Acute neuromuscular paralysis is a relatively common condition in emergency rooms (ERs). They can be caused by several reasons, including adverse drug reactions. Betamethasone is a glucocorticoid commonly used for various conditions, such as allergic conditions. One of the rare but known side effects of glucocorticoids is hypokalemia. Rare cases of hypokalemia following high- and low-dose glucocorticoid injections have been reported. This study presents the history of a young, healthy male without significant past medical history who presented with an inability to stand and walk due to four-limb paralysis (more prominent in the lower limbs) following an intramuscular injection of a 4 mg betamethasone, which was prescribed for the treatment of allergic rhinitis. The patient was stabilized with an intravascular injection of potassium chloride diluted in 1000 mL of normal saline and monitored for 24 h, ruling out any other endocrine condition. Hypokalemia and its severe form are defined as the serum level of lower than 3.5 and 2.5 mEq/Lit, respectively. One of the etiologies of drug-induced hypokalemic paralysis is systemic glucocorticoid administration. In severe cases, it can cause quadriplegia and other neuromuscular, respiratory, and cardiac complications. Therefore, it is an urgent condition that should be managed carefully. Pregnant women who are receiving these medications are a specific group at risk of hypokalemic paralysis. There are several safer treatments for seasonal allergic rhinitis compared to systemic glucocorticoids, which should be considered by physicians. Moreover, paralysis in patients receiving these medications should be approached attentively since it might be caused by hypokalemia, which can be life threatening if not treated. It is advisable that the blood level of electrolytes, especially potassium, be checked for patients who present with paralysis or weakness after glucocorticoid injections.

BACKGROUND: Topical therapies represent the first-line treatment for mild-to-moderate psoriasis. Among various topical options, the fixed-dose combination of calcipotriene (Cal) and betamethasone dipropionate (BD) foam (Enstilar®, LEO Pharma, Ballerup, Denmark) showed superior efficacy to Cal and BD monotherapy and ointment and gel formulations. In addition, the Cal/BD foam is the only topical treatment allowed for either reactive treatment of relapse or twice-weekly maintenance use. Since treatment acceptability is crucial to optimize adherence, this paper presents a case series from a multicenter experience using the Cal/BD foam, to further characterize the use of this therapeutic approach. In addition, a narrative review of studies evaluating the acceptability of the Cal/BD foam, even compared with other formulations, is provided.
METHODS: The case series involved adult patients with mild-to-moderate psoriasis treated with the Cal/BD foam from October 2021 to June 2022. A clinical and dermoscopic evaluation of plaques was provided for all patients. Data from the clinical practice report complete clinical resolution of plaques in most patients after 4 weeks of active treatment with the Cal/BD foam, and the dermoscopic clearance after a maximum of 8 weeks. Full adherence to treatment was also reported. Literature evidence suggests that the Cal/BD foam is easy to apply and presents high cosmetic acceptance, rapid onset of action, high efficacy, optimal safety, and a high patient preference. The high satisfaction obtained with Cal/BD foam suggests that this formulation is better accepted than others.
CONCLUSIONS: The Cal/BD foam represents a valuable approach for managing mild-to-moderate psoriasis, both in short and long-term treatment.

OBJECTIVE: Radiation dermatitis (RD) is a frequently occurring adverse reaction during radiotherapy in cancer patients. While the use of topical corticosteroids (TCs) is common for the treatment of RD, its role in preventing severe reactions remains unclear. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the evidence on the use of TCs as prophylaxis of RD.
METHODS: A systematic search was conducted using OVID MedLine, Embase, and Cochrane databases (between 1946 and 2023) to identify studies examining TC use in the prevention of severe RD. Statistical analysis was completed using RevMan 5.4 to calculate pooled effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals. Forest plots were then developed using a random effects model.
RESULTS: Ten RCTs with a total of 1041 patients met the inclusion criteria. Six studies reported on mometasone furoate (MF) and four studies reported on betamethasone. Both TCs were associated with a significant improvement in the prevention of moist desquamation [OR = 0.34, 95% CI [0.25, 0.47], p < 0.00001], but betamethasone was found to be more effective than MF [OR = 0.29, 95% CI [0.18, 0.46], p < 0.00001 and OR = 0.39, 95% CI [0.25, 0.61], p < 0.0001, respectively]. A similar finding was seen in reducing the development of grade 2 or higher RD according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group scale.
CONCLUSIONS: The current evidence supports the use of TCs in preventing severe reactions of RD. Both MF and betamethasone were found to be effective; however, betamethasone, a higher potency TC, is more effective despite MF being more commonly reported in literature.

UNASSIGNED: Antenatal corticosteroids (ACS) are highly effective at improving outcomes for preterm newborns. Evidence suggests the benefits of ACS may vary with the time interval between administration-to-birth. However, the optimal ACS administration-to-birth interval is not yet known. In this systematic review, we synthesised available evidence on the relationship between ACS administration-to-birth interval and maternal and newborn outcomes.
UNASSIGNED: This review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021253379). We searched Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Global Index Medicus on 11 Nov 2022 with no date or language restrictions. Randomised and non-randomised studies of pregnant women receiving ACS for preterm birth where maternal and newborn outcomes were reported for different administration-to-birth intervals were eligible. Eligibility screening, data extraction and risk of bias assessment were performed by two authors independently. Fetal and neonatal outcomes included perinatal and neonatal mortality, preterm birth-related morbidity outcomes and mean birthweight. Maternal outcomes included chorioamnionitis, maternal mortality, endometritis, and maternal intensive care unit admission.
UNASSIGNED: Ten trials (4592 women; 5018 neonates), 45 cohort studies (at least 22,992 women; 30,974 neonates) and two case-control studies (355 women; 360 neonates) met the eligibility criteria. Across studies, 37 different time interval combinations were identified. There was considerable heterogeneity in included administration-to-birth intervals and populations. The odds of neonatal mortality, respiratory distress syndrome and intraventricular haemorrhage were associated with the ACS administration-to-birth interval. However, the interval associated with the greatest improvements in newborn outcomes was not consistent across studies. No reliable data were available for maternal outcomes, though odds of chorioamnionitis might be associated with longer intervals.
UNASSIGNED: An optimal ACS administration-to-birth interval likely exists, however variations in study design limit identification of this interval from available evidence. Future research should consider advanced analysis techniques such as individual patient data meta-analysis to identify which ACS administration-to-birth intervals are most beneficial, and how these benefits can be optimised for women and newborns.
UNASSIGNED: This study was conducted with funding support from the UNDP-UNFPA-UNICEF-WHO-World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research (SRH), a co-sponsored programme executed by the World Health Organization.

OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies exploring the association between antenatal corticosteroids exposure and hearing loss in preterm infants.
METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane library, and EMBASE databases from the inception dates to December 22, 2020 without language restriction. Key search terms included hearing loss, cortisol steroid, and antenatal. Included studies were case control or cohort studies examining preterm (<37 weeks\' gestation) or very low-birth-weight (<1500 g) infants and reporting primary data that could be used to explore the association between antenatal corticosteroids exposure and the development of hearing outcomes. This meta-analysis follows the reporting guidelines (MOOSE) for observational studies. Data were independently extracted by 2 researchers. A fixed effects model was used to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95 % CI. Subgroup analysis was conducted according to different types of antenatal steroids exposure (dexamethasone vs betamethasone) and subgroup analyses based on betamethasone and betamethasone combined with magnesium sulfate (betamethasone vs betamethasone combined with magnesium sulfate).
RESULTS: A total of 110 potentially relevant studies were found, of which 7 met the inclusion criteria (A total of 8130 preterm infants were included. 5337 preterm infants were exposed to antenatal corticosteroids, and 2793 preterm infants were not exposed to antenatal corticosteroids.). Meta-analysis showed that antenatal corticosteroids exposure was significantly associated with hearing loss in preterm infants. (OR, 0.64; 95 % CI, 0.48-0.87; P = 0.004) In addition, significant differences were found between antenatal betamethasone exposure and antenatal dexamethasone exposure. (OR, 0.27; 95 % CI, 0.10-0.77; P = 0.01) Betamethasone and betamethasone combined with magnesium sulfate showed that the difference was no statistically significant. (OR, 1.34; 95 % CI, 0.74-2.43; P = 0.33).
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study confirm that among preterm infants, exposure to antenatal corticosteroids exposure is associated with a lower risk of developing hearing impairment.
UNASSIGNED: PROSPERO 2021 CRD42021255665.

To review the pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of recently approved calcipotriene and betamethasone dipropionate (C-BD) cream.
A literature review was conducted using MEDLINE (PubMed) and ClinicalTrials.gov from 2002 to mid-May 2022.
Articles in English discussing the use of C-BD cream in the treatment of psoriasis were included.
In 2 phase I trials, there was no phototoxic or photoallergic skin reaction at irradiated C-BD cream sites at baseline, 24 hours, 48 hours, and 72 hours postirradiation. In 2 phase III trials, after 8 weeks of treatment, more subjects treated with C-BD cream achieved Physician\'s Global Assessment treatment success (37.4%), compared to C-BD topical suspension (TS) (22.8%, P < 0.0001) and vehicle (3.7%, P < 0.0001). More subjects had greater mean percentage decline in Modified Psoriasis Area Severity Index (Trial 1: 52.9% and Trial 2: 64.6%), when compared to C-BD TS (Trial 1: 51.3%, P < 0.0001 and Trial 2: 56.4%, P < 0.0001) and vehicle (Trial 1: 22.9%, P < 0.0001 and Trial 2: 20.0%, P < 0.0001).
Psoriasis has a multifactorial pathogenesis and topical treatments are considered first line. Poor adherence is a major hurdle in management; the combination of 2 separate first-line drugs may address this by decreasing the complexity of treatment regimens. A cream formulation can be preferred, and C-BD is now Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved as one.
Newly FDA-approved C-BD cream with novel polyaphron dispersion (PAD) technology provides a safe efficacious combination therapy for mild-to-moderate psoriasis which may be preferred by some patients.

While many patients with psoriasis are candidates for topical agents, long-term treatment effects are unclear. This systematic review evaluated global findings from clinical trials and real-world studies of topical calcipotriol and the two-compound formulation of calcipotriol and betamethasone dipropionate for mild-to-moderate plaque psoriasis (including scalp psoriasis). PubMed, Embase and MEDLINE were searched for relevant English-language publications along with Chinese, Japanese, Korean and Latin American publication databases. Identified articles were screened by title and abstract against predefined inclusion/exclusion criteria. A narrative synthesis of key efficacy and safety findings from the full papers of selected publications was developed. Thirty-seven relevant papers were identified (25 English, 11 Chinese and one Japanese-language study) including 28 randomized controlled trials. While there was significant heterogeneity in study length, treatment intensity and clinical measures, following a critical review of the published data combined with expert opinion, the following clinical practice recommendations were agreed in order to assist healthcare providers: in adults, long-term treatment with calcipotriol/betamethasone dipropionate is well tolerated and efficacious for up to 1 year on an \'as needed\' basis, and for up to 16 weeks on a fixed-treatment regimen. Calcipotriol is also well tolerated and efficacious when used long term (up to 52 weeks) \'as needed\' and for up to 20 weeks on a fixed-treatment regimen. Used on an \'as needed\' basis for up to 1 year, the safety and efficacy profile of fixed-dose combination calcipotriol/betamethasone dipropionate is more favorable than calcipotriol alone; regular consultation between patients and their dermatologist/primary care physician is required to review psoriasis symptoms and adjust treatment accordingly; a specific treatment goal should be agreed on initiation of topical agent(s) to determine when long-term treatment can begin or if a regimen change is warranted; and application frequency during the continued treatment phase should consider the patients\' treatment expectations and goals.

BACKGROUND: There is limited evidence supporting the use of alternative treatments for patients with nonstable vitiligo.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to review the effects of oral mini-pulse (OMP) therapy in the management of nonsegmental vitiligo.
METHODS: The following databases were searched between inception and May 2020 for relevant studies: Scopus, Web of Science, MEDLINE, and Embase. All randomized controlled trials that compared OMP therapy with any other active treatment or placebo for nonstable vitiligo were included. The Cochrane\'s risk of bias tool was used to evaluate the risk of bias (ROB) in selected studies, and the overall quality of evidence of each outcome was assessed using the Grading Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) system.
RESULTS: Four studies met our selection criteria. All of them were conducted in India and included 246 patients. OMP therapy included betamethasone or dexamethasone. The duration of treatment was 6 months in all studies. Up to 32% of patients achieved a repigmentation rate of >75% when OMP therapy was administered as monotherapy. No difference was observed between OMP therapy and other treatments in arresting the disease, and weight gain was the most frequent adverse effect. The overall ROB in all included studies was relatively high because of the randomization process, outcome measurement and informed selection of outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on the findings of these studies, OMP therapy did not demonstrate additional value compared with other treatments. Hence, there is an urgent need to conduct high-quality clinical trials to evaluate this therapy.

Corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, vitamin D, photodynamic therapy, herbal drugs are some of the interventions tried in clinical trials for treating oral lichen planus. We carried out the present network meta-analysis to compare the above-mentioned interventions.
Electronic databases were searched for randomized clinical trials evaluating interventions in patients with symptomatic oral lichen planus. Clinical resolution, clinical score, pain resolution, pain score, and adverse effects were the outcomes evaluated.
Fifty-five (2831 patients) trials were included. Corticosteroids (OR: 13.6; 95% CI: 1.2, 155.4), pimecrolimus (OR: 14.7; 95% CI: 1.7, 125), purslane (OR: 18.4; 95% CI: 3.5, 97), and ozonized water/corticosteroids (OR: 52; 95% CI: 1.4, 1882.6) had better rates of clinical resolution compared to placebo. Corticosteroids (OR: 3.18; 95% CI: 1.2, 8.43), ozonized water/corticosteroids (OR: 9.9; 95% CI: 2.7, 36.2), aloe vera (OR: 13; 95%: 1.5, 111.8), pimecrolimus (OR: 18.8; 95% CI: 2, 177.4) and hyaluronic acid (OR: 24.8; 95% CI: 1.3, 457.6) were significantly associated with superior rates of pain resolution compared to placebo. Pimecrolimus and cyclosporine were associated with significantly higher risk of adverse effects than placebo.
Topical corticosteroids were the most effective drug class for treating oral lichen planus.

This study aimed to evaluate the comparative clinical effectiveness and safety of dexamethasone vs betamethasone for preterm birth.
The sources searched were MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, LILACS, ClinicalTrials.gov, and International Clinical Trials Registry Platform without language restrictions until October 2019 in addition to the reference lists of included studies. Field experts were also contacted.
Randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials comparing any corticosteroids against each other or against placebo at any dose for preterm birth were included in the study.
Three researchers independently selected and extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies by using Early Review Organizing Software and Covidence software. Random-effects pairwise meta-analysis and Bayesian network meta-analysis were performed. The primary outcomes were chorioamnionitis, endometritis or puerperal sepsis, neonatal death, respiratory distress syndrome, and neurodevelopmental disability.
A total of 45 trials (11,227 women and 11,878 infants) were included in the study. No clinical or statistical difference was found between dexamethasone and betamethasone in neonatal death (odds ratio, 1.05; 95% confidence interval, 0.62-1.84; moderate-certainty evidence), neurodevelopmental disability (odds ratio, 1.03; 95% confidence interval, 0.80-1.33; moderate-certainty evidence), intraventricular hemorrhage (odds ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 0.56-1.78); low-certainty evidence), or birthweight (+5.29 g; 95% confidence interval, -49.79 to 58.97; high-certainty evidence). There was no statistically significant difference, but a potentially clinically important effect was found between dexamethasone and betamethasone in chorioamnionitis (odds ratio, 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.45-1.06; moderate-certainty evidence), fetal death (odds ratio, 0.81; 95% confidence interval, 0.24-2.41; low-certainty evidence), puerperal sepsis (odds ratio, 2.04; 95% confidence interval, 0.72-6.06; low-certainty evidence), and respiratory distress syndrome (odds ratio, 1.34; 95% confidence interval, 0.96-2.11; moderate-certainty evidence). Meta-regression, subgroup, and sensitivity analyses did not reveal important changes regarding the main analysis.
Corticosteroids have proven effective for most neonatal and child-relevant outcomes compared with placebo or no treatment for women at risk of preterm birth. No important difference was found on neonatal death, neurodevelopmental disability, intraventricular hemorrhage, and birthweight between corticosteroids, and there was no statistically significant difference, but a potentially important difference was found in chorioamnionitis, fetal death, endometritis or puerperal sepsis, and respiratory distress syndrome. Further research is warranted to improve the certainty of evidence and inform health policies.