关键词: Childhood abuse Childhood maltreatment College students Reliability Validity

Mesh : Humans Female Male Reproducibility of Results Students / psychology statistics & numerical data China Young Adult Psychometrics / instrumentation Universities Self Report Adult Self Concept Child Abuse / psychology statistics & numerical data Adolescent Depression / psychology diagnosis Child Adult Survivors of Child Abuse / psychology statistics & numerical data Psychiatric Status Rating Scales / standards Factor Analysis, Statistical

来  源:   DOI:10.1186/s40359-024-01734-5   PDF(Pubmed)

Abstract:
BACKGROUND: The reliability and validity of the current scale for measuring childhood abuse in China are worrying. The development of the Short Version of the Childhood Abuse Self Report Scale (CASRS-12) helps to change this situation, but the effectiveness of the tool has not yet been tested in Chinese participants. This study aims to test the reliability and validity of the CASRS‑12 in Chinese college students.
METHODS: A total of 932 college students were investigated, of whom 418 were investigated for the first time, and only the CASRS‑12 was filled out. In the second survey, 514 participants filled out the CASRS‑12, Depression Scale, Self-esteem Scale and Subjective Well-being Scale in turn. After 4 weeks, 109 participants were selected for retest.
RESULTS: Each item of the CASRS‑12 had good discrimination. Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis (χ2/df = 4. 18, RMSEA = 0. 079, CFI = 0. 95, TLI = 0. 94, IFI = 0. 95, NFI = 0. 94) all supported the four-factor structure of the scale, and the cumulative contribution rate of variance was 76.05%. Cronbach\'s α coefficient and retest reliability were 0.86 and 0.65, respectively. Childhood abuse was positively correlated with depression (r = 0. 42, p < 0.01), and negatively correlated with self-esteem (r=-0. 33, p < 0.01) and subjective well-being (r=-0. 32, p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: The Chinese version of CASRS‑12 meets the measurement standard and could be used to measure the level of childhood abuse of Chinese college students.
摘要:
背景:当前中国儿童期虐待量表的信度和效度令人担忧。短版儿童虐待自我报告量表(CASRS-12)的研制有助于改变这种状况,但该工具的有效性尚未在中国参与者中进行测试。本研究旨在检验CASRS-12在中国大学生中的信度和效度。
方法:对932名大学生进行调查,其中418人是第一次被调查,只填写了CASRS-12。在第二次调查中,514名参与者填写了CASRS-12抑郁量表,自尊量表和主观幸福感量表依次为。4周后,选择109名参与者进行重新测试。
结果:CASRS-12的每一项都有很好的辨别力。探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析(χ2/df=4。18,RMSEA=0。079,CFI=0。95,TLI=0。94,FI=0。95,NFI=0。94)全部支持四因素结构的量表,方差的累积贡献率为76.05%。Cronbach的α系数和重测可靠度分别为0.86和0.65。儿童期虐待与抑郁呈正相关(r=0。42,p<0.01),与自尊呈负相关(r=-0。33,p<0.01)和主观幸福感(r=-0。32,p<0.01)。
结论:中文版CASRS‑12符合测量标准,可用于测量中国大学生的儿童期虐待水平。
公众号