Age factors

年龄因素
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:预测模型可以识别容易跌倒的个体。预测模型可以基于来自研究队列的数据(基于队列)或常规收集的数据(基于RCD)。我们回顾并比较了基于队列和基于RCD的研究,这些研究描述了社区居住的老年人的跌倒预测模型的开发和/或验证。
    方法:通过Ovid搜索Medline和Embase,直到2023年1月。我们纳入了描述老年人(60+)跌倒多变量预测模型发展或验证的研究。使用PROBAST和TRIPOD评估偏倚风险和报告质量,分别。
    结果:我们纳入并回顾了28项相关研究,描述30个预测模型(23个基于队列的和7个基于RCD的),以及两个现有模型(一个基于队列和一个基于RCD)的外部验证。基于队列和基于RCD的研究的中位数样本量为1365[四分位距(IQR)426-2766]与90.441(IQR56.442-128.157),下降幅度为5.4%至60.4%,而下降幅度为1.6%至13.1%,分别。基于队列和基于刚果民盟的模型之间的歧视表现是可比的,接收器工作特性曲线下的相应面积范围为0.65至0.88,而非0.71至0.81。基于队列的最终模型中预测因子的中位数为6(IQR5-11);对于基于RCD的模型,它是16(IQR11-26)。除了一个基于队列的模型外,所有模型都有很高的偏倚风险,主要是由于统计分析和结果确定方面的不足。
    结论:基于队列的预测社区老年人跌倒的模型很多。基于RCD的模型还处于起步阶段,但在没有额外数据收集工作的情况下提供了可比的预测性能。未来的研究应侧重于方法学和报告质量。
    BACKGROUND: Prediction models can identify fall-prone individuals. Prediction models can be based on either data from research cohorts (cohort-based) or routinely collected data (RCD-based). We review and compare cohort-based and RCD-based studies describing the development and/or validation of fall prediction models for community-dwelling older adults.
    METHODS: Medline and Embase were searched via Ovid until January 2023. We included studies describing the development or validation of multivariable prediction models of falls in older adults (60+). Both risk of bias and reporting quality were assessed using the PROBAST and TRIPOD, respectively.
    RESULTS: We included and reviewed 28 relevant studies, describing 30 prediction models (23 cohort-based and 7 RCD-based), and external validation of two existing models (one cohort-based and one RCD-based). The median sample sizes for cohort-based and RCD-based studies were 1365 [interquartile range (IQR) 426-2766] versus 90 441 (IQR 56 442-128 157), and the ranges of fall rates were 5.4% to 60.4% versus 1.6% to 13.1%, respectively. Discrimination performance was comparable between cohort-based and RCD-based models, with the respective area under the receiver operating characteristic curves ranging from 0.65 to 0.88 versus 0.71 to 0.81. The median number of predictors in cohort-based final models was 6 (IQR 5-11); for RCD-based models, it was 16 (IQR 11-26). All but one cohort-based model had high bias risks, primarily due to deficiencies in statistical analysis and outcome determination.
    CONCLUSIONS: Cohort-based models to predict falls in older adults in the community are plentiful. RCD-based models are yet in their infancy but provide comparable predictive performance with no additional data collection efforts. Future studies should focus on methodological and reporting quality.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:孤独是一个严重的公共卫生问题。尽管以前的干预措施在减轻孤独感方面取得了一些成功,这个领域正在寻找小说,更有效,和更具可扩展性的解决方案。这里,我们专注于“关系代理”,一种软件代理形式,越来越多地由人工智能和大型语言模型(LLM)提供支持。我们报告了系统综述和荟萃分析,以调查关系主体对各年龄组孤独感的影响。
    方法:在本系统综述和荟萃分析中,从成立到2022年9月16日,我们检索了11个数据库,包括OvidMEDLINE和Embase。我们纳入了所有年龄组的随机对照试验和非随机干预研究。这些孤独干预措施,通常试图提高社交技能,社会支持,社交互动,和适应不良的认知。同行评审的期刊文章,书籍,书籍章节,硕士和博士学位论文,或会议文件有资格列入。两名审稿人独立筛选研究,提取的数据,并通过RoB2和ROBINS-I工具评估偏倚风险。我们在随机效应荟萃分析中计算了Hedge的汇总估计值,并进行了敏感性和亚组分析。我们通过漏斗图评估了出版偏差,Egger\'stest,和修剪和填充算法。
    结果:我们的搜索确定了3,935条记录,其中14条符合资格标准,并被纳入我们的荟萃分析。纳入的研究包括286名参与者,个人研究样本量从4到42名参与者(x²=20.43,s=11.58,x²=20)。我们使用了Bonferroni校正,αBonferroni=0.05/4=0.0125,并应用了Knapp-Hartung调整。关联剂在调整后的αBonferroni上显着降低了孤独感(g=-0.552;95%Knapp-HartungCI,-0.877至-0.226;P=0.003),这相当于孤独的适度减少。
    结论:我们的研究结果是目前同类研究中最全面的,为相关药物的疗效提供了有希望的证据。关系代理是一种有前途的技术,可以以可扩展的方式减轻孤独,并且可以成为其他方法的有意义的补充。LLM的出现应该提高它们的功效,需要进一步的研究来探索关系代理的优化设计和使用。未来的研究还可以解决当前结果的缺点,如样本量小,偏倚风险高。特别是年轻观众在过去的研究中被忽视了。
    BACKGROUND: Loneliness is a serious public health concern. Although previous interventions have had some success in mitigating loneliness, the field is in search of novel, more effective, and more scalable solutions. Here, we focus on \"relational agents\", a form of software agents that are increasingly powered by artificial intelligence and large language models (LLMs). We report on a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the impact of relational agents on loneliness across age groups.
    METHODS: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched 11 databases including Ovid MEDLINE and Embase from inception to Sep 16, 2022. We included randomised controlled trials and non-randomised studies of interventions published in English across all age groups. These loneliness interventions, typically attempt to improve social skills, social support, social interaction, and maladaptive cognitions. Peer-reviewed journal articles, books, book chapters, Master\'s and PhD theses, or conference papers were eligible for inclusion. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias via the RoB 2 and ROBINS-I tools. We calculated pooled estimates of Hedge\'s g in a random-effects meta-analysis and conducted sensitivity and sub-group analyses. We evaluated publication bias via funnel plots, Egger\'s test, and a trim-and-fill algorithm.
    RESULTS: Our search identified 3,935 records of which 14 met eligibility criteria and were included in our meta-analysis. Included studies comprised 286 participants with individual study sample sizes ranging from 4 to 42 participants (x̄ = 20.43, s = 11.58, x̃ = 20). We used a Bonferroni correction with αBonferroni = 0.05 / 4 = 0.0125 and applied Knapp-Hartung adjustments. Relational agents reduced loneliness significantly at an adjusted αBonferroni (g = -0.552; 95% Knapp-Hartung CI, -0.877 to -0.226; P = 0.003), which corresponds to a moderate reduction in loneliness.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our results are currently the most comprehensive of their kind and provide promising evidence for the efficacy of relational agents. Relational agents are a promising technology that can alleviate loneliness in a scalable way and that can be a meaningful complement to other approaches. The advent of LLMs should boost their efficacy, and further research is needed to explore the optimal design and use of relational agents. Future research could also address shortcomings of current results, such as small sample sizes and high risk of bias. Particularly young audiences have been overlooked in past research.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:焦虑症状和障碍在老年人中很常见,并且经常未被发现。完成了一项系统评价,以确定可用于检测社区居住老年人焦虑症状和疾病的工具。
    方法:MEDLINE,使用搜索概念焦虑搜索Embase和PsycINFO,2023年3月的老年人和诊断准确性。纳入的文章使用指数焦虑工具和焦虑评估的黄金标准形式评估了社区居住老年人的焦虑,并报告了由此产生的诊断准确性结果。完成了对合并诊断准确性结果的估计。
    结果:从32篇文章中确定了23种焦虑工具。对老年焦虑量表(GAI)-20[n=3,敏感性=0.89,95%置信区间(CI)=0.70-0.97,特异性=0.80,95%CI=0.67-0.89]和GAI-20(n=3,截止值≥9,敏感性=0.74,95%CI=0.74,特异性=0.62-0.83,贝克焦虑量表(n=3,敏感性=0.70,95%CI=0.58-0.79,特异性=0.60,95%CI=0.51-0.68)和医院焦虑和抑郁量表(HADS-A)(n=3,敏感性=0.78,95%CI=0.60-0.89,特异性=0.76,95%CI=0.60-0.87)在临床样本中检测焦虑症。
    结论:GAI-20是研究最多的工具,在识别GAD和焦虑症时具有足够的灵敏度,同时保持可接受的特异性。支持GAI-20,GAI-ShortForm和HADS-A工具,用于检测社区居住的老年人的焦虑。Brief,在资源有限的情况下,在社区居住的老年人中,自我评估和易于使用的工具可能是焦虑检测的最佳选择.临床医生在选择工具并切断时可能会考虑包括患者合并症和焦虑患病率在内的因素。
    BACKGROUND: Anxiety symptoms and disorders are common in older adults and often go undetected. A systematic review was completed to identify tools that can be used to detect anxiety symptoms and disorders in community-dwelling older adults.
    METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase and PsycINFO were searched using the search concepts anxiety, older adults and diagnostic accuracy in March 2023. Included articles assessed anxiety in community-dwelling older adults using an index anxiety tool and a gold standard form of anxiety assessment and reported resulting diagnostic accuracy outcomes. Estimates of pooled diagnostic accuracy outcomes were completed.
    RESULTS: Twenty-three anxiety tools were identified from the 32 included articles. Pooled diagnostic accuracy outcomes were estimated for the Geriatric Anxiety Inventory (GAI)-20 [n = 3, sensitivity = 0.89, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.70-0.97, specificity = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.67-0.89] to detect generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and for the GAI-20 (n = 3, cut off ≥ 9, sensitivity = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.62-0.83, specificity = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.74-1.00), Beck Anxiety Inventory (n = 3, sensitivity = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.58-0.79, specificity = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.51-0.68) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-A) (n = 3, sensitivity = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.60-0.89, specificity = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.60-0.87) to detect anxiety disorders in clinical samples.
    CONCLUSIONS: The GAI-20 was the most studied tool and had adequate sensitivity while maintaining acceptable specificity when identifying GAD and anxiety disorders. The GAI-20, GAI-Short Form and HADS-A tools are supported for use in detecting anxiety in community-dwelling older adults. Brief, self-rated and easy-to-use tools may be the best options for anxiety detection in community-dwelling older adults given resource limitations. Clinicians may consider factors including patient comorbidities and anxiety prevalence when selecting a tool and cut off.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:女性在心血管健康预防中经常被忽视。初潮年龄(AAM)与女性心血管(CVD)疾病有关,并可能被确定为重要的CVD风险因素之一。然而,解决这个问题的全面证据仍然有限。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在调查初潮早期如何影响全因死亡率的结果。CVD死亡率,总心血管疾病事件,中风(缺血性,出血性,和总行程),冠心病(CHD)。
    方法:Cochrane图书馆,MEDLINE,Embase,ScienceDirect,我们在2013年3月至2023年3月期间搜索了GoogleScholar数据库,以调查月经初潮早期发作对CVD事件的影响,最短随访期为5年.观察到特定人群和/或包括基线有CVD病史的女性的研究被排除。纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表用于评估每个队列的偏倚风险。使用风险比将数据呈现为二分测量。I2统计量用于评价所提供数据的异质性。
    结果:13个队列包括18626799名女性患者,年龄在43至62.6岁之间。这些报告分别对冠心病(5483298例患者)和全因死亡率(1595878例患者)进行了6次估计,5估计每个总中风(2941321名患者)和心血管疾病死亡率(1706742名患者),4估计每个总CVD事件(3988311名患者)和缺血性卒中(2434580名患者),1估计出血性中风(66104例)。我们的研究发现,在初潮早期,CHD事件显著降低(RR0.57;95%CI0.41-0.78;P<.00001)。以及总卒中(RR0.51;95%CI0.35-0.73;P=.0003),CVD死亡率(RR0.47;95%CI0.22-0.98;P=0.04),总CVD事件(RR0.44;95%CI0.25-0.76;P=.003),缺血性卒中(RR0.31;95%CI0.15-0.61;P<.0008),出血性卒中(RR0.12;95%CI0.07-0.20;P<.00001);全因死亡率无明显升高(RR0.90,95%CI0.76-1.06,P=.20)。
    结论:在我们的研究中,早期初潮女性的心血管事件较低;因此,初潮年龄越晚是评估患者CVD风险时需要考虑的潜在危险因素.然而,我们的样本特征是异质的,我们没有考虑其他女性荷尔蒙因素可能导致观察到的CVD结果;因此,需要进一步的研究来澄清。
    BACKGROUND: Women are often neglected in cardiovascular health prevention. Age at menarche (AAM) has been linked to cardiovascular (CVD) disease in women and is potentially identified as one of the significant CVD risk factor. However, there is still limited comprehensive evidence addressing this issue. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate how early menarche affects the outcome of all-cause mortality, CVD mortality, total cardiovascular disease event, stroke (ischemic, hemorrhagic, and total stroke), and coronary heart disease (CHD).
    METHODS: The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar databases were searched from March 2013 to March 2023 for cohorts investigating the effect of early onset of menarche on CVD events with a minimum follow-up period of 5 years. Studies that observed specific population and/or included women with a history of CVD at baseline were excluded. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used for risk of bias assessment for each cohort included. The data were presented as dichotomous measure using risk ratios. I2 statistics were utilized to evaluate the heterogeneity of presented data.
    RESULTS: Thirteen cohorts included 18 626 799 female patients with ages ranging from 43 to 62.6 years. These reported 6 estimates each for CHD (5 483 298 patients) and all-cause mortality (1 595 878 patients), 5 estimates each for total stroke (2 941 321 patients) and CVD mortality (1 706 742 patients), 4 estimates each for total CVD events (3 988 311 patients) and ischemic stroke (2 434 580 patients), and 1 estimate for hemorrhagic stroke (66 104 patients). Our study found that events of CHD were significantly lower in early menarche (RR 0.57; 95% CI 0.41-0.78; P <.00001), as well as total stroke (RR 0.51; 95% CI 0.35-0.73; P =.0003), CVD mortality (RR 0.47; 95% CI 0.22-0.98; P =.04), total CVD events (RR 0.44; 95% CI 0.25-0.76; P =.003), ischemic stroke (RR 0.31; 95% CI 0.15-0.61; P <.0008), and hemorrhagic stroke (RR 0.12; 95% CI 0.07-0.20; P <.00001); and insignificantly higher in all-cause mortality (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.76-1.06, P =.20).
    CONCLUSIONS: In our study, cardiovascular events are lower in women with early menarche; hence, the later age of menarche is a potential risk factor to be considered when assessing CVD risk in a patient. However, our sample characteristics were heterogenous, and we did not consider other female hormonal factors that might potentially contribute to the CVD outcomes observed; thus, further studies are needed to clarify.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:由于社会偏见和污名,感染艾滋病毒的老年妇女往往被忽视。尽管老年妇女的病例有所增加,关于影响他们经历的社会心理因素的研究有限。艾滋病毒和更年期复合的老龄化复杂性影响这些妇女的健康,虽然心理健康等因素会影响,不断变化的支持网络,和年龄歧视与艾滋病毒的耻辱影响他们的福祉。现有研究大多比较老年HIV阳性个体,而不考虑性别和交叉身份。限制了对他们独特经历的理解。缺乏从不同角度解决与年龄相关的差异的研究延迟了定制治疗和干预措施的发展。
    目的:该研究旨在通过三个子问题全面探讨老年艾滋病病毒感染者的年龄相关经历:(1)关键经历,医疗和社会挑战,和优势;(2)交叉身份对他们的经验的影响;(3)当前研究中的差距和局限性。
    方法:利用范围审查方法,这项研究旨在绘制现有文献,采用植根于基于性别和性别的分析加(SGBA+)的理论框架。将包括侧重于50岁及以上感染艾滋病毒的老年妇女的年龄相关经历的文章。研究选择过程将涉及两名独立的审稿人根据预先建立的纳入标准筛选文章。接下来将进行数据提取和合成,分析性的影响,性别,和经验上的其他身份。
    结论:该研究的综合方法旨在弥合在了解老年妇女的艾滋病毒经历方面的差距,强调交叉性。虽然仅限于英语同行评审文章,这篇评论旨在为医疗保健提供有价值的见解,政策,和研究,可能促进感染艾滋病毒的不同老年妇女的生活发生积极变化。
    BACKGROUND: Older women living with HIV often go unnoticed due to societal biases and stigmas. Despite a rise in cases among older women, there is limited research on the psychosocial factors impacting their experiences. Aging complexities compounded by HIV and menopause affect these women\'s health, while factors like mental health impact, changing support networks, and ageism with HIV stigma influence their well-being. Existing studies mostly compare older HIV-positive individuals without considering gender and intersectional identities, limiting understanding of their unique experiences. The scarcity of research addressing age-related differences from diverse perspectives delays the development of tailored treatments and interventions.
    OBJECTIVE: The study aims to comprehensively explore the age-related experiences of older women with HIV through three sub-questions that address (1) Key experiences, medical and social challenges, and strengths; (2) Impact of intersectional identities on their experiences; and (3) Gaps and limitations in current research.
    METHODS: Utilizing a scoping review approach, the study seeks to map existing literature, employing a theoretical framework rooted in Sex- and Gender-Based Analysis Plus (SGBA+). Articles focusing on the age-related experiences of older women living with HIV aged 50 and above will be included. The study selection process will involve two independent reviewers screening articles based on pre-established inclusion criteria. Data extraction and synthesis will follow, analyzing the influence of sex, gender, and other identities on experiences.
    CONCLUSIONS: The study\'s comprehensive approach aims to bridge gaps in understanding older women\'s HIV experiences, emphasizing intersectionality. While limited to English-language peer-reviewed articles, this review seeks to offer valuable insights for healthcare, policy, and research, potentially fostering positive change in the lives of diverse older women living with HIV.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    本系统综述旨在(1)评估亚洲公众对自杀的媒体描述与随后的模仿自杀或企图之间的关联,(2)了解与模仿自杀相关的因素,以及(3)确定媒体报道自杀的积极影响(例如增加寻求帮助,应对)。
    对来自8个电子数据库(即PsycINFO,MEDLINE,Embase,CINAHL,WebofScience,Ariti,中国国家知识基础设施和OpenGrey)于2000年1月至2023年5月进行。包括观察性研究,并通过叙事综合分析数据。该方案在PROSPERO(CRD42021281535)注册。
    在综述中包含的32项研究(证据综合n=29)中,有高质量的证据表明,在媒体报道自杀后,模仿自杀和自杀未遂增加,无论哪个国家,名人身份,研究设计,媒体类型,自杀模式或随访期。雌性,较年轻的年龄组和与公布的自杀事件中死者具有相似特征的年龄组(年龄,性别)更容易受到负面影响。在公众中,以相同的方法报告死者的死亡方式增加了自杀。
    媒体对自杀的描述似乎对亚洲人口水平的模仿自杀产生了负面影响。因此,除了更严格的媒体控制,医疗保健系统,专业医疗机构和社区外展服务机构应共同努力,促进有心理困扰的人的早期求助。
    UNASSIGNED: This systematic review is aimed at (1) evaluating the association between media portrayals of suicides and subsequent copycat suicides or attempts among the general public in Asia, (2) understanding the factors associated with copycat suicides and (3) determining the positive impacts of the media reporting of suicides (e.g. increased help-seeking, coping).
    UNASSIGNED: A systematic review and narrative synthesis of English and Chinese articles from 8 electronic databases (i.e. PsycINFO, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Ariti, China National Knowledge Infrastructure and OpenGrey) from January 2000 to May 2023 was conducted. Observational studies were included, and the data were analysed through narrative synthesis. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021281535).
    UNASSIGNED: Among the 32 studies included (n=29 for evidence synthesis) in the review, there is good-quality evidence to show that copycat suicides and suicide attempts increase after media reports of a suicide, regardless of country, celebrity status, study design, type of media, mode of suicide or follow-up period. Females, younger age groups and those sharing similar characteristics as the deceased in publicised suicides (age, gender) were more susceptible to negative impact. Reporting of the mode of death of the deceased increased suicides by the same method among the public.
    UNASSIGNED: Media portrayals of suicide appear to have a negative impact on copycat suicides at the population level in Asia. Thus, in addition to tighter media control, healthcare systems, professional medical bodies and community outreach services should work collaboratively to promote early help-seeking in those with psychological distress.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    目标:重症监护研究中老年人的比例可能不足,结果可能不适用于这一特定人群。我们的主要目标是评估老年人纳入重症监护试验的患病率,重点是常见的ICU条件或干预措施。我们的次要目标是评估年龄是否被用作随机化或结果分析的分层变量。
    方法:我们对先前发表的重症监护随机对照试验(RCTs)的系统评价进行了系统评价。我们搜索了PubMed,奥维德,中部,和Cochrane从2009年到2022年。对五个主题的任何干预措施的系统评价:急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS),脓毒症/休克,营养,镇静,动员是合格的。
    结果:我们确定了216篇系统评价,共包括253例RCTs和113,090例患者。我们提取了基线特征和报告的老年人比例。我们评估了年龄上限是否是试验的排除标准,在随机化或数据分析期间,年龄是否用于分层,以及是否存在年龄特异性亚组分析。最普遍的话题是败血症(78项试验,31%),其次是营养学(62项试验,25%),ARDS(39项试验,15%),动员(38项试验,15%),和镇静(36项试验,14%)。18项试验(7%)有基于年龄的排除标准。6项试验(2%)给出了年龄分布和老年人患病率信息。在使用分析方法评估按年龄分层的结果的10项试验(5%)的分析中考虑了年龄。
    在这篇系统综述中,老年危重病人的比例不确定,目前还不清楚年龄是或不是效应修正因子,或者结果在多大程度上对老年群体有效。报告年龄对于指导临床医生个性化护理很重要。这些结果强调了在未来的试验中纳入老年危重病人的重要性,以确保结果可推广到这个不断增长的人群。
    OBJECTIVE: Older adults may be under-represented in critical care research, and results may not apply to this specific population. Our primary objective was to evaluate the prevalence of inclusion of older adults across critical care trials focused on common ICU conditions or interventions. Our secondary objective was to evaluate whether older age was used as a stratification variable for randomization or outcome analysis.
    METHODS: We performed a systematic review of previously published systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in critical care. We searched PubMed, Ovid, CENTRAL, and Cochrane from 2009 to 2022. Systematic reviews of any interventions across five topics: acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), sepsis/shock, nutrition, sedation, and mobilization were eligible.
    RESULTS: We identified 216 systematic reviews and included a total of 253 RCTs and 113,090 patients. We extracted baseline characteristics and the reported proportion of older adults. We assessed whether any upper age limit was an exclusion criterion for trials, whether age was used for stratification during randomization or data analysis, and if age-specific subgroup analysis was present. The most prevalent topic was sepsis (78 trials, 31%), followed by nutrition (62 trials, 25%), ARDS (39 trials, 15%), mobilization (38 trials, 15%), and sedation (36 trials, 14%). Eighteen trials (7%) had exclusion criteria based on older age. Age distribution with information on older adults prevalence was given in six trials (2%). Age was considered in the analysis of ten trials (5%) using analytic methods to evaluate the outcome stratified by age.
    UNASSIGNED: In this systematic review, the proportion of older critically ill patients is undetermined, and it is unclear how age is or is not an effect modifier or to what extent the results are valid for older adult groups. Reporting age is important to guide clinicians in personalizing care. These results highlight the importance of incorporating older critically ill patients in future trials to ensure the results are generalizable to this growing population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:总结老年胃癌患者术前虚弱危险因素的现有证据。
    方法:我们全面搜索了CNKI,万方,VIP,CBM,PubMed,Embase,科克伦图书馆,WebofScience,术前文章和CINAHL数据库中老年胃癌患者虚弱的危险因素。搜索是从图书馆建造之时到2024年1月27日进行的,没有语言限制。纳入研究的质量由纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表和医疗保健研究和质量工具机构进行评级。
    结果:共纳入20项研究,包括16项队列研究和4项横断面研究,总样本量为51,717人。荟萃分析的结果表明,年龄,白蛋白,血红蛋白,癌症III-IV期,Charlson合并症指数评分≥3,东部肿瘤协作组评分>2,美国麻醉医师协会评分>2,吸烟,营养风险,高中或以上学历,睡眠障碍是老年胃癌患者术前虚弱发生的主要影响因素。其中,高中以上学历是保护因素。
    结论:我们的研究为老年胃癌患者术前虚弱的危险因素提供了有效的证据,并告知临床医护人员采取有针对性的干预措施。
    OBJECTIVE: To summarize the available evidence on risk factors for preoperative frailty in older gastric cancer patients.
    METHODS: We comprehensively searched the CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, CBM, PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CINAHL databases for preoperative articles on risk factors for frailty in older gastric cancer patients. The search was conducted from the time of construction of the library to January 27, 2024, with no language restrictions. The quality of the included studies was rated by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality tool.
    RESULTS: A total of 20 studies were included, including 16 cohort studies and 4 cross-sectional studies, with a total sample size of 51,717 individuals. The results of the meta-analysis showed that age, albumin, hemoglobin, cancer stage III-IV, Charlson Comorbidity Index score ≥ 3, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score > 2, American Society of Anesthesiologists score > 2, smoking, nutritional risk, high school degree or above, and sleep disorders are the main influencing factors for the occurrence of preoperative frailty in older gastric cancer patients. Among them, high school degree or above was a protective factor.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides valid evidence of risk factors for preoperative frailty in older patients with gastric cancer and informs clinical healthcare professionals to make targeted interventions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:神经性厌食症住院患者的体重指数(BMI)的变化尚未在年龄范围内进行分析。据报道,在15岁及以下的青少年住院患者中,BMI与年龄之间呈正相关,在15至18岁时趋于稳定。年龄和性别标准化的BMI(标准差分数,在这些8至18岁的住院患者中,SDSs)与年龄呈负相关。
    方法:当前回顾性研究的目的有三个方面:第一,为了确认BMI之间的关系,在更大的样本中,青少年住院患者的BMI-SDS和年龄;第二,为了系统地评估BMI之间的关系,BMI-SDS,转诊时成人住院患者的身高-SDS和年龄;第三,评估身高-SDS和年龄以评估发育迟缓。
    结果:我们包括2014年至2021年期间接受住院治疗的1001名女孩(12-17.9岁)和1371名妇女(18-73岁)。青少年入院时的平均BMI为14.95kg/m2(SD=1.43;范围10.67-18.47),成年人为14.63kg/m2(SD=2.02;范围8.28-18.47)。青少年患者中没有一个,但20名成年人的BMI值非常低,低于10kg/m2。青少年在年龄和BMI之间显示出较小但显着的正相关(r=0.12;p=2.4×10-4)。在成年人中,BMI与年龄无关(r=-0.03;p=0.3)。在青少年中,BMI-SDS与年龄呈负相关,而在成年人中,BMI-SDS与年龄呈负相关(r=-0.35;p<0.001,r=-0.09;p=0.001)。所有患者的曲线拟合分析表明,年龄与BMI-SDS之间存在二次(年龄×年龄)关系。成人(r=0.1;p<0.001)和青少年(r=0.09p=0.005)患者的身高与BMI呈正相关,我们没有发现发育迟缓的证据。
    结论:结论:住院患者的BMI在整个年龄段似乎相对稳定,平均值在14~15kg/m2之间.在年轻患者中,BMI值最初随着年龄的增长而增加,在18至23岁之间下降,然后随着年龄的增长而缓慢下降。
    BACKGROUND: The variation in body mass index (BMI) of inpatients with anorexia nervosa has not been analyzed across the age span. A positive correlation between BMI and age has been reported in adolescent inpatients aged 15 years and younger that levels off at 15 to 18 years. BMIs standardized for age and sex (standard deviation scores, SDSs) were negatively correlated with age in these inpatients aged 8 to 18 years.
    METHODS: The aims of the current retrospective study were threefold: first, to confirm the relationships of BMI, BMI-SDS and age in adolescent inpatients in a larger sample; second, to systematically assess the relationship of BMI, BMI-SDS, body height-SDS and age in adult inpatients at the time of referral; and third, to assess body height-SDSs and age to evaluate stunting.
    RESULTS: We included 1001 girls (aged 12-17.9 years) and 1371 women (aged 18-73 years) admitted to inpatient treatment between 2014 and 2021. Mean BMI at admission was 14.95 kg/m2 (SD = 1.43; range 10.67-18.47) in adolescents and 14.63 kg/m2 (SD = 2.02; range 8.28-18.47) in adults. None of the adolescent patients but 20 adults had very low BMI values below 10 kg/m2. Adolescents showed a small but significant positive correlation between age and BMI (r = 0.12; p = 2.4 × 10-4). In adults, BMI was not correlated with age (r = -0.03; p = 0.3). BMI-SDSs was negatively correlated with age in adolescents and less so in adults (r = -0.35; p < 0.001 and r = -0.09; p = 0.001). Curve fit analyses for all patients indicated that there was a quadratic (age × age) relationship between age and BMI-SDS. Height correlated positively with BMI in adult (r = 0.1; p < 0.001) and adolescent (r = 0.09 p = 0.005) patients and we detected no evidence for stunting.
    CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the BMI of inpatients seems to be relatively stable across the age span with mean values between 14 and 15 kg/m2. BMI values initially increase with age in younger patients, drop between ages 18 and 23 and then slowly decline with age.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:全球年轻年龄组中的卒中正在增加。虽然有一个重点是对65岁以下中风患者进行的研究,关于年轻人(≤30岁)中卒中的发生率和危险因素的数据很少.这项范围审查审查了围产期发病率和危险因素的证据,全球儿童和年轻成人中风。
    方法:审查是由JoannaBriggs研究所的范围审查方法指导的。2022年3月23日,在MedlineOvid进行了系统搜索,Embase,护理和相关健康文献的PsycINFO和累积指数(CINAHL)。资格标准包括所有研究设计,提供了过去十年中年轻人(≤30岁)中风的发生率和危险因素的信息。
    结果:共鉴定出5750篇文章。筛选后,471篇文献(224项队列研究(47.6%),164个案例研究/案例系列(34.8%),35条评论(7.4%),包括30例病例对照(6.4%)和18种设计组合(3.8%)。有来自50个不同国家的数据,199项研究来自高收入国家,中高收入(n=38),中低收入(n=39),低收入(n=3)国家,国际研究(n=7)和另外185篇文章没有说明研究的国家。大多数研究(63%)集中在危险因素上,而发病率占37%。发病率数据在研究中报告不均匀,导致无法合成数据。三个最常报告的围产期中风的危险因素是感染,心脏病,和产时因素。血管病变,感染和心脏疾病占儿科卒中的大多数报告危险因素,而慢性疾病如糖尿病,血管病变和心脏病是年轻人中报告最多的危险因素.
    结论:本综述强调了30岁以下人群的不同卒中危险因素。流行病学研究的数量较少,这表明需要进一步研究这种类型,以充分了解青年中风的发病率和危险因素。必须对发病率数据的年龄分组进行标准化报告,以便能够比较来自不同地理位置的数据。
    BACKGROUND: Stroke among younger age groups is increasing globally. While there is a focus on research conducted on people under 65 years who have had a stroke, there is a paucity of data on the incidence and risk factors of stroke among younger people (≤ 30 years). This scoping review examines evidence on incidence and risk factors for perinatal, paediatric and young adult stroke globally.
    METHODS: The review was guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute\'s scoping review methodology. A systematic search was conducted on 23rd March 2022 across Medline Ovid, Embase, PsycINFO and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL). The eligibility criteria included all study designs providing information on the incidence and risk factors of stroke among young people (≤ 30 years) in the last ten years.
    RESULTS: A total of 5750 articles were identified. After screening, 471 articles (224 cohort studies (47.6%), 164 case studies/case series (34.8%), 35 reviews (7.4%), 30 case-control (6.4%) and 18 combinations of designs (3.8%) were included. There was data from 50 different countries, 199 studies were from high-income countries, upper and middle income (n = 38), lower middle-income (n = 39), low-income (n = 3) countries, international study (n = 7) and a further 185 articles did not state the country of research. Most of the studies (63%) focused on risk factors while incidence constituted 37%. Incidence data were reported heterogeneously across studies, leading to an inability to synthesise data. The three most frequently reported risk factors for perinatal stroke were infections, cardiac conditions, and intrapartum factors. Vasculopathies, infection and cardiac conditions accounted for most reported risk factors for paediatric stroke, while chronic conditions such as diabetes mellitus, vasculopathies and cardiac conditions accounted for the most reported risk factors among young adults.
    CONCLUSIONS: This review has highlighted different stroke risk factors for each age cohort of people under 30 years. The low number of epidemiological studies suggests that further research of this type is needed to fully understand the incidence and risk factors in young stroke. A standardised reporting of age groupings of incidence data is imperative to enable the comparison of data from different geographical locations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号