RESULTS: A systematic literature search yielded 26 studies with 527 participants, grouped by mean CS into low (11.5 km·h-1; 95% CI, 11.2-11.8), medium (13.4 km·h-1; 95% CI, 11.2-11.8), and high (16.0 km·h-1; 95% CI, 15.7-16.3) groups. Across all studies, T1 occurred at 82.3% of CS (95% CI, 81.1-83.6). In the medium- and high-CS groups, T1 occurred at a higher fraction of CS (83.2% CS, 95% CI, 81.3-85.1, and 84.2% CS, 95% CI, 82.3-86.1, respectively) relative to the low-CS group (80.6% CS, 95% CI, 78.0-83.2).
CONCLUSIONS: The study highlights some uncertainty in the fraction of T1 relative to CS, influenced by inconsistent approaches in determining both boundaries. However, our findings serve as a foundation for remote analysis and prescription of exercise intensity, although testing is recommended for more precise applications.
结果:系统的文献检索产生了26项研究,527名参与者,按平均CS分为低(11.5km·h-1;95%CI,11.2-11.8),中等(13.4km·h-1;95%CI,11.2-11.8),高(16.0km·h-1;95%CI,15.7-16.3)组。在所有研究中,T1发生在CS的82.3%(95%CI,81.1-83.6)。在中、高CS组中,T1发生在较高的CS分数(83.2%CS,95%CI,81.3-85.1和84.2%CS,95%CI,分别为82.3-86.1)相对于低CS组(80.6%CS,95%CI,78.0-83.2)。
结论:该研究强调了T1相对于CS的部分的一些不确定性,受确定两个边界的不一致方法的影响。然而,我们的发现为远程分析和规定运动强度奠定了基础,虽然测试建议用于更精确的应用。