Bibliometric analysis

文献计量分析
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Ferroptosis作为一种新兴的药物靶标已被广泛研究,而它与纳米科学的结合提供了广阔的应用前景。近年来,调节铁死亡的纳米药物的发展引起了全世界的关注。描述相关的出版范式将是有意义的。
    这里,使用WebofScienceCoreCollection的数据库进行了文献计量学分析,以阐明出版范式.介绍了近6年来相关出版物的发展情况,革命趋势被弄清楚了。最终,提出了未来可能的勘探方向。
    对327份文件的文献计量分析表明,主要研究重点是包括材料科学在内的多个领域,科学技术,化学,药理学和药学。凭借广泛的合作和强大的资金,来自中国组织的研究人员贡献了大部分出版物,其次是美国和澳大利亚。共合分析显示,几篇原始论文报道了铁凋亡的关键分子机制,被认为是后续研究的基础。并以一些与纳米药物相关的文献为例进行了讨论。挖掘结果表明,铁凋亡调节疗法在癌症治疗中的机制评估是热点。然后,提出并讨论了与铁凋亡相关的纳米科学的几种可能的未来探索。
    详细分析了纳米科学-铁性研究的文献计量学概况。我们认为,文献计量分析可以作为一种可靠的方法,将出版范式解释为某个领域。
    UNASSIGNED: Ferroptosis has been widely investigated as an emerging drug target, while its combination with nanoscience provides bourgeoning application prospects. The development of ferroptosis regulating nanomedicines have attracted worldwide attentions in recent years. It would be meaningful to describe the relevant publication paradigm.
    UNASSIGNED: Herein, a bibliometric analysis was performed using the database of Web of Science Core Collection to clarify the publication paradigm. The development of related publications in the last 6 years was described, and the revolutionary trends were figured out. Ultimately, the possible future exploration directions were proposed.
    UNASSIGNED: The bibliometric analysis of 327 documents of interest indicated that the main research focus was in multiple fields including Materials science, Science & technology, Chemistry, and Pharmacology & pharmacy. With widely cooperation and strong funding, the researchers from Chinese organizations contributed most of publications, followed with United States and Australia. Cocitation analysis revealed that several original papers reported the key molecular mechanisms of ferroptosis were considered as the foundation for subsequent studies, and some nanomedicines-related documents were taken as examples and discussed. Mining results showed that the mechanism evaluation of ferroptosis regulation therapy for cancer treatment was the hotspot. Then, several possible future explorations of ferroptosis-related nanoscience were presented and discussed.
    UNASSIGNED: The bibliometric profile of nanoscience-ferroptosis research was analyzed in detail. We believe that the bibliometric analysis could act as a robust method for explicating the publication paradigm as a certain field.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在探索2020年COVID-19教育研究领域的不同知识结构。使用文献计量学方法,对从WebofScience数据库中检索到的308篇科学论文的样本进行了分析。使用不同的数据分析技术结合共现分析,共引分析和因子分析,所有关键字和关键字加都用于实现主要研究目标:确定COVID-19教育研究领域的主要主题和生产趋势。这项研究在概念结构方面的主要发现表明,对主题趋势的中心性和密度的分析表明,整个教育系统朝着面向远程教育的方法论教学程序发生了普遍的结构变化。至于智力结构,在涉及的大量作者和信息来源中,只有少数人对科学界有更大的影响。最后,就社会结构而言,来自不同国家的作者和机构之间的合作有限。然而,这种合作在国家内部和国家自身的生产方面更加紧密,美国是联系最紧密的国家。
    This study seeks to explore the different knowledge structures in the sphere of educational research into COVID-19 during 2020. Using bibliometric methods, analysis was performed of a sample of 308 scientific articles retrieved from the Web of Science database. Using different data analysis techniques combining co-occurrence analysis, co-citation analysis and factorial analysis, All Keywords and Keywords Plus were used to achieve the main research objective: identification of the main themes and trends of production in the sphere of educational research into COVID-19. The main findings of this study in terms of the conceptual structure show that analysis of the centrality and density of the thematic trends points to a generalised structural change in the entire educational system towards methodological teaching-learning procedures oriented towards distance education. As for the intellectual structure, among the host of authors and sources of information involved only a select few have a greater influence on the scientific community. Finally, in terms of social structure, there is limited collaboration between authors and institutions from different countries. However, this collaboration is more intense within countries themselves and in terms of their own production, with the USA being the country with the strongest links.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    生态文明(EC)已被视为特定社会中社会和环境改革的最终目标。在以往的研究中,政府层面的研究得到了很多关注,地区和地方政府的行动一直是较低的优先事项,这可能导致忽略了与欧共体有关的管理机构和政策系统的关键细节。在这项研究中,我们旨在通过追踪欧共体的轨迹和政策转变,为文献做出重大贡献。通过对政策文件的文献计量分析,回顾了2004-2020年福建省电子商务建设体系。政策重点,组织功能网络,并深入讨论了三个阶段中每个阶段政策变化的因素。目标设置,actors\'函数,制度保障是电子商务建设的核心要素。这项研究为理解中国地方政府的政策改革和转型提供了定量基础。福建省的经验显示出法制化的趋势,多演员联动,并发布可作为其他国家和地区基础的改进,以探索促进可持续发展和环境治理作为通往欧共体的途径。
    Ecological civilization (EC) has been seen as the final goal of social and environmental reform within a given society. Much attention has been paid to the national governmental level in previous studies, and district- and local-level government actions have been a lower priority, which may have led to overlooking key details of management institutions and policy systems in relation to EC. In this research, we aimed to make a significant contribution to the literature by tracing the EC trajectory and policy transitions. Through bibliometric analysis of policy documents, we reviewed the EC construction system for Fujian Province from 2004 to 2020. The policy priorities, organization-functional network, and contributing factors to policy changes in each of the three phases are discussed in depth. Target setting, actors\' functions, and institutional guarantees are the core elements of EC construction. This research provides a quantitative foundation for understanding policy reform and transition with regards to Chinese local governments\' EC actions. The experience of Fujian Province shows trends toward legalization, multi-actor linkage, and issue refinement that may serve as a basis for other countries and regions in order to explore the promotion of sustainable development and environmental governance as pathways to EC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    为了批判性地检查案例研究在最近的古病理学文献中发挥的作用,通过评估它们的出版频率,学术影响,以及它们产生的公众参与。
    2011年至2018年在国际古病理学杂志上发表的文章(N=377)。
    文章被编码为案例研究,人口研究,方法学研究,或评论。案例研究被编码为文化习俗,鉴别诊断,历史,或方法论/理论。我们利用文献计量分析来评估学术影响,并利用altmetric分析来评估公众参与度。
    案例研究仍然是最经常发表的,但引用最少,文章类型。文章类型之间的公众参与度数据没有显着差异。方法论/理论案例研究具有最大的学术影响。鉴别诊断案例研究的学术影响最小,公众参与最少。
    案例研究类型包括多种方法,其中一些具有对古病理学及其他学科做出贡献的巨大潜力。
    本研究更新了梅斯(2012b)引文分析,先驱使用altmetric数据来分析公众对古病理学出版物的参与,并确定案例研究类型中生产率较低的方法和相关性较高的领域。
    仅分析了一份期刊中的出版物。只有一个来源用于引文数据(GoogleScholar)和一个来源用于altmetric数据(PlumX)。
    将此处试点的案例研究的粒度分析扩展到其他期刊和/或引文索引,以扩大样本量并提供更敏锐的见解。
    To critically examine the role that case studies play in recent paleopathological literature, by evaluating their frequency of publication, academic impact, and the public engagement they generate.
    Articles published in International Journal of Paleopathology between 2011 and 2018 (N = 377).
    Articles were coded as case studies, population studies, methodological studies, or reviews. Case studies were coded as cultural practices, differential diagnosis, historical, or methodological/theoretical. We utilized bibliometric analysis to assess academic impact and altmetric analysis to evaluate public engagement.
    Case studies continue to be the most frequently published, but least frequently cited, article type. There are no significant differences in public engagement data between article types. Methodological/theoretical case studies have the most academic impact. Differential diagnosis case studies have the least academic impact and generate the least public engagement.
    The case study genre includes a variety of approaches, some of which hold significant potential for contributing to the discipline of paleopathology and beyond.
    This study updates Mays\' (2012b) citation analysis, pioneers the use of altmetric data to analyze public engagement with paleopathological publications, and identifies less productive approaches and areas of heightened relevance in the case study genre.
    Publications in only one journal were analyzed. Only one source was utilized for citation data (Google Scholar) and one source for altmetric data (PlumX).
    Expanding the granular analysis of case studies piloted here to additional journals and/or citation indexes to enlarge the sample size and provide keener insights.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    目的:牙科创伤学(DT)杂志是牙科创伤学领域最好的资源之一。它一直鼓励发表高质量的病例报告。CARE声明(2011年)是为统一和透明的医学病例报告而制定的。由于病例报告与DT文献密不可分,本文献计量分析的目的是评估过去20年(2001-2021年)在《DT》上发表的病例报告,并评估其在阐明DT趋势和这些论文报告质量的CARE指南方面的合规性.
    方法:两位作者独立观察了2002-2021年所有数字孪生问题的目录,并确定了病例报告。对选定的文章进行了审查,以确定其资格。进行了数据提取,病例报告分为多个领域,并使用自行设计验证的方法评估其护理依从性。用卡方检验分析了二十年来(2002-2011年和2012-2021年)发布的病例报告之间的差异。
    结果:对2002年2月至2021年10月期间发表的1612篇文章进行了审查,以确定357例病例报告,其中277例来自2002-2011年,80例来自2012-2021年。来自亚洲的病例报告数量最多(2002-2011:135,2012-2021:28)。2002-2011年十年中大多数报告的CARE合规性在75%至85%之间(良好),而2012-2021年大多数报告的CARE合规性在85%至95%之间(非常好)或>95%(优秀)。这些差异具有统计学意义(p<0.005)。
    结论:2002-2011年十年中发布的病例报告数量是2012-2021年十年中发布的病例报告数量的三倍以上。在过去的几十年中,来自亚洲的报告数量最多,属于治疗和预后领域。2012-2021年十年期间,援外社执行报告的情况好于2002-2011年期间。
    OBJECTIVE: The journal Dental Traumatology (DT) is one of the best resources in the field of dental traumatology. It has always encouraged publication of case reports of good quality. The CARE statement (2011) was developed for uniform and transparent reporting of cases in medical sciences. Since case reports are inseparable from the DT literature, the aim of this bibliometric-analysis was to evaluate the case reports published in the DT in the last two decades (2001-2021) and assess their compliance regarding CARE guidelines for elucidating the trends in DT and the reporting quality of these papers.
    METHODS: Two authors independently observed the tables of contents in all issues of DT from 2002-2021 and identified case reports. Selected articles were scrutinized to determine their eligibility. Data extraction was performed, case reports were segregated into domains, and their CARE compliance was evaluated by using a self-designed-validated method. Differences between the case reports published in two decades (2002-2011 and 2012-2021) were analysed with the Chi-square test.
    RESULTS: A total of 1612 articles published between February 2002 and October 2021 were scrutinized to identify 357 case reports with 277 from the period of 2002-2011 and 80 between 2012 and 2021. The highest number of case reports originated from Asia (2002-2011:135, 2012-2021:28). The CARE compliances of the majority of reports in the decade of 2002-2011 were between 75 and 85% (good) while the CARE compliances of the majority of reports from 2012-2021 were between 85 and 95% (very good) or >95% (excellent). These differences were statistically significant (p < .005).
    CONCLUSIONS: The number of case reports published in the decade of 2002-2011 were more than three times the number of case reports published in the decade of 2012-2021. The highest number of reports in both decades were from Asia and belonged to the therapeutic and prognostic domains. The CARE compliances of the reports in the decade of 2012-2021 were better than those from 2002-2011.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:分析2015年至2019年在期刊引文报告“初级卫生保健”类别索引的期刊中发表的文章和评论的主题行。
    方法:观察性文献计量学研究。确定了WebofScience的书目记录,并分析了主题描述符的出现频率及其在研究中包含的文件中的共同出现。除了全球分析,评论,引用最多的文件,分别分析了2015年和2019年发表的。使用当前加拿大索引量表按主题聚类对描述符进行分类,并使用第二版国际初级保健分类对临床出版物进行分析。
    结果:在所分析的7,453个文档中,总共确定了16,444个描述符。最常见的描述符集中在:诊断,患病率,管理,风险,护理实践和健康专业人士的图。在引用最多的文档中,使用了具有特定主题的术语:抑郁症,干预,满意,质量,治疗,以研究为基础的实践。2019年,有更多的出版物专注于流行病学,诊所,研究和提供服务。从临床的角度来看,关于心理和心理健康问题的研究,神经系统,社会问题,2019年姑息治疗和癌症增加。
    结论:进行的分析确定了初级保健期刊中的相关主题行,强调疾病的诊断和流行,病理及其相关风险的管理,以及临床实践和健康专业人士的身影。
    OBJECTIVE: Analyze the thematic lines of the articles and reviews published between 2015 and 2019 in the journals indexed in the \"Primary Health Care\" category of the Journal Citation Reports.
    METHODS: Observational bibliometric study. The bibliographic records of the Web of Science were identified and the frequencies of appearance of the thematic descriptors and their co-occurrence in the documents included in the study were analyzed. In addition to the global analysis, the reviews, the most cited documents, those published in 2015, and those published in 2019 were analyzed separately. Descriptors were classified by thematic clusters using the Current Canadian Index scale and clinical publications were analyzed using the second edition of the International Classification of Primary Care.
    RESULTS: A total of 16,444 descriptors were identified in the 7,453 documents analyzed. The most frequent descriptors focus on: diagnosis, prevalence, management, risks, care practice and the figure of the health professional. In the most cited documents, terms with specific themes were used: depression, intervention, satisfaction, quality, therapy, research-based practice. In 2019, there were a greater number of publications focused on epidemiology, clinic, research and provision of services. From a clinical point of view, studies on psychological and mental health problems, nervous system, social problems, palliative care and cancer increased in 2019.
    CONCLUSIONS: The analysis carried out identifies the relevant thematic lines in primary care journals, highlighting the diagnosis and prevalence of diseases, the management of pathologies and their associated risks, as well as clinical practice and the figure of the health professional.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在这项研究中,我们将荷兰整个大学的注册产出与从WebofScience检索的数据相结合。最初的研究问题是:是否有可能显示大学的影响,考虑到大学研究概况中涵盖的学科种类繁多?为了回答这个问题,我们分析了在CRIS系统METIS中注册的大学的产出,2004-2009年。注册涵盖了各种各样的学术产出,这些都是在分析中考虑的。在这项研究中,我们对大学产出的覆盖面进行了分析,从输出本身的角度来看,面向WebofScience(“外部”),以及从WebofScience的角度来看(“内部”)。这为我们提供了必要的信息,以便能够就在具有此类研究概况的大学的研究评估中使用标准文献计量学方法的有效性得出明确的结论。
    In this study we combine the registered output of a whole university in the Netherlands with data retrieved from the Web of Science. The initial research question was: is it possible to show the impact of the university in its\' full broadness, taking into account the variety of disciplines covered in the research profile of the university? In order to answer this question, we analyzed the output of the university as registered in the CRIS system METIS, over the years 2004-2009. The registration covers a wide variety of scholarly outputs, and these are all taken into account in the analysis. In the study we conduct analyses on the coverage of the output of the university, both from the perspective of the output itself, towards the Web of Science (\"external\"), as well as from the Web of Science perspective itself (\"internal\"). This provides us with the necessary information to be able to draw clear conclusions on the validity of the usage of standard bibliometric methodologies in the research assessment of universities with such a research profile.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号