Biofeedback, Psychology

生物反馈,心理学
  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    心率变异性生物反馈(HRVB)已被广泛用于改善心血管健康和福祉。HRVB基于个体共振频率下的呼吸,刺激呼吸性窦性心律失常(RSA)和压力反射。有,然而,在如何应用HRVB的方法上没有共识,虽然有关使用的方案的详细信息通常没有得到很好的报道。因此,本系统综述的目的是描述不同的HRVB方案并检测方法学问题.PsycINFO,CINALH,Medline和WebofScience在2000年至2021年4月之间进行了搜索。数据提取和质量评估基于PRISMA指南。最终纳入了来自任何科学领域和任何类型样本的总共143项研究。找到了三种HRVB协议:(i)“最佳射频”(n=37),每个参与者都以他们先前检测到的射频呼吸;(Ii)“个体射频”(n=48),每个参与者都遵循一个生物反馈装置,该装置根据心血管数据实时显示最佳呼吸频率,和(iii)“预设频率射频”(n=51),所有参与者以相同的速率呼吸,通常6次呼吸/分钟。此外,我们发现了应用HRVB在周数方面的几个方法学差异,呼吸持续时间或实验室和家庭会议的组合。值得注意的是,几乎2/3的研究没有报告足够的信息来复制HRVB协议的呼吸持续时间,吸气/呼气比,呼吸控制或身体位置。提出了方法学指南和清单,以提高未来HRVB研究的方法学质量并增加报告的信息。
    Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback (HRVB) has been widely used to improve cardiovascular health and well-being. HRVB is based on breathing at an individual\'s resonance frequency, which stimulates respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) and the baroreflex. There is, however, no methodological consensus on how to apply HRVB, while details about the protocol used are often not well reported. Thus, the objectives of this systematic review are to describe the different HRVB protocols and detect methodological concerns. PsycINFO, CINALH, Medline and Web of Science were searched between 2000 and April 2021. Data extraction and quality assessment were based on PRISMA guidelines. A total of 143 studies were finally included from any scientific field and any type of sample. Three protocols for HRVB were found: (i) \"Optimal RF\" (n = 37), each participant breathes at their previously detected RF; (ii) \"Individual RF\" (n = 48), each participant follows a biofeedback device that shows the optimal breathing rate based on cardiovascular data in real time, and (iii) \"Preset-pace RF\" (n = 51), all participants breathe at the same rate rate, usually 6 breaths/minute. In addition, we found several methodological differences for applying HRVB in terms of number of weeks, duration of breathing or combination of laboratory and home sessions. Remarkably, almost 2/3 of the studies did not report enough information to replicate the HRVB protocol in terms of breathing duration, inhalation/exhalation ratio, breathing control or body position. Methodological guidelines and a checklist are proposed to enhance the methodological quality of future HRVB studies and increase the information reported.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: Management practices of functional constipation are far from satisfactory in developing countries like India; available guidelines do not comprehensively address the problems pertinent to our country.
    METHODS: A questionnaire-based survey was conducted among selected practising pediatricians and pediatric gastroenterologists in India, and the respondents agreed on the need for an Indian guideline on the topic. A group of experts were invited to present the published literature under 12 different headings, and a consensus was developed to formulate the practice guidelines, keeping in view the needs in Indian children.
    OBJECTIVE: To formulate practice guidelines for the management of childhood functional constipation that are relevant to Indian children.
    CONCLUSIONS: Functional constipation should be diagnosed only in the absence of red flags on history and examination. Those with impaction and/or retentive incontinence should be disimpacted with polyethylene glycol (hospital or home-based). Osmotic laxatives (polyethylene glycol more than 1 year of age and lactulose/lactitol less than 1 year of age) are the first line of maintenance therapy. Stimulant laxatives should be reserved only for rescue therapy. Combination therapies of two osmotics, two stimulants or two classes of laxatives are not recommended. Laxatives as maintenance therapy should be given for a prolonged period and should be tapered off gradually, only after a successful outcome. Essential components of therapy for a successful outcome include counselling, dietary changes, toilet-training and regular follow-up.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Comparative Study
    BACKGROUND: The aims of this pilot trial were to (i) test the hypothesis that modifying patterns of painful lumbo-pelvic movement using motion-sensor biofeedback in people with low back pain would lead to reduced pain and activity limitation compared with guidelines-based care, and (ii) facilitate sample size calculations for a fully powered trial.
    METHODS: A multicentre (8 clinics), cluster-randomised, placebo-controlled pilot trial compared two groups of patients seeking medical or physiotherapy primary care for sub-acute and chronic back pain. It was powered for longitudinal analysis, but not for adjusted single-time point comparisons. The intervention group (n = 58) received modification of movement patterns augmented by motion-sensor movement biofeedback (ViMove, dorsaVi.com) plus guidelines-based medical or physiotherapy care. The control group (n = 54) received a placebo (wearing the motion-sensors without biofeedback) plus guidelines-based medical or physiotherapy care. Primary outcomes were self-reported pain intensity (VAS) and activity limitation (Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), Patient Specific Functional Scale (PSFS)), all on 0-100 scales. Both groups received 6-8 treatment sessions. Outcomes were measured seven times during 10-weeks of treatment and at 12, 26 and 52 week follow-up, with 17.0 % dropout. Patients were not informed of group allocation or the study hypothesis.
    RESULTS: Across one-year, there were significant between-group differences favouring the intervention group [generalized linear model coefficient (95 % CI): group effect RMDQ -7.1 (95 % CI-12.6;-1.6), PSFS -10.3 (-16.6; -3.9), QVAS -7.7 (-13.0; -2.4); and group by time effect differences (per 100 days) RMDQ -3.5 (-5.2; -2.2), PSFS -4.7 (-7.0; -2.5), QVAS -4.8 (-6.1; -3.5)], all p < 0.001. Risk ratios between groups of probability of improving by >30 % at 12-months = RMDQ 2.4 (95 % CI 1.5; 4.1), PSFS 2.5 (1.5; 4.0), QVAS 3.3 (1.8; 5.9). The only device-related side-effects involved transient skin irritation from tape used to mount motion sensors.
    CONCLUSIONS: Individualised movement retraining using motion-sensor biofeedback resulted in significant and sustained improvements in pain and activity limitation that persisted after treatment finished. This pilot trial also refined the procedures and sample size requirements for a fully powered RCT. This trial (Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry NCT01572779) was equally funded by dorsaVi P/L and the Victorian State Government.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Consensus Development Conference
    背景:肛肠疾病,如协同排便障碍,大便失禁,肛提提肌综合征,孤立性直肠溃疡综合征很常见,并影响成人和儿童人群。虽然他们有几种治疗方法,在过去的二十年里,使用视觉和语言反馈技术的生物反馈疗法已成为一种有用的选择。因为它很安全,这是普遍推荐的。然而,生物反馈疗法在成人和儿童中的临床疗效尚不清楚,对这些疾病的生物反馈治疗所使用的技术和结果缺乏严格的评估。
    目的:美国神经胃肠病学和动力学会和欧洲神经胃肠病学和动力学会召集了一个工作组来检查适应症,研究性能特征,使用的方法,以及生物反馈疗法的疗效,并提供基于证据的建议。基于证据的力量,建议将生物反馈疗法用于短期和长期治疗伴有协同排便的便秘(I级,A级),和治疗大便失禁(二级,B级)。生物反馈疗法可用于短期治疗伴有协同排便障碍的提肌肛门综合征(II级,B级),和孤立性直肠溃疡综合征伴协同排便障碍(III级,C级),但证据是公平的.证据不支持使用生物反馈治疗儿童便秘(1级,D级)。
    BACKGROUND: Anorectal disorders such as dyssynergic defecation, fecal incontinence, levator ani syndrome, and solitary rectal ulcer syndrome are common, and affect both the adult and pediatric populations. Although they are treated with several treatment approaches, over the last two decades, biofeedback therapy using visual and verbal feedback techniques has emerged as an useful option. Because it is safe, it is commonly recommended. However, the clinical efficacy of biofeedback therapy in adults and children is not clearly known, and there is a lack of critical appraisal of the techniques used and the outcomes of biofeedback therapy for these disorders.
    OBJECTIVE: The American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society and the European Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility convened a task force to examine the indications, study performance characteristics, methodologies used, and the efficacy of biofeedback therapy, and to provide evidence-based recommendations. Based on the strength of evidence, biofeedback therapy is recommended for the short-term and long-term treatment of constipation with dyssynergic defecation (Level I, Grade A), and for the treatment of fecal incontinence (Level II, Grade B). Biofeedback therapy may be useful in the short-term treatment of Levator Ani Syndrome with dyssynergic defecation (Level II, Grade B), and solitary rectal ulcer syndrome with dyssynergic defecation (Level III, Grade C), but the evidence is fair. Evidence does not support the use of biofeedback for the treatment of childhood constipation (Level 1, Grade D).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Patient Education Handout
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    METHODS: The American College of Physicians (ACP) developed this guideline to present the evidence and provide clinical recommendations on the nonsurgical management of urinary incontinence (UI) in women.
    METHODS: This guideline is based on published English-language literature on nonsurgical management of UI in women from 1990 through December 2013 that was identified using MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, Scirus, and Google Scholar. The outcomes evaluated for this guideline include continence, improvement in UI, quality of life, adverse effects, and discontinuation due to adverse effects. It grades the evidence and recommendations by using ACP\'s guideline grading system. The target audience is all clinicians, and the target patient population is all women with UI.
    CONCLUSIONS: ACP recommends first-line treatment with pelvic floor muscle training in women with stress UI. (Grade: strong recommendation, high-quality evidence).
    CONCLUSIONS: ACP recommends bladder training in women with urgency UI. (Grade: strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence).
    CONCLUSIONS: ACP recommends pelvic floor muscle training with bladder training in women with mixed UI. (Grade: strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence).
    CONCLUSIONS: ACP recommends against treatment with systemic pharmacologic therapy for stress UI. (Grade: strong recommendation, low-quality evidence).
    CONCLUSIONS: ACP recommends pharmacologic treatment in women with urgency UI if bladder training was unsuccessful. Clinicians should base the choice of pharmacologic agents on tolerability, adverse effect profile, ease of use, and cost of medication. (Grade: strong recommendation, high-quality evidence).
    CONCLUSIONS: ACP recommends weight loss and exercise for obese women with UI. (Grade: strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • DOI:
    文章类型: English Abstract
    Continence problems can occur during childhood. This guideline is for the Dutch Youth Health Care (JGZ) and gives recommendations for the prevention, early detection and treatment of these problems. As a preventative measure advices for potty training should be started in children aged 18-24 months. If incontinence is present, it is important to take a history and carry out physical examination. In children over the age of 5 who are incontinent of urine the following are recommended: taking child out of bed, calendar with reward system, bedwetting alarm or voiding diary; children over the age of 8 can follow dry bed training. Faecal incontinence is often associated with constipation. Incontinent children with constipation are given advice about normal eating and exercise patterns. If this is not successful then laxatives are prescribed. The JGZ should refer further if there are indications of an underlying condition; if children over the age of 5 are wet during the day; if children are incontinent of faeces at night; if children are incontinent of faeces but not constipated; if children persistently wet the bed; if there is faecal incontinence despite counselling, and if medication needs to be prescribed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Consensus Development Conference
    BACKGROUND: The scheduled update to the German S3 guidelines on fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) by the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies (\"Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften\", AWMF; registration number 041/004) was planned starting in March 2011.
    METHODS: The development of the guidelines was coordinated by the German Interdisciplinary Association for Pain Therapy (\"Deutsche Interdisziplinären Vereinigung für Schmerztherapie\", DIVS), 9 scientific medical societies and 2 patient self-help organizations. Eight working groups with a total of 50 members were evenly balanced in terms of gender, medical field, potential conflicts of interest and hierarchical position in the medical and scientific fields. Literature searches were performed using the Medline, PsycInfo, Scopus and Cochrane Library databases (until December 2010). The grading of the strength of the evidence followed the scheme of the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. The recommendations were based on level of evidence, efficacy (meta-analysis of the outcomes pain, sleep, fatigue and health-related quality of life), acceptability (total dropout rate), risks (adverse events) and applicability of treatment modalities in the German health care system. The formulation and grading of recommendations was accomplished using a multi-step, formal consensus process. The guidelines were reviewed by the boards of the participating scientific medical societies.
    CONCLUSIONS: Cognitive behavioral therapy combined with aerobic exercise (multicomponent therapy) is strongly recommended. Relaxation as single therapy should not be applied. The English full-text version of this article is available at SpringerLink (under \"Supplemental\").
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    Constipation is a common complaint in our daily practice, which may occur in young adult or elderly patients. Recently, the incidence has been increasing; however, most patients try to have self-medication using over-the-counter (OTC) drugs, which is usually inappropriate. Moreover, there has been unequal distribution of knowledge and vigilance of medical practitioners, both general physician and specialist doctors on the constipation issue. Therefore, patients usually present with greater complications. The Organizing Committee of Indonesian Society of Gastroenterology or Pengurus Besar Perkumpulan Gastroenterologi Indonesia (PB PGI) considers that it is important to compose a National Consensus on the Management of Constipation in Indonesia. The Consensus is expected to be a guideline for doctors to deal with patients who have constipation in their daily practice, so that optimal results could be achieved. Nowadays, there are new data on definition, pathophysiology, diagnosis and management of constipation; thus, the Organizing Committee of ISG feels that it is necessary to revise the established consensus. We expect that the consensus may bring advantages for medical practitioners in Indonesia and in general, it may cause community health improvement.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号