Aortoiliac occlusive disease

主动脉闭塞性疾病
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: Extra-anatomic bypass (ExAB) grafting has been questioned due its inferior durability compared to anatomic bypass for aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD). This study aims to present early and late outcomes of patients treated with ExAB as well as to evaluate potential prognostic factors.
    METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study presenting a series of patients treated with ExAB for AIOD. All patients were treated between 2005 and 2022 within the Vascular Surgery Unit of a University Surgery Clinic. Both early (30-day) and late outcomes were evaluated. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted for potential predictors. Kaplan-Meier curve was produced for long-term patency.
    RESULTS: A total of 41 patients were treated (85.3% males; mean age: 76.3 ± 4.2 years). Indication for treatment included severe claudication or critical limb ischemia (Rutherford stages III-VI). The following procedures were recorded: Femorofemoral bypass (FFB; n = 21) and axillofemoral bypass (AxFB; n = 20). All procedures were conducted using synthetic grafts with external rings. Early outcomes included no death, no myocardial infarction, no major bleeding, no graft infection, and no major amputation. Regarding late outcomes, 14.6% patients were lost after the first month. For the rest of patients (n = 35), five-year primary patency was 88.6%, primary-assisted patency was 94.3%, and secondary patency was also 94.3%. Limb salvage was 100% within follow-up. Endarterectomy at the distal anastomosis was the only independent predictor associated with worse patency in the long-term (OR = 5.356; 95% CI (1.012-185.562); p = .041).
    CONCLUSIONS: FFB and AxFB is a safe and durable strategy for treating patients with severe AIOD where no other option is feasible. Regarding predictors, only endarterectomy at the distal anastomosis site was associated with an increased risk for graft failure.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景:主动脉动脉疾病是一种慢性进行性疾病,其特征是主动脉和髂动脉狭窄闭塞变化。治疗疾病晚期患者的金标准是主动脉双股重建术。主动脉周围钙化的患者具有术中并发症的高风险,由于难以在这样的区域交叉夹紧。
    方法:我们介绍了一例因左腿休息疼痛和第二脚趾溃疡入院的73岁患者。多层计算机断层扫描显示主动脉段明显狭窄,周围钙化的腹主动脉。使用通过左肱动脉放置的球囊导管,以主动脉腔内闭塞为特征,进行了主动脉重建。手术和术后过程都很顺利,患者在术后第六天出院。
    结论:所提出的混合血管内和开放手术技术是选择高危患者的有效替代方法。擦洗护士应熟悉血管内技术和工具,并了解防止电离辐射有害影响的措施。
    Aortoiliac arterial disease is a chronic progressive disease which is characterized by steno-occlusive changes in the aorta and iliac arteries. The gold standard for the treatment of patients with the advanced stage of the disease is aorto-bifemoral reconstruction. Patients with circumferential juxtarenal calcifications of the aorta bear a high risk of intraoperative complications, due to difficult cross-clamping in such zones.
    We present a case of a 73-year-old patient who has been admitted due to left leg rest pain and second toe ulceration. Multislice computed tomography showed significant stenosis of the aortoiliac segment with a circumferentially calcified abdominal aorta. Aortobifemoral reconstruction was performed featuring endoluminal occlusion of the aorta using a balloon catheter which was placed through the left brachial artery. The procedure and the postoperative course were uneventful, and the patient was discharged on the sixth postoperative day.
    The hybrid endovascular and open surgery technique presented emerged as a valid alternative for selected high-risk patients. Scrub nurses should be familiarized with endovascular techniques and tools and be aware of the measures to be protected from the harmful effects of ionizing radiation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    覆盖的主动脉分叉腔内重建(CERAB)技术为涉及主动脉分叉的跨大西洋社会间共识(TASC)C/D病变提供了替代方案。该研究旨在使用Begraft球囊扩张覆膜支架(BECS)评估CERAB技术治疗广泛的主动脉闭塞性疾病(AIOD)的结果。
    这是医生发起的,多中心,回顾性,观察性研究。在2017年6月至2021年6月之间,所有使用Begraft支架(BentleyInnoMed,赫辛根,德国)在3个诊所注册。患者人口统计学,病变特征,收集和回顾性分析手术结果.在1、6和12个月进行随访,然后每年进行临床检查,踝肱指数(ABI),和双工超声。主要终点是12个月时的通畅性。次要终点包括手术相关并发症,二级通畅,无靶病变血运重建(TLR),和临床改善。
    总之,分析了120名患者(64名男性),中位年龄为65岁(范围:34-84岁)。大多数患者的广泛AIOD分类为TASCIIC(n=32;26.7%)或TASCIID(n=81;67.5%)。手术的中位持续时间为120分钟(四分位距[IQR]:80-180分钟)。所有454个Begraft支架(137个主动脉和317个外周)均成功递送和部署。手术并发症总发生率为14例(11.7%)。中位住院时间为5天(IQR:3-6天)。所有患者临床好转,ABI显著升高(p<0.05)。中位随访时间为19个月(6~56个月)。主要通畅率,二级通畅率,12个月时的TLR自由度为94.5%,97.3%,93.5%,分别。
    使用BegraftBECSs的CERAB程序具有很高的技术成功率,良好的通畅结果,低发病率,即使在患有广泛AIOD的相对疾病的患者中。绝对建议对CERAB技术进行前瞻性随机研究。
    结论:本研究评估了覆膜血管内重建主动脉分叉(CERAB)手术期间使用Begraft支架的结果。迄今为止,几种球囊扩张覆膜支架已用于该技术,结果令人满意。这项研究显示了CERAB技术在使用Begraft球囊扩张覆膜支架的广泛AIOD中的安全性和出色的通畅性。
    UNASSIGNED: The covered endovascular reconstruction of the aortic bifurcation (CERAB) technique offers an alternative for Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) C/D lesions involving the aortic bifurcation. The study aims to evaluate the outcomes of the CERAB technique for extensive aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) using the BeGraft balloon-expandable covered stent (BECS).
    UNASSIGNED: This is a physician-initiated, multicenter, retrospective, observational study. Between June 2017 and June 2021, all consecutive patients who underwent the CERAB procedure using the BeGraft stent (Bentley InnoMed, Hechingen, Germany) in 3 clinics were enrolled. Patients\' demographics, lesion characteristics, and procedural results were collected and retrospectively analyzed. Follow-up was done at 1, 6, and 12 months and then annually with clinical examination, ankle-brachial index (ABI), and duplex ultrasound. The primary endpoint was the patency at 12 months. Secondary endpoints included procedural-related complications, secondary patency, freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR), and clinical improvement.
    UNASSIGNED: In all, 120 patients (64 men) with a median age of 65 years (range: 34-84 years) were analyzed. Most patients had extensive AIOD classified as TASC II C (n=32; 26.7%) or TASC II D (n=81; 67.5%). The median duration of the procedure was 120 minutes (interquartile range [IQR]: 80-180 minutes). All 454 BeGraft stents (137 aortic and 317 peripheral) were successfully delivered and deployed. The overall procedural complication rate was 14 (11.7%). The median hospital length of stay was 5 days (IQR: 3-6 days). All patients improved clinically, and the ABI increased significantly (p<0.05). The median follow-up was 19 months (range: 6-56 months). The primary patency rate, secondary patency rate, and freedom from TLR at 12 months were 94.5%, 97.3%, and 93.5%, respectively.
    UNASSIGNED: The CERAB procedure with BeGraft BECSs has a high technical success rate, favorable patency outcomes, and low morbidity, even in relatively ill patients with extensive AIOD. Prospective randomized studies on the CERAB technique are definitely recommended.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study evaluates the outcomes of BeGraft stents used during the covered endovascular reconstruction of the aortic bifurcation (CERAB) procedure. To date, several balloon-expandable covered stents have been used for this technique with satisfactory results. This study showed the safety and excellent patency of the CERAB technique in extensive AIOD using BeGraft balloon-expandable covered stents.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:有人认为,与裸金属支架(BMS)相比,覆膜支架(CS)可能降低髂总动脉血管内治疗后的再狭窄率。该试验旨在提供关于CS与BMS在髂总动脉。
    方法:这个多中心,随机化,单盲对照优势试验比较了球囊扩张CS和球囊扩张BMS治疗髂总动脉晚期动脉粥样硬化病变的疗效,定义为长度>3cm的狭窄或闭塞.主要终点是随访两年后无二元再狭窄。这项研究是根据《赫尔辛基宣言》(2008年10月版)的原则进行的,并在荷兰审判登记册(NTR3381)上注册。
    结果:在2012年至2019年期间,共纳入了174条肢体,每组87条肢体。六名患者从BMS组交叉到CS组,但根据意向治疗原则进行了分析。随访两年后,BMS组为84.7%(95%CI76.7-92.7%),CS组为89.1%(95%CI82.4-95.8%)(p=0.40)。BMS组的无闭塞率为95.0%(95%CI90.3-95.7%),CS组为96.4%(95%CI92.5-100%)(p=0.66)。靶病变血运重建的发生率为91.1%(95%CI84.8-97.3%)和95.2%(95%CI90.7-99.7%),分别(p=.31)。技术上的成功,并发症,血液动力学的成功,两组的临床成功率也相当.按方案分析不影响研究结果。
    结论:球囊扩张CS和BMS治疗髂总动脉晚期动脉粥样硬化病变没有差异。
    OBJECTIVE: It has been suggested that covered stents (CS) may lower restenosis rates compared with bare metal stents (BMS) after endovascular treatment of the common iliac artery. This trial aimed to provide additional evidence on the efficacy of CS vs. BMS in the common iliac artery.
    METHODS: This multicentre, randomised, single blind controlled superiority trial compared balloon expandable CS and balloon expandable BMS for advanced atherosclerotic lesions in the common iliac artery; this was defined as a stenosis > 3 cm in length or occlusion. The primary end point was freedom from binary restenosis after two years of follow up. The study was conducted according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki (version: October 2008) and registered with the Dutch Trial register (NTR3381).
    RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-four limbs were included between 2012 and 2019 with 87 limbs in each group. Six patients crossed over from the BMS group to the CS group but were analysed according to an intention to treat principle. Freedom from binary restenosis after two years of follow up was 84.7% (95% CI 76.7 - 92.7%) in the BMS group and 89.1% (95% CI 82.4 - 95.8%) in the CS group (p = .40). Freedom from occlusion was 95.0% (95% CI 90.3 - 95.7%) in the BMS group and 96.4% (95% CI 92.5 - 100%) in the CS group (p = .66). Freedom from target lesion revascularisation was 91.1% (95% CI 84.8 - 97.3%) and 95.2% (95% CI 90.7 -99.7%), respectively (p = .31). Technical success, complications, haemodynamic success, and clinical success were also comparable between both groups. Per-protocol analysis did not affect the outcomes of the study.
    CONCLUSIONS: No difference was found between balloon expandable CS and BMS for treating advanced atherosclerotic lesions of the common iliac artery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:术后肠缺血是腹主动脉手术的严重并发症。需要早期诊断以进行适当和及时的治疗。我们研究了血管患者术后L-乳酸的动力学,以评估其作为早期术后肠缺血检测指标的价值。
    方法:我们在80名择期患者中进行了一项前瞻性非随机单中心观察性队列研究,50例用于腹主动脉瘤(AAA),30例用于主动脉闭塞性疾病(AIOD)。术前测量血清L-乳酸,术中,以及术后确定的时间点直至术后第7天。使用MRI小肠造影检测肠缺血。我们使用单变量逻辑回归和接收器工作特征曲线来评估标记物的准确性。
    结果:我们记录了6例术后肠缺血(7.5%),五个非透壁和一个透壁。2例患者因该并发症死亡(死亡率33%)。AAA和AIOD队列的比较显示,在一个术中时间点,l-乳酸水平存在显着差异,这归因于程序差异。在某些时间点与较高L-乳酸水平相关的唯一术前因素是慢性肾脏疾病。术后肠缺血的患者在多个时间点的血清L-乳酸水平升高。最准确的诊断时间点是血管重建(DC24H)复位后24小时,第二个是卸货后10分钟。灵敏度,特异性,DC24H时间点的阳性和阴性预测值为100%,82%,32%,100%,分别。
    结论:如果使用适当的时间点,血清L-乳酸水平可能有助于早期发现主动脉手术后的肠缺血。在大规模前瞻性研究中需要建立截止值。
    BACKGROUND: Postoperative intestinal ischemia is a severe complication in abdominal aortic surgery. Early diagnosis is needed for adequate and timely treatment. We studied the postoperative kinetics of l-lactate in vascular patients to assess its value as a marker for early postoperative intestinal ischemia detection.
    METHODS: We performed a prospective non-randomized single-center observational cohort study in eighty elective patients, fifty operated on for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and thirty for aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD). Serum l-lactate was measured preoperatively, intraoperatively, and postoperatively at defined timepoints up to postoperative day 7. Intestinal ischemia was detected using MRI enterocolography. We have used univariate logistic regression and receiver operating characteristics curves for the evaluation of marker accuracy.
    RESULTS: We recorded 6 cases of postoperative intestinal ischemia (7.5%), five non-transmural and one transmural. Two patients died because of this complication (mortality 33%). The comparison of AAA and AIOD cohorts showed a significant difference in l-lactate levels at one intraoperative timepoint, which was attributable to procedure differences. The only preoperative factor associated with higher l-lactate levels at some timepoints was chronic kidney disease. Patients suffering postoperative intestinal ischemia had elevated serum l-lactate levels at multiple timepoints. The most accurate timepoint for diagnosis was 24 h after the declamping of the vascular reconstruction (DC24H), the second was 10 min after declamping. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values at timepoint DC24H were 100%, 82%, 32%, and 100%, respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: Serum l-lactate levels might help in the early detection of postoperative intestinal ischemia after aortic surgery if proper timepoints are used. Cutoff values need to be established in large-scale prospective studies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a next-generation balloon-expandable stent-graft for the treatment of arterial occlusive disease in patients with de novo or restenotic lesions in the common and/or external iliac arteries.
    METHODS: A prospective, multicenter, single-arm safety and efficacy study ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02080871) of the VBX Stent Graft for treatment of de novo or restenotic lesions in the iliac arteries was conducted under an Investigational Device Exemption at 26 US sites and 1 New Zealand center. The study eligibility criteria were established with the aim of enrolling more \"real-world\" patients compared with previous iliac stent studies supporting Food and Drug Administration approval. The study enrolled 134 patients (mean age 66±9.5 years; 79 men) with 213 iliac lesions. Three-quarters of the population (101, 75.4%) had Rutherford category 3 ischemia, and 43 (32.1%) patients presented with TASC II C/D lesions. The primary endpoint was a composite of device- or procedure-related death within 30 days, myocardial infarction within 30 days, target lesion revascularization (TLR) within 9 months, and amputation above the metatarsals in the treated leg within 9 months.
    RESULTS: In all, 234 devices were implanted in 213 lesions with 100% technical success; 57 (42.5%) patients received kissing stents at the aortic bifurcation. No devices exhibited a discernable change in length after final deployment as determined by independent core laboratory quantitative angiographic analysis. At 9 months, 3 (2.3%) of 132 patients (1 lost to follow-up, 1 unrelated death) experienced a major adverse event (3 TLRs) related to the primary endpoint. At 9 months, there were no device-related serious adverse events or unanticipated adverse device effects.
    CONCLUSIONS: The next-generation balloon-expandable stent-graft demonstrated notable 9-month safety and efficacy in treating iliac occlusive disease in patients reflecting common clinical practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:这项前瞻性研究描述了在广泛的主动脉闭塞性病变的腹膜后腹腔镜主动脉经口旁路术中使用的新的无缝线和无缝线主动脉吻合技术的可行性和安全性。这是以前发表的技术的一系列案例,展示了该技术更广泛的适用性。
    方法:12例患者使用血管内腹腔镜技术(EVREST)对TASCD主髂闭塞性病变进行了无切口和无切口的腹腔镜旁路手术。腹腔镜下进行腹膜后间隙和肾下主动脉的解剖。将分叉的移植物插入腹膜后间隙。移植物的主体通过主动脉内和主动脉外覆盖的支架移植物连接在主动脉的左侧。由于在展开连接器时出血过多,四名患者暂时使用了主动脉钳。股骨吻合通过经典的开放手术进行。最初的技术成功,并发症,并评估了旁路通畅性。
    结果:中位随访时间为9.3个月。中位手术时间为265分钟。主动脉-假体连接的中位持续时间为60秒。术后30天死亡率为0%。术后无重大并发症发生。在随访结束时,所有移植物均为专利,并且近端组装没有早期或晚期破坏。
    结论:EVREST极大地促进了闭塞性疾病的腹腔镜主动脉手术,无需缝合或夹紧主动脉。这项技术在一个中心对12名患者进行,似乎是可行和安全的。它提供了腹腔镜和血管内手术的优点,尤其是在主动脉腹腔镜手术中遇到的挑战性条件。早期经验支持程序和初始的程序后安全性,并证明了EVREST的概念验证。
    OBJECTIVE: This prospective study describes the feasibility and safety of a new clampless and sutureless aortic anastomotic technique used during retroperitoneal laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass in extensive aortoiliac occlusive lesions. This is a case series of a previously published technique, demonstrating wider applicability of the technique.
    METHODS: Twelve patients underwent a clampless and sutureless laparoscopic bypass for TASC D aortoiliac occlusive lesions using the EndoVascular REtroperitoneoScopic Technique (EVREST). Dissection of the retroperitoneal space and the infrarenal aorta was performed laparoscopically. A bifurcated graft was inserted into the retroperitoneal space. The main body of the graft was connected on the left side of the aorta by an intra- and extra-aortic covered stent-graft. An aortic clamp was used temporarily on four patients because of excessive bleeding when the connector was deployed. The femoral anastomoses were performed by classic open surgery. Initial technical success, complications, and bypass patency were assessed.
    RESULTS: Median follow-up was 9.3 months. Median operative time was 265 minutes. Median duration of aorto-prosthetic connection was 60 seconds. Thirty-day postoperative mortality was 0%. No major postoperative complications were observed. All grafts were patent at the end of follow-up and there was no early or late disruption of the proximal assembly.
    CONCLUSIONS: EVREST greatly facilitates laparoscopic aortic surgery in occlusive disease with no need for suture or clamping of the aorta. This technique performed in a single center on 12 patients, seems to be feasible and safe. It offers the advantages of laparoscopy and those of endovascular surgery, especially in the challenging conditions encountered during aortic laparoscopic surgery. Early experience supports procedural and initial postprocedural safety and demonstrates proof-of-concept for EVREST.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号