PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
BACKGROUND: Gender representation trends at the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) Annual Meetings and the effect of the 2018 \'We R SAGES\' initiatives are unknown. We assessed gender trends in oral presentations at the SAGES Annual Meeting between 2012 and 2022 with a focus on assessing the impact of the 2018 initiatives.
METHODS: Abstracts selected for oral presentations from 2012 to 2022 were reviewed for presenter and first, second, and senior author gender. Gender was categorized as woman, man, or unknown using public professional profiles. Subsequent publications were identified using search engines. The primary outcome was the temporal trend of proportion of women in each role using interrupted time series analysis. Secondary outcomes included publication rates based on first and senior author genders in 2012-2018 versus 2019-2022.
RESULTS: 1605 abstracts were reviewed. The proportion of women increased linearly in all categories: presenter (2.4%/year, R2 = 0.91), first author (2.4%/year, R2 = 0.90), senior author (2%/year, R2 = 0.65), and overall (2.2%, R2 = 0.91), (p < 0.01 for all). Prior to 2018, the proportion of women increased annually for presenters (coefficient: 0.026, 95% CI [0.016, 0.037], p = 0.002) and first authors (coefficient: 0.026, 95% CI [0.016, 0.037], p = 0.002), but there was no significant increase after 2018 (p > 0.05). Female second author proportion increased annually prior to 2018 (coefficient: 0.012, 95% CI [0.003, 0.021], p = 0.042) and increased by 0.139 (95% CI [0.070, 0.208], p = 0.006) in 2018. Annual female senior author proportion did not significantly change after 2018 (p > 0.05). 1198 (75.2%) abstracts led to publications. Women were as likely as men to be first (79% vs 77%, p = 0.284) or senior author (79% vs 77%, p = 0.702) in abstracts culminating in publications. There was no difference in woman first author publication rate before and after 2018 (80% vs 79%, p = 1.000), but woman senior author publication rate increased after 2018 (71% vs 83%, p = 0.032).
CONCLUSIONS: There was an upward trend in women surgeons\' presentations and associated publications in the SAGES Annual Meetings over the last decade.
METHODS: Abstracts selected for oral presentations from 2012 to 2022 were reviewed for presenter and first, second, and senior author gender. Gender was categorized as woman, man, or unknown using public professional profiles. Subsequent publications were identified using search engines. The primary outcome was the temporal trend of proportion of women in each role using interrupted time series analysis. Secondary outcomes included publication rates based on first and senior author genders in 2012-2018 versus 2019-2022.
RESULTS: 1605 abstracts were reviewed. The proportion of women increased linearly in all categories: presenter (2.4%/year, R2 = 0.91), first author (2.4%/year, R2 = 0.90), senior author (2%/year, R2 = 0.65), and overall (2.2%, R2 = 0.91), (p < 0.01 for all). Prior to 2018, the proportion of women increased annually for presenters (coefficient: 0.026, 95% CI [0.016, 0.037], p = 0.002) and first authors (coefficient: 0.026, 95% CI [0.016, 0.037], p = 0.002), but there was no significant increase after 2018 (p > 0.05). Female second author proportion increased annually prior to 2018 (coefficient: 0.012, 95% CI [0.003, 0.021], p = 0.042) and increased by 0.139 (95% CI [0.070, 0.208], p = 0.006) in 2018. Annual female senior author proportion did not significantly change after 2018 (p > 0.05). 1198 (75.2%) abstracts led to publications. Women were as likely as men to be first (79% vs 77%, p = 0.284) or senior author (79% vs 77%, p = 0.702) in abstracts culminating in publications. There was no difference in woman first author publication rate before and after 2018 (80% vs 79%, p = 1.000), but woman senior author publication rate increased after 2018 (71% vs 83%, p = 0.032).
CONCLUSIONS: There was an upward trend in women surgeons\' presentations and associated publications in the SAGES Annual Meetings over the last decade.
摘要：
背景：美国胃肠和内窥镜外科医师学会（SAGES）年会上的性别代表趋势以及2018年“WeRSAGES”计划的影响尚不清楚。我们在2012年至2022年SAGES年会上的口头报告中评估了性别趋势，重点是评估2018年倡议的影响。
方法：从2012年到2022年为口头报告选择的摘要进行了回顾，首先，第二,和资深作者性别。性别被归类为女性，男人,或使用公共专业资料未知。使用搜索引擎确定了随后的出版物。主要结果是使用中断时间序列分析得出每个角色中女性比例的时间趋势。次要结果包括2012-2018年与2019-2022年基于第一和高级作者性别的发表率。
结果：综述了1605篇摘要。在所有类别中，女性比例呈线性增长:主持人(2.4%/年，R2=0.91),第一作者(2.4%/年，R2=0.90),资深作者(2%/年，R2=0.65),和总体(2.2%，R2=0.91),（所有P<0.01）。在2018年之前，主持人的女性比例每年都在增加(系数：0.026，95%CI[0.016，0.037]，p=0.002)和第一作者(系数：0.026，95%CI[0.016，0.037]，p=0.002),但2018年后无显著增加(p>0.05)。2018年之前，女性第二作者比例逐年增加(系数：0.012，95%CI[0.003，0.021]，p=0.042)，增加0.139(95%CI[0.070，0.208]，2018年p=0.006）。2018年后，年度女性高级作者比例没有显着变化（p>0.05）。1198（75.2%）摘要导致出版物。女性和男性一样有可能成为第一（79％vs77％，p=0.284)或资深作者(79%对77%，p=0.702)在摘要中最终成为出版物。2018年前后女性第一作者发表率没有差异(80%vs79%，p=1.000),但女性资深作者发表率在2018年后有所增加(71%对83%，p=0.032)。
结论：在过去十年中，女外科医生在SAGES年会上的演讲和相关出版物呈上升趋势。
方法：从2012年到2022年为口头报告选择的摘要进行了回顾，首先，第二,和资深作者性别。性别被归类为女性，男人,或使用公共专业资料未知。使用搜索引擎确定了随后的出版物。主要结果是使用中断时间序列分析得出每个角色中女性比例的时间趋势。次要结果包括2012-2018年与2019-2022年基于第一和高级作者性别的发表率。
结果：综述了1605篇摘要。在所有类别中，女性比例呈线性增长:主持人(2.4%/年，R2=0.91),第一作者(2.4%/年，R2=0.90),资深作者(2%/年，R2=0.65),和总体(2.2%，R2=0.91),（所有P<0.01）。在2018年之前，主持人的女性比例每年都在增加(系数：0.026，95%CI[0.016，0.037]，p=0.002)和第一作者(系数：0.026，95%CI[0.016，0.037]，p=0.002),但2018年后无显著增加(p>0.05)。2018年之前，女性第二作者比例逐年增加(系数：0.012，95%CI[0.003，0.021]，p=0.042)，增加0.139(95%CI[0.070，0.208]，2018年p=0.006）。2018年后，年度女性高级作者比例没有显着变化（p>0.05）。1198（75.2%）摘要导致出版物。女性和男性一样有可能成为第一（79％vs77％，p=0.284)或资深作者(79%对77%，p=0.702)在摘要中最终成为出版物。2018年前后女性第一作者发表率没有差异(80%vs79%，p=1.000),但女性资深作者发表率在2018年后有所增加(71%对83%，p=0.032)。
结论：在过去十年中，女外科医生在SAGES年会上的演讲和相关出版物呈上升趋势。
