Antibiotic

抗生素
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在牙科手术前作为感染预防处方的抗生素有可能导致严重的药物不良事件(ADE)。然而,指南一致性和不同牙科设置与抗生素预防产生的ADE相关的程度尚不清楚.目的:目的是评估指南一致性和抗生素相关的ADE,以及它是否因VA和非VA设置而不同。方法:回顾性队列研究,从2015年至2017年,对患有心脏病或人工关节的成年人进行抗生素预防。多变量逻辑回归模型适合评估ADE的影响,指南一致性和牙科设置。一致性与牙齿设置的相互作用项评估了ADE与一致性之间的关系是否因设置而异。结果:从2015年到2017年,61,124例接受抗生素预防的患者被确定为62例(0.1%)患有ADE。在那些具有指导方针一致性的人中,18例(0.09%)有ADE,而44例(0.1%)使用不一致抗生素的患者有ADE(未调整OR:0.84,95%CI:0.49-1.45)。调整后的分析表明,指南一致性与ADE无关(OR:0.78,95%CI:0.25-2.46),这种关系因牙齿设置而没有差异(相互作用的Waldχ^2p值=0.601)。结论:抗生素相关的ADE在设置或指南一致性方面没有差异。
    Background: Antibiotics prescribed as infection prophylaxis prior to dental procedures have the potential for serious adverse drug events (ADEs). However, the extent to which guideline concordance and different dental settings are associated with ADEs from antibiotic prophylaxis is unknown. Aim: The purpose was to assess guideline concordance and antibiotic-associated ADEs and whether it differs by VA and non-VA settings. Methods: Retrospective cohort study of antibiotic prophylaxis prescribed to adults with cardiac conditions or prosthetic joints from 2015 to 2017. Multivariable logistic regression models were fit to assess the impact of ADEs, guideline concordance and dental setting. An interaction term of concordance and dental setting evaluated whether the relationship between ADEs and concordance differed by setting. Results: From 2015 to 2017, 61,124 patients with antibiotic prophylaxis were identified with 62 (0.1%) having an ADE. Of those with guideline concordance, 18 (0.09%) had an ADE while 44 (0.1%) of those with a discordant antibiotic had an ADE (unadjusted OR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.49-1.45). Adjusted analyses showed that guideline concordance was not associated with ADEs (OR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.25-2.46), and this relationship did not differ by dental setting (Wald χ^2 p-value for interaction = 0.601). Conclusion: Antibiotic-associated ADEs did not differ by setting or guideline concordance.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    体外和体内研究对于针对肌肉骨骼感染(MSKI)的新疗法的临床前疗效评估至关重要。已经开发了许多临床前模型,并将其用作评估人体临床试验安全性和有效性的前奏。在进行这些研究时,同时需要对疗效进行强有力的评估,以及考虑此类研究中使用的实验动物的负担的平行责任。由于MSKI是一个广泛的术语,包括病原体不同的感染,解剖位置和使用的植入物,也有许多动物模型描述了模拟这些不同的感染。尽管这些变化中的一些需要充分评估具体的干预措施,在MSKI治疗中创建一个统一和标准化的动物试验标准将是巨大的价值。2023年肌肉骨骼感染国际共识会议的治疗工作组负责与MSKI治疗临床前模型相关的问题。主要目的是回顾与优先问题有关的文献,并在投票后估计共识意见。本文件介绍了临床前模型的过程和结果,涉及1)动物模型注意事项,2)结果测量,3)成像。本文受版权保护。保留所有权利。
    In vitro and in vivo studies are critical for the preclinical efficacy assessment of novel therapies targeting musculoskeletal infections (MSKI). Many preclinical models have been developed and applied as a prelude to evaluating safety and efficacy in human clinical trials. In performing these studies, there is both a requirement for a robust assessment of efficacy, as well as a parallel responsibility to consider the burden on experimental animals used in such studies. Since MSKI is a broad term encompassing infections varying in pathogen, anatomical location, and implants used, there are also a wide range of animal models described modeling these disparate infections. Although some of these variations are required to adequately evaluate specific interventions, there would be enormous value in creating a unified and standardized criteria to animal testing in the treatment of MSKI. The Treatment Workgroup of the 2023 International Consensus Meeting on Musculoskeletal Infection was responsible for questions related to preclinical models for treatment of MSKI. The main objective was to review the literature related to priority questions and estimate consensus opinion after voting. This document presents that process and results for preclinical models related to (1) animal model considerations, (2) outcome measurements, and (3) imaging.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    儿科门诊就诊的最常见原因之一是急性咽炎,上呼吸道感染.细菌性咽炎是由A组β-溶血性链球菌(GABHS)引起的,也称为化脓性链球菌。这项研究旨在评估医生对临床诊断指南的依从性,管理,并为疑似细菌性咽炎的儿童选择合适的治疗方法。
    回顾,观察性研究是通过回顾2019年6月至2019年12月在巴勒斯坦医疗综合中心(PMC)急诊科诊断为咽炎的3至13岁儿童的病案进行的.修改后的中心评分,喉咙拭子集合,以及对抗菌药物选择的评估被用来评估医师对临床指南的坚持程度,以适当诊断和治疗咽炎.采用SPSS进行数据分析。
    在290例诊断为急性咽炎的病例中,217例患者(74.8%)的改良Centor评分≥2;126例接受抗生素治疗,八个人擦拭喉咙以确认诊断;此外,73例患者(25.2%)的改良Centor评分<2;其中34例接受了抗生素治疗。阿奇霉素是最常用的抗生素(41.3%),其次是阿莫西林-克拉维酸(38.1%)。在Centor评分>2、年龄较大的儿童中,经验性抗生素处方的频率明显更高,和那些发烧的人。
    大多数病例没有经过适当的测试以确认细菌性咽炎的诊断,并且大多使用不适当的抗菌药物如阿奇霉素进行治疗。在这项研究中,不遵守临床指南是非常明显的。
    UNASSIGNED: One of the most common reasons for pediatric outpatient visits is acute pharyngitis, an upper respiratory tract infection. Bacterial pharyngitis is caused by Group A beta-hemolytic Streptococcus (GABHS), also known as Streptococcus pyogenes. This research aimed to assess physicians\' adherence to clinical guidelines for diagnosis, management, and selecting appropriate treatment for children suspected of bacterial pharyngitis.
    UNASSIGNED: A retrospective, observational study was conducted by reviewing patient charts for childred aged 3 to 13 years old diagnosed with pharyngitis from June 2019 until December 2019 at the Emergency Department of Palestine Medical Complex (PMC). The Modified Centor score, throat swab collections, and assessment of antimicrobial selection were used to assess the extent of physicians\' adherence to clinical guidelines for appropriate diagnosis and management of pharyngitis. SPSS was used for data analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: Out of 290 cases diagnosed with acute pharyngitis, 217 patients (74.8%) had a Modified Centor score of ≥2; 126 received antibiotics, and eight had their throat swabbed to confirm the diagnosis; furthermore, 73 patients (25.2%) had a Modified Centor score of <2; 34 of them received antibiotics. Azithromycin was the most commonly prescribed antibiotic (41.3%), followed by amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (38.1%). The frequency of empirical antibiotics prescribing was significantly higher among children with a Centor score >2, older children, and those presenting with fever.
    UNASSIGNED: Most cases were not appropriately tested to confirm the diagnosis of bacterial pharyngitis and were mostly treated with inappropriate antimicrobial agents such as azithromycin. Nonadherence to clinical guidelines is very evident in this study.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    方法:这些ESCMID指南适用于参与儿童和成人脑脓肿诊断和治疗的临床医生。
    方法:提出了关键问题,并对1月1日以来发表的所有研究进行了系统回顾,1996年,使用搜索术语“脑脓肿”或“脑脓肿”作为PubMed电子数据库中的网格术语或文本,Embase,和Cochrane登记处.搜索于9月29日更新,2022年。排除标准是样本量<10名患者或以非英语语言发表。提取的数据被总结为叙述性审查和表格。使用随机效应模型进行元分析,并通过I2测试以及漏斗和Galbraith图检查异质性。使用ROBINS-I(观察性研究)和QUADAS-2(诊断性研究)评估偏倚风险。等级方法被应用于对建议强度(强或有条件)和证据质量(高,中度,低,或非常低)。
    建议MRI用于诊断脑脓肿(强,高)。如果可以在合理的时间内进行神经外科手术,则在无严重疾病的患者抽吸或切除脑脓肿之前,可以保留抗菌药物。最好在24小时内(有条件的,低)。推荐分子诊断,如果可用,在文化阴性的患者中(有条件的,中度)。建议在可行的情况下进行脑脓肿的抽吸或切除,除了弓形虫病的病例(强,低)。在免疫能力强的人群中,推荐的经验性抗微生物治疗是第三代头孢菌素和甲硝唑(强,中度)在重度免疫损害患者中添加甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑和伏立康唑(条件性,低)。神经外科术后脑脓肿的推荐经验性治疗是碳青霉烯联合万古霉素或利奈唑胺(条件,低)。抗菌治疗的推荐持续时间为6-8周(有条件的,低)。由于缺乏数据,没有建议早期过渡到口服抗菌药物。和口服巩固治疗后≥6周的静脉内抗菌药物是不常规推荐(条件,非常低)。辅助糖皮质激素治疗推荐用于治疗由于周围水肿或即将发生的疝引起的严重症状(强,低)。不建议使用抗癫痫药进行初级预防(有条件的,非常低)。研究需要得到解决。
    METHODS: These European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases guidelines are intended for clinicians involved in diagnosis and treatment of brain abscess in children and adults.
    METHODS: Key questions were developed, and a systematic review was carried out of all studies published since 1 January 1996, using the search terms \'brain abscess\' OR \'cerebral abscess\' as Mesh terms or text in electronic databases of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane registry. The search was updated on 29 September 2022. Exclusion criteria were a sample size <10 patients or publication in non-English language. Extracted data was summarized as narrative reviews and tables. Meta-analysis was carried out using a random effects model and heterogeneity was examined by I2 tests as well as funnel and Galbraith plots. Risk of bias was assessed using Risk Of Bias in Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions (ROBINS-I) (observational studies) and Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) (diagnostic studies). The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach was applied to classify strength of recommendations (strong or conditional) and quality of evidence (high, moderate, low, or very low).
    UNASSIGNED: Magnetic resonance imaging is recommended for diagnosis of brain abscess (strong and high). Antimicrobials may be withheld until aspiration or excision of brain abscess in patients without severe disease if neurosurgery can be carried out within reasonable time, preferably within 24 hours (conditional and low). Molecular-based diagnostics are recommended, if available, in patients with negative cultures (conditional and moderate). Aspiration or excision of brain abscess is recommended whenever feasible, except for cases with toxoplasmosis (strong and low). Recommended empirical antimicrobial treatment for community-acquired brain abscess in immuno-competent individuals is a 3rd-generation cephalosporin and metronidazole (strong and moderate) with the addition of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and voriconazole in patients with severe immuno-compromise (conditional and low). Recommended empirical treatment of post-neurosurgical brain abscess is a carbapenem combined with vancomycin or linezolid (conditional and low). The recommended duration of antimicrobial treatment is 6-8 weeks (conditional and low). No recommendation is offered for early transition to oral antimicrobials because of a lack of data, and oral consolidation treatment after ≥6 weeks of intravenous antimicrobials is not routinely recommended (conditional and very low). Adjunctive glucocorticoid treatment is recommended for treatment of severe symptoms because of perifocal oedema or impending herniation (strong and low). Primary prophylaxis with antiepileptics is not recommended (conditional and very low). Research needs are addressed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    腹腔内感染(IAI)是最常见的全球医疗保健挑战之一,通常是由胃肠道(GI)的破坏引起的。他们的成功管理通常需要密集的资源利用,尽管有最好的治疗方法,发病率和死亡率仍然很高。适当治疗与其他脓毒症病因不同的IAI所需的主要问题之一是经常需要提供物理源控制。幸运的是,在这方面的治疗已经取得了巨大的进步。历史上,源代码控制只留给外科医生。采用新技术,引入了非外科手术的微创介入程序。或者,除了正式的手术外,开腹技术长期以来一直被提出作为严重腹内脓毒症的源头控制辅助手段.具有讽刺意味的是,尽管缺乏甚至延迟控制源头显然与死亡有关,这是一个描述不佳的概念。例如,没有明确的定义源控制技术,甚至充分性已被普遍接受。实际上,源代码控制涉及一个复杂的定义,包括几个因素,包括因果事件,感染源细菌,当地细菌菌群,患者状况,和他/她最终的合并症。随着对败血症的全身病理生物学和人类微生物组的深刻理解,充分的源头控制不再只是一个外科问题,而是一个需要多学科的问题,多模态方法。因此,虽然必须控制胃肠道的任何裂口,源头控制还应尝试控制全身生物宿主的产生和传播,以及对微生物组的生态失调影响,从而使多系统器官功能衰竭和死亡长期存在。鉴于这些增加的复杂性,本文代表了世界急诊外科学会的当前意见和未来研究的建议,欧洲外科感染学会和美国外科感染学会全球外科感染联盟关于腹腔内感染源控制的概念和操作充分性。
    Intra-abdominal infections (IAI) are among the most common global healthcare challenges and they are usually precipitated by disruption to the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Their successful management typically requires intensive resource utilization, and despite the best therapies, morbidity and mortality remain high. One of the main issues required to appropriately treat IAI that differs from the other etiologies of sepsis is the frequent requirement to provide physical source control. Fortunately, dramatic advances have been made in this aspect of treatment. Historically, source control was left to surgeons only. With new technologies non-surgical less invasive interventional procedures have been introduced. Alternatively, in addition to formal surgery open abdomen techniques have long been proposed as aiding source control in severe intra-abdominal sepsis. It is ironic that while a lack or even delay regarding source control clearly associates with death, it is a concept that remains poorly described. For example, no conclusive definition of source control technique or even adequacy has been universally accepted. Practically, source control involves a complex definition encompassing several factors including the causative event, source of infection bacteria, local bacterial flora, patient condition, and his/her eventual comorbidities. With greater understanding of the systemic pathobiology of sepsis and the profound implications of the human microbiome, adequate source control is no longer only a surgical issue but one that requires a multidisciplinary, multimodality approach. Thus, while any breach in the GI tract must be controlled, source control should also attempt to control the generation and propagation of the systemic biomediators and dysbiotic influences on the microbiome that perpetuate multi-system organ failure and death. Given these increased complexities, the present paper represents the current opinions and recommendations for future research of the World Society of Emergency Surgery, of the Global Alliance for Infections in Surgery of Surgical Infection Society Europe and Surgical Infection Society America regarding the concepts and operational adequacy of source control in intra-abdominal infections.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:提供临床指南的智能手机应用程序等移动健康平台无处不在,然而,它们对指南依从性的长期影响尚不清楚.2016年,抗生素指南应用程序,叫做SCRIPT,是在奥克兰市医院介绍的,新西兰,在智能手机上向临床医生提供当地抗生素指南。
    目的:我们旨在评估在智能手机应用中提供抗生素指南是否导致处方者对抗生素指南依从性的持续改变。
    方法:我们使用中断的时间序列研究分析了被诊断患有社区获得性肺炎的成年人在入院的前24小时内的抗生素指南依从率(即,3、12和24个月)。
    结果:依从性从基线时的23%(46/200)增加到3个月时的31%(73/237)和12个月时的34%(69/200),在应用实施后24个月减少到31%(62/200)(P=.07与基线相比)。然而,在X线检查时,肺实变患者的依从性持续增加(基线时9/63,14%;3个月后23/77,30%;12个月后32/92,35%;24个月后32/102,31%;与基线相比P=.04).
    结论:抗生素指南应用程序提高了总体依从性,但这并没有持续下去。在肺实变患者中,坚持的增加是持续的。
    Mobile health platforms like smartphone apps that provide clinical guidelines are ubiquitous, yet their long-term impact on guideline adherence remains unclear. In 2016, an antibiotic guidelines app, called SCRIPT, was introduced in Auckland City Hospital, New Zealand, to provide local antibiotic guidelines to clinicians on their smartphones.
    We aimed to assess whether the provision of antibiotic guidelines in a smartphone app resulted in sustained changes in antibiotic guideline adherence by prescribers.
    We analyzed antibiotic guideline adherence rates during the first 24 hours of hospital admission in adults diagnosed with community-acquired pneumonia using an interrupted time-series study with 3 distinct periods post app implementation (ie, 3, 12, and 24 months).
    Adherence increased from 23% (46/200) at baseline to 31% (73/237) at 3 months and 34% (69/200) at 12 months, reducing to 31% (62/200) at 24 months post app implementation (P=.07 vs baseline). However, increased adherence was sustained in patients with pulmonary consolidation on x-ray (9/63, 14% at baseline; 23/77, 30% after 3 months; 32/92, 35% after 12 month; and 32/102, 31% after 24 months; P=.04 vs baseline).
    An antibiotic guidelines app increased overall adherence, but this was not sustained. In patients with pulmonary consolidation, the increased adherence was sustained.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    To generate evidence-based recommendations through formal consensus regarding the treatment of upper urinary tract infections during gestation.
    Experts in microbiology, public health, internal medicine, infectious diseases, obstetrics, maternal fetal medicine and obstetric and gynecological infections participated in the consensus development group. The group also included professionals with training in clinical epidemiology, systematic data search, and representatives from the Health Secretariat and the Bogota Obstetrics and Gynecology Association. The participants disclosed their conflicts of interest. Starting with a clinical question, outcomes were graded and a systematic search was conducted in the Medline via PubMed, Embase, Lilacs, and Bireme databases. The search was expanded to include institutional repositories and antimicrobial resistance surveillance systems, with no language or date restrictions. The search was updated on October 1, 2022. The GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology was used to assess the quality of the evidence and determine the strength of the recommendations. Finally, the RAND/UCLA (Research and Development/University of California Los Angeles) methodology was applied for the formal consensus. This document was reviewed by academic peers before publication.
    The following are the consensus recommendations. Recommendation 1. The initial management of pregnant women with upper urinary tract infections (UTIs) should be approached in a hospital setting. Recommendation 2. The use of second generation cephalosporins is the suggested first option for empirical antimicrobial management in pregnant women with upper UTI in order to improve the rates of clinical and microbiological cure. Recommendation 3. Because of the risk-benefit balance, the use of aminoglycosides is suggested as a second option for empirical antimicrobial treatment in pregnant women presenting with upper UTIs in the second and third trimester. Recommendation 4. The use of third-generation cephalosporins is suggested as the third option for empirical antimicrobial treatment in pregnant women with upper UTIs given that the risk of inducing microbial resistance is high with this group of antibiotics. Recommendation 5. The use of carbapenems is suggested as a first option in pregnant women with upper UTIs and a history of infections caused by microorganisms with resistance to third or fourth-generation cephalosporins. Recommendation 6. The use of aminoglycosides or fourth-generation cephalosporins is suggested as a second option in pregnant women with upper UTIs and a history of infection caused by microorganisms with resistance to third-generation cephalosporins, taking risk-benefit into account. Recommendation 7. The use of piperacillin/tazobactam is suggested as a third option in pregnant women with upper UTIs and a history of infection caused by microorganisms with resistance to third or fourthgeneration cephalosporins. Recommendation 8. Getting a urine culture is recommended in pregnant women with upper UTIs before initiating empirical antimicrobial treatment. Recommendation 9. In pregnant women with upper UTIs, it is suggested to modify therapy in accordance with the results of the sensitivity test when the culture report shows resistance to the antimicrobial agent initiated empirically. Recommendation 10. In pregnant women hospitalized due to upper UTIs, it is suggested to switch to oral antimicrobial therapy after at least 48 hours of modulation of the systemic inflammatory response and the clinical signs of infection, and when tolerance to oral intake is adequate. Recommendation 11. In pregnant women with upper UTIs with no complications secondary to the primary infection, it is recommended to administer antibiotic therapy for a period of 7 to 10 days.
    It is expected that with this Colombian upper UTI consensus variability in clinical practice will be reduced. It is recommended that groups doing research in maternal fetal medicine assess the implementation and effectiveness of these recommendations.
    generar recomendaciones informadas en la evidencia, a través de un consenso formal, orientadas al tratamiento de la infección de vías urinarias altas durante la gestación.
    en el grupo desarrollador participaron expertos temáticos en microbiología, salud pública, medicina interna, infectología, obstetricia, medicina materno-fetal e infectología ginecobstétrica. También hicieron parte profesionales con entrenamiento en epidemiología clínica, búsqueda sistemática de la información, representantes de la Secretaría de Salud y la Asociación Bogotana de Obstetricia y Ginecología. Los participantes presentaron sus conflictos de interés. A partir de una pregunta clínica se realizó la graduación de los desenlaces y una búsqueda sistemática que abarcó las bases de datos Medline vía PubMed, Embase, Lilacs, Bireme. La pesquisa se amplió a repositorios institucionales y reportes de vigilancia de resistencia antimicrobiana, sin restricción de idioma o fecha, la búsqueda se actualizó el 1 de octubre de 2022. Se utilizó la metodología GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) para valorar la calidad de la evidencia y establecer la fuerza de las recomendaciones.Finalmente, se utilizó la metodología RAND/ UCLA (Research and Development/University of California Los Angeles) para el consenso formal. Este documento fue revisado por pares académicos previo a su publicación.
    el consenso formuló las siguientes recomendaciones. Recomendación 1. Se sugiere que el manejo inicial de la gestante con infección de vías urinarias (IVU) altas se realice de forma intrahospitalaria. Recomendación 2. Como primera opción, se sugiere que el tratamiento antimicrobiano empírico de la gestante con IVU altas se realice con el uso de cefalosporinas de segunda generación con el fin de mejorar la tasa de cura clínica y microbiológica. Recomendación 3. Como segunda opción, se sugiere que el tratamiento antimicrobiano empírico de la gestante con IVU altas en el segundo y tercer trimestre se realice con aminoglucósidos dado su balance riesgo-beneficio. Recomendación 4. Como tercera opción, se sugiere que el tratamiento antimicrobiano empírico de la gestante con IVU altas se realice con el uso de cefalosporinas de tercera generación, debido a que el riesgo de inducción de resistencia microbiana es alto con este grupo de antibióticos. Recomendación 5. Como primera opción, en mujeres gestantes con IVU altas y antecedente de infección por microorganismos con resistencia a cefalosporinas de tercera o cuarta generación se sugiere el uso de carbapenémicos. Recomendación 6. Como segunda opción, en gestantes con IVU altas y antecedente de infección por microorganismos con resistencia a cefalosporinas de tercera generación se sugiere el uso de aminoglucósidos o cefalosporinas de cuarta generación teniendo en cuenta el riesgo-beneficio. Recomendación 7. Como tercera opción, en gestantes con IVU altas y antecedente de infección por microorganismos con resistencia a cefalosporinas de tercera o cuarta generación se sugiere el uso de piperacilina/tazobactam. Recomendación 8. En gestantes con IVU altas se recomienda realizar urocultivo previo al inicio de tratamiento antimicrobiano empírico. Recomendación 9. En gestantes con IVU altas, cuando el urocultivo reporte resistencia al antimicrobiano iniciado de forma empírica, se sugiere modificar la terapia guiada por los resultados del antibiograma. Recomendación 10. En la gestante hospitalizada por IVU altas se sugiere realizar el cambio de terapia antimicrobiana a vía oral cuando la paciente tenga, al menos, 48 horas de modulación de respuesta inflamatoria sistémica y de los signos clínicos de infección, así como adecuada tolerancia a vía oral. Recomendación 11. En gestantes con IVU altas, sin complicaciones secundarias a la infección primaria, se recomienda que la terapia antibiótica se administre de 7 a 10 días.
    se espera que este consenso colombiano de IVU altas reduzca la variabilidad en la práctica clínica. Se recomienda a los grupos de investigación en medicina materno fetal e infectología evaluar la implementación y efectividad de las recomendaciones emitidas.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Review
    背景:抗生素耐药性是全球性的健康危机。确保负责任,适当的使用(管理)对于保持抗生素尽可能长时间的工作很重要。整个医疗保健中约有10%的抗生素是由口腔保健专业人员开的。不必要的使用率很高。为了最大限度地发挥研究的价值,优化牙科抗生素的使用,这项研究就牙科抗生素管理的核心结果集达成了国际共识.
    方法:候选结果来自文献综述。国际参与者是通过专业机构招募的,患者组织,和社交媒体,至少有30名牙医,学者,和患者贡献者。>70%的参与者(牙医,学者,和患者)在最终共识会议后,将2轮Delphi纳入核心结果集。研究方案已在COMET计划中注册,并在BMC试验中发表。
    结果:共有来自15个国家的33名参与者,包括8个低收入和中等收入国家,完成了两轮Delphi研究。抗生素使用结果(例如,处方的适当性),不良或不良结果(例如,疾病进展引起的并发症),患者报告的结果包括在最终结果中,商定的核心集。与质量有关的结果,时间,和费用不包括在内。
    结论:牙科抗生素管理的这一核心结果集代表了未来牙科抗生素管理研究应报告的最低限度。通过支持研究人员以对多个利益相关者有意义的方式设计和报告他们的研究,并进行国际比较,口腔健康专业对全球应对抗生素耐药性的努力的贡献可以进一步改善。
    BACKGROUND: Antibiotic resistance is a global health crisis. Ensuring responsible, appropriate use (stewardship) is an important for keeping antibiotics working as long as possible. Around 10% of antibiotics across health care are prescribed by oral health care professionals, with high rates of unnecessary use. To maximise the value from research to optimise antibiotic use in dentistry, this study developed international consensus on a core outcome set for dental antibiotic stewardship.
    METHODS: Candidate outcomes were sourced from a literature review. International participants were recruited via professional bodies, patient organisations, and social media, with at least 30 dentists, academics, and patient contributors in total. Outcomes scored \"critical for inclusion\" by >70% of the participants (dentists, academics, and patients) after 2 Delphi rounds were included in the core outcome set following a final consensus meeting. The study protocol was registered with the COMET Initiative and published in BMC Trials.
    RESULTS: A total of 33 participants from 15 countries, including 8 low- and middle-income countries, completed both rounds of the Delphi study. Antibiotic use outcomes (eg, appropriateness of prescribing), adverse or poor outcomes (eg, complications from disease progression), and a patient-reported outcome were included in the final, agreed core set. Outcomes relating to quality, time, and cost were not included.
    CONCLUSIONS: This core outcome set for dental antibiotic stewardship represents the minimum which future studies of antibiotic stewardship in dentistry should report. By supporting researchers to design and report their studies in a way meaningful to multiple stakeholders and enabling international comparisons, the oral health profession\'s contribution to global efforts to tackle antibiotic resistance can be further improved.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:降钙素原抗生素共识试验(ProACT)发现,向医院临床医生提供降钙素原抗生素处方指南并未减少抗生素的使用。可能的原因包括临床医生不愿遵循指南,观察到64.8%的依从率。在这项研究中,我们试图确定减少抗生素使用的阈值依从率,并探索增加依从性的机会。
    方法:本研究是对ProACT数据的回顾性分析。ProACT将前往美国14家医院怀疑下呼吸道感染的1656名患者随机分配到常规护理或向治疗医生提供降钙素原测定结果和抗生素处方指南。我们模拟了对低降钙素原水平的指南建议的不同依从性,并确定了哪个阈值依从率可能导致在alpha=0.05时拒绝组间无差异的零假设。我们还在特定的临床环境中进行了敏感性分析,并将最初使用抗生素的患者分组为低降钙素原,中等,以及疾病严重程度或细菌感染的高风险。
    结果:我们的主要结果是使用意向治疗方法到第30天的抗生素天数和抗生素使用无差异的零假设。我们确定,在医院环境(急诊科和住院)中,低降钙素原的依从率为84%,可能会拒绝零假设(3.7vs4.3抗生素天,p=0.048)。出院后持续遵循指南的阈值依从率为76%。即使仅在急诊科100%的依从性也无法减少抗生素天数。尽管降钙素原水平较低,但在急诊科仍有218名患者使用抗生素,153(70.2%)被归类为低风险或中风险。
    结论:在医院环境中,对降钙素原抗生素处方指南的高依从性对于减少疑似下呼吸道感染的抗生素使用是必要的。在低和中低降钙素原患者出院后继续坚持指南和停用抗生素可能为减少抗生素提供有影响的潜在机会。试验注册降钙素原抗生素共识试验(ProACT),ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT02130986。首次发布于2014年5月6日。
    BACKGROUND: The Procalcitonin Antibiotic Consensus Trial (ProACT) found provision of a procalcitonin antibiotic prescribing guideline to hospital-based clinicians did not reduce antibiotic use. Possible reasons include clinician reluctance to follow the guideline, with an observed 64.8% adherence rate. In this study we sought to determine the threshold adherence rate for reduction in antibiotic use, and to explore opportunities to increase adherence.
    METHODS: This study is a retrospective analysis of ProACT data. ProACT randomized 1656 patients presenting to 14 U.S. hospitals with suspected lower respiratory tract infection to usual care or provision of procalcitonin assay results and an antibiotic prescribing guideline to the treating clinicians. We simulated varying adherence to guideline recommendations for low procalcitonin levels and determined which threshold adherence rate could have resulted in rejection of the null hypothesis of no difference between groups at alpha = 0.05. We also performed sensitivity analyses within specific clinical settings and grouped patients initially prescribed antibiotics despite low procalcitonin into low, medium, and high risk of illness severity or bacterial infection.
    RESULTS: Our primary outcome was number of antibiotic-days by day 30 using an intention-to-treat approach and a null hypothesis of no difference in antibiotic use. We determined that an 84% adherence rate in the hospital setting (emergency department and inpatient) for low procalcitonin could have allowed rejection of the null hypothesis (3.7 vs 4.3 antibiotic-days, p = 0.048). The threshold adherence rate was 76% for continued guideline adherence after discharge. Even 100% adherence in the emergency department alone failed to reduce antibiotic-days. Of the 218 patients prescribed antibiotics in the emergency department despite low procalcitonin, 153 (70.2%) were categorized as low or medium risk.
    CONCLUSIONS: High adherence in the hospital setting to a procalcitonin antibiotic prescribing guideline is necessary to reduce antibiotic use in suspected lower respiratory tract infection. Continued guideline adherence after discharge and withholding of antibiotics in low and medium risk patients with low procalcitonin may offer impactful potential opportunities for antibiotic reduction. Trial registration Procalcitonin Antibiotic Consensus Trial (ProACT), ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02130986. First posted May 6, 2014.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:正确的围手术期抗生素策略对于预防经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)中的术后感染至关重要。我们旨在将在中国应用的现实抗生素策略与现行泌尿外科指南进行比较。
    方法:在2020年4月至5月期间,邀请了来自中国的泌尿科医师完成一项在线横断面调查。问卷是根据现行泌尿外科指南和文献设计的。
    结果:收到了3393份完整的回复。61.1%(2073/3393)的受访者有10年以上的泌尿外科经验。72.4%的泌尿科医师为术前尿培养(UC-)阴性和尿镜检查(UM-)阴性的患者选择了多剂量抗生素。华中地区受访者(OR=1.518;95%CI1.102-2.092;P=0.011),华东地区(OR=1.528;95%CI1.179-1.979;P=0.001)和东北地区(OR=1.904;95%CI1.298-2.792;P=0.001)更有可能为UC-UM患者开出多剂量抗生素.值得注意的是,每年完成PCNL超过100例的受访者赞成单剂量给药(OR=0.674;95%CI0.519-0.875;P=0.003).只有8.3%的泌尿科医生为UC-UM+患者选择了单剂量抗生素,而65.5%的抗生素给药1-3天。同时,对于UC+患者,59.0%的泌尿科医生在1周内使用抗生素,只有26.3%的泌尿科医师进行了UC的常规复检。此外,术后抗生素的处方频率为3~6天(1815;53.5%).最后,尽管88.2%的泌尿科医师认为结石培养对术后抗生素管理很重要,只有18.5%的人例行执行。
    结论:在中国目前的实践和泌尿外科指南中,抗生素策略是不同的。差异表明,应进行进一步的研究以调查差异的原因并规范抗生素的使用。
    BACKGROUND: Correct perioperative antibiotic strategies are crucial to prevent postoperative infections during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). We aimed to compare the realistic antibiotic strategies applied in China with current urological guidelines.
    METHODS: Between April and May 2020, urologists from China were invited to finish an online cross-sectional survey. The questionnaire was designed according to the current urological guidelines and literatures.
    RESULTS: 3393 completed responses were received. 61.1% (2073/3393) respondents had urological experience of more than 10 years. 72.4% urologists chose multiple-dose antibiotics for patients with both negative urine culture (UC-) and negative urine microscopy (UM-) preoperatively. Respondents in central China (OR = 1.518; 95% CI 1.102-2.092; P = 0.011), east China (OR = 1.528; 95% CI 1.179-1.979; P = 0.001) and northeast China (OR = 1.904; 95% CI 1.298-2.792; P = 0.001) were more likely to prescribe multiple-dose antibiotic for UC-UM- patients. Notably, the respondents who finished PCNL exceeded 100 cases per year were in favor of single-dose administration (OR = 0.674; 95% CI 0.519-0.875; P = 0.003). There are only 8.3% urologists chose single-dose antibiotic for UC-UM+ patients, whereas 65.5% administered antibiotics for 1-3 days. Meanwhile, for UC+ patients, 59.0% of the urologists applied antibiotics shorter than 1 week, and only 26.3% of the urologists carried out routine re-examination of UC. Moreover, postoperative antibiotics were frequently prescribed for 3-6 days (1815; 53.5%). Finally, although 88.2% urologists considered stone culture important for management of postoperative antibiotics as the guideline recommended, only 18.5% performed it routinely.
    CONCLUSIONS: The antibiotic strategies are different between current practice in China and the urological guidelines. The dissimilarities suggested that further studies should be conducted to investigate the reasons of the differences and standardize the application of antibiotics.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号