The ISTH-SSC guidelines for lupus anticoagulant (LA) testing recommend using in-house determined cut-off values, pooled normal plasma (PNP) for ratio normalization, and a ratio for the mixing test interpretation. They strongly support the mixing step role in the diagnostic process.
To investigate and compare the LA testing results and interpretations obtained following the ISTH-SSC guidelines or the available alternatives.
Blood samples for LA testing from 462 consecutive patients were evaluated for screening, mixing and confirmatory tests. The analysis focused on the interpretation differences between using (1) the in-house cut-off values versus the manufacturer\'s cut-off values, (2) a normalized ratio calculated using PNP at each run versus the mean of the reference interval, (3) a normalized ratio versus the index of circulating anticoagulant to interpret the mixing step, and (4) a two-step versus three-step procedure.
LA testing outcomes were comparable when using the in-house and manufacturer\'s cut-off values. More positive dilute Russell\'s viper venom (DRVV) time results were obtained with the normalized ratio based on PNP than with the mean of the reference interval. Overall, the mixing test results obtained with the normalized ratio and the index of circulating anticoagulant showed a good agreement. Among the 97 DRVV Screen test-positive samples, 33 and 89 were classified as LA-positive with the 3-step and the 2-step procedure, respectively.
The cut-off value used and the way to normalize ratios had a limited impact. Conversely, it is important to understand the mixing test characteristics to maximize its diagnostic potential.

UNASSIGNED: Despite guidelines recommending no need for coagulation testing before surgeries when a history of bleeding is negative, surgeons still overuse it in this part of the world. We aim to measure unbiased estimates of hemostatic outcomes in ear, nose, and throat (ENT) surgeries and assess the surgeons\' behavior of preoperative coagulation testing.
UNASSIGNED: We enrolled all patients who underwent ENT surgeries from July 2017 to January 2018. The primary outcome was postoperative bleeding. Surgeons were asked about their decision on history alone or doing coagulation testing and their reason.
UNASSIGNED: We recruited 730 patients; 372 were interviewed for a challenging bleeding history alone (group 1), and 358 had preoperative coagulation testing (group 2). Coagulation testing was repeated twice or more in 55.0% of patients, and more than half had coagulation factor and Von Willebrand factor assays. Most surgeons performed coagulation testing because of habitual practice.
UNASSIGNED: Almost half of the local surgeons consider coagulation testing as standard to evaluate bleeding risk before surgical procedures. This resulted in unnecessary delays in surgeries, parent/patient anxiety, and additional total cost. We recommend awareness campaigns for surgeons and the involvement of surgical societies to adhere to guidelines of detailed hemostatic history.

BACKGROUND: Acquired haemophilia A (AHA) is a rare bleeding disorder caused by development of auto-antibodies to endogenous coagulation factor VIII (FVIII). Recombinant porcine factor VIII (rpFVIII) is currently licensed only for the management of bleeding in patients with AHA. Regular monitoring of rpFVIII is recommended to assess treatment effectiveness.
OBJECTIVE: This guideline from the United Kingdom Haemophilia Centre Doctors\' Organisation (UKHCDO) examines the current publications in the area and aims to offer advice for the laboratory monitoring of rpFVIII in patients with AHA.
METHODS: A review of the current literature was undertaken followed by critical review by the authors.
CONCLUSIONS: A validated one-stage clotting FVIII assay is recommended for the measurement and regular monitoring of rpFVIII. Assessment of cross-reacting rpFVIII inhibitors by one-stage porcine Bethesda assay should be performed as part of the initial diagnosis of AHA or prior to treatment with rpFVIII. Available data show that chromogenic FVIII assays underestimate rpFVIII and this should be considered if measurement of rpFVIII is required in patients receiving Emicizumab.

This guidance focuses on methodological aspects of lupus anticoagulant (LA) testing, as well as interpretation of results for clinicians. The main changes in how to test for LA compared with the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis Scientific and Standardization Committee 2009 guidelines, in the preanalytical phase are more detailed recommendations on how to handle testing in anticoagulated patients, and the timing of testing. Also, routine coagulation tests are advised to obtain more information on the coagulation background of the patient, and when necessary, anti-Xa activity measurement for heparins or specific assays for direct oral anticoagulants should be performed. The three-step procedure with two test systems (diluted Russell\'s viper venom time and activated partial thromboplastin time [aPTT]) is essentially not changed. Silica remains the preferable activator in the aPTT assays, but ellagic acid is not excluded. We advise simultaneous performance of the mixing and confirmatory step, in each sample with a prolonged screening test. The confirmatory step can also be performed on a mixture of patient plasma and normal pooled plasma. Cutoff values should be established in-house on at least 120 normals, with transference of the manufacturer\'s cutoffs as an alternative. Reporting of results has not been changed, although more attention is focused on what clinicians should know. Patient selection for LA testing has been expanded.

Assessment of the immediate need for specific blood product transfusions in acutely bleeding patients is challenging. Clinical assessment and commonly used coagulation tests are inaccurate and time-consuming. The goal of this practice management guideline was to evaluate the role of the viscoelasticity tests, which are thromboelastography (TEG) and rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM), in the management of acutely bleeding trauma, surgical, and critically ill patients.
Systematic review and meta-analyses of manuscripts comparing TEG/ROTEM with non-TEG/ROTEM-guided blood products transfusions strategies were performed. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology was applied to assess the level of evidence and create recommendations for TEG/ROTEM-guided blood product transfusions in adult trauma, surgical, and critically ill patients.
Using TEG/ROTEM-guided blood transfusions in acutely bleeding trauma, surgical, and critically ill patients was associated with a tendency to fewer blood product transfusions in all populations. Thromboelastography/ROTEM-guided transfusions were associated with a reduced number of additional invasive hemostatic interventions (angioembolic, endoscopic, or surgical) in surgical patients. Thromboelastography/ROTEM-guided transfusions were associated with a reduction in mortality in trauma patients.
In patients with ongoing hemorrhage and concern for coagulopathy, we conditionally recommend using TEG/ROTEM-guided transfusions, compared with traditional coagulation parameters, to guide blood component transfusions in each of the following three groups: adult trauma patients, adult surgical patients, and adult patients with critical illness.
Systematic Review/Meta-Analysis, level III.

Accurate clotting time assay results are vital, as the test is employed to indicate the amount of oral anticoagulant to be prescribed, while it is also used for screening the hemorrhagic and thrombotic diseases. The procedure chosen for preparation of a patient blood sample including centrifugation can contribute to significant differences in the results obtained. Thus, for the purpose of proposing a standardized method to appropriately prepare blood samples prior to assay, the Japanese Society of Laboratory Hematology organized the Working Group for Standardization of Sample Preparation for Clotting Time Assays (WG). Following reviews of previously announced guidelines and original experimental results, consensus was obtained by the WG, with the main findings as follows. (1) The recommended anticoagulant in the blood collection tube is sodium citrate solution at 0.105-0.109 M (3.13-3.2%). (2) Whole blood samples should be stored at room temperature (18-25 ˚C) within 1 h of collection from the patient. (3) For plasma preparation, centrifugation at 1500 × g should be performed for at least 15 min or at 2000 × g for at least 10 min at room temperature. (4) After the plasma sample is prepared, it should be stored at room temperature and assayed within 4 h.

Severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) can complicate novel pandemic coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) represents the final possible rescue strategy. Variations in practice, combined with a paucity of rigourous guidelines, may complicate blood-product resource availability and allocation during a pandemic. We conducted a literature review around venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) transfusion practices for platelets, packed red blood cells, fresh frozen plasma, prothrombin complex concentrate, and antithrombin. Pertinent society guidelines were examined, and the practice of Canadian ECLS experts was sampled through an environmental scan. This paper represents a synthesis of these explorations, combined with input from the Canadian Cardiovascular Critical Care (CANCARE) Society, Canadian Society of Cardiac Surgeons, and the Canadian Critical Care Society. We offer a pragmatic guidance document for restrictive transfusion thresholds in nonbleeding patients on VV-ECMO, which may attenuate transfusion-related complications and simultaneously shield national blood product inventory from strain during pandemic-induced activation of the National Plan for the Management of Shortages of Labile Blood Components.

Validation protocols for the evaluation of coagulometers are needed to help professionals select the most suitable system for their regular laboratory routines. The objective of this study was to show how high standard protocols for the coagulometer validation process can fit into the daily laboratory routine. For this study, 45 healthy individuals and 112 patient samples were analyzed. From the patient samples, 51 were investigated for deep venous thrombosis, 27 for coagulopathy, 19 for antivitamin K therapy, and 15 for hemophilia. For the assessment, the performance of the 3 coagulometers and 1 point-of-care device was considered. One of the coagulometers was a new acquisition evaluated for precision, linearity, throughput, and carryover in the first moment, and the new coagulometer was then compared with the other well-established equipment in the laboratory. In normal plasma, coefficient of variation was ≤1.8% for total precision in screening tests and ≤3.5% for within-run precision in specific assays. For prothrombin time/international normalized ratio, no significant difference was found when comparing methods. Our study showed how to compare the capacity of a reagent in order to discriminate patients with severe hemophilia from patients with moderated hemophilia, and the κ coefficient agreement was 0.669 (95% confidence interval: 0.3-1.0; P < .001). d-dimer evaluated in patients with deep venous thrombosis and controls showed a 20% discrepancy between the methods. In our experience across Latin America, the number of laboratories that has performed this process is limited. In this study, we demonstrated how to adapt the validation process for the hemostasis laboratory routine to help the professional chose the best and more suitable option.

Liver biopsy is required when clinically important information about the diagnosis, prognosis or management of a patient cannot be obtained by safer means, or for research purposes. There are several approaches to liver biopsy but predominantly percutaneous or transvenous approaches are used. A wide choice of needles is available and the approach and type of needle used will depend on the clinical state of the patient and local expertise but, for non-lesional biopsies, a 16-gauge needle is recommended. Many patients with liver disease will have abnormal laboratory coagulation tests or receive anticoagulation or antiplatelet medication. A greater understanding of the changes in haemostasis in liver disease allows for a more rational, evidence-based approach to peri-biopsy management. Overall, liver biopsy is safe but there is a small morbidity and a very small mortality so patients must be fully counselled. The specimen must be of sufficient size for histopathological interpretation. Communication with the histopathologist, with access to relevant clinical information and the results of other investigations, is essential for the generation of a clinically useful report.

OBJECTIVE: The clinical relevance of hereditary thrombophilia (HT) testing in venous thromboembolic disease (VTE) is limited to specific guidelines. The present study aimed to evaluate the consistency of HT prescriptions in clinical practice according to the current French guidelines.
METHODS: This study was conducted from April 2017 to February 2018 in a specialized haemostasis centre and included 58 consecutive patients referred by their clinicians for thrombophilia screening (56 patients following a personal VTE event and 2 asymptomatic relatives of a first-degree patient who had had VTE). One experienced clinician met every patient and assessed a pre-test prediction for the presence or absence of HT based on the clinical characteristics of VTE which was compared to the HT biological results.
RESULTS: Among the 58 patients referred to our specialized haemostasis centre, 60% were outside the scope of recommendations for thrombophilia screening. Eight patients were diagnosed with HT. Six out of 8 (75%) patients with diagnosed HT had a history of unprovoked VTE event. Familial history with VTE was a poor predictor for positive HT testing among relatives. The positive and negative predictive values of the clinical prediction were respectively of 19% and 89%.
CONCLUSIONS: The present results underline that screening for HT remains too largely prescribed. Pre-test physician\'s feeling for the presence of HT was neither sensitive nor specific. Increasing physicians\' awareness on this issue and current recommendations should limit prescriptions of HT tests while providing the best possible care for patients with VTE.