METHODS: Data was extracted from N = 11 studies with k = 19 effect sizes retrieved from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL and citation searching by hand in June 2023 and updated in October 2023. Standardized mean differences were calculated, and a random-effects three-level meta-analysis was conducted. Effect heterogeneity was assessed using Q and I2.
RESULTS: HCC during pregnancy was higher among PTB than term groups, but effects were not statistically significant (z = 0.11, 95% CI: - 0.28, 0.51, p = .54) and total heterogeneity was high (Q16 = 60.01, p < .001, I2Total = 92.30%). After leaving out two possible outlier studies in sensitivity analyses, HCC was lower among preterm compared to term delivering groups, although not statistically significant (z = - 0.06, 95% CI: - 0.20, 0.08, p = .39) but with a substantially reduced total heterogeneity (Q12 = 16.45, p = .17, I2Total = 42.15%). No moderators affected the estimates significantly, but an effect of trimester and gestational age at delivery is likely.
CONCLUSIONS: There is currently no evidence of prenatal HCC differences between PTB and term groups as effects were small, imprecise, and not significant. Low statistical power and methodological weaknesses of the small-scale studies challenge possible biological inferences from the small effects, but further research on HCC during pregnancy is highly encouraged.
方法:数据来自从PubMed检索到的N=11项具有k=19效应大小的研究,Embase,WebofScience,CINAHL和引文搜索于2023年6月进行,并于2023年10月进行了更新。计算了标准化的平均差异,并进行了随机效应三水平荟萃分析。使用Q和I2评估效应异质性。
结果:PTB组妊娠期间HCC高于足月,但效果无统计学意义(z=0.11,95%CI:-0.28,0.51,p=.54),总异质性高(Q16=60.01,p<.001,I2总计=92.30%)。在敏感性分析中遗漏了两个可能的离群值研究之后,与足月分娩组相比,早产组HCC较低,虽然没有统计学意义(z=-0.06,95%CI:-0.20,0.08,p=.39),但总异质性大大降低(Q12=16.45,p=.17,I2总计=42.15%)。没有主持人对估计有重大影响,但在分娩时妊娠和胎龄的影响是可能的。
结论:目前尚无PTB和足月组之间的产前HCC差异的证据,因为影响很小,不精确,并不重要。小规模研究的低统计能力和方法学弱点挑战了可能的生物学推论,但在怀孕期间肝癌的进一步研究是高度鼓励。