Antipsychotic Agents

抗精神病药
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在COVID-19大流行期间,实施了社交距离和禁闭措施。这些可能会影响精神分裂症等精神障碍患者的心理健康。这项研究调查了COVID-19大流行期间摩洛哥一家公立医院精神分裂症患者的临床病程。
    方法:这项纵向观察研究在15个月的三个时期进行:2020年4月1日(严格家庭分娩开始)至2020年6月30日(T1),2020年7月1日至2021年1月31日(对应于三角洲波)[T2],和2021年2月1日至2021年6月30日(对应于Omicronwave)[T3]。邀请在大流行前诊断为精神分裂症或分裂情感障碍(基于DSM5)的18至65岁的患者参加,这些患者被邀请参加拉巴特医学和药学学院。使用阳性和阴性综合征量表(PANSS)评估精神病症状。使用临床总体印象(CGI)-严重程度和改善分量表评估精神障碍的严重程度和改善程度。使用卡尔加里抑郁量表(CDS)评估抑郁症状。使用药物依从性评定量表(MARS)评估对治疗的依从性。所有评估均由精神科医生或居民面对面(对于T1)或通过电话(对于T2和T3)进行。
    结果:在招募的146名患者中,83名男性和19名女性(平均年龄,39年)完成了所有三项评估。CGI严重程度评分在T2高于T1和T3(3.24vs3.04vs3.08,p=0.041),T1和T2时MARS评分高于T3(6.80vs6.83vs6.35,p=0.033)。患者年龄与T1时(Spearmanrho=-0.239,p=0.016)和T2时(Spearmanrho=-0.231,p=0.019)抑郁症状的CDS评分呈负相关。在T1时,女性患者的依从性MARS评分高于男性患者(p=0.809),T2(p=0.353),和T3(p=0.004)。每日烟草消费量与T3时的PANSS总分相关(p=0.005),T3时的CGI-严重性评分(p=0.021),和T3时的MARS评分(p=0.002)。在T1(p=0.015)和T3(p=0.018),但在T2(p=0.346)时,有自杀未遂史的患者的CDS评分高于无自杀未遂史的患者。
    结论:COVID-19大流行期间的家庭分娩对摩洛哥精神分裂症患者的心理健康的负面影响有限。
    BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, social-distancing and confinement measures were implemented. These may affect the mental health of patients with mental disorders such as schizophrenia. This study examined the clinical course of patients with schizophrenia at a public hospital in Morocco during the COVID-19 pandemic.
    METHODS: This longitudinal observational study was conducted across three periods in 15 months: 1 April 2020 (start of strict home confinement) to 30 June 2020 (T1), 1 July 2020 to 31 January 2021 (corresponding to the Delta wave) [T2], and 1 February 2021 to 30 June 2021 (corresponding to the Omicron wave) [T3]. Patients aged 18 to 65 years with a diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (based on DSM 5) made before the pandemic who presented to the Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy of Rabat were invited to participate. Psychotic symptomatology was evaluated using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). Severity and improvement of mental disorder were evaluated using the Clinical Global Impression (CGI)-Severity and -Improvement subscales. Depressive symptoms were assessed using the Calgary Depression Scale (CDS). Adherence to treatments was assessed using the Medication Adherence Rating Scale (MARS). All assessments were made by psychiatrists or residents face-to-face (for T1) or via telephone (for T2 and T3).
    RESULTS: Of 146 patients recruited, 83 men and 19 women (mean age, 39 years) completed all three assessments. The CGI-Severity score was higher at T2 than T1 and T3 (3.24 vs 3.04 vs 3.08, p = 0.041), and the MARS score was higher at T1 and T2 than T3 (6.80 vs 6.83 vs 6.35, p = 0.033). Patient age was negatively correlated with CDS scores for depressive symptoms at T1 (Spearman\'s rho = -0.239, p = 0.016) and at T2 (Spearman\'s rho = -0.231, p = 0.019). The MARS score for adherence was higher in female than male patients at T1 (p = 0.809), T2 (p = 0.353), and T3 (p = 0.004). Daily tobacco consumption was associated with the PANSS total score at T3 (p = 0.005), the CGI-Severity score at T3 (p = 0.021), and the MARS score at T3 (p = 0.002). Patients with a history of attempted suicide had higher CDS scores than those without such a history at T1 (p = 0.015) and T3 (p = 0.018) but not at T2 (p = 0.346).
    CONCLUSIONS: Home confinement during the COVID-19 pandemic had limited negative impact on the mental health of patients with schizophrenia in Morocco.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:肺栓塞(PE)是静脉血栓栓塞的严重且危及生命的并发症。然而,缺乏关于女性和男性PE患者之间差异的系统研究。本文旨在比较精神病性PE患者临床特征和实验室指标的性别差异。
    方法:本回顾性研究纳入2018年6月至2022年6月深圳市康宁医院(深圳市精神卫生中心)收治的PE精神病患者。人口特征,与PE相关的因素,并收集实验室指标以评估性别差异.
    结果:在168例患者中,87(51.8%)为女性,81(48.2%)为男性,女性患者平均年龄58岁,男性患者平均年龄46岁。男性组高泌乳素血症比例较高,更多使用抗精神病药物的患者,PE发作时D-二聚体水平较高,更大的D-二聚体差异,D-二聚体升高率高于女性组(p<0.05)。女性患者明显年龄较大,表现出更高的糖尿病患病率,与男性患者相比,服用抗抑郁药和催眠药/镇静药的患者数量更多(p<0.05)。精神分裂症谱系障碍在男性患者中更为普遍,而女性患者的情绪障碍发生率较高(p<0.05)。在年龄<45岁的患者中,男性组PE发病时D-二聚体水平较高,D-二聚体差异较大(p<0.05).在所有112名年龄≥45岁的患者中,男性患者比女性患者更容易发生呼吸道感染,PE发作时D-二聚体水平较高,更大的D-二聚体差异,D-二聚体升高率较高(p<0.05)。多元线性回归分析显示高泌乳素血症和第一代抗精神病药(FGA)的使用与男性患者PE发病时D-二聚体水平相关,女性患者PE发病时间和保护性约束与PE发病时D-二聚体水平相关(p<0.05)。
    结论:男性和女性患者与PE相关的临床特征不同。这些差异可能暗示PE发病的过程和机制是性别特异性的。与女性患者相比,男性患者在PE发作时更容易发生呼吸道感染和更高的D-二聚体水平。FGA的使用可能与男性精神病患者的D-二聚体增加有关,而保护性约束可能与女性精神病患者的D-二聚体升高有关。
    BACKGROUND: Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a severe and life-threatening complication of venous thromboembolism. However, there is a lack of systematic studies on differences between female and male PE patients. This paper aimed to compare the sex-specific differences in clinical characteristics and laboratory indicators in psychotic patients with PE.
    METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled psychiatric patients with PE from June 2018 to June 2022 at Shenzhen Kangning Hospital (Shenzhen Mental Health Center). Demographic characteristics, factors associated with PE, and laboratory indices were collected to assess sex-specific differences.
    RESULTS: Of the 168 patients, 87 (51.8%) were female and 81 (48.2%) were male, with a mean age of 58 years for females and 46 years for male patients. The male group had higher ratio of hyperprolactinemia, more patients using antipsychotic medications, higher D-dimer levels at PE onset, greater D-dimer difference, and a higher rate of D-dimer elevation than the female group (p < 0.05). Female patients were significantly older, exhibited a higher prevalence of diabetes, and had a greater number of patients taking antidepressants and hypnotics/sedatives than male patients (p < 0.05). Schizophrenia spectrum disorders were more prevalent in male patients, while female patients had a higher incidence of mood disorders (p < 0.05). Among patients aged < 45 years, the male group had higher D-dimer levels at PE onset and greater D-dimer difference (p < 0.05). Among all 112 patients aged ≥ 45 years, male patients were more likely than female patients to have respiratory tract infections, higher D-dimer levels at PE onset, greater D-dimer difference, and a higher rate of D-dimer elevation (p < 0.05). The multiple linear regression analysis indicated that hyperprolactinemia and the use of first-generation antipsychotics (FGAs) were associated with D-dimer levels at PE onset in male patients, while the time of PE onset and protective restraints were associated with D-dimer levels at PE onset in female patients (p < 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: PE-associated clinical features differ between male and female patients. These differences may imply that the processes and mechanisms of PE onset are sex specific. Male patients are more likely to have respiratory tract infections and higher D-dimer levels at PE onset than female patients. The use of FGAs may be associated with increased D-dimer in male psychiatric patients, while protective restraints may be associated with increased D-dimer in female psychiatric patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:Deutrabenazine被批准用于患有迟发性运动障碍(TD)的成年人。基于潜在精神病和基线多巴胺受体拮抗剂(DRA)使用的数据有限。
    方法:完成父母研究ARM-TD或AIM-TD的TD患者符合3年的条件,开放标签扩展研究(RIM-TD;NCT02198794)。在RIM-TD中,根据运动障碍的控制和耐受性对deutrabenazine进行滴定。在对RIM-TD的事后分析中,在母体研究基线时,通过基础条件和DRA使用分析了总运动异常非自愿运动量表(AIMS)评分和不良事件(AE).
    结果:在参加RIM-TD的343名患者中,336项被包括在按基本条件进行的分析中,通过使用DRA分析包括337例。205名精神病患者(精神分裂症/分裂情感障碍)中的一百八十九名(92%)和131名情绪和其他疾病(抑郁症/双相情感障碍/其他)中的65名(50%)正在接受DRA。第145周的平均(SE)德丁苯那嗪剂量为40.4(1.13),38.5(1.21),39.9(1.00),精神病患者为38.5(1.48)mg/d,那些有情绪和其他疾病的人,以及那些是否接受DRAs的人,分别。从本研究基线到第145周,总运动AIMS评分的平均值(SD)变化为-6.3(4.53),-7.1(4.92),-6.1(4.42),和-7.5(5.19)。暴露调整后的不良事件发生率(不良事件数/患者年)各组相似:任何(1.02、1.71、1.08、1.97),严重(0.10,0.12,0.10,0.12),并导致停药(0.07,0.05,0.06,0.05)。
    结论:长期治疗对TD相关运动提供了有临床意义的改善,具有良好的利益-风险状况,无论基础条件或DRA使用如何。
    BACKGROUND: Deutetrabenazine is approved for adults with tardive dyskinesia (TD). Data based on underlying psychiatric condition and baseline dopamine receptor antagonist (DRA) use are limited.
    METHODS: Patients with TD who completed parent studies ARM-TD or AIM-TD were eligible for the 3-year, open-label extension study (RIM-TD; NCT02198794). In RIM-TD, deutetrabenazine was titrated based on dyskinesia control and tolerability. In this post hoc analysis of RIM-TD, total motor Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) score and adverse events (AEs) were analyzed by underlying condition and DRA use at parent study baseline.
    RESULTS: Of 343 patients enrolled in RIM-TD, 336 were included in the analysis by underlying condition, and 337 were included in the analysis by DRA use. One hundred eighty-nine of 205 (92%) patients with psychotic disorders (schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder) and 65 of 131 (50%) with mood and other disorders (depression/bipolar disorder/other) were receiving a DRA. Mean (SE) deutetrabenazine doses at week 145 were 40.4 (1.13), 38.5 (1.21), 39.9 (1.00), and 38.5 (1.48) mg/d for patients with psychotic disorders, those with mood and other disorders, and those receiving DRAs or not, respectively. Mean (SD) changes in total motor AIMS score from this study baseline to week 145 were -6.3 (4.53), -7.1 (4.92), -6.1 (4.42), and -7.5 (5.19). Exposure-adjusted incidence rates (number of AEs/patient-years) of AEs were similar across groups: any (1.02, 1.71, 1.08, 1.97), serious (0.10, 0.12, 0.10, 0.12), and leading to discontinuation (0.07, 0.05, 0.06, 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: Long-term deutetrabenazine provided clinically meaningful improvements in TD-related movements, with a favorable benefit-risk profile, regardless of underlying condition or DRA use.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景和目的:抗抑郁药的处方模式多年来发生了变化,转向具有更好耐受性和安全性的新型抗抑郁药。多药在精神病学环境中很常见。该研究旨在评估精神科门诊环境中抗抑郁药的处方模式和多重用药。调查:这项前瞻性观察性研究是在精神科门诊进行的。收集符合条件的患者用药数据。此外,抗抑郁药物处方的基本原理,定义的每日剂量(DDD),规定的每日剂量(PDD),并评估了PDD与DDD的比率。处方复方药物的评估是利用国家心理健康计划主任协会提供的框架进行的。结果:分析了131例患者的数据。重度抑郁症(32.8%)是最常见的抗抑郁药处方。大多数,91(69.4%),接受单一疗法。选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂是69(52.7%)中最常用的处方药。米氮平是最常见的32种(24.4%)处方药。艾司西酞普兰和米氮平是最常用的联合治疗(4.6%)。抗精神病药物(37.4%)是最广泛的共同处方药物,还有抗抑郁药.米氮平和丙咪嗪的PDD与DDD之比小于1;其他人则≥1。在87.1%的处方中记录了精神病学多重用药。总的多重用药与人口统计学无关(p>0.05),疾病,和治疗相关变量。结论:选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂是最常用的抗抑郁药,单一疗法,和联合治疗。大量患者同时服用抗抑郁药或精神药物,保证仔细监测。
    Background and aim: Prescription patterns of antidepressants have changed over the years with a shift towards newer antidepressants with better tolerability and safety. Polypharmacy is common in psychiatry settings. The study aimed to evaluate the antidepressant drug prescription pattern and polypharmacy in a psychiatry outpatient setting. Investigations: This prospective observational study was conducted in a psychiatric outpatient clinic. The medication use data of eligible patients were collected. In addition, the rationale of antidepressant medication prescription, the defined daily dosage (DDD), the prescribed daily dose (PDD), and the PDD to DDD ratio were assessed. The assessment of prescription polypharmacy was conducted utilizing the framework provided by the National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors. Results: Data from 131 patients was analyzed. Major depressive disorder (32.8%) was the most common disorder for which antidepressants were prescribed. The majority, 91 (69.4%), received monotherapy. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors were the most frequently prescribed drugs in 69 (52.7%). Mirtazapine was the most frequently 32(24.4%) prescribed drug. Escitalopram and mirtazapine were the most commonly prescribed combination therapy (4.6%). Antipsychotic medications (37.4%) were the most widely co-prescribed medications, along with antidepressants. The PDD to DDD ratio was less than 1 for mirtazapine and imipramine; they were ≥1 for others. Psychiatric polypharmacy was documented in 87.1% of prescriptions. The total polypharmacy was not significantly (p>0.05) associated with demographic, illness, and treatment-related variables. Conclusion: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors were the most commonly prescribed antidepressants, monotherapy, and combination therapy. A substantial amount of patients received concomitant administration of antidepressants or psychotropic drugs, warranting careful monitoring.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:氯氮平是一种在大多数国家用于预防精神分裂症患者自杀的标签外药物。然而,很少有研究报告真实世界的处方实践。这项研究旨在探讨早期精神分裂症患者住院八周期间自杀行为史与氯氮平处方之间的关系。
    方法:这项观察性队列研究使用了从北京一家精神病医院收集的常规健康数据,中国。该研究包括1057名在3年内有精神分裂症发作的住院患者。根据哥伦比亚自杀严重程度等级量表,通过审查医疗记录对自杀行为的病史进行编码。从处方记录中提取了住院期间使用抗精神病药的信息。使用经社会人口统计学和临床协变量校正的Cox回归模型分析使用氯氮平的时间。
    结果:自我伤害的患病率,自杀行为,自杀企图是12.3%,7.5%,和5.4%,分别。自我伤害史与入院时使用氯氮平呈正相关(4.1%vs.0.8%,精确p=0.009)。在那些没有使用氯氮平和没有氯氮平禁忌症的人中,自杀行为史增加了入院后56天内改用氯氮平的可能性(危险比[95%CI],6.09[2.08-17.83])或住院期间(4.18[1.62-10.78])。
    结论:在中国有自杀行为者中,使用氯氮平治疗早期精神分裂症的频率高于无自杀行为者,尽管药物说明书没有标注其用于自杀风险。
    BACKGROUND: Clozapine is an off-label drug used in most countries to prevent suicide in individuals with schizophrenia. However, few studies have reported real-world prescription practices. This study aimed to explore the association between a history of suicidal behavior and clozapine prescribing during eight weeks of hospitalization for individuals with early-stage schizophrenia.
    METHODS: This observational cohort study used routine health data collected from a mental health hospital in Beijing, China. The study included 1057 inpatients who had schizophrenia onset within 3 years. History of suicidal behavior was coded from reviewing medical notes according to the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale. Information on antipsychotic use during hospitalization was extracted from the prescription records. Time to clozapine use was analyzed using Cox regression models adjusted for sociodemographic and clinical covariates.
    RESULTS: The prevalence rates of self-harm, suicidal behavior, and suicide attempt were 12.3%, 7.5%, and 5.4%, respectively. A history of self-harm history was positively associated with clozapine uses upon admission (4.1% vs. 0.8%, exact p = 0.009). Among those who had not used clozapine and had no clozapine contraindication, A history of suicidal behavior increased the possibility of switch to clozapine within 56 days after admission (Hazard Ratio[95% CI], 6.09[2.08-17.83]) or during hospitalization (4.18[1.62-10.78]).
    CONCLUSIONS: The use of clozapine for early-stage schizophrenia was more frequent among those with suicidal behavior than among those without suicidal behavior in China, although the drug instructions do not label its use for suicide risk.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:分析棕榈酸帕潘立酮治疗精神分裂症的经济效益。
    方法:我们根据《疾病和相关健康问题国际统计分类》收集了546例符合精神分裂症诊断标准的患者,《第10号》(ICD-10)。我们收集了一般人口数据,如性别,年龄,婚姻状况,和教育水平,然后开始用棕榈酸帕潘立酮治疗。然后在治疗开始后1、3、6、9和12个月进行随访评估,以评估临床疗效。不良反应,和注射剂量。我们还收集了12个月治疗前后的经济负担信息,以及过去一年的门诊次数和住院次数,以分析经济效益。
    结果:基线患者总计546例,其中239例在12个月后仍在接受帕潘立酮棕榈酸酯治疗。经过12个月的治疗,与以前相比,每年的门诊量增加(4(2,10)vs.12(4,12),Z=-5.949,P<0.001),而住院人数减少(1(1,3)vs.1(1,2),Z=5.625,P<0.001)。治疗12个月后患者的直接医疗费用中的住院费用与以前相比有所下降(5000(2000,12000)vs.3000(1000,8050),P<0.05),而门诊费用和直接非医疗费用没有显著变化(交通,住宿,膳食,和家庭陪同费用,等。)(P>0.05);治疗12个月后患者的间接成本(患者和家庭的生产力损失成本,由于破坏性行为造成的经济成本,寻求非医疗援助的成本)与以前相比有所下降(300(150,600)与150(100,200),P<0.05)。
    结论:棕榈酸酯减少了患者的住院次数,以及他们的直接和间接经济负担,具有良好的经济效益。
    BACKGROUND: To analyze the economic benefits of paliperidone palmitate in the treatment of schizophrenia.
    METHODS: We collected 546 patients who met the diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia according to the 《International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems,10th》(ICD-10). We gathered general population data such as gender, age, marital status, and education level, then initiated treatment with paliperidone palmitate. Then Follow-up evaluations were conducted at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after the start of treatment to assess clinical efficacy, adverse reactions, and injection doses. We also collected information on the economic burden before and after 12 months of treatment, as well as the number of outpatient visits and hospitalizations in the past year to analyze economic benefits.
    RESULTS: The baseline patients totaled 546, with 239 still receiving treatment with paliperidone palmitate 12 months later. After 12 months of treatment, the number of outpatient visits per year increased compared to before (4 (2,10) vs. 12 (4,12), Z=-5.949, P < 0.001), while the number of hospitalizations decreased (1 (1,3) vs. 1 (1,2), Z = 5.625, P < 0.001). The inpatient costs in the direct medical expenses of patients after 12 months of treatment decreased compared to before (5000(2000,12000) vs. 3000 (1000,8050), P < 0.05), while there was no significant change in outpatient expenses and direct non-medical expenses (transportation, accommodation, meal, and family accompanying expenses, etc.) (P > 0.05); the indirect costs of patients after 12 months of treatment (lost productivity costs for patients and families, economic costs due to destructive behavior, costs of seeking non-medical assistance) decreased compared to before (300(150,600) vs. 150(100,200), P < 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: Palmatine palmitate reduces the number of hospitalizations for patients, as well as their direct and indirect economic burdens, and has good economic benefits.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在使用2010年至2020年的日本索赔数据库评估临床实践中抗精神病药剂量与迟发性运动障碍(TD)风险之间的关系。
    方法:研究人群包括有精神分裂症诊断记录的15岁或以上患者,抑郁症,或开了抗精神病药的双相情感障碍。使用病例控制设计,我们将新诊断为TD的患者分类为病例,对照组中相应的1:10匹配。主要终点是>中值剂量组和≤中值剂量组的TD相对风险,根据年龄调整后的条件逻辑回归分析确定。
    结果:分析人群包括58,452名患者,平均每日抗精神病药物剂量为75mg/d的氯丙嗪当量(CPZE)。其中,80例被确定为TD病例,剂量>75mg/d与末次处方和最大剂量的TD风险显着增加相关,分别,在首次诊断TD的日期之前。事后分析进一步显示,与剂量≤75mg/d和剂量>75至<300mg/d相比,剂量≥300mg/d与TD风险之间存在显着关联。比较≥300mg/d与>75至<300mg/d,首次诊断TD前最后一次处方和最大剂量的奇数比分别为3.40和3.50。
    结论:在接受相对低剂量抗精神病药物的日本医疗索赔数据库中,剂量>75mg/d与TD风险增加呈剂量依赖性.
    This study aimed to assess the association between antipsychotic doses and the risk of tardive dyskinesia (TD) in clinical practice using a Japanese claims database from 2010 to 2020.
    The study population included patients 15 years or older with a diagnosis record of schizophrenia, depression, or bipolar disorder who were prescribed antipsychotics. Using a case-control design, we categorized patients newly diagnosed with TD as cases, with corresponding 1:10 matching in the control group. The primary endpoint was the relative risk of TD in the >median dose and ≤median dose groups, as determined using conditional logistic regression analysis adjusted for age.
    The analysis population included 58,452 patients, and the median daily antipsychotic dose was 75 mg/d of chlorpromazine equivalent (CPZE). Of these, 80 were identified as TD cases, and doses >75 mg/d were associated with a significantly increased risk of TD at the last prescription and the maximum dose, respectively, before the date of the first diagnosis of TD. Post-hoc analysis further showed a significant association between doses ≥300 mg/d and the risk of TD compared to doses ≤75 mg/d and doses >75 to <300 mg/d. Comparing ≥300 mg/d versus >75 to <300 mg/d, the odd ratios at the last prescription and maximum dose before the first diagnosis of TD were 3.40 and 3.50, respectively.
    In the Japanese medical claims database of patients receiving relatively low doses of antipsychotics, doses >75 mg/d were associated with an increased risk of TD in a dose-dependent manner.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:该研究的目的是评估各种增强策略与氯氮平在难治性精神分裂症患者中的相互作用效果。
    方法:提取了单独使用各种抗精神病药及其与氯氮平联合使用的阳性和阴性综合征量表(PANSS)或简短精神病学评定量表(BPRS)评分变化的数据。使用来自已发表的临床试验的数据模拟(阶乘试验框架)生成个体患者数据,样本量为8至400,以通过线性建模评估相互作用效果。计算剂量当量,并为模拟数据确定了最佳拟合模型。
    结果:发现多项式模型是模拟数据的最佳拟合,以确定组合的相互作用效应。发现利培酮和齐拉西酮的氯氮平增强作用具有拮抗作用,而它是氟哌啶醇的添加剂,阿立哌唑,还有喹硫平.观察到ECT与氯氮平组合的协同作用(相互作用作用:-7.62;p<0.001)。250-300的样本量可能足以证明在未来的试验中具有临床意义的相互作用。
    结论:氯氮平可以通过电惊厥治疗增强,导致抗精神病作用的增强。尽管一些抗精神病药物如阿立哌唑表现出累加效应,它们也可能增加不利影响。
    BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to evaluate interaction effect of various augmentation strategies with clozapine in patients with Treatment-resistant schizophrenia.
    METHODS: Data was extracted for change in positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) or brief psychiatric rating scale (BPRS) scores for monotherapy with various antipsychotic agents alone and their combination with clozapine. Individual patient data was generated using simulation of data (factorial trial framework) from published clinical trials for sample sizes from eight to 400 to evaluate interaction effect through linear modeling. Dose equivalents were calculated, and best fit models were determined for simulated data.
    RESULTS: The polynomial model was found to be the best fit for the simulated data to determine interaction effect of combination. The clozapine augmentation with risperidone and ziprasidone was found to be antagonistic, whereas it was additive for haloperidol, aripiprazole, and quetiapine. A synergistic effect was observed for ECT combined with clozapine (Interaction effect: -7.62; p <0.001). A sample size of 250-300 may be sufficient to demonstrate a clinically significant interaction in future trials.
    CONCLUSIONS: Clozapine may be augmented with electroconvulsive therapy, leading to the enhancement of antipsychotic effect. Though some antipsychotics like aripiprazole demonstrate additive effects, they may also add to the adverse effects.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    全科医生(GP)通常不知道抗精神病药(AP)引起的心血管风险(CVR),因此未对使用非典型AP的患者进行系统监测。我们评估了复杂干预的可行性,该干预旨在审查AP的使用并在透壁合作中就降低CVR的策略提供建议。2021年在荷兰的三种一般做法中进行了混合方法前瞻性队列研究。干预包括三个步骤:数字信息会议,多学科会议,以及对GP的共同决策访问。我们评估了患者招募和保留率,给出和采纳的建议,在基线和干预后3个月,具有QRISK3评分的CVR和MHI-5的精神状态。全科医生邀请了146名符合条件的患者中的57名(39%),其中28人(19%)参加。23人(82%)完成干预,18人(64%)进行随访。在多学科会议上,22例(78%)患者被建议改变AP使用。其他有关药物的建议(AP除外),生活方式,监测,还有心理治疗.干预后3个月,41%(28/68)的建议被采纳。我们的发现表明,这种复杂的干预措施对于评估试验中使用AP的患者的健康改善是可行的。
    General practitioners (GPs) are often unaware of antipsychotic (AP)-induced cardiovascular risk (CVR) and therefore patients using atypical APs are not systematically monitored. We evaluated the feasibility of a complex intervention designed to review the use of APs and advise on CVR-lowering strategies in a transmural collaboration. A mixed methods prospective cohort study in three general practices in the Netherlands was conducted in 2021. The intervention comprised three steps: a digital information meeting, a multidisciplinary meeting, and a shared decision-making visit to the GP. We assessed patient recruitment and retention rates, advice given and adopted, and CVR with QRISK3 score and mental state with MHI-5 at baseline and three months post-intervention. GPs invited 57 of 146 eligible patients (39%), of whom 28 (19%) participated. The intervention was completed by 23 (82%) and follow-up by 18 participants (64%). At the multidisciplinary meeting, 22 (78%) patients were advised to change AP use. Other advice concerned medication (other than APs), lifestyle, monitoring, and psychotherapy. At 3-months post-intervention, 41% (28/68) of this advice was adopted. Our findings suggest that this complex intervention is feasible for evaluating health improvement in patients using AP in a trial.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    最近的Alva等人。3b期研究pimavanserin在患有神经退行性疾病(NDDs)的老年人中的使用,特别包括阿尔茨海默病,血管性痴呆,帕金森病(伴有或不伴有痴呆),额颞叶痴呆,和路易体痴呆症,为该人群的神经精神症状管理提供了有关其安全性的重要新数据.这项研究的评论进一步检查了抗精神病药物治疗的更广泛背景下的发现,因为它已经从氯丙嗪发展为吡马色林,不断寻求更大的安全性。将匹马色林的安全性和有效性与历史数据和监管里程碑进行比较,为临床医生提供了一个细微差别的观点,即该药物相对于以前的抗精神病药物治疗的已知优势的重要性。需要更多的研究来确定匹马色林在改善患有NDD的老年人的神经精神症状方面的全部潜力。
     The recent Alva et al. Phase 3b study on pimavanserin use in older adults with neurodegenerative diseases (NDDs), specifically including Alzheimer\'s disease, vascular dementia, Parkinson\'s disease (with or without dementia), frontotemporal dementia, and dementia with Lewy bodies, provides important new data on its safety for managing neuropsychiatric symptoms in this population. This commentary on the study further examines the findings within the broader context of antipsychotic therapy as it has evolved from chlorpromazine to pimavanserin in a continuous search for greater safety. Comparing pimavanserin\'s safety and efficacy profile with historical data and regulatory milestones provides a nuanced perspective for clinicians regarding the significance of the drug\'s known advantages over prior antipsychotic treatments. More research is needed to determine the full potential of pimavanserin to improve neuropsychiatric symptoms in older adults with NDDs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号