METHODS: The aim of our study is to compare the three-factor structure of the ICU in different age groups (preschool, middle childhood, early, and late adolescence) and to test for measurement invariance in a German sample of N = 2368 children and adolescents (M = 11.76 years; SD = 3.72).
RESULTS: The results of our study indicate configural measurement invariance, suggesting that the ICU has the same structure in all age groups but with different meanings, parameters, and mean values in the groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Accordingly, the ICU cannot be applied in the same way to children and adolescents of different age groups, which emphasizes the need for a more differentiated assessment.
方法:我们研究的目的是比较不同年龄段ICU的三因素结构(学龄前,童年中期,早期,和青春期后期),并在N=2368名儿童和青少年(M=11.76岁;SD=3.72)的德国样本中测试测量不变性。
结果:我们的研究结果表明结构测量不变性,这表明ICU在所有年龄组都有相同的结构,但含义不同,参数,以及组中的平均值。
结论:因此,ICU不能以相同的方式应用于不同年龄段的儿童和青少年,这强调了需要进行更有区别的评估。