METHODS: The systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA statement. A systematic literature search was carried out in PubMed, PubPsych and PsycINFO and the results were assessed for eligibility by two independent raters using the PICOS criteria. Only studies that included a mealtime observation were considered suitable for analysis of both explicit and implicit parental communication.
RESULTS: The results of the review suggest that mothers communicate more, with more complexity, and with a greater variety of words with their children during mealtimes compared to fathers. The intention and type of communication is diverse and heterogeneous. In general, parents often tried to encourage their children to eat. Verbal modeling and co-eating appeared to be common behaviors. Mothers with a history of eating disorders expressed more negative emotions during eating than mothers without eating disorders. Findings regarding the use of positive comments and controlling speech are contradicting.
CONCLUSIONS: The review outlines major fields of parent-child communication and modeling behavior around family meals which might be relevant to investigate and integrate into models of intergenerational transmission of eating behavior and disordered eating.
方法:根据PRISMA声明进行系统评价。在PubMed进行了系统的文献检索,PubPsych和PsycINFO以及结果由两名独立评估者使用PICOS标准进行了资格评估。只有包括用餐时间观察的研究才被认为适合分析显性和隐性父母交流。
结果:审查的结果表明,母亲之间的交流更多,更复杂,与父亲相比,他们的孩子在用餐时的话语种类更多。通信的意图和类型是多样和异构的。总的来说,父母经常试图鼓励他们的孩子吃饭。言语建模和共同饮食似乎是常见的行为。有饮食失调史的母亲比没有饮食失调史的母亲在进食过程中表现出更多的负面情绪。关于使用积极评论和控制言论的发现是矛盾的。
结论:这篇综述概述了亲子沟通和家庭聚餐行为建模的主要领域,这可能与调查和整合饮食行为和无序饮食的代际传播模型有关。