BACKGROUND: Rodent models are routinely used to assess the safety and developmental toxicity of pharmaceuticals, along with analysis of their distribution. These models require sacrifice of parent females, have challenges in the estimation of the number of embryos and stage of development, and are expensive and time-consuming. In this study, we used fertilized chicken eggs as an alternative model to address drug distribution to the developing brain of two antiepileptic drugs, valproic acid (VPA) and lamotrigine (LTG) at two developmental stages.
METHODS: VPA or LTG was injected into the allantois of the egg on embryonic day 13 (E13) or E16. Whole chicken brains were harvested at time-points of 5 min to 24 h and the concentrations of the drugs determined using GC/MS and LC-MS/MS, for VPA and LTG, respectively.
RESULTS: VPA and LTG had distinct absorption and elimination phases and were found in the brain as early as 5-15 min after injection. Both drugs reached the brain in clinically relevant concentrations, with Cmax 10-30% of the calculated concentration assuming uniform distribution throughout the egg. LTG concentrations were higher when injected at E13 compared to E16.
CONCLUSIONS: The chicken embryo model may be a suitable alternative animal model for preclinical drug distribution studies. It enables to easily approach antenatal development on an individual level, with a precise number of experimental animals, high reproducibility and low time and cost. Knowledge of the concentrations reaching the brain at different developmental stages with different drugs is important for the planning and interpretation of neurodevelopmental toxicity studies.

Biological disease models can be difficult and costly to develop and use on a routine basis. Particularly, in vivo lung infection models performed to study lung pathologies use to be laborious, demand a great time and commonly are associated with ethical issues. When infections in experimental animals are used, they need to be refined, defined, and validated for their intended purpose. Therefore, alternative and easy to handle models of experimental infections are still needed to test the virulence of bacterial lung pathogens. Because non-mammalian models have less ethical and cost constraints as a subjects for experimentation, in some cases would be appropriated to include these models as valuable tools to explore host-pathogen interactions. Numerous scientific data have been argued to the more extensive use of several kinds of alternative models, such as, the vertebrate zebrafish (Danio rerio), and non-vertebrate insects and nematodes (e.g., Caenorhabditis elegans) in the study of diverse infectious agents that affect humans. Here, we review the use of these vertebrate and non-vertebrate models in the study of bacterial agents, which are considered the principal causes of lung injury. Curiously none of these animals have a respiratory system as in air-breathing vertebrates, where respiration takes place in lungs. Despite this fact, with the present review we sought to provide elements in favor of the use of these alternative animal models of infection to reveal the molecular signatures of host-pathogen interactions.