Acinetobacter

不动杆菌
  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    背景:耐碳青霉烯鲍曼不动杆菌(CRAB)感染的最佳治疗方法仍存在争议。
    目的:描述头孢地洛治疗CRAB感染的患者的结局,并比较头孢地洛与最佳可用疗法(BAT)的疗效。
    方法:我们搜索了MEDLINE,Cochrane图书馆和EMBASE筛选截至2023年9月发表的原始报告研究合格标准:RCT和观察性研究调查30天死亡率,临床失败,头孢地洛或BAT参与者治疗的患者的微生物学失败或ADRs发生率:因CRAB干预而感染的患者:头孢地洛单药或与其他潜在活性剂联合使用或BAT对BIAS风险的评估:我们使用Cochrane偏差风险工具进行RCT,和纽卡斯尔渥太华量表进行观察研究。
    我们通过随机效应模型进行了荟萃分析,汇集了风险比(RR)。
    结果:我们筛选了801份原始报告,和18项研究(2项随机对照试验,13项队列研究和3项病例系列)纳入分析,总共733名接受头孢地洛治疗的患者,和473接收BAT。在接受头孢地洛的患者中,30天死亡率为42%(95%CI38-47%),微生物失败率48%(95%CI31-65%),临床失败率43%(95%CI32-55%),不良反应发生率为3%(95%CI1-6%)。与接受联合治疗的患者相比,接受头孢地洛单药治疗的患者的死亡率较低(RR:0.64;95%CI:0.43-0.94,p=0.024)。我们发现,与BAT相比,头孢地洛治疗组的死亡率显着降低(RR:0.74;95%CI:0.57-0.95,p=0.02),ADR发生率降低(RR:0.28;95%CI:0.09-0.91,p=0.03)。在微生物学和临床失败率方面没有观察到差异。
    结论:我们的数据加强了头孢地洛在CRAB感染中的疗效和安全性。
    BACKGROUND: The best treatment for carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) infections is still a matter of debate.
    OBJECTIVE: To describe the outcomes of patients treated with cefiderocol for CRAB infections, and to compare the efficacy of cefiderocol versus best available therapy (BAT).
    METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library and EMBASE to screen original reports published up to September 2023.
    METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies investigating 30-day mortality, clinical failure, microbiological failure or rate of adverse drug reactions of patients treated with cefiderocol or BAT.
    METHODS: Patients with infections due to CRAB.
    METHODS: Cefiderocol in monotherapy or in combination with other potentially active agents or BAT.
    UNASSIGNED: We used the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for RCTs, and the Newcastle Ottawa scale for observational studies.
    UNASSIGNED: We conducted a meta-analysis pooling risk ratios (RRs) through random effect models.
    RESULTS: We screened 801 original reports, and 18 studies (2 RCTs, 13 cohort studies and 3 case-series) were included in the analysis, for a total 733 patients treated with cefiderocol, and 473 receiving the BAT. Among patients receiving cefiderocol, the 30-day mortality rate was 42% (95% CI 38-47%), the rate of microbiological failure 48% (95% CI 31-65%), the clinical failure rate 43% (95% CI 32-55%), and the rate of ADRs was 3% (95% CI 1-6%). A lower mortality rate was observed among patients receiving cefiderocol monotherapy as compared to those treated with combination regimens (RR: 0.64; 95% CI: 0.43-0.94, p = 0.024). We found a significantly lower mortality rate (RR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.57-0.95, p = 0.02) and a lower rate of ADRs (RR: 0.28; 95% CI: 0.09-0.91, p = 0.03) in the group treated with cefiderocol as compared to BAT. No difference was observed in microbiological and clinical failure rate.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our data strengthen the efficacy and safety profile of cefiderocol in CRAB infections.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:社区获得性不动杆菌肺炎(CAAP)通常表现为快速进展为暴发性疾病,并且并发高死亡率。澳大利亚的流行病学研究很少。
    方法:我们对北昆士兰州20年(2000-2019年)的CAAP菌血症病例进行了回顾性研究。病例是根据微生物,临床,和射线照相参数。获得了患者人口统计学数据,随着微生物,抗生素,死亡率和气候数据。
    结果:共28例CAAP。男性19人(67.9%),23名(82.1%)是澳大利亚土著居民,平均年龄为45.9岁。大多数表现为中度至重度肺炎(25/28(89.3%))。此外,90%的病例有两种或两种以上的危险因素。CAAP的最大危险因素是酒精过量和烟草使用。严重程度无统计学差异,在干季和湿季疾病之间观察到ICU入院或死亡。旱季疾病占病例的35.7%。总死亡率为28.6%。早期使用美罗培南或庆大霉素可降低死亡率,无论其严重程度如何(死亡率为17.6%)。非靶向抗生素治疗与44.4%的死亡率无显著差异相关。
    结论:早期使用靶向抗生素可以降低高死亡率。社区获得性肺炎抗生素治疗的选择应基于严重程度,危险因素和临床怀疑CAAP而不是季节性。
    BACKGROUND: Community-acquired Acinetobacter pneumonia (CAAP) typically presents with rapid progression to fulminant disease and is complicated by high mortality. Australian epidemiological studies are few.
    METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study on bacteraemic cases of CAAP over twenty years (2000-2019) in North Queensland. Cases were selected on microbiologic, clinical, and radiographic parameters. Data on patient demographics were obtained, along with microbial, antibiotic, mortality and climatic data.
    RESULTS: 28 cases of CAAP were included. Nineteen (67.9%) were male, twenty-three (82.1%) were Indigenous Australians, and the mean age was 45.9 years. Most presentations were of moderate to severe pneumonia (25/28 (89.3%)). Furthermore, 90% of cases had two or more risk factors. The strongest risk factors for CAAP were alcohol excess and tobacco use. No statistically significant difference in presenting severity, ICU admission or mortality was seen between dry- and wet-season disease. Dry-season disease accounted for 35.7% of cases. Overall mortality was 28.6%. Early use of meropenem or gentamicin reduced mortality irrespective of presenting severity (mortality 17.6%) Non-targeted antibiotic therapy was associated with a non-significant difference in mortality of 44.4%.
    CONCLUSIONS: Early administration of targeted antibiotics can mitigate a high mortality rate. The choice of antibiotic therapy for community-acquired pneumonia should be based on severity, risk factors and clinical suspicion of CAAP rather than seasonality.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    耐碳青霉烯类鲍曼不动杆菌(CRAB)引起的感染的治疗选择有限。舒巴坦-杜洛巴坦是两种β内酰胺酶抑制剂的组合,在3期临床研究中具有抗CRAB的活性。我们对报告鲍曼不动杆菌对舒巴坦/杜洛巴坦的耐药性的体外研究进行了系统评价。我们认为“抗性”物种是MIC≥8mg/L的物种。该综述包括10项研究(9754个测试的分离株)。总的来说,2.3%的鲍曼不动杆菌对舒巴坦/杜洛巴坦耐药,在CRAB亚组中,这一百分比上升到3.4%,在粘菌素耐药菌株中上升到3.7%。产金属β-内酰胺酶菌株的抗性为100%。总的来说,在12.5%的案例中,舒巴坦/durlobactam抗性与NDM-1的产生有关,在31.7%的病例中,PBP3决定簇中存在取代,在其余病例中,耐药机制未知。总之,鲍曼不动杆菌对舒巴坦/杜洛巴坦的耐药性有限,除了生产MBL的菌株。
    Infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) have limited therapeutic options. Sulbactam-durlobactam is a combination of two βlactamase inhibitors with activity against CRAB under phase 3 clinical investigation. We performed a systematic review on in vitro studies reporting A. baumannii resistances against sulbactam/durlobactam. We considered \"resistant\" species to be those with MIC ≥ 8 mg/L. Ten studies were included in the review (9754 tested isolates). Overall, 2.3% of A. baumannii were resistant to sulbactam/durlobactam, and this percentage rose to 3.4% among CRAB subgroups and to 3.7% among colistin-resistant strains. Resistance was 100% among metallo β-lactamase-producing strains. Overall, in 12.5% of cases, sulbactam/durlobactam resistance was associated with the production of NDM-1, in 31.7% of cases with the substitutions in the PBP3 determinants, and in the remaining cases the resistance mechanism was unknown. In conclusion, A. baumannii resistance towards sulbactam/durlobactam is limited, except for MBL-producing strains.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    新生儿急性化脓性腮腺炎(ASP)是一种罕见的疾病,以易怒为特征,红斑,和受累腺体的压痛。
    在Engilsh文献中报道的病例很少,主要是男性新生儿,以单方面的方式。在我们的案例中,一种多微生物病因(肺炎克雷伯菌,金黄色葡萄球菌,伯氏不动杆菌,和朱尼不动杆菌)被发现。根据对1970年至2020年英语文献中ASP病例的微生物学发现的回顾,金黄色葡萄球菌是最常见的分离微生物(占65名患者总数的47%)。我们的病人出生时接受剖腹产手术,没有母乳喂养,随着奶瓶的使用,ASP开发可能的风险因素。
    ASP可能是由于多微生物的病因。新生儿的初始表现可能不包括典型的体征和症状,比如发烧.口服无菌技术在有免疫力的新生儿中也至关重要。
    Acute suppurative parotitis (ASP) of neonates is a rare condition characterized by irritability, erythema, and tenderness of the affected gland.
    Only few cases have been reported in Engilsh literature, mostly in male neonates, in a unilateral fashion. In our case, a polymicrobial etiology (Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, Acinetobacter ursingii, and Acinetobacter junii) was found. Based on the review of the microbiological findings of cases of ASP in English literature for the years 1970 to 2020, S. aureus is the most commonly isolated microorganism (47% of the total 65 patients). Our patient was born with a C-section procedure and was not breast-fed, making dysbiosis along with the usage of the feeding bottle, possible risk factors for the development of ASP.
    ASP may be due to polymicrobial etiology. Initial presentation in neonates may not include typical signs and symptoms, like fever. Aseptic technique of oral procedures is of utmost importance also in immune-competent neonates.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本系统综述旨在总结筛选策略检测碳青霉烯类耐药革兰阴性菌(肠杆菌科,鲍曼不动杆菌,和铜绿假单胞菌)。
    方法:符合条件的研究是随机试验,非随机对照试验,控制前后研究,和中断的时间序列。我们在中部进行了搜索,pubmed,Embase,认识论,以及虚拟健康库(LILACS,Scielo,世卫组织IBECS,和泛美IBECS)。所有搜索都涵盖了2021年6月4日之前的时间。未应用日期或语言限制。两名评审员根据预定义的选择标准独立评估潜在合格的研究,并提取了有关研究特征的数据,方法,结果,和偏见的风险,使用预先设计的标准化表格。如果可能,我们打算使用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析.我们评估了证据的确定性(CoE),并使用GRADE方法总结了结果。
    结果:我们的搜索策略获得了57,451个参考。没有发现随机试验。16项研究(一项前后对照研究和15项中断时间序列)符合我们的纳入标准,并被纳入审查。大多数研究是在美国的三级护理综合医院进行的,欧洲,和亚洲。11项研究包括在普通病房和重症监护病房住院的成年患者,其中一次是在新生儿重症监护室进行的,两个在血液科或肿瘤科,还有一个在实体器官移植科。在爆发的背景下进行了11项研究。关于使用的检测策略,所有研究均包括高危患者入院时的筛查策略,7项研究报告了接触监测策略.大多数研究是在同时安装或加强感染预防和控制措施的环境中进行的。数据不适合进行荟萃分析,所以结果被呈现为叙事综合。大多数研究表明,在实施积极监测政策后,感染率和定植率都有所下降,但CoE很低.筛查策略可能导致全因死亡率和住院时间的风险几乎没有差异。
    结论:现有证据可能支持对碳青霉烯类耐药革兰阴性菌进行监测培养,但是它的质量很差,所以不能得出可靠的结论。需要进行良好的随机试验或高质量的准实验研究来提高现有证据的确定性。这些研究应评估添加筛查策略作为单一干预措施的效果,并测量临床上重要的结局,例如感染,住院时间,和死亡率。
    This systematic review aims to summarize the evidence on the effects of screening strategies to detect carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria (Enterobacteriaceae, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa).
    Eligible studies were randomized trials, non-randomized controlled trials, controlled before-after studies, and interrupted time series. We conducted searches in CENTRAL, PUBMED, Embase, Epistemonikos, and in multiple databases available in the Virtual Health Library (LILACS, Scielo, WHO IBECS, and PAHO IBECS). All the searches covered the period until 4 June 2021. No date or language restrictions were applied. Two reviewers independently evaluated potentially eligible studies according to predefined selection criteria, and extracted data on study characteristics, methods, outcomes, and risk of bias, using a predesigned standardized form. When possible, we intended to conduct meta-analyses using a random-effect model. We assessed the certainty of the evidence (CoE) and summarized the results using the GRADE approach.
    Our search strategy yielded 57,451 references. No randomized trials were identified. Sixteen studies (one controlled before-after study and 15 interrupted time series) met our inclusion criteria and were included in the review. Most studies were conducted in tertiary care general hospitals from the United States, Europe, and Asia. Eleven studies included adult patients hospitalized in general wards and intensive care units, one was carried out in a neonatal intensive care unit, two in hematology or oncology units, and one in a solid organ transplantation department. Eleven studies were conducted in the setting of an outbreak. Regarding the detection strategy used, all studies included screening strategies for high-risk patients at the moment of admission and 7 studies reported a contact surveillance strategy. Most studies were conducted in settings where infection prevention and control measures were concomitantly installed or reinforced. Data were not suitable for meta-analysis, so the results were presented as a narrative synthesis. Most studies showed a decline in the prevalence of both infection and colonization rates after the implementation of a policy of active surveillance, but the CoE is low. Screening strategies may result in little to no difference in the risk of all-cause mortality and the length of hospital stay.
    Existing evidence may favor the use of surveillance culture to carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria, but its quality is poor, so solid conclusions cannot be drawn. Well-conducted randomized trials or high-quality quasi-experimental studies are needed to improve the certainty of the existing evidence. These studies should assess the effect of the addition of screening strategies as a single intervention and measure clinically important outcomes such as infection, length of hospital stay, and mortality.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Antimicrobial combinations are at the moment the only potential treatment option for pandrug-resistant A. baumannii. A systematic review was conducted in PubMed and Scopus for studies reporting the activity of antimicrobial combinations against A. baumannii resistant to all components of the combination. The clinical relevance of synergistic combinations was assessed based on concentrations achieving synergy and PK/PD models. Eighty-four studies were retrieved including 818 eligible isolates. A variety of combinations (n = 141 double, n = 9 triple) were tested, with a variety of methods. Polymyxin-based combinations were the most studied, either as double or triple combinations with cell-wall acting agents (including sulbactam, carbapenems, glycopeptides), rifamycins and fosfomycin. Non-polymyxin combinations were predominantly based on rifampicin, fosfomycin, sulbactam and avibactam. Several combinations were synergistic at clinically relevant concentrations, while triple combinations appeared more active than the double ones. However, no combination was consistently synergistic against all strains tested. Notably, several studies reported synergy but at concentrations unlikely to be clinically relevant, or the concentration that synergy was observed was unclear. Selecting the most appropriate combinations is likely strain-specific and should be guided by in vitro synergy evaluation. Furthermore, there is an urgent need for clinical studies on the efficacy and safety of such combinations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    Acinetobacter ursingii is an anaerobic gram negative opportunistic coccobacillus, rarely isolated in bacteremic patients. It is mainly found in immunocompromised and severely ill patients with no identifiable source of infection. When isolated into the bloodstream, it usually displays resistance to at least two antimicrobial agents. To date only seven cases of bacteremia due to this microorganism have been reported in adults, of which, this accounts for the second one associated to renal replacement therapy and the first case of a documented catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) in a patient with a hemodialysis catheter. A 78-year-old male presented into the emergency department with acute kidney injury requiring hemodialysis, later developing bacteremia due to Acinetobacter ursingii.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    不动杆菌属,特别是鲍曼不动杆菌,是新型抗生素成为“红色警报”人类病原体的关键优先病原体清单上的第一个病原体。鲍曼不动杆菌是一种新兴的全球抗生素耐药革兰阴性菌,最常见的是引起生物膜相关感染,如呼吸机相关肺炎和导管相关感染。两者都对抗生素治疗有抗药性。鲍曼不动杆菌发展抗生素耐药机制的能力使生物体在医院环境中茁壮成长,促进多重耐药菌株的全球传播。尽管不动杆菌感染在世界各地的医院环境中迅速扩大,感染浓度最高的是重症监护病房(ICU).生物膜是生物或非生物表面上的细菌种群,被包裹在细胞外基质中,在发病机理中起着至关重要的作用。使治疗选择更加困难。尽管鲍曼不动杆菌生物膜的生产涉及多种生物和环境因素,葡萄糖是最重要的成分。生物膜介导的鲍曼不动杆菌感染是与医疗设备相关的最常见的鲍曼不动杆菌感染类型。而且很难治疗.因此,卫生保健工作者(HCWs)应专注于感染预防和安全行动,以避免由医疗器械引起的鲍曼不动杆菌生物膜相关感染,当与抗生物膜结合使用治疗时,它们应该非常有选择性。因此,这篇综述讨论了鲍曼不动杆菌生物膜的形成,它在疾病发病机理中的作用,及其耐药机制。
    Acinetobacter species, particularly Acinetobacter baumannii, is the first pathogen on the critical priority list of pathogens for novel antibiotics to become a \"red-alert\" human pathogen. Acinetobacter baumannii is an emerging global antibiotic-resistant gram-negative bacteria that most typically causes biofilm-associated infections such as ventilator-associated pneumonia and catheter-related infection, both of which are resistant to antibiotic therapy. A. baumannii\'s capacity to develop antibiotic resistance mechanisms allows the organism to thrive in hospital settings, facilitating the global spread of multidrug-resistant strains. Although Acinetobacter infections are quickly expanding throughout hospital environments around the world, the highest concentration of infections occurs in intensive care units (ICUs). Biofilms are populations of bacteria on biotic or abiotic surfaces that are encased in the extracellular matrix and play a crucial role in pathogenesis, making treatment options more difficult. Even though a variety of biological and environmental elements are involved in the production of A. baumannii biofilms, glucose is the most important component. Biofilm-mediated A. baumannii infections are the most common type of A. baumannii infection associated with medical equipment, and they are extremely difficult to treat. As a result, health care workers (HCWs) should focus on infection prevention and safety actions to avoid A. baumannii biofilm-related infections caused by medical devices, and they should be very selective when using treatments in combination with anti-biofilms. Therefore, this review discusses biofilm formation in A. baumannii, its role in disease pathogenesis, and its antimicrobial resistance mechanism.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:区分鲍曼不动杆菌复合体(ABC)感染与定植仍然很困难,并且在多微生物感染中进一步复杂化。
    目的:评估多重微生物ABC感染的频率和相关死亡率。我们假设如果ABC分离反映了某些多微生物感染中的定植,则多微生物感染的死亡率较低。
    方法:在PubMed,Scopus和CENTRAL用于报告ABC肺部和血流感染的研究。通过荟萃分析估计了多微生物感染的比例以及多微生物(与单抗微生物)感染与死亡率之间的关联程度。
    结果:基于来自23个国家的80项研究(9759例感染),多重微生物感染的合并比例为27%(95%CI22-31%),血流和肺部感染的合并比例同样高.在大多数(95%)研究中,多微生物感染的定义可变且不充分。观察到相当大的异质性(I2=95%),在亚组分析和荟萃回归中仍然存在。根据17项研究(2675例感染),多微生物感染与较低的28日死亡率相关(OR=0.75,95%CI0.58~0.98,I2=36%).然而,根据14项研究(953例感染),多重微生物感染与院内死亡率无关(OR=0.97,95%CI0.69~1.35,I2=0%).多微生物(与单抗微生物药物)感染与死亡率相关的证据质量(GRADE)较低,偏倚风险较高。
    结论:多微生物ABC感染是常见的,可能与较低的28天死亡率有关。考虑到微生物感染的异质性和现有文献的局限性,需要更多的研究来阐明多重微生物(vs单抗微生物)ABC感染的临床影响.
    BACKGROUND: Differentiating Acinetobacter baumannii complex (ABC) infection from colonization remains difficult and further complicated in polymicrobial infections.
    OBJECTIVE: To assess the frequency of polymicrobial ABC infections and associated mortality. We hypothesized a lower mortality in polymicrobial infections if ABC isolation reflects colonization in some polymicrobial infections.
    METHODS: A systematic review was conducted in PubMed, Scopus and CENTRAL for studies reporting ABC pulmonary and bloodstream infections. The proportion of infections that were polymicrobial and the magnitude of the association between polymicrobial (vs monomicrobial) infection and mortality were estimated with meta-analyses.
    RESULTS: Based on 80 studies (9759 infections) from 23 countries, the pooled proportion of polymicrobial infection was 27% (95% CI 22-31%) and was similarly high for bloodstream and pulmonary infections. Polymicrobial infection was variably and insufficiently defined in most (95%) studies. Considerable heterogeneity (I2 = 95%) was observed that persisted in subgroup analyses and meta-regressions. Based on 17 studies (2675 infections), polymicrobial infection was associated with lower 28-day mortality (OR = 0.75, 95% CI 0.58-0.98, I2 = 36%). However, polymicrobial infection was not associated with in-hospital mortality (OR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.69-1.35, I2 = 0%) based on 14 studies (953 infections). The quality of evidence (GRADE) for the association of polymicrobial (vs monomicrobial) infection with mortality was low and at high risk of bias.
    CONCLUSIONS: Polymicrobial ABC infections are common and may be associated with lower 28-day mortality. Considering the heterogeneity of polymicrobial infections and limitations of the available literature, more research is required to clarify the clinical impact of polymicrobial (vs monomicrobial) ABC infection.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Over the last century, contamination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) has risen tremendously due to the intensified industrial activities like petrochemical, pharmaceutical, insecticides and fertilizers applications. PAHs are a group of organic pollutants with adverse effects on both humans and the environment. These PAHs are widely distributed in various ecosystems including air, soil, marine water and sediments. Degradation of PAHs generally occurs through processes like photolysis, adsorption, volatilization, chemical degradation and microbial degradation. Microbial degradation of PAHs is done by the utilization of diverse microorganisms like algae, bacteria, fungi which are readily compatible with biodegrading/bio transforming PAHs into H2O, CO2 under aerobic, or CH4 under anaerobic environment. The rate of PAHs degradation using microbes is mainly governed by various cultivation conditions like temperature, pH, nutrients availability, microbial population, chemical nature of PAHs, oxygen and degree of acclimation. Several microbial species including Selenastrum capricornutum, Ralstonia basilensis, Acinetobacter haemolyticus, Pseudomonas migulae, Sphingomonas yanoikuyae and Chlorella sorokiniana are known to degrade PAHs via biosorption and enzyme-mediated degradation. Numerous bacterial mediated PAHs degradation methods are studied globally. Among them, PAHs degradation by bacterial species like Pseudomonas fluorescence, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Rhodococcus spp., Paenibacillus spp., Mycobacterium spp., and Haemophilus spp., by various degradation modes like biosurfactant, bioaugmentation, biostimulation and biofilms mediated are also investigated. In contrarily, PAHs degradation by fungal species such as Pleurotus ostreatus, Polyporus sulphureus, Fusarium oxysporum occurs using the activity of its ligninolytic enzymes such as lignin peroxidase, laccase, and manganese peroxidase. The present review highlighted on the PAHs degradation activity by the algal, fungal, bacterial species and also focused on their mode of degradation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号