Adult congenital heart disease

成人先天性心脏病
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    欧洲指南提倡以目标为导向的肺动脉高压(PAH)治疗方法,基于全面的风险评估工具,这已经在几个PAH亚组中得到了验证。我们调查了它的歧视能力,并探讨了三尖瓣环平面收缩期偏移(TAPSE)和修订的阈值,以提高其在成人先天性心脏病(CHD)人群中的可预测性。总的来说,223名成年人(42±16岁,66%女性,68%的艾森曼格)来自五个欧洲PAH-CHD专家中心。患者被归类为“低”,\'中级\',或基线访视和4-18个月内随访时的高风险。根据一般PAH指南文书,风险组之间的生存率没有差异(P=n.s.),主要是由于群体分布偏斜。使用N末端脑利钠肽前体(NT-proBNP)和6分钟步行距离(6MWD)的修订阈值对患者进行重新分类(即,\'低\',\'中级\',\'高\'为<500、500-1400、>1400ng/l和>400、165-400和<165m,分别)和使用TAPSE(\'低\',\'中级\',\'High\'as>20,16-20and<16mm)显著改善了基线和随访时风险组之间的歧视(P=0.001,ROC从0.648增加到0.701),重新分类64例(29%)患者。不考虑随访风险组,低风险变量比例较高的患者生存率较好.在9个月的中位随访中,“低风险”状况的改善提供了与“低风险”组患者的生存率相当的生存率。总之,PAH一般风险工具的外部有效性在PAH-CHD患者中的区分价值似乎有限.我们提出了一种改进的风险工具,改进了PAH-CHD的辨别能力。
    European guidelines advocate a goal-oriented treatment approach in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), based on a comprehensive risk assessment instrument, which has been validated in several PAH subgroups. We investigated its discriminatory ability, and explored tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) and revised thresholds to improve its predictability within the adult congenital heart disease (CHD) population. In total, 223 adults (42±16 years, 66% female, 68% Eisenmenger) were enrolled from five European PAH-CHD expert centers. Patients were classified as \'Low\', \'Intermediate\', or \'High\' risk at baseline visit and at follow-up within 4-18 months. By the general PAH guidelines instrument, survival did not differ between the risk groups (P=n.s.), mostly due to skewed group distribution. Reclassifying patients using revised thresholds for N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) (i.e., \'Low\', \'Intermediate\', \'High\' as <500, 500-1400, >1400 ng/l and >400, 165-400 and <165 m, respectively) and use of TAPSE (\'Low\', \'Intermediate\', \'High\' as >20, 16-20 and <16mm) significantly improved discrimination between the risk groups both at baseline and follow-up (P=0.001, ROC increase from 0.648 to 0.701), reclassifying 64 (29%) patients. Irrespective of follow-up risk group, survival was better for patients with higher proportions of low-risk variables. Improvement to a \'Low-risk\' profile at a median of 9 months follow-up provided improved survival comparable to survival of patients who remained in the \'Low risk\' group. In conclusion, the external validity of general risk instrument for PAH appeared to be of limited discriminatory value in PAH-CHD patients. We propose a refined risk instrument with improved discrimination for PAH-CHD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:使用血管紧张素受体阻滞剂/脑啡肽抑制剂(ARNi)和钠-葡萄糖转运蛋白抑制剂(SGLT2i)的指导心力衰竭治疗在改善心力衰竭患者的预后方面越来越有益。
    目的:评估成人先天性心脏病(ACHD)患者指南指导药物治疗(GDMT)的可行性和有效性。
    方法:在一项回顾性队列研究中,46名纽约心脏协会(NYHA)II类症状或全身射血分数(EF)<45%的ACHD患者,在β受体阻滞剂(BB)的组合上优化,ARNi,评估盐皮质激素受体拮抗剂(MRA)和SGLT2i。
    结果:确定了46例患者,平均年龄为42.6±12.1岁。28人(61%)为男性,20(43%)具有系统性右心室(RV),9(20%)具有单心室生理。在优化期间,除了用BB和MRA治疗外,ARNi维持20例(43%),SGLT2i维持42例(91%)。在45周的时间里,左心室(LV)射血分数(EF)的超声心动图参数(7.5%,p=0.006),全身心室(SV)速度时间积分(VTI)(+1.9cm,p=0.012)和LV整体纵向应变(GLS)(-2.5%,p=0.005)与单独使用1-2种药物相比,使用3-4种药物时有所改善。使用ARNi或SGLT2i(+8.1%,p=0.017)或组合(+7.0%,p=0.043)与使用两种药物相比,LVEF增加。
    结论:联合GDMT对改善ACHD伴系统性RV和LV患者的心肌特性有益。
    BACKGROUND: Guideline-directed heart failure therapy with angiotensin receptor blocker/neprilysin inhibitor (ARNi) and sodium-glucose transporter inhibitors (SGLT2i) has been incrementally beneficial in improving outcomes in heart failure patients.
    OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in adults congenital heart disease (ACHD) patients.
    METHODS: In a retrospective cohort study, ACHD patients with either New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class II symptoms or systemic ejection fraction (EF) <45%, optimized on a combination of beta-blocker (BB), ARNi, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) and SGLT2i were evaluated.
    RESULTS: Forty-six patients with a mean age 42.6 ± 12.1 years prescribed GDMT were identified. Twenty-eight (61%) were male, 20 (43%) had a systemic right ventricle (RV) and 9 (20%) had single-ventricle physiology. Over the optimization period, 20 (43%) were sustained on ARNi and 42 (91%) on SGLT2i in addition to treatment with BB and MRA. Over a period of 45 weeks, echocardiography parameters for left ventricle (LV) ejection fraction (EF) (+7.5%, p = 0.006), systemic ventricle (SV) velocity time integral (VTI) (+1.9 cm, p = 0.012) and LV global longitudinal strain (GLS) (-2.5%, p = 0.005) improved when 3-4 medications were used versus 1-2 medications alone. The use of either ARNi or SGLT2i (+8.1%, p = 0.017) or in combination (+7.0%, p = 0.043) increased LVEF compared to the use of neither medication.
    CONCLUSIONS: Combination GDMT is beneficial in improving myocardial characteristics in ACHD patients with systemic RV and LV.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:Fontan生理学会导致其他器官系统的慢性变化,这可能会影响长期存活和心脏移植的成功。对Fontan的心脏外影响的评估和治疗不足可能会导致不良结局。Fontan并发症的严重程度分级/顺序共识定义缺乏,这限制了对Fontan特异性发病率如何影响患者预后的理解。
    结果:Fontan患者和生理学专家小组,包括儿科,成人先天性,心力衰竭,和重症监护心脏病学,和小儿肾脏病学,肝病学和心理学,召开会议以制定Fontan并发症的定义。定义是使用严重性分级创建的,序数:1级-轻度;2级中度;3级-重度;4级-致残或危及生命。定义创建后,由21名Fontan循环衰竭专家组成的第二个小组使用改良的Delphi方法对定义进行修改和投票,直至就最终定义达成共识(>90%的一致性,未建议进一步修改).经过三轮修改和投票,就Fontan的所有具体定义达成了共识。Fontan的定义的并发症和发病率包括:解剖Fontan通路阻塞,紫癜,由静脉功能不全引起的全身静脉异常,房性心律失常,室性心律失常,心动过缓,慢性胸腔积液,慢性腹水,蛋白质丢失性肠病,塑料支气管炎,咯血和肺出血,睡眠呼吸暂停,Fontan相关性肝病,门静脉和肝静脉曲张疾病,急性肾损伤影响临床治疗,红细胞增多症,血栓性疾病,反复或严重的细菌感染,皮肤萎缩,肾上腺功能不全,先前中风的身体影响,情绪/行为障碍和神经发育障碍。
    结论:共识,Fontan特异性心脏和心脏外并发症的严重程度分级定义已完成,可用于研究.它们将允许未来对Fontan患者结果进行稳健分析。
    BACKGROUND: Fontan physiology leads to chronic changes in other organ systems that may affect long-term survival and the success of heart transplantation. Inadequate assessment and treatment of the extra-cardiac effects of Fontan may contribute to poor outcomes. Severity-graded/ordinal consensus definitions of Fontan complications are lacking, which limits understanding of how Fontan-specific morbidity affects patients\' outcomes.
    RESULTS: A panel of Fontan patient and physiology experts, including pediatric, adult congenital, heart failure, and critical-care cardiology as well as pediatric nephrology, hepatology and psychology, convened to develop definitions of Fontan complications. Definitions were created by using a severity-graded ordinal scale: grade 1, mild; grade 2, moderate; grade 3, severe; grade 4, disabling or life threatening. Following definition creation, a second panel of 21 experts in Fontan circulatory failure used a modified Delphi methodology to modify and vote on definitions until consensus (> 90% agreement without recommended further modification) was reached on final definitions. After 3 rounds of modifications and voting, consensus agreement was achieved on all Fontan-specific definitions. The defined complications and morbidities of Fontan include: anatomic Fontan pathway obstruction, cyanosis, systemic venous abnormalities resulting from venous insufficiency, atrial arrhythmia, ventricular arrhythmia, bradycardia, chronic pleural effusions, chronic ascites, protein-losing enteropathy, plastic bronchitis, hemoptysis and pulmonary hemorrhage, sleep apnea, Fontan-associated liver disease, portal and hepatic variceal disease, acute kidney injury affecting clinical treatment, polycythemia, thrombotic disease, recurrent or severe bacterial infection, skin atrophy, adrenal insufficiency, physical impact of previous stroke, mood/behavior disorder, and neurodevelopmental disorder.
    CONCLUSIONS: Consensus and severity-graded definitions of Fontan-specific cardiac and extra-cardiac complications were achieved and are available for use in research. They will allow future robust analyses of Fontan patient outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    先天性心脏病患者的运动参与是一个不断发展的主题。美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会发布了一套指南,建议运动参与的类型和水平主要基于解剖缺陷,其次考虑血液动力学影响。最近,欧洲预防心脏病学协会/欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲儿科和先天性心脏病学协会提供了一种基于每位患者的血液动力学和电生理特征的运动参与对比方法,不管解剖学的考虑。这些指南的方法截然不同,但确实有一些相似之处。在这次审查中,我们比较两个文件,专注于目标,人口,体育分类,以及提出建议的方法。这篇综述旨在帮助执业心脏病专家在为患者提供运动参与咨询时整合可用的已发表数据和建议。
    Sports participation in patients with congenital heart disease is an evolving subject. The American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology released a set of guidelines that advise the type and level of sports participation based primarily on anatomical defects with secondary consideration given to hemodynamic effects. Recently, the European Association of Preventive Cardiology/European Society of Cardiology/Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology offered a contrasting approach to sports participation that is based on hemodynamic and electrophysiological profiles of each patient, regardless of anatomical consideration. These guidelines are drastically different in their approaches but do have some similarities. In this review, we compare both documents, focusing on the aim, population, classification of sports, and the methodology of making recommendations. This review aims to assist practicing cardiologists in integrating the available published data and recommendations when counseling patients for sports participation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Practice Guideline
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    冠状动脉异常主动脉起源(AAOCA)的患者需要进行影像学检查以阐明阻塞的多个潜在解剖部位(固定或动态)。一旦修复,血液进入心肌的途径不得遇到:(1)固有的口狭窄,(2)连合或冠间柱附近压迫或扭曲造成的阻塞,(3)动脉离开主动脉壁的狭窄(由于急剧倾斜的“起飞”),(4)由于大血管之间的通道而压缩,(5)沿壁内的狭窄或压迫,或(6)由于肌内(脑内/腔内)过程的压迫。这些位置的详细解剖评估允许外科医生选择适当的修复策略。这些异常的解剖特征中的每一个都应该与特定的手术矫正“匹配”。我们推测最常见的手术修复,有或没有固定的屋顶,往往是不够的,作为孤立,它可能不允许用适当鼻窦的大孔进行矫正,没有动脉间通道.虽然证据基础不足以将这些建议称为正式指南,这些建议应作为进一步有效性测试的基础,并最终演变为更精细的AAOCA管理指南。
    Patients with anomalous aortic origin of a coronary artery (AAOCA) require imaging to clarify the multiple potential anatomic sites of obstruction (fixed or dynamic). Once repaired, the pathway of blood to the myocardium must not encounter: (1) intrinsic ostial stenosis, (2) obstruction from compression or distortion near the commissure or the intercoronary pillar, (3) stenosis where the artery exits the aortic wall (due to an acutely angled \"take-off\"), (4) compression due to a pathway between the great vessels, (5) stenosis or compression along an intramural course, or (6) compression due to an intramuscular (intraseptal/intraconal) course. Detailed anatomic evaluation of each of these locations allows the surgeon to select an appropriate repair strategy, and each of these abnormal anatomic features should be \"matched\" with a particular surgical correction. We speculate that the most common surgical repair, unroofing with or without tacking, is often inadequate, as in isolation, it may not allow for correction with a large orifice from the appropriate sinus, without an interarterial course. While the evidence base is insufficient to call these recommendations formal guidelines, these recommendations should serve as a basis for further validity testing, and ultimate evolution to more granular guidelines on AAOCA management.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    The American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology published practice guidelines for the management of adult congenital heart disease in 2018 and the European Society of Cardiology published analogous guidelines in 2020. Although there are broad areas of consensus between the 2 documents, there are important differences that impact patient management. This review discusses key areas of agreement and disagreement between the 2 guidelines, with discussion of possible reasons for disagreement and potential implications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) continues to rapidly increase worldwide. With an estimated 1.5 million adults with ACHD in the USA alone, there is a growing need for better education in the management of these complex patients and multiple knowledge gaps exist. This manuscript comprehensively reviewed the recent (2020) updated European Society of Cardiology Guidelines for the management of ACHD created by the Task Force for the management of adult congenital heart disease of the European Society of Cardiology, with perioperative implications for the adult cardiac anesthesiologist and intensivist who may be called upon to manage these complex patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    To examine the current status of care and needs of adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) services in the Central and South Eastern European (CESEE) region.
    We obtained data regarding the national ACHD status for 19 CESEE countries from their ACHD representative based on an extensive survey for 2017 and/or 2018. Thirteen countries reported at least one tertiary ACHD centre with a median year of centre establishment in 2007 (interquartile range 2002-2013). ACHD centres reported a median of 2114 patients under active follow-up with an annual cardiac catheter and surgical intervention volume of 49 and 40, respectively. The majority (90%) of catheter or surgical interventions were funded by government reimbursement schemes. However, all 19 countries had financial caps on a hospital level, leading to patient waiting lists and restrictions in the number of procedures that can be performed. The median number of ACHD specialists per country was 3. The majority of centres (75%) did not have ACHD specialist nurses. The six countries with no dedicated ACHD centres had lower Gross Domestic Product per capita compared to the remainder (P = 0.005).
    The majority of countries in CESEE now have established ACHD services with adequate infrastructure and a patient workload comparable to the rest of Europe, but important gaps still exist. ACHD care is challenged or compromised by limited financial resources, insufficient staffing levels, and reimbursement caps on essential procedures compared to Western Europe. Active advocacy and increased resources are required to address the inequalities of care across the continent.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号