Bronchoconstriction

支气管收缩
  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    目的:比较各种诊断性支气管激发试验(BPT)在运动员下气道功能障碍(LAD)评估中的表现,并提供最佳临床实践。
    方法:系统评价与敏感性和特异性荟萃分析。
    方法:PubMed,EBSCOhost和WebofScience(1990年1月1日-2021年12月31日)。
    方法:原始全文研究,包括通过基于症状的问卷/病史和/或直接和/或间接BPT进行LAD评估的运动员/体力活动者(15-65岁)。
    结果:在26项包含BPT诊断性能定量荟萃分析数据的研究中(n=2624名参与者;33%为女性);22%的医生诊断为哮喘,51%的患者报告了LAD症状。在有LAD症状的运动员中,eucapnic自愿性呼吸过度(EVH)和运动挑战测试(ECTs)以46%的灵敏度和74%的特异性证实了诊断,51%的灵敏度和84%的特异性,分别,而乙酰甲胆碱BPT的敏感性为55%,特异性为56%。如果EVH是参考标准,LAD症状的存在对EVH阳性的敏感性为78%,特异性为45%,而ECT的敏感性为42%,特异性为82%。如果ECT是参考标准,LAD症状的存在对阳性ECT有80%的敏感性和56%的特异性,而EVH对阳性ECT表现出65%的敏感性和65%的特异性。
    结论:在运动员的LAD评估中,EVH和基于现场的ECT提供相似和中等的诊断测试性能。相比之下,乙酰甲胆碱BPT具有较低的整体测试性能。
    未经评估:CRD42020170915。
    OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance of various diagnostic bronchoprovocation tests (BPT) in the assessment of lower airway dysfunction (LAD) in athletes and inform best clinical practice.
    METHODS: Systematic review with sensitivity and specificity meta-analyses.
    METHODS: PubMed, EBSCOhost and Web of Science (1 January 1990-31 December 2021).
    METHODS: Original full-text studies, including athletes/physically active individuals (15-65 years) who underwent assessment for LAD by symptom-based questionnaires/history and/or direct and/or indirect BPTs.
    RESULTS: In 26 studies containing data for quantitative meta-analyses on BPT diagnostic performance (n=2624 participants; 33% female); 22% had physician diagnosed asthma and 51% reported LAD symptoms. In athletes with symptoms of LAD, eucapnic voluntary hyperpnoea (EVH) and exercise challenge tests (ECTs) confirmed the diagnosis with a 46% sensitivity and 74% specificity, and 51% sensitivity and 84% specificity, respectively, while methacholine BPTs were 55% sensitive and 56% specific. If EVH was the reference standard, the presence of LAD symptoms was 78% sensitive and 45% specific for a positive EVH, while ECTs were 42% sensitive and 82% specific. If ECTs were the reference standard, the presence of LAD symptoms was 80% sensitive and 56% specific for a positive ECT, while EVH demonstrated 65% sensitivity and 65% specificity for a positive ECT.
    CONCLUSIONS: In the assessment of LAD in athletes, EVH and field-based ECTs offer similar and moderate diagnostic test performance. In contrast, methacholine BPTs have lower overall test performance.
    UNASSIGNED: CRD42020170915.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) can be defined as the smallest change or difference in an outcome measure that is perceived as beneficial and would lead to a change in the patient\'s medical management.The aim of the current expert consensus report is to provide a \"state-of-the-art\" review of the currently available literature evidence about MCID for end-points to monitor asthma control, in order to facilitate optimal disease management and identify unmet needs in the field to guide future research.A series of MCID cut-offs are currently available in literature and validated among populations of asthmatic patients, with most of the evidence focusing on outcomes as patient reported outcomes, lung function and exercise tolerance. On the contrary, only scant and partial data are available for inflammatory biomarkers. These clearly represent the most interesting target for future development in diagnosis and clinical management of asthma, particularly in view of the several biologic drugs in the pipeline, for which regulatory agencies will soon require personalised proof of efficacy and treatment response predictors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Asthma affects millions of individuals worldwide. Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction is common in patients diagnosed with asthma, but may also occur in patients without chronic asthma. Patients with isolated exercise-induced bronchoconstriction may require pretreatment with inhaled short-acting β-agonists prior to exercise. Patients diagnosed with asthma can achieve good control of the symptoms of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction with appropriate treatment of underlying chronic asthma. Current guidelines suggest staging patients with asthma based on severity of symptoms and initiating therapy according to their stage. Pharmacotherapy for asthma management consists of both quick-relief medications (short-acting β-agonists) as well as maintenance, or long-term control, medications (inhaled corticosteroids, long-acting β-agonists, leukotriene receptor antagonists, cromolyn, and theophylline).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Consensus Development Conference
    Respiratory symptoms cannot be relied on to make a diagnosis of asthma and/or airways hyperresponsiveness (AHR) in elite athletes. For this reason, the diagnosis should be confirmed with bronchial provocation tests. Asthma management in elite athletes should follow established treatment guidelines (eg, Global Initiative for Asthma) and should include education, an individually tailored treatment plan, minimization of aggravating environmental factors, and appropriate drug therapy that must meet the requirements of the World Anti-Doping Agency. Asthma control can usually be achieved with inhaled corticosteroids and inhaled beta(2)-agonists to minimize exercise-induced bronchoconstriction and to treat intermittent symptoms. The rapid development of tachyphylaxis to beta(2)-agonists after regular daily use poses a dilemma for athletes. Long-term intense endurance training, particularly in unfavorable environmental conditions, appears to be associated with an increased risk of developing asthma and AHR in elite athletes. Globally, the prevalence of asthma, exercise-induced bronchoconstriction, and AHR in Olympic athletes reflects the known prevalence of asthma symptoms in each country. The policy of requiring Olympic athletes to demonstrate the presence of asthma, exercise-induced bronchoconstriction, or AHR to be approved to inhale beta(2)-agonists will continue.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Guideline
    “职业性哮喘诊断指南”由欧洲变态反应和临床免疫学会职业过敏小组委员会编写,为评估疑似职业性哮喘的个体患者提供通用诊断标准。建议的诊断程序包括五个步骤。1.病史提示职业性哮喘。2.确认支气管哮喘,证明了支气管阻塞的可逆性,非特异性支气管高反应性和峰值呼气流速(PEFR)的昼夜变异性增加。3.通过连续测量PEFR和非特异性支气管反应性确认与工作相关的支气管收缩。4.通过皮肤试验和/或体外试验确认对职业剂的致敏以检测特定的免疫球蛋白。5.确认具有特定支气管挑战的职业病原体的因果作用。要求,讨论了每种建议技术的优点和局限性。
    The \'Guidelines for the diagnosis of Occupational Asthma\' have been written by the Subcommittee on Occupational Allergy of the European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology to give common diagnostic criteria in the evaluation of individual patients with suspected occupational asthma. The suggested diagnostic procedure includes five steps. 1. History suggestive of occupational asthma. 2. Confirmation of bronchial asthma, with demonstration of reversibility of bronchial obstruction, of non-specific bronchial hyperreactivity and of increased diurnal variability of peak expiratory flow rates (PEFR). 3. Confirmation of work-related bronchoconstriction with serial measurements of PEFR and of non-specific bronchial reactivity. 4. Confirmation of sensitization to occupational agents with skin tests and/or in vitro tests to detect specific immunoglobulins. 5. Confirmation of causal role of occupational agent with specific bronchial challenges. Requirements, advantages and limitations are discussed for each of the suggested techniques.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号