关于SMBM的论文和三篇关于BAT的论文。在SMBM评估的七个心理测量特性中,内容,结构,标准效度被评为不足,而结构和内部一致性的证据质量是高的和中等的,分别。在BAT评估的九个心理测量属性中,内容,结构,判据,结构效度适中,内部一致性较高。这项研究的一个局限性是我们没有评估跨文化的有效性,因为审查的研究数量太少,内容有效性只能根据原始PROM版本而不是翻译进行评估。最后,BAT在心理测量效度方面优于SMBM,但是某些属性的证据质量很低或非常低,建议需要额外的验证研究。
    Unedostatkume²unarodnopriznatihstandarziranihkriterijaosmišljenojenekolikomjeraishodakojuopisujepacijent(engl.患者报告的结果指标,Krat.PROM)zamjerenjeprofesionalnogizgaranja.CiljjeovogispitivanjabioširiitinašprethodnipsihometrijkevaljanostipetPROM-ovaiz2021.纳upitnikeShirom-Melamed倦怠测量(SMBM)i倦怠评估工具(BAT)。UtusmosvrhusustavnopretrazililiteraturudostupnubazamapodatakaMEDLINE,PsycINFOiEmbase,.COSMINstandarzmazaodabirmjernihinstrumenatatemeljenimanakonsenzusu(izv.健康测量仪器的选择标准)。RazinudokazaocjenjivalismopomoćusmjernicaGradingofRecommendations,评估,发展,和评估(等级)。Pretragomsuizdvojene694publikacijezaSMBMte421zaBAT,noovajkonačnipregledobuhvaćaosamčlanakaoSMBM-uitrioBAT-u.OdsedamocijenjenihpsiometrijskihsvojstavazaSMBM,Valjanostsadrzajaistrackurekriterijaocijenjenisunedovoljnomocjenom,一个kakvoćadokazazakonstruktodnosnoumjereni.OddevetpsiometrijskihsvojstavazaBAT,Valjanostsadrzajatestrackurekriterijaikonstruktaocijenjenisuumjerenima,一个internakonzistencijasnaznom.Jednoodocgraničenjaovogaispitivanjasvakakoječininjenicadanismoocjenjivalime²ukulturnuvaljanost(engl.cross-culturalvalidity)budućidajekoličinapregledanihispitivanjapremalena,avaljanostsadrzajamoíeseocijenitiisključivonatemeljuizvorneinačicaPROM-a,一个njezinaprijevoda。Zaključno,BATimaboljupsihometrijskuvaljanostodSMBM-a,nokakvoćajedokazazapojedinasvojstvaniskailiveomaniska,toupućujenadaljnjaistraçivanjavaljanosti.
    In the absence of internationally recognised standardised criteria, several patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have been developed to measure occupational burnout. The aim of this study was to extend our 2021 review of the psychometric validity of five PROMs to the Shirom-Melamed Burnout Measure (SMBM) and the Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT). To do that we ran a systematic literature search in the MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Embase databases following our previous methodological framework and the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN). We assessed the level of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) guideline. We identified 694 publications on SMBM and 421 on BAT, but the final review includes eight papers on SMBM and three on BAT. Of the seven psychometric properties assessed for SMBM, content, structural, and criterion validity were rated as insufficient, whereas the quality of evidence for construct and internal consistency was high and moderate, respectively. Of the nine psychometric properties assessed for BAT, content, structural, criterion, and construct validity was moderate and internal consistency was high. One limitation of this study is that we did not assess cross-cultural validity, because the number of studies reviewed is too small and content validity can only be assessed based on the original PROM version rather than translation. To conclude, BAT is superior to SMBM in terms of psychometric validity, but the quality of evidence for some properties is low or very low, suggesting a need for additional validation studies.
    U nedostatku međunarodno priznatih standardiziranih kriterija osmišljeno je nekoliko mjera ishoda koje opisuje pacijent (engl. patient-reported outcome measures, krat. PROM) za mjerenje profesionalnog izgaranja. Cilj je ovog ispitivanja bio proširiti naš prethodni pregled psihometrijske valjanosti pet PROM-ova iz 2021. na upitnike Shirom-Melamed Burnout Measure (SMBM) i Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT). U tu smo svrhu sustavno pretražili literaturu dostupnu u bazama podataka MEDLINE, PsycINFO i Embase, služeći se metodološkim okvirom iz prethodnog ispitivanja te tzv. COSMIN standardima za odabir mjernih instrumenata temeljenima na konsenzusu (izv. COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments). Razinu dokaza ocjenjivali smo pomoću smjernica Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). Pretragom su izdvojene 694 publikacije za SMBM te 421 za BAT, no ovaj konačni pregled obuhvaća osam članaka o SMBM-u i tri o BAT-u. Od sedam ocijenjenih psihometrijskih svojstava za SMBM, valjanost sadržaja i strukture kriterija ocijenjeni su nedovoljnom ocjenom, a kakvoća dokaza za konstrukt odnosno interna konzistencija ocijenjeni su kao snažni odnosno umjereni. Od devet psihometrijskih svojstava za BAT, valjanost sadržaja te strukture kriterija i konstrukta ocijenjeni su umjerenima, a interna konzistencija snažnom. Jedno od ograničenja ovoga ispitivanja svakako je činjenica da nismo ocjenjivali međukulturnu valjanost (engl. cross-cultural validity) budući da je količina pregledanih ispitivanja premalena, a valjanost sadržaja može se ocijeniti isključivo na temelju izvorne inačica PROM-a, a ne njezina prijevoda. Zaključno, BAT ima bolju psihometrijsku valjanost od SMBM-a, no kakvoća je dokaza za pojedina svojstva niska ili veoma niska, što upućuje na daljnja istraživanja valjanosti.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    首先,提供有关急诊医生工作压力和倦怠水平的现有科学文献的综合和分析。第二,找出影响具体工作情境的相关因素。
    在NCBIPubMed和Embase中进行了系统搜索。比较初级研究,系统回顾和横断面,包括量化急诊医师的倦怠。仅保留了2011年至2022年之间发表的研究。为“倦怠和压力”的搜索键编译了同义词集,\'紧急\',“医生”和“倦怠和创伤后应激障碍”。
    保留了35篇论文以供进一步研究。与其他医疗保健专业相比,急诊医师在所有职业倦怠方面的得分均显着较高。职业倦怠与工作特征和组织因素显着相关。严重事件和攻击被认为是影响急诊医师心理健康的最重要的急性工作特征和组织因素,包括创伤后应激障碍的发展。此外,个人因素,如年龄,个性,应对策略在职业倦怠和工作相关创伤的发展中也起着重要作用。
    现有研究表明,与其他医疗保健专业人员相比,急诊医生报告的情绪疲惫和人格解体得分更高。工作特点促成了这一点,但是与工作有关的创伤事件和侵略是重要的决定因素。个人特征,如年龄,人格类型D,以前的经验和应对策略似乎也是决定因素。急诊医生显示出发展倦怠和工作压力相关问题的高风险。
    UNASSIGNED: First, to provide a synthesis and analysis of available scientific literature regarding the level of work stress and burnout among emergency physicians. Second, to identify the effect of the specific work situation-related factors.
    UNASSIGNED: A systematic search was performed in NCBI PubMed and Embase. Comparative primary studies, both systematic review and cross-sectional, quantifying burnout in emergency physicians were included. Only studies published between 2011 and 2022 were retained. Synonym sets were compiled for the search key for \'burnout & stress\', \'emergency\', \'physician\' and \'burnout & posttraumatic stress disorder\'.
    UNASSIGNED: Thirty-five papers were retained for further research. Emergency physicians scored significantly higher for all dimensions of burnout compared to other healthcare professions. Significant correlations for burnout were found with work characteristic and organizational factors. Critical incidents and aggression were identified as the most important acute work characteristics and organizational factors impacting emergency physician\'s mental wellbeing including the development of posttraumatic stress disorder. Moreover, personal factors such as age, personality, and coping strategies also play an important role in the development of burnout as well as work-related trauma.
    UNASSIGNED: Available studies show that emergency physicians report higher scores of emotional exhaustion and depersonalization when compared to other healthcare professionals. Work characteristics contribute to this, but work-related traumatic incidents and aggression are important determinants. Personal characteristics such as age, personality type D, previous experiences and coping strategies seem to be determining factors likewise. Emergency physicians showed a high risk for developing burnout and work stress-related problems.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号