Abstract：
In the DSM-5 Alternative Model of Personality Disorders (AMPD), psychopathy is marked by the presence of attention seeking, low anxiousness, and lack of social withdrawal, along with traits from the domains of Antagonism and Disinhibition. The triarchic model of psychopathy (TriPM) posits three biobehaviorally based traits underlying it: disinhibition, meanness, and boldness. The current study directly compared relations for measures of the two models with the broad dimensions of externalizing, internalizing, and positive adjustment. Participants (1,678 adults) were surveyed regarding maladaptive personality traits, clinical symptoms, and positive adjustment features. The TriPM model explained more variance than the AMPD in substance use, positive adjustment, and empathy, whereas the AMPD model explained more variance in internalizing symptoms. In addition, AMPD Antagonism and the Psychopathy Specifier diverged from TriPM Meanness and Boldness in their associations with some specific outcomes. Overall, our study provides evidence for complementarity of the two models in characterizing the multifaceted nature of psychopathy.
摘要：
在DSM-5人格障碍替代模型(AMPD)中，精神病的特点是寻求注意力的存在，低焦虑,缺乏社会退缩，以及拮抗和去抑制领域的特征。精神病的三元模型（TriPM）提出了三个基于生物行为的特征：去抑制，卑鄙，和大胆。当前的研究直接比较了两种模型的度量与外部化的广泛维度的关系，内化，积极的调整。参与者(1678名成年人)接受了关于适应不良人格特质的调查，临床症状,和积极的调整功能。TriPM模型在物质使用方面比AMPD解释了更多的方差，积极调整,和同理心，而AMPD模型解释了内在化症状的更多差异。此外,AMPD拮抗和精神病患者在某些特定结果的关联上与TriPM的卑鄙和大胆不同。总的来说,我们的研究为两种模型在描述精神病的多面性方面的互补性提供了证据.
