PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
UNASSIGNED: To compare incisor angulation and/or position changes among orthodontically treated patients with metal brackets and clear aligners.
UNASSIGNED: A total of sixty-two participants of both sexes, aged-16-40 years old, with CL I skeletal pattern and mild crowding following strict eligibility criteria were included. The patients were divided into two groups based on their treatment approach. Pre and post lateral cephalograms were collected from Riyadh Elm University (REU) and then digitally analyzed using WEBCEPH (Medical Image Analysis) software. Eight angular and two linear measurements were used for the assessment.
UNASSIGNED: The upper incisor angulation and position showed statistically significant differences when orthodontic clear aligners were used. In contrast, no significant difference was observed with the conventional orthodontic treatment. However, the upper incisal palatal root torque decreased after clear aligner therapy compared to conventional treatment. The inter-incisal angle demonstrated a significant increase with clear aligners compared to conventional treatment.
UNASSIGNED: The current study revealed the importance of definitive guidelines upon and after treatment, in addition to determining incisor changes. Orthodontic clear aligners are distinct from conventional treatments in controlling the incisors\' angulation and position. The expansion treatment modality precedes Interproximal reduction in increasing the arch perimeter.
UNASSIGNED: A total of sixty-two participants of both sexes, aged-16-40 years old, with CL I skeletal pattern and mild crowding following strict eligibility criteria were included. The patients were divided into two groups based on their treatment approach. Pre and post lateral cephalograms were collected from Riyadh Elm University (REU) and then digitally analyzed using WEBCEPH (Medical Image Analysis) software. Eight angular and two linear measurements were used for the assessment.
UNASSIGNED: The upper incisor angulation and position showed statistically significant differences when orthodontic clear aligners were used. In contrast, no significant difference was observed with the conventional orthodontic treatment. However, the upper incisal palatal root torque decreased after clear aligner therapy compared to conventional treatment. The inter-incisal angle demonstrated a significant increase with clear aligners compared to conventional treatment.
UNASSIGNED: The current study revealed the importance of definitive guidelines upon and after treatment, in addition to determining incisor changes. Orthodontic clear aligners are distinct from conventional treatments in controlling the incisors\' angulation and position. The expansion treatment modality precedes Interproximal reduction in increasing the arch perimeter.
摘要：
■比较金属托槽和透明矫正器正畸治疗的患者的切牙角度和/或位置变化。
■共有62名男女参与者，年龄-16-40岁，符合严格合格标准的CLI骨骼模式和轻度拥挤。根据患者的治疗方法将患者分为两组。从利雅得榆树大学(REU)收集前和后外侧头颅图,然后使用WEBCEPH(医学图像分析)软件进行数字分析。八个角度和两个线性测量用于评估。
■当使用正畸透明对齐器时，上切牙角度和位置显示出统计学上的显着差异。相比之下,与传统正畸治疗无显著差异。然而,与常规治疗相比，清除矫正器治疗后上切腭根部扭矩降低。与常规治疗相比，清晰的对准器显示出明显的增加。
■当前的研究揭示了治疗前后明确指南的重要性，除了确定门牙的变化。正畸透明矫正器在控制门牙角度和位置方面与传统治疗方法不同。在增加足弓周长方面，扩张治疗方式先于邻间减少。
■共有62名男女参与者，年龄-16-40岁，符合严格合格标准的CLI骨骼模式和轻度拥挤。根据患者的治疗方法将患者分为两组。从利雅得榆树大学(REU)收集前和后外侧头颅图,然后使用WEBCEPH(医学图像分析)软件进行数字分析。八个角度和两个线性测量用于评估。
■当使用正畸透明对齐器时，上切牙角度和位置显示出统计学上的显着差异。相比之下,与传统正畸治疗无显著差异。然而,与常规治疗相比，清除矫正器治疗后上切腭根部扭矩降低。与常规治疗相比，清晰的对准器显示出明显的增加。
■当前的研究揭示了治疗前后明确指南的重要性，除了确定门牙的变化。正畸透明矫正器在控制门牙角度和位置方面与传统治疗方法不同。在增加足弓周长方面，扩张治疗方式先于邻间减少。
