Best practice guidelines

最佳实践指南
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:研究与无ACNP的跨专业团队相比,有急性护理执业护士(ACNP)的跨专业团队对最佳实践指南的遵守程度。
    方法:2023年进行了一项回顾性观察性研究。
    方法:创建了一个回顾性队列,包括280例患者,这些患者在2019年1月1日至2020年1月31日期间接受了冠状动脉旁路移植术和/或瓣膜修复术,并在魁北克(加拿大)大学附属医院的心脏外科病房住院。对最佳实践指南的遵守程度是根据百分比的综合得分来衡量的。综合评分是从一个新开发的工具创建的,该工具包括六个类别的99个项目(患者信息,药物治疗,实验室测试,术后评估,患者和跨专业团队的特点)。计算多元线性和逻辑回归模型,以检查具有ACNP的跨专业团队对遵守最佳实践指南的水平的影响。
    结果:该队列的大多数患者为男性,接受了冠状动脉旁路移植术。与没有ACNP的跨专业团队相比,接受ACNP的跨专业团队护理的患者达到依从性高于80%的可能性是1.72倍,并且在该水平的得分最高四分位数内的可能性是2.29倍。
    结论:本研究提供的经验数据支持ACNP实践对患者的益处,跨专业团队和医疗机构。
    结论:我们的发现确定了跨专业团队的重要贡献,包括使用经过验证的工具的ACNP,以及他们对提供高质量患者护理的贡献。
    本研究遵循加强流行病学观察性研究报告(STROBE)声明:报告观察性研究指南指南。
    没有患者或公众捐款。
    OBJECTIVE: To examine the level of adherence to best-practice guidelines of interprofessional teams with acute care nurse practitioners (ACNPs) compared to interprofessional teams without ACNPs.
    METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted in 2023.
    METHODS: A retrospective cohort was created including 280 patients who underwent a coronary artery bypass graft and/or a valve repair and hospitalised in a cardiac surgery unit of a university affiliated hospital in Québec (Canada) between 1 January 2019 to 31 January 2020. The level of adherence to best-practice guidelines was measured from a composite score in percentage. The composite score was created from a newly developed tool including 99 items across six categories (patient information, pharmacotherapy, laboratory tests, post-operative assessment, patient and interprofessional teams\' characteristics). Multivariate linear and logistic regression models were computed to examine the effect of interprofessional teams with ACNPs on the level of adherence to best-practice guidelines.
    RESULTS: Most of the patients of the cohort were male and underwent a coronary artery bypass graft procedure. Patients under the care of interprofessional teams with ACNP were 1.72 times more likely to reach a level of adherence higher than 80% compared to interprofessional teams without ACNPs and were 2.29 times more likely to be within the highest quartile of the scores for the level of adherence to best-practice guidelines of the cohort.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study provides empirical data supporting the benefits of ACNP practice for patients, interprofessional teams and healthcare organisations.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our findings identify the important contributions of interprofessional teams that include ACNPs using a validated instrument, as well as their contribution to the delivery of high quality patient care.
    UNASSIGNED: This study followed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies guidelines.
    UNASSIGNED: No patient or public contribution.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED:为了改善患者的治疗效果,许多医疗机构采取了一系列措施来提高护理质量,包括使用循证实践(EBPs),如临床实践指南。然而,对基于指南的实践的长期使用以及如何确保其持续使用几乎没有经验理解。这项研究的目的是确定决定因素和知识翻译干预措施(KTI),从组织的角度来看,随着时间的推移,影响机构疼痛政策和方案的选定建议的持续使用,并在急性护理环境中的两个单位实施10年后。
    UNASSIGNED:我们在实施10年后,以EBP的动态可持续性框架为指导进行了混合方法案例研究。我们检查了加拿大多中心三级护理部门和单位级别的协议可持续性。数据来源包括文件审查(n=29),图表审计(n=200),以及对科室(n=3)和科室(n=16)级别护士的半结构化访谈。
    未经评估:我们确定了32个影响急性护理中持续使用EBP的可持续性决定因素和29个KTI因素。三个决定因素和八个KTI在所有三个时间段都有持续的影响:实施阶段(0-2年),持续阶段(>2-10年。),在十年大关。KTI的实现随着应用级别的发展(例如,部门vs.单元),以使EBP符合上下文,强调需要关注影响持续使用的决定因素。可持续性与持续努力监测和提供有关遵守建议的及时反馈有关。用于将建议嵌入常规实践/过程的KTI对高依从率产生了积极影响。使用参与性方法进行执行和维持,并将旨在逐步解决低遵守率的KTI联系起来,促进了维持。
    UNASSIGNED:这项研究提供了对实施和可持续性决定因素以及实施和持续使用阶段相关KTI之间关系的见解。部门和单位护士确定的独特决定因素反映了他们基于各自的角色和职责对创新的不同观点。KTI促进了急性护理中行为的改变并促进了EBP的维持。研究结果证实,可持续性的概念是一个动态的“持续过程”。\"
    UNASSIGNED: To improve patient outcomes many healthcare organizations have undertaken a number of steps to enhance the quality of care, including the use of evidence-based practices (EBPs) such as clinical practice guidelines. However, there is little empirical understanding of the longer-term use of guideline-based practices and how to ensure their ongoing use. The aim of this study was to identify the determinants and knowledge translation interventions (KTIs) influencing ongoing use of selected recommendations of an institutional pain policy and protocol over time from an organizational perspective and 10 years post implementation on two units within an acute care setting.
    UNASSIGNED: We conducted a mixed methods case study guided by the Dynamic Sustainability Framework of an EBP 10 years post implementation. We examined protocol sustainability at the nursing department and unit levels of a multi-site tertiary center in Canada. Data sources included document review (n = 29), chart audits (n = 200), and semi-structured interviews with nurses at the department (n = 3) and unit (n = 16) level.
    UNASSIGNED: We identified 32 sustainability determinants and 29 KTIs influencing ongoing use of an EBP in acute care. Three determinants and eight KTIs had a continuous influence in all three time periods: implementation phase (0-2 yrs), sustained phase (>2-10 yrs.), and at the 10-year mark. Implementation of KTIs evolved with the level of application (e.g., department vs. unit) to fit the EBP within the context highlighting the need to focus on determinants influencing ongoing use. Sustainability was associated with continual efforts of monitoring and providing timely feedback regarding adherence to recommendations. KTIs used to embed recommendations into routine practices/processes positively influenced high adherence rates. Use of a participatory approach for implementation and sustainment and linking KTIs designed to incrementally address low adherence rates facilitated sustainment.
    UNASSIGNED: This research provides insight into the relationship between implementation and sustainability determinants and related KTIs during implementation and sustained use phases. Unique determinants identified by department and unit nurses reflect their different perspectives toward the innovation based on their respective roles and responsibilities. KTIs fostered changed behaviors and facilitated EBP sustainment in acute care. Findings confirm the concept of sustainability is a dynamic \"ongoing process.\"
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号