Arterial Occlusive Diseases

动脉闭塞性疾病
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    大血管闭塞(LVO)卒中与更差的功能结果和更高的死亡率相关。在本系统综述和荟萃分析中,我们评估了辛辛那提院前卒中量表(CPSS)检测LVO的诊断率.
    我们在包括Medline在内的在线数据库中进行了广泛的系统搜索,Embase,WebofScience,还有Scopus,直到7月31日,2023年。我们还在谷歌和谷歌学者上进行了手动搜索,在检索所有评估CPSS在疑似卒中患者中检测LVO的诊断准确性的研究时,使用引文追踪作为系统搜索的补充.
    本荟萃分析包括14项研究。CPSS显示在≥1的临界点的敏感性为97%(95%CI:87%-99%)和特异性为17%(95%CI:4%-54%)。检测LVO的最佳阈值为≥2,灵敏度为82%(95%CI:74%-88%),特异性为62%(95%CI:48%-74%)。在≥3的最高截止点,CPSS的最低灵敏度为60%(95%CI:51%-69%),最高特异度为81%(95%CI:71%-88%)。敏感性分析显示,无论研究人群如何,结果都是稳健的,纳入出血性中风患者,院前或院内设置,以及LVO的定义。
    非常低的证据表明CPSS,阈值设置为≥2,是识别LVO中风和指导患者进行CSC的有用工具,无论是在院前还是在院内。
    UNASSIGNED: Large vessel occlusion (LVO) strokes are associated with worse functional outcomes and higher mortality rates. In the present systematic review and meta-analysis, we evaluated the diagnostic yield of the Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale (CPSS) in detecting LVO.
    UNASSIGNED: We performed an extensive systematic search among online databases including Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus, until July 31st, 2023. We also conducted a manual search on Google and Google scholar, along with citation tracking to supplement the systematic search in retrieving all studies that evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of the CPSS in detecting LVO among patients suspected to stroke.
    UNASSIGNED: Fourteen studies were included in the present meta-analysis. CPSS showed the sensitivity of 97% (95% CI: 87%-99%) and the specificity of 17% (95% CI: 4%-54%) at the cut-off point of ≥1. The optimal threshold was determined to be ≥2, with a sensitivity of 82% (95% CI: 74%-88%) and specificity of 62% (95% CI: 48%-74%) in detecting LVO. At the highest cut-off point of ≥3, the CPSS had the lowest sensitivity of 60% (95% CI: 51%-69%) and the highest specificity of 81% (95% CI: 71%-88%). Sensitivity analyses showed the robustness of the results regardless of study population, inclusion of hemorrhagic stroke patients, pre-hospital or in-hospital settings, and the definition of LVO.
    UNASSIGNED: A very low level of evidence demonstrated that CPSS, with a threshold set at ≥2, is a useful tool for identifying LVO stroke and directing patients to CSCs, both in prehospital and in-hospital settings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:急性主动脉闭塞(AAO)是一种罕见但严重的疾病,与显着的发病率和死亡率相关。
    目的:这篇综述提供了对AAO的急诊医学评估,包括介绍,评估,和基于当前证据的急诊科(ED)管理。
    结论:AAO是指由于血栓形成或栓塞导致的主动脉血流阻塞。这种情况主要影响60-70岁的老年人心血管合并症,最常见于急性肢体缺血的体征和症状。虽然胃肠道,肾脏,脊髓可能会受到影响。第一线成像模式包括胸部的计算机断层扫描血管造影,腹部,还有骨盆.ED复苏管理包括避免极端的血压或心率,维持正常的氧饱和度和正常血容量状态,肝素抗凝,疼痛控制。建议紧急咨询血管外科专家,以建立通过血管内或开放技术恢复缺血组织灌注的计划。受影响人群中存在的基线合并症以及缺血和再灌注损伤的高发生率使AAO患者在手术治疗后立即和延迟地处于并发症的高风险中。
    结论:了解AAO可以帮助急诊临床医生诊断和治疗这种罕见但破坏性疾病。
    Acute aortic occlusion (AAO) is a rare but serious condition associated with significant morbidity and mortality.
    This review provides an emergency medicine focused evaluation of AAO, including presentation, assessment, and emergency department (ED) management based on current evidence.
    AAO refers to obstruction of blood flow through the aorta due to either thrombosis or embolism. This condition primarily affects older adults ages 60-70 with cardiovascular comorbidities and most commonly presents with signs and symptoms of acute limb ischemia, though the gastrointestinal tract, kidneys, and spinal cord may be affected. The first line imaging modality includes computed tomography angiography of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis. ED resuscitative management consists of avoiding extremes of blood pressure or heart rate, maintaining normal oxygen saturation and euvolemic status, anticoagulation with heparin, and pain control. Emergent consultation with the vascular surgery specialist is recommended to establish a plan for restoration of perfusion to ischemic tissues via endovascular or open techniques. High rates of baseline comorbidities present in the affected population as well as ischemic and reperfusion injuries place AAO patients at high risk for complications in an immediate and delayed fashion after surgical management.
    An understanding of AAO can assist emergency clinicians in diagnosing and managing this rare but devastating disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    目的:我们承认血管内治疗(EVT)已成为一种有前途的治疗方法,在临床试验中观察到一些益处的证据。然而,关于EVT的实际应用和有效性的证据仍然存在显著差距.这项研究的目的是综合评估基底动脉闭塞(BAO)患者的EVT和标准药物治疗(SMT)之间的安全性和有效性差异。
    方法:通过EMBASE中的搜索确定了对接受EVT和SMT的BAO患者的真实世界研究(RWS),PubMed,和Cochrane图书馆数据库。疗效结果包括良好的临床结果[定义为90天时0-3的改良Rankin量表(mRS)评分],卓越的临床结果(定义为90天时0-2的mRS评分),90天死亡率,和再灌注状态。安全性结果为症状性颅内出血(sICH)。根据研究类型(前瞻性和回顾性研究)进行亚组分析。EVT和SMT与BAO患者预后的关系用比值比(OR)表示,置信区间为95%(95%CI)。
    结果:七项研究共涉及2885名患者。在进行敏感性分析并排除高异质性文章后,与SMT相比,EVT与90天的良好临床结局(OR=4.01,95%CI:2.60-6.19)和90天的卓越临床结局(OR=5.70,95%CI:3.18-10.22)显着相关。此外,与SMT组相比,EVT与90天死亡率的相关性较低(OR=0.35,95%CI:0.25-0.47)。根据研究类型进行的亚组分析显示,EVT的再灌注成功率(回顾性研究组:OR=7.97,95%CI:4.83-13.15;前瞻性研究组:OR=51.57,95%CI:29.76-89.38)高于SMT组。回顾性研究组中sICH的存在无统计学意义(OR=1.20,95%CI:0.58-2.48),并且表现出高度异质性。然而,在前瞻性研究小组中,与SMT相比,EVT显示出较高的出血风险(OR=11.42,95%CI:2.65-49.20)。
    结论:总之,我们的实际研究与最近发表的随机对照试验研究的结论一致.当比较EVT和SMT治疗BAO时,EVT与良好的临床结果有更高的相关性,再灌注成功率更高,和较低的死亡率。然而,它确实增加了sICH的风险。
    We acknowledge that between endovascular treatment (EVT) has emerged as a promising therapeutic approach, with some evidence of benefits observed in clinical trials. However, there remains a significant gap in the evidence regarding the real-world application and effectiveness of EVT.The objective of this study was to comprehensively evaluate the safety and efficacy differences between EVT and standard medical treatment (SMT) in patients with basilar artery occlusion(BAO).
    Real-world studies (RWSs) on patients with BAO who underwent EVT and SMT were identified through searches in EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases. The efficacy outcomes included good clinical outcomes [defined as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores of 0-3 at 90 days], excellence clinical outcomes (defined as mRS scores of 0-2 at 90 days), 90-day mortality rate, and reperfusion status. The safety outcome was symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). Subgroup analysis was conducted based on study type (prospective and retrospective studies). The relationship between EVT and SMT with the prognosis of BAO patients was expressed using odds ratios (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI).
    The seven studies involved a total of 2885 patients. After conducting sensitivity analysis and excluding articles with high heterogeneity, EVT demonstrated a significant association with good clinical outcomes at 90 days (OR=4.01, 95% CI: 2.60-6.19) and excellence clinical outcomes at 90 days (OR=5.70, 95% CI: 3.18-10.22) compared to SMT. Additionally, EVT showed a lower correlation with 90-day mortality rate compared to the SMT group (OR=0.35, 95% CI: 0.25-0.47). Subgroup analysis based on study type revealed that EVT had higher rates of successful reperfusion (retrospective study group: OR=7.97, 95% CI: 4.83-13.15; prospective study group: OR=51.57, 95% CI: 29.76-89.38) than the SMT group in both subgroups. The presence of sICH was not statistically significant in the retrospective study group (OR=1.20, 95% CI: 0.58-2.48) and showed high heterogeneity. However, in the prospective study group, EVT exhibited a higher risk of bleeding compared to SMT (OR=11.42, 95% CI: 2.65-49.20).
    In summary, our real-world study aligns with the conclusions of recently published randomized controlled trials research. When comparing EVT and SMT in the treatment of BAO, EVT shows a higher correlation with favorable clinical outcomes, higher rates of successful reperfusion, and lower mortality rates. However, it does come with an increased risk of sICH.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    大血管闭塞(LVO)中风与更高的死亡率和更大的长期残疾风险有关。本研究旨在通过系统评价和荟萃分析评估快速动脉闭塞评估(RACE)工具在检测LVO方面的诊断性能。
    对包括PubMed在内的在线数据库进行了全面搜索,Embase,Scopus,和WebofScience,到6月25日,2023年。此外,在Google和GoogleScholar上进行了一项手动搜索,以确定评估RACE量表在有卒中症状的患者中检测LVO的诊断准确性的研究.
    分析了从43项研究中提取的数据。最佳截止点确定为3和4,截止点≥3的敏感性为0.86(95%置信区间(CI):0.78,0.91),特异性为0.57(95%CI:0.49,0.67),截止点≥4的敏感性为0.78(95%CI:0.70,0.84),特异性为0.68(95%CI:0.59,0.75)。亚组荟萃回归分析显示在敏感性和特异性方面存在显著差异。RACE量表在疑似卒中病例的LVO检测中的敏感性明显较高,在院前设置,前瞻性设计研究,以及在考虑LVO定义的前后闭塞时。RACE量表的特异性在评估确诊卒中病例时显著更高,在医院设置,仅考虑前路闭塞的LVO定义和回顾性设计研究。值得注意的是,与其他急诊人员相比,神经科医师和医师使用RACE时表现出更高的敏感性和特异性。尽管有这些变化,我们的研究发现,不同条件下的诊断准确率具有可比性.
    高水平的证据表明,RACE量表对检测LVOs缺乏有希望的诊断价值。对于旨在帮助诊断中风的筛查工具,灵敏度范围为0.69至0.86是不够的。考虑到与这种情况相关的大量发病率和死亡率。
    UNASSIGNED: Large vessel occlusion (LVO) strokes are linked to higher mortality rates and a greater risk of long-term disability. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the Rapid Arterial Occlusion Evaluation (RACE) tool in detecting LVO through a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: A comprehensive search was conducted across online databases including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science, up to June 25th, 2023. Additionally, a manual search on Google and Google Scholar was performed to identify studies that assessed the diagnostic accuracy of the RACE scale in detecting LVO among patients with stroke symptoms.
    UNASSIGNED: Data extracted from 43 studies were analyzed. The optimal cut-off points were determined to be 3 and 4, with a sensitivity of 0.86 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.78, 0.91) and specificity of 0.57 (95% CI: 0.49, 0.67) for cut-off ≥3, and a sensitivity of 0.78 (95% CI: 0.70, 0.84) and specificity of 0.68 (95% CI: 0.59, 0.75) for cut-off ≥4. Subgroup meta-regression analysis revealed significant variations in sensitivity and specificity. RACE scale\'s sensitivity was significantly higher in LVO detection in suspected stroke cases, in pre-hospital settings, prospective design studies, and when considering both anterior and posterior occlusions for LVO definition. RACE scale\'s specificity was significantly higher when evaluating confirmed stroke cases, in-hospital settings, and considering only anterior occlusions for LVO definition and retrospective design studies. Notably, RACE exhibited higher sensitivity and specificity when utilized by neurologists and physicians compared to other emergency staff. Despite these variations, our study found comparable diagnostic accuracy across different conditions.
    UNASSIGNED: A high level of evidence indicates that the RACE scale lacks promising diagnostic value for detection of LVOs. A sensitivity range of 0.69 to 0.86 is insufficient for a screening tool intended to aid in the diagnosis of strokes, considering the substantial morbidity and mortality associated with this condition.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Review
    我们的目标是通过分享我们在处理揭示霍顿病的亚急性上肢缺血病例方面的经验来丰富医学文献。鉴于目前缺乏完善的准则,这一点尤其重要。
    背景:急性上肢缺血在Horton病很少见。
    方法:我们介绍了一例63岁的女性患者,双肢亚急性缺血,伴有颌骨跛行和双侧颞脉冲缺失。CT血管造影扫描显示双侧腋窝和锁骨下动脉闭塞和狭窄,以及颈外动脉及其分支的参与。动脉造影证实了主动脉上干的中型动脉异常。颞动脉活检组织病理学检查阴性。患者接受了紧急皮质类固醇治疗,然后使用免疫抑制剂。由于上肢的临床状况有所改善,未进行手术干预.
    UNASSIGNED: Our goal is to enrich the medical literature by sharing our experience in managing a case of sub-acute upper limb ischemia that revealed Horton\'s disease. This is particularly relevant given the current lack of well-established guidelines.
    BACKGROUND: Acute upper limb ischemia is rarely seen in Horton\'s disease.
    METHODS: We present a case of a 63-year-old female patient with sub-acute ischemia in both upper limbs, accompanied by jaw claudication and absence of bilateral temporal pulses. The CT Angiography scan revealed bilateral occlusions and stenosis of the axillary and sub-clavier arteries, as well as involvement of the external carotid arteries and its branches. The Arteriography confirmed abnormalities in the medium-sized arteries of the supra-aortic trunks. The histopathology examination of the temporal artery biopsy was negative. The patient received emergency corticosteroid therapy followed by an immunosuppressant. Due to the improved clinical condition of the upper limbs, surgical intervention was not performed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    目的:急性基底动脉闭塞(BAO)是一种破坏性的神经系统事件。随着血管内血栓切除术(EVT)在前循环卒中变得越来越普遍,在后循环中进行了调查。在讨论BAO后,与标准药物治疗(SMT)相比,它在改善结果方面取得了成功。
    方法:我们对所有随机对照试验(RCT)和观察性队列研究进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,评估EVT与SMT在急性BAO中的比较。我们询问PubMed,Embase,和科克伦进行研究。主要结果是90天的良好功能结果(改良的Rankin量表(mRS)≤3)。我们分析了偏倚风险(ROB)的研究,并计算了合并风险比(RR),赔率比(OR),对于我们的主要结果和次要阳性结果和危害,使用随机效应模型,平均差异(MD)和95%置信区间(95CI)。
    结果:我们确定了符合纳入标准的4项随机对照试验(991例患者随机分组)和3项队列研究(1030例患者在试验中接受治疗)。三个RCT的ROB很低,一个有严重的ROB。一项队列研究有高ROB,一个有适度的罗布,一个人的ROB很低。在RCT中,EVT与良好功能结局的相关性显著高于SMT(RR=1.54,95CI=1.16-2.04,p=0.003),在队列研究中具有显著性趋势(RR=2.64,95CI=0.87-8.00,p=0.09)。RCTs中EVT患者90天的平均mRS较低(MD=-0.65,95CI=-1.07-0.22,p=0.003),但不是队列研究(MD=-0.84,95CI=-2.48-0.79,p=0.31)。症状性脑出血(sICH)在RCT中与EVT有统计学意义(OR=6.36,95CI=2.24-18.07,p<0.001),在队列研究中无统计学意义(OR=4.51,95CI=1.00-20.33,p=0.05)。在两项RCT(OR=0.76,95CI=0.65-0.88,p<0.001)队列研究(OR=0.36,95CI=0.26-0.50,p<0.001)中,EVT在90天的死亡率均低于SMT(尽管围手术期sICH发生率较高,但EVT与较高的良好功能结局率和较低的死亡和残疾率相关。
    Acute basilar artery occlusion (BAO) is a devastating neurologic event. As endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) became more prevalent for anterior circulation strokes, investigations were conducted in the posterior circulation. Its success in improving outcomes compared to standard medical therapy (SMT) after BAO has been debated.
    We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational cohort studies evaluating EVT compared to SMT in acute BAO. We queried PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane for studies. Primary outcome was good functional outcome at 90 days (modified Rankin scale (mRS) ≤ 3). We analyzed studies for risk of bias (ROB) and calculated pooled risk ratios (RRs), odds ratios (ORs), and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) using the random effects model for our primary outcome and secondary positive outcomes and harms.
    We identified four RCTs (991 patients randomized) and three cohort studies (1030 patients treated in-trial) that fit inclusion criteria. Three RCTs had low ROB, one had serious ROB. One cohort study had high ROB, one had moderate ROB, and one had low ROB. EVT was statistically significantly more associated with good functional outcome than SMT in RCTs (RR=1.54, 95%CI=1.16-2.04, p = 0.003) and trended towards significance in cohort studies (RR=2.64, 95%CI=0.87-8.00, p = 0.09). Mean mRS at 90 days was lower in EVT patients in RCTs (MD=-0.65, 95%CI=-1.07--0.22, p = 0.003) though not cohort studies (MD =-0.84, 95%CI=-2.48-0.79, p = 0.31). Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) was statistically significantly associated with EVT in RCTs (OR=6.36, 95%CI=2.24-18.07, p < 0.001) and statistically non-significantly in cohort studies (OR=4.51, 95CI=1.00-20.33, p = 0.05). Mortality at 90 days was statistically lower with EVT than with SMT in both RCTs (OR=0.76, 95%CI=0.65-0.88, p < 0.001) cohort studies (OR=0.36, 95%CI=0.26-0.50, p < 0.001) CONCLUSION: EVT is associated with greater rates of good functional outcomes and lower rates of death and disability despite higher rates of periprocedural sICH.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    目的:本研究旨在总结不同病理机制的基底动脉闭塞(BAO)患者腔内治疗的临床效果。
    方法:两名独立的审阅者搜索了PubMed/MEDLINE,截至2022年12月的Embase和CochraneLibrary数据库,具有不同BAO病理机制的患者(BAO与原位动脉粥样硬化vs.无椎动脉狭窄闭塞的单纯栓塞与收集并分析了来自串联椎动脉狭窄闭塞的栓塞)。我们计算了比值比(ORs)和95%置信区间(CIs),以评估临床结果与BAO病理机制之间的关联。
    结果:共确定了来自12项研究的1163名参与者。与单纯栓塞相比,原位动脉粥样硬化BAO患者的有利转归率较低(改良Rankin评分[mRS]0-2:34.5%vs.41.2%;OR0.83,95%CI0.70-0.98;P=0.03)和中度结局率(mRS0-3:45.8%vs.55.4%;OR0.65,95%CI0.47-0.90;P=0.01)在3个月和更高的死亡率风险(29.9%vs.27.2%;OR1.31,95%CI0.96-1.79,P=0.09;调整后OR1.46,95%CI1.08-1.96)。串联BAO与原位动脉粥样硬化性BAO(OR1.37,95%CI0.84-2.22;P=0.48)或单独栓塞(OR1.44,95%CI0.65-3.21;P=0.43)的死亡风险相当,串联BAO与其他两种BAO机制在有利或中度结局方面无显着差异。
    结论:在接受血管内治疗的BAO患者中,栓塞机制比原位动脉粥样硬化有更好的临床结果,动脉粥样硬化机制与3个月时较高的死亡率相关。需要通过不同机制进一步证实BAO的临床结局。
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to summarize the clinical outcomes of endovascular treatment in patients with basilar artery occlusion (BAO) with different pathologic mechanisms.
    METHODS: Two independent reviewers searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library database up to December 2022, patients with different BAO pathological mechanisms (BAO with in situ atherosclerosis vs. embolism alone without vertebral artery steno-occlusion vs. embolism from tandem vertebral artery steno-occlusion) were collected and analyzed. We calculated the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to assess the associations between clinical outcomes and BAO pathological mechanisms.
    RESULTS: A total of 1163 participants from 12 studies were identified. Compared with embolism alone, patients with in situ atherosclerotic BAO had a lower favorable outcome rate (modified Rankin score [mRS] 0-2: 34.5% vs. 41.2%; OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.70-0.98; P = 0.03) and moderate outcome rate (mRS 0-3: 45.8% vs. 55.4%; OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.47-0.90; P = 0.01) at 3 months and a higher risk of mortality (29.9% vs. 27.2%; OR 1.31, 95% CI 0.96-1.79, P = 0.09; adjusted OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.08-1.96). Tandem BAO had a comparable mortality risk to that of in situ atherosclerotic BAO (OR 1.37, 95% CI 0.84-2.22; P = 0.48) or embolism alone (OR 1.44, 95% CI 0.65-3.21; P = 0.43), and there were no significant differences in favorable or moderate outcomes between tandem BAO and each of the other two BAO mechanisms.
    CONCLUSIONS: Among BAO patients with endovascular treatment, embolism mechanism had better clinical outcomes than in situ atherosclerosis, and atherosclerotic mechanism was associated with a higher mortality at 3 months. RCTs are needed to further confirm clinical outcomes of BAO by different mechanisms.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    流体衰减反转恢复(FLAIR)血管高强度(FVH)是指对应于蛛网膜下腔动脉的高强度。它是由严重减慢的血流引起的,通常在大动脉狭窄闭塞的患者中遇到。相当多的研究集中在FLAIR血管高强度在其与短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)预后的关系方面的临床意义,基线严重程度或梗死体积,早期神经系统恶化或梗塞生长,和急性缺血性卒中(AIS)的功能结局。然而,在这些研究中,不一致或相互矛盾的发现很常见,并在该影像学标记物指导下的临床决策过程中造成混乱.通过回顾FVH的病因机制的现有研究,探讨其在AIS和TIA中的临床意义,本综述旨在阐明解释FVH临床意义的关键因素。
    Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) vessel hyperintensity(FVH)refers to the hyperintensity corresponding to the arteries in the subarachnoid space. It is caused by critically slowed blood flow and is commonly encountered in patients with large artery steno-occlusions. Quite a few studies have focused on the clinical significance of FLAIR vessel hyperintensity in terms of its relationship to the prognosis of transient ischemic attack (TIA), baseline severity or infarction volume, early neurological deterioration or infarction growth, and functional outcomes in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). However, inconsistent or conflicting findings were common in these studies and caused confusion in the clinical decision-making process guided by this imaging marker. Through reviewing the available studies on the etiologic mechanism of FVH and investigating findings on its clinical significance in AIS and TIA, this review aims to elucidate the key factors for interpreting the clinical significance of FVH individually.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    目的:机械取栓(MT)辅助动脉内溶栓(IAT)能否改善大血管闭塞(LVO)卒中患者的预后尚不清楚。本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在比较MT与IAT治疗LVO卒中的安全性和有效性。
    方法:对PubMed,Embase,和Cochrane图书馆进行,以确定比较3个月功能独立性率的研究(改良Rankin量表评分0-2),成功的血运重建,症状性颅内出血,MT+IAT和单独MT的3个月死亡率。使用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析,效应大小表示为比值比(ORs)和95%置信区间(CIs)。用Cochran的Q检验和I2统计量评估异质性。
    结果:12项研究符合资格标准,包括一项随机对照试验和11项观察性队列研究,涉及2584例患者。与单独的MT相比,MT+IAT3个月功能独立性的几率提高了43%(OR1.43,95%CI1.11-1.83;I2=21%),3个月死亡率的几率降低了23%(OR0.77,95%CI0.60-0.99;I2=0%)。两组之间成功的血运重建(OR1.39,95%CI0.89-2.17;I2=57%)或症状性颅内出血(OR0.87,95%CI0.56-1.35;I2=6%)没有差异。
    结论:本研究表明,与单独的MT相比,在LVO卒中患者MT期间使用辅助IAT可带来更好的功能结局和更低的死亡率.
    It is unknown whether adjunctive intra-arterial thrombolysis (IAT) during mechanical thrombectomy (MT) improves outcomes in patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of MT with and without IAT for the treatment of LVO stroke.
    A systematic literature search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was conducted to identify studies that compared rates of 3-month functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score 0-2), successful revascularization, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and 3-month mortality for MT+IAT and MT alone. Meta-analyses were performed using random effects models, and effect sizes were expressed as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was assessed with Cochran\'s Q test and I2 statistic.
    Twelve studies met eligibility criteria, comprising one randomized controlled trial and 11 observational cohort studies involving 2584 patients. Compared to MT alone, MT+IAT had a 43% higher odds of 3-month functional independence (OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.11-1.83; I2 =21%) and a 23% decrease in odds for 3-month mortality (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.60-0.99; I2 =0%). There were no differences in successful revascularization (OR 1.39, 95% CI 0.89-2.17; I2 =57%) or symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.56-1.35; I2 =6%) between the two groups.
    The present study has demonstrated that, compared with MT alone, the use of adjunct IAT during MT in patients with LVO stroke resulted in better functional outcomes and lower mortality.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    背景:急性基底动脉闭塞的一线抽吸和支架取出术之间的最佳选择仍存在争议。本研究旨在进行系统评价和荟萃分析,比较支架取出器和直接抽吸术对报告的再通率和围手术期并发症的影响。
    方法:PubMed,Embase,WebofScience,科克伦,我们在临床试验中搜索了评估一线抽吸术与支架取出器治疗急性基底动脉闭塞的疗效和安全性的研究。标准软件程序(Stata公司)用于终点分析。统计显著性定义为p值小于0.05。
    结果:本研究共涉及11项研究,包括1014名患者。关于术后再通,汇总分析发现,两组在成功再通(比值比[OR]=1.642;95%置信区间(95%CI):1.099~2.453;p=0.015)和完全再通(OR=3.525;95%CI:1.306~2.872;p=.001)方面存在显著差异,有利于一线抽吸.关于并发症,一线抽吸术的总并发症发生率(OR=.359;95%CI:.229-.563;p<.001)和出血性并发症发生率(OR=.446,95%CI:.259-.769;p=.004)低于支架取出术。术后死亡率无显著差异(OR=.966;p=.880),蛛网膜下腔血肿(OR=.171;p=.094),和实质性血肿(OR=.799;p=.720)。此外,汇总结果显示,两组间手术持续时间存在显著差异,有利于误吸(WMD=-27.630,95%CI:-50.958~-4.302;p=.020).然而,两组间的良好结局(OR=1.149;p=.352)和抢救治疗(OR=1.440;p=.409)无显著差异.
    结论:鉴于一线抽吸与术后再通率较高有关,术后并发症的风险较低,以及更快的手术持续时间,这些发现支持抽吸可能比支架取出器更安全.
    The best choice between first-line aspiration and stent retriever for acute basilar artery occlusion remains controversial. This study aims to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the stent retriever and direct aspiration about reported recanalization rates and periprocedural complications.
    PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Clinical Trials were searched for the studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of first-line aspiration versus stent retriever for acute basilar artery occlusion. A standard software program (Stata Corporation) was used for end-point analyses. Statistical significance was defined as a p-value less than .05.
    A total of 11 studies were involved in the current study, including 1014 patients. Regarding postoperative recanalization, the pooled analysis identified a significant difference in successful recanalization (odds ratio [OR] = 1.642; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.099-2.453; p = .015) and complete recanalization (OR = 3.525; 95% CI: 1.306-2.872; p = .001) between the two groups in favor of the first-line aspiration. Concerning the complications, the first-line aspiration could achieve a lower rate of total complication (OR = .359; 95% CI: .229-.563; p < .001) and hemorrhagic complication (OR = .446, 95% CI: .259-.769; p = .004) than stent retriever. No significant difference was observed in postoperative mortality (OR = .966; p = .880), subarachnoid hematoma (OR = .171; p = .094), and parenchymal hematoma (OR = .799; p = .720). In addition, the pooled results revealed a significant difference in procedure duration between the two groups in favor of aspiration (WMD = -27.630, 95% CI: -50.958 to -4.302; p = .020). However, there was no significant difference in favorable outcome (OR = 1.149; p = .352) and rescue therapy (OR = 1.440; p = .409) between the two groups.
    Given that the first-line aspiration was associated with a higher rate of postoperative recanalization, a lower risk of postoperative complication, and a faster duration of the procedure, these findings support the aspiration may be more secure than a stent retriever.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号