BACKGROUND: 5-Fluorouracil (FU) is one of the most commonly used cytostatic drugs in the systemic treatment of cancer. Treatment with FU may cause severe or life-threatening side effects and the treatment-related mortality rate is 0.2-1.0%.
CONCLUSIONS: Among other risk factors associated with increased toxicity, a genetic deficiency in dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), an enzyme responsible for the metabolism of FU, is well known. This is due to variants in the DPD gene (DPYD). Up to 9% of European patients carry a DPD gene variant that decreases enzyme activity, and DPD is completely lacking in approximately 0.5% of patients. Here we describe the clinical and genetic background and summarize recommendations for the genetic testing and tailoring of treatment with 5-FU derivatives. The statement was developed as a consensus statement organized by the German Society for Hematology and Medical Oncology in cooperation with 13 medical associations from Austria, Germany, and Switzerland. Key Messages: (i) Patients should be tested for the 4 most common genetic DPYD variants before treatment with drugs containing FU. (ii) Testing forms the basis for a differentiated, risk-adapted algorithm with recommendations for treatment with FU-containing drugs. (iii) Testing may optionally be supplemented by therapeutic drug monitoring.

BACKGROUND: The digestive tract malignancies are a series of malignant tumor with high morbidity and mortality. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) combined with chemotherapy drugs interventions have been applied for the treatment of malignant tumors in Asian countries for dacades. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety on the combination of Kanglaite injection and fluorouracil-based chemotherapy for treating digestive tract malignancies.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness and safety on the combination of Kanglaite injection and fluorouracil-based chemotherapy for digestive tract malignancies.
METHODS: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed when conducting the meta-analysis. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of Kanglaite injection combined with fluorouracil-based chemotherapy in the treatment of digestive tract malignant tumors were selected and assessed for inclusion. RevMan 5.3 software (Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK) was used for meta-analysis. The objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the primary endpoint, and the disease control rate (DCR), quality of life (QoL), and toxicities were the secondary outcomes.
RESULTS: 20 RCTs enrolling 1339 patients with advanced digestive tract malignancies were included. The methodological quality of most included trials was low to moderate. Compared with fluorouracil-based chemotherapy alone, Kanglaite injection plus fluorouracil-based chemotherapy can improve DCR (risk ratio (RR) = 1.18, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.11-1.25, P < .00001), ORR (RR = 1.35, 95% CI 1.18-1.54, P < .00001), QoL (RR = 1.58, 95% CI 1.35-1.85, P < .00001), and can reduce adverse drug reactions (ADRs) such as myelosuppression (RR = 0.33, 95% CI 0.25-0.43, P < .00001), leukopenia (RR = 0.31, 95% CI 0.22-0.43, P < .00001), thrombocytopenia (RR = 0.6, 95% CI 0.38-0.49, P = .03), neutropenia (RR = 0.26, 95% CI 0.12-0.55, P = .0005), anemia (RR = 0.41, 95% CI 0.23-0.75, P = .004), gastrointestinal reaction (RR = 0.35, 95% CI 0.27-0.46, P < .00001), nausea/vomiting (RR = 0.41, 95% CI 0.28-0.61, P < .00001), diarrhea (RR = 0.34, 95% CI 0.18-0.62, P = .0004), hepatotoxicity (RR = 0.28, 95% CI 0.17-0.47, P < .00001), neurotoxicity (RR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.41-0.82, P = .002), mucositis (RR = 0.59, 95% CI 0.29-1.21, P = .15).
CONCLUSIONS: Kanglaite injection combined with fluorouracil-based chemotherapy could remarkably improve the clinical effectiveness and reduce the adverse effects in patients with advanced malignant tumors of the digestive tract which may provide evidence to judge whether TCM is an effective and safe intervention for the digestive tract malignancies.

Despite advances in the field of pharmacogenetics (PGx), clinical acceptance has remained limited. The Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group (DPWG) aims to facilitate PGx implementation by developing evidence-based pharmacogenetics guidelines to optimize pharmacotherapy. This guideline describes the starting dose optimization of three anti-cancer drugs (fluoropyrimidines: 5-fluorouracil, capecitabine and tegafur) to decrease the risk of severe, potentially fatal, toxicity (such as diarrhoea, hand-foot syndrome, mucositis or myelosuppression). Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD, encoded by the DPYD gene) enzyme deficiency increases risk of fluoropyrimidine-induced toxicity. The DPYD-gene activity score, determined by four DPYD variants, predicts DPD activity and can be used to optimize an individual\'s starting dose. The gene activity score ranges from 0 (no DPD activity) to 2 (normal DPD activity). In case it is not possible to calculate the gene activity score based on DPYD genotype, we recommend to determine the DPD activity and adjust the initial dose based on available data. For patients initiating 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine: subjects with a gene activity score of 0 are recommended to avoid systemic and cutaneous 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine; subjects with a gene activity score of 1 or 1.5 are recommended to initiate therapy with 50% the standard dose of 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine. For subjects initiating tegafur: subjects with a gene activity score of 0, 1 or 1.5 are recommended to avoid tegafur. Subjects with a gene activity score of 2 (reference) should receive a standard dose. Based on the DPWG clinical implication score, DPYD genotyping is considered \"essential\", therefore directing DPYD testing prior to initiating fluoropyrimidines.

To develop an evidence-based clinical practice guideline to assist in clinical decision making for patients with resected biliary tract cancer.
ASCO convened an Expert Panel to conduct a systematic review of the literature on adjuvant therapy for resected biliary tract cancer and provide recommended care options for this patient population.
Three phase III randomized controlled trials, one phase II trial, and 16 retrospective studies met the inclusion criteria.
Based on evidence from a phase III randomized controlled trial, patients with resected biliary tract cancer should be offered adjuvant capecitabine chemotherapy for a duration of 6 months. The dosing used in this trial is described in the qualifying statements, while it should be noted that the dose of capecitabine may also be determined by institutional and regional practices. Patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma or gallbladder cancer and a microscopically positive surgical resection margin (R1 resection) may be offered chemoradiation therapy. A shared decision-making approach is recommended, considering the risk of harm and potential for benefit associated with radiation therapy for patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma or gallbladder cancer. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/gastrointestinal-cancer-guidelines .

Thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) activity exhibits a monogenic codominant inheritance and catabolizes thiopurines. TPMT variant alleles are associated with low enzyme activity and pronounced pharmacologic effects of thiopurines. Loss-of-function alleles in the NUDT15 gene are common in Asians and Hispanics and reduce the degradation of active thiopurine nucleotide metabolites, also predisposing to myelosuppression. We provide recommendations for adjusting starting doses of azathioprine, mercaptopurine, and thioguanine based on TPMT and NUDT15 genotypes (updates on www.cpicpgx.org).

BACKGROUND: High-dose methotrexate is used to treat a variety of malignancies. Methotrexate-associated supportive care and the threshold methotrexate level for the discontinuation of supportive care are not consistent among studies. We evaluated the implementation of high-dose methotrexate administration guidelines, which raised the standard threshold methotrexate level for the discontinuation of supportive care from <0.05 to <0.1 µmol.
METHODS: A single-center, observational analysis of patients receiving high-dose methotrexate from 1 January 2015 to 31 May 2017 was conducted. The primary endpoint was time from the start of the methotrexate infusion until the discontinuation of the sodium bicarbonate infusion, before and after guideline implementation.
RESULTS: Fifty-two patients met the inclusion criteria, which comprised of a total of 136 individual methotrexate doses and were included in the retrospective analysis. Twenty-four patients were included in the prospective analysis, which comprised a total of 46 individual methotrexate doses. The primary endpoint, time until discontinuation of the sodium bicarbonate infusion, was a median of 97.7 h in the retrospective group versus 73.2 h in the prospective group (p = 0.098). Secondary endpoints also favored patients in the prospective group, including hours of hospitalization, number of methotrexate levels checked, weight gained during admission, and adherence to the guideline.
CONCLUSIONS: Among patients who received high-dose methotrexate, implementation of a guideline using a methotrexate threshold of <0.1 µmol was able to significantly decrease the time to discontinuation of supportive care and subsequently may lead to early hospital discharge given that we did not show a statistical significance.

暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: The hypomethylating agent 5-azacytidine has been approved in Europe for patients with intermediate 2 and high (i.e., higher) risk myelodysplastic syndrome according to the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS). A total of 91% of all first responses in higher risk patients occur within 6 cycles of treatment; however, data regarding the time to first response in clinical trials with lower risk patients are not available.
UNASSIGNED: Our case describes the late response of a lower risk (intermediate 1 according to the IPSS and intermediate according to the IPSS-R) patient to 5-azacytidine treatment.Diagnosis and interventions: Once diagnosed, the patient started supportive treatment due to persistent pancytopenia and recurrent infections. The use of a hypomethylating agent was decided because the patient was transfusion dependent, and suffering from recurrent severe febrile infections due to neutropenia. Other possible causes of fever except infections in the context of his neutropenia were excluded.
RESULTS: After the 12th cycle of 5-azacytidine the patient showed a hematologic response, with transfusion independency and with no recurrent febrile episodes.
CONCLUSIONS: This case report probably indicates that a subset of patients who belong to the lower risk category according to the previous prognostic systems and to the intermediate one according to the IPSS-R, may benefit from prolonged treatment with the drug. The indication of 5-azacytidine in Europe for patients with higher risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) (according to the IPSS) could possibly include a wider range of patients if updated according to the IPSS-R.

The aim of this paper is to test nursing educational intervention as a method of managing with handfoot syndrome in patients treated with capecitabine in an Eastern European setting.
43 females and 49 males with colorectal and breast cancer and were treated with capecitabine monotherapy or polychemotherapy with completion of at least one cycle were enrolled for this trial in the Department of Oncology University Hospital in Krakow, between January 2011 and December 2014.
Patients who were in contact with their oncology nurses and followed the recommendations had a fiftyfold lower risk of developing hand-foot syndrome G2 or G3.
Our data confirmed the role of oncology nurses in patient education process during the home-based therapies in Poland.

The purpose of this guideline is to provide information for the interpretation of clinical dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPYD) genotype tests so that the results can be used to guide dosing of fluoropyrimidines (5-fluorouracil and capecitabine). Detailed guidelines for the use of fluoropyrimidines, their clinical pharmacology, as well as analyses of cost-effectiveness are beyond the scope of this document. The Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC® ) guidelines consider the situation of patients for which genotype data are already available (updates available at https://cpicpgx.org/guidelines/guideline-for-fluoropyrimidines-and-dpyd/).