Meta-analysis

Meta 分析
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    常规进行远端胃切除术(DG)和淋巴结清扫术治疗胃癌。在这个荟萃分析中,我们提供了腹腔镜DG(LDG)和机器人DG(RDG)的围手术期和肿瘤学结局的最新概述,以比较DG患者的安全性和总体结局.使用MEDLINE进行了广泛的搜索,EMBASE,PubMed,WebofScience,从数据库建立到2023年6月,Cochrane中央对照试验登记册用于比较RDG和LDG的随机临床试验。主要结果是手术结果,术后恢复,并发症,切除的充分性,和长期生存。我们确定了20项研究,评估5,447例患者(1,968例和3,479例接受RDG和LDG治疗的患者,分别)。我们观察到两组在近端切缘方面无显著差异,解剖的淋巴结数量,主要并发症,吻合部位渗漏,时间到了第一次排气,和住院时间。RDG组手术时间较长(P<0.00001),出血较少(P=0.0001),远端切除边缘较长(P=0.02),较早的口服时间(P=0.02),总体并发症较少(P=0.004),且费用高于LDG组(P<0.0001)。由于可接受的并发症和根治性切除的可能性,RDG是改善LDG的有前途的方法。更长的手术时间和更高的成本不应该阻止研究人员探索机器人手术的新应用。
    Distal gastrectomy (DG) with lymph node dissection for gastric cancer is routinely performed. In this meta-analysis, we present an updated overview of the perioperative and oncological outcomes of laparoscopic DG (LDG) and robotic DG (RDG) to compare their safety and overall outcomes in patients undergoing DG. An extensive search was conducted using the MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from the establishment of the database to June 2023 for randomized clinical trials comparing RDG and LDG. The primary outcome was operative results, postoperative recovery, complications, adequacy of resection, and long-term survival. We identified twenty studies, evaluating 5,447 patients (1,968 and 3,479 patients treated with RDG and LDG, respectively). We observed no significant differences between the two groups in terms of the proximal resection margin, number of dissected lymph nodes, major complications, anastomosis site leakage, time to first flatus, and length of hospital stay. The RDG group had a longer operative time (P < 0.00001), lesser bleeding (P = 0.0001), longer distal resection margin (P = 0.02), earlier time to oral intake (P = 0.02), fewer overall complications (P = 0.004), and higher costs (P < 0.0001) than the LDG group. RDG is a promising approach for improving LDG owing to acceptable complications and the possibility of radical resection. Longer operative times and higher costs should not prevent researchers from exploring new applications of robotic surgery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在评估运动疗法对轴性脊柱关节炎(axSpA)患者的有效性。
    方法:从数据库开始到2024年3月,我们搜索了PubMed(通过Medline),科克伦图书馆,Embase,WebofScience,Scopus,和SPORTDiscus适用于所有相关出版物,不受任何语言限制。
    方法:我们纳入了axSpA患者的随机对照试验(RCTs),其中至少有一组患者接受了运动疗法。
    方法:两名独立审稿人使用Cochrane协作偏差风险工具2.0评估文献质量。结果为强直性脊柱炎(AS)疾病活动评分(ASDAS),巴斯AS疾病活动指数(BASDAI),浴AS功能指数(BASFI),BathAS计量学指数(BASMI),6分钟步行距离(6MWT),胸部扩展能力,峰值耗氧量(VO2peak),疼痛,疲劳,C反应蛋白(CRP),和红细胞沉降率(ESR)。
    结果:共20项RCT,包括1670名病人,包括在这项研究中。与对照组相比,运动疗法改善了BASFI(加权平均差[WMD]:-0.49,95%置信区间[CI]:-0.65至-0.32,I2=3.4%,P=0.414),BASMI(大规模毁灭性武器:-0.49,95%CI:-0.87至-0.11,I2=71.9%,P=0.679),BASDAI(大规模杀伤性武器:-0.78,95%CI:-1.08,-0.47,I2=55.9%,P=0.021),ASDAS(大规模毁灭性武器:-0.44,95%CI:-0.64至-0.24,I2=0.0%,P=0.424),VO2peak(WMD:3.16,95%CI:1.37至4.94,I2=0.0%,P=0.873),6MWT(大规模毁灭性武器:27.64,95%CI:12.04至43.24,I2=0.0%,P=0.922),疼痛(标准化平均差[SMD]:-0.47,95%CI:-0.74至-0.21,I2=66.0%,P=0.046)和疲劳(SMD:-0.49,95%CI:-0.71至-0.27,I2=0.0%,P=0.446)。然而,胸部扩张没有发现显著的好处,CRP,和ESR结果。
    结论:运动疗法是改善axSpA疾病控制和症状缓解的有效策略。
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of exercise therapy for Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) patients.
    METHODS: From the database inception to March 2024, we searched PubMed (via Medline), Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and SPORTDiscus for all relevant publications without any language restriction.
    METHODS: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for axSpA patients in which at least one group received exercise therapy.
    METHODS: Two independent reviewers assessed the quality of the literature using the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool 2.0. The outcomes were ankylosing spondylitis (AS) disease activity score (ASDAS), Bath AS disease activity index (BASDAI), Bath AS functional index (BASFI), Bath AS metrology index (BASMI), 6-minute walk distance (6MWT), Chest expansion capacity, Peak oxygen consumption (VO2peak), pain, fatigue, C-reactive protein (CRP), and Eythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR).
    RESULTS: A total of 20 RCTs, including 1,670 patients, were included in this study. Compared with the control group, exercise therapy improved BASFI (weighted mean difference [WMD]: -0.49, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.65 to -0.32, I2= 3.4%, P=0.414), BASMI (WMD: -0.49, 95% CI: -0.87 to -0.11, I2= 71.9%, P=0.679), BASDAI (WMD: -0.78, 95% CI: -1.08, -0.47, I2=55.9%, P=0.021), ASDAS (WMD: -0.44, 95% CI: -0.64 to -0.24, I2 =0.0%, P=0.424), VO2peak (WMD: 3.16, 95% CI: 1.37 to 4.94, I2=0.0%, P=0.873), 6MWT (WMD: 27.64, 95% CI: 12.04 to 43.24, I2= 0.0%, P=0.922), Pain (standardized mean difference [SMD]: -0.47, 95% CI: -0.74 to -0.21, I2= 66.0%, P=0.046) and Fatigue (SMD: -0.49, 95% CI: -0.71 to -0.27, I2= 0.0%, P=0.446). However, no significant benefit was found in Chest expansion, CRP, and ESR outcomes.
    CONCLUSIONS: Exercise therapy is an effective strategy for improving disease control and symptom relief in axSpA.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管许多研究已经调查了社区居住的老年人中轻度认知障碍(MCI)的可改变的危险因素,没有荟萃分析总结了这些发现.从2000年1月1日至2023年12月30日搜索了五个数据库。该协议已在PROSPERO注册。根据系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目提取和报告数据。对可改变的危险因素进行相关荟萃分析。通过队列研究的GRADE评估每个因素的证据。在16,651次引用中,包括87项研究,涉及225,584名社区居住老年人。进行了14项荟萃分析,涉及20项研究,共44,199名参与者。分析显示,低到中等质量的证据支持糖尿病,2或更多合并症,焦虑,冷漠,抑郁症状,和身体虚弱是老年人发生MCI的危险因素.相反,高血压,激动,易怒可能不是危险因素。此外,中等质量的证据支持参与认知需求活动对MCI发病的保护作用.总的来说,这项研究是关于老年人MCI发展的各种危险因素的首次广泛证据汇编.我们的发现对于指导制定预防和管理策略以预防或可能逆转MCI的发作具有重要的潜力。
    Although numerous studies have investigated modifiable risk factors for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) among community-dwelling seniors, no meta-analysis has summarized these findings. Five databases were searched from January 1, 2000, to December 30, 2023. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO. Data were extracted and reported following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Relevant meta-analyses of modifiable risk factors were performed. The evidence of each factor was assessed by the GRADE for cohort studies. Of 16,651 citations, 87 studies involving 225,584 community-dwelling seniors were included. Fourteen meta-analyses involving 20 studies with 44,199 participants were performed. The analyses revealed low-to-moderate-quality evidence supporting that diabetes, 2 or more comorbidities, anxiety, apathy, depressive symptoms, and physical frailty were risk factors for incident MCI in older adults. Conversely, hypertension, agitation, and irritability might not be risk factors. Additionally, moderate-quality evidence supports the protective effect of engaging in cognitive-demanding activities on the onset of MCI. Collectively, this study constitutes the first extensive compilation of evidence regarding the various risk factors for the development of MCI in older adults. Our findings hold significant potential to guide the formulation of prevention and management strategies to either prevent or potentially reverse the onset of MCI.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:颈椎前路椎间盘切除术和融合术(ACDF)的最佳融合策略选择仍然是一个尚未解决的问题。本研究旨在对ACDF中使用的各种融合策略的融合率和并发症率进行网络荟萃分析和系统评价。
    方法:本研究遵循Prisma指南,我们搜索了PubMed,Embase,科克伦图书馆,和WebofScience从成立到2022年11月11日,用于比较ACDF中融合方式的有效性和安全性的RCT。主要结果是融合率和并发症率。PROSPERO编号为CRD42022374440。
    结果:这项荟萃分析确定了26项RCT研究,包括15种融合方法中的1789名患者。自体移植+平板(CATG+P)融合率最高,超越其他方法,如自体骨移植(ICAG)和人工骨移植(AFG)。具有自体移植物的独立笼(SATG)具有第二高的融合率。关于并发症发生率,人工骨移植(CAFG)的比例最高,比其他方法。ICAG的并发症发生率高于ICAG+P,AFG,SAFG,SATG,和CALG。SATG在融合和并发症发生率方面均表现良好。
    结论:在这项研究中,我们进行了首次网络荟萃分析,以比较ACDF中各种融合方法的有效性和安全性.我们的研究结果表明,SATG,在融合率和并发症发生率方面表现优异,可能是ACDF的最佳选择。然而,在其他研究提供进一步证据之前,应谨慎解释结果.
    OBJECTIVE: The optimal choice for fusion strategy in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) remains an unresolved issue. This study aims to perform a network meta-analysis and systematic review of fusion rate and complication rate of various fusion strategies used in ACDF.
    METHODS: This study followed Prisma guidelines, and we searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science from inception to November 11, 2022, for RCTs comparing the efficacy and safety of fusion modalities in ACDF. The primary outcome was the fusion rate and complication rate. The PROSPERO number is CRD42022374440.
    RESULTS: This meta-analysis identified 26 RCT studies with 1789 patients across 15 fusion methods. The cage with autograft + plating (CATG + P) showed the highest fusion rate, surpassing other methods like iliac crest autograft (ICAG) and artificial bone graft (AFG). The stand-alone cage with autograft (SATG) had the second highest fusion rate. Regarding complication rate, the cage with artificial bone graft (CAFG) had the highest rate, more than other methods. The ICAG had a higher complication rate compared to ICAG + P, AFG, SAFG, SATG, and CALG. The SATG performed well in both fusion and complication rate.
    CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we conducted the first network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of various fusion methods in ACDF. Our findings suggest that SATG, with superior performance in fusion rate and complication rate, may be the optimal choice for ACDF. However, the results should be interpreted cautiously until additional research provides further evidence.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在资源分配背景下,个人不仅对自己,而且对他人的不公平待遇都有强烈的厌恶。然而,对于这两种类型的不公平之间的共同性和区别,没有明确的共识。此外,许多神经影像学研究已经调查了人们在上述两种情况下如何评估和应对不公平,但结果的一致性仍有待研究。为了解决这两个问题,我们试图总结现有的关于对自我和他人不公平的发现,并通过以往神经影像学研究的荟萃分析,进一步阐明与区分评估和反应过程相关的神经基础.我们的结果表明,这两种类型的不公平一致激活情感和冲突相关的前岛(AI)和背侧前扣带皮质/补充运动区(dACC/SMA),但是与自我不公平相关的激活似乎比与他人相关的激活更强,这表明个人对不公平和对自我不公平有更大的厌恶反应。在评估过程中,自我激活双边人工智能的不公平,dACC,和右背外侧前额叶皮质(DLPFC),与不公平厌恶相关的地区,冲突,和认知控制,指示反应性,情感和自动反应。相比之下,对与心理理论相关的其他激活领域的不公平,下顶叶小叶和颞顶交界处(IPL-TPJ),这表明需要从他人的角度做出理性的判断。在回应中,自我激活与情感相关的左AI和纹状体的不公平,而对他人的不公平激活了认知控制领域,左侧DLPFC和丘脑。这表明前者保持了自动化和情绪化的特征,而后者需要认知控制。这些发现提供了对自我不公平和对他人不公平的共同和独特的神经认知机制的细粒度描述。总的来说,本研究不仅验证了不公平厌恶模型,而且为神经生物学模型的公平性提供了神经机制的直接证据。
    Under resource distribution context, individuals have a strong aversion to unfair treatment not only toward themselves but also toward others. However, there is no clear consensus regarding the commonality and distinction between these two types of unfairness. Moreover, many neuroimaging studies have investigated how people evaluate and respond to unfairness in the abovementioned two contexts, but the consistency of the results remains to be investigated. To resolve these two issues, we sought to summarize existing findings regarding unfairness to self and others and to further elucidate the neural underpinnings related to distinguishing evaluation and response processes through meta-analyses of previous neuroimaging studies. Our results indicated that both types of unfairness consistently activate the affective and conflict-related anterior insula (AI) and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex/supplementary motor area (dACC/SMA), but the activations related to unfairness to self appeared stronger than those related to others, suggesting that individuals had negative reactions to both unfairness and a greater aversive response toward unfairness to self. During the evaluation process, unfairness to self activated the bilateral AI, dACC, and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), regions associated with unfairness aversion, conflict, and cognitive control, indicating reactive, emotional and automatic responses. In contrast, unfairness to others activated areas associated with theory of mind, the inferior parietal lobule and temporoparietal junction (IPL-TPJ), suggesting that making rational judgments from the perspective of others was needed. During the response, unfairness to self activated the affective-related left AI and striatum, whereas unfairness to others activated cognitive control areas, the left DLPFC and the thalamus. This indicated that the former maintained the traits of automaticity and emotionality, whereas the latter necessitated cognitive control. These findings provide a fine-grained description of the common and distinct neurocognitive mechanisms underlying unfairness to self and unfairness to others. Overall, this study not only validates the inequity aversion model but also provides direct evidence of neural mechanisms for neurobiological models of fairness.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:进行了一项荟萃分析,以评估阻力训练对促炎细胞因子C反应蛋白(CRP)的影响。白细胞介素6(IL6),和肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)在中老年人中的作用。
    方法:WebofScience和其他大型电子数据库的检索期默认为2022年3月。纳入和排除的研究人员都是关于抗阻运动对老年人炎症标志物影响的独立检查文献。物理医疗证据数据库量表(物理治疗证据数据库,PEDro)用于评估研究质量,用Revmen5.3结束指标分析。
    结果:经过四轮淘汰,最终包括12个项目。该研究的总样本量为388人。抗阻训练大大降低了中老年人的CRP水平,SMD=-0.56和95%置信区间([-0.78,-0.34],相应地,P<0.00001。抗阻训练可以成功降低中老年人的IL6浓度,虽然综合影响不大。SMD=-0.25,95%CI[-0.54,0.04];P=0.09。在中年人和老年人进行抗阻运动后,TNF-浓度没有显着变化。总体效果为SMD=-0.07,置信区间为95%[-0.37,0.23],P=0.64。
    结论:阻力训练可降低CRP,中老年人IL6和TNF-α水平。然而,对TNF-α无明显抗炎作用。中等程度的抗阻运动3次/周,持续时间为6-12周或16-32周,显著降低CRP水平。这项工作有助于探索老年人的阻力训练计划,以减少炎症标志物,进一步,为老年人参加抗阻训练和降低炎症标志物浓度提供建议。
    OBJECTIVE: A meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the impact of resistance training on pro-inflammatory cytokines c-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin 6 (IL 6), and tumor necrosis factor- α (TNF- α) in middle-aged and elderly individuals.
    METHODS: The retrieval period for the Web of Science and other large electronic databases is set by default to March 2022. Both included and excluded researchers are independent examination literature on the impact of resistance exercise on markers of inflammation in the elderly. The physical medical care Evidence Database scale (Physical Therapy Evidence Database, PEDro) was used to evaluate the research quality, and Revmen 5.3 was used to end the index analysis.
    RESULTS: After a total of four rounds of elimination, 12 items were eventually included. The total sample size for the research was 388 persons. Resistance training substantially reduced CRP levels in middle-aged and older individuals, with SMD = -0.56 and 95 % confidence interval ([-0.78, -0.34], P < 0.00001, correspondingly. Resistance training can successfully lower IL6 concentrations in middle-aged and older adults, although the combined impact is not substantial. SMD = -0.25, 95 % CI [-0.54, 0.04]; P = 0.09. TNF- concentrations did not alter significantly following resistance exercise in middle-aged and older adults. The overall effect was SMD = -0.07, with a 95 % confidence interval [-0.37, 0.23], while P = 0.64.
    CONCLUSIONS: Resistance training reduces CRP, IL6, and TNF-α levels among middle-aged and elderly people. However, it has no significant anti-inflammatory effects on TNF-α. Resistance exercise at a moderate level for 3 times / week with a duration of 6-12 weeks or 16-32 weeks, significantly reduced CRP levels. This work contributing to exploring the resistance training program for the elderly to reduce inflammatory markers, and further, providing suggestions for the elderly to participate in resistance training and reduce the concentration of inflammatory markers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    镉(Cd)在水稻中的积累,一个全球性的环境问题,由于其广泛存在和通过食物链的潜在转移,对人类健康构成了重大威胁。硒(Se),人类和植物必需的微量营养素,可以减少水稻对Cd的吸收,减轻Cd的毒性。然而,硒对Cd污染土壤中水稻生产性能的影响和机制尚不清楚。这里,进行了全球荟萃分析,以评估有关硒补充影响水稻生长和Cd积累的影响和机制的现有知识。结果表明,补硒对Cd污染土壤水稻生长具有显著的正向影响。具体来说,补硒使水稻根系Cd积累量下降16.3%(11.8-20.6%),射击量为24.6%(19.9-29.1%),谷物增长37.3%(33.4%-40.9%),分别。谷物Cd的减少与Se剂量和土壤Cd污染水平有关,而与Se类型或施用方法无关。Se通过调节Cd转运蛋白基因(OSLCT1,OSHMA2和OSHMA3)的表达来影响水稻中Cd的积累,增强细胞壁中的Cd固存,降低土壤中Cd的生物有效性。重要的是,硒处理通过刺激光合作用和激活抗氧化酶,促进水稻中硒的富集,减轻与镉暴露相关的氧化损伤。总的来说,硒处理减轻了稻粒中与镉相关的健康危害,特别是在轻度污染的土壤中。这些发现表明,补硒是水稻同时减少Cd和富硒的有希望的策略。
    Cadmium (Cd) accumulation in rice, a global environmental issue, poses a significant threat to human health due to its widespread presence and potential transfer through the food chain. Selenium (Se), an essential micronutrient for humans and plants, can reduce Cd uptake in rice and alleviate Cd-induced toxicity. However, the effects and mechanisms of Se supplementation on rice performance in Cd-contaminated soil remain largely unknown. Here, a global meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the existing knowledge on the effects and mechanisms by which Se supplementation impacts rice growth and Cd accumulation. The result showed that Se supplementation has a significant positive impact on rice growth in Cd-contaminated soil. Specifically, Se supplementation decreased Cd accumulation in rice roots by 16.3 % (11.8-20.6 %), shoots by 24.6 % (19.9-29.1 %), and grain by 37.3 % (33.4-40.9 %), respectively. The grain Cd reduction was associated with Se dose and soil Cd contamination level but not Se type or application method. Se influences Cd accumulation in rice by regulating the expression of Cd transporter genes (OSLCT1, OSHMA2, and OSHMA3), enhancing Cd sequestration in the cell walls, and reducing Cd bioavailability in the soil. Importantly, Se treatment promoted Se enrichment in rice and alleviated oxidative damage associated with Cd exposure by stimulating photosynthesis and activating antioxidant enzymes. Overall, Se treatment mitigated the health hazard associated with Cd in rice grains, particularly in lightly contaminated soil. These findings reveal that Se supplementation is a promising strategy for simultaneous Cd reduction and Se enrichment in rice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    新烟碱(NEO)是目前世界上增长最快,使用最广泛的杀虫剂类。越来越多的证据表明,环境中的长期NEO残留物对非目标土壤动物具有毒性作用。然而,很少有研究对近地天体对土壤动物的影响进行调查,只有少数人专注于全球系统评价或荟萃分析,以量化近地天体对土壤动物的影响。这里,我们对来自113个现场和实验室研究的2940个观察结果进行了荟萃分析,这些研究调查了NEO(浓度为0.001-78,600.000mg/kg)对五个指标中不同土壤动物的影响(即,生存,增长,行为,繁殖,和生化生物标志物)。此外,我们量化了近地天体对不同物种土壤动物的影响。结果表明,近地天体抑制了生存,增长率,行为,和土壤动物的繁殖,并改变生化生物标志物。NEO残基使个体的存活率和寿命均降低了100%。青少年生存的平均值,茧号,卵孵化率降低了97%,100%,84%,分别。个体和茧重量都减少了82%,而NEO残留的增长率下降了88%。我们的荟萃分析证实,近地天体对土壤动物造成重大负面影响。
    Neonicotinoids (NEOs) are currently the fastest-growing and most widely used insecticide class worldwide. Increasing evidence suggests that long-term NEO residues in the environment have toxic effects on non-target soil animals. However, few studies have conducted surveys on the effects of NEOs on soil animals, and only few have focused on global systematic reviews or meta-analysis to quantify the effects of NEOs on soil animals. Here, we present a meta-analysis of 2940 observations from 113 field and laboratory studies that investigated the effects of NEOs (at concentrations of 0.001-78,600.000 mg/kg) on different soil animals across five indicators (i.e., survival, growth, behavior, reproduction, and biochemical biomarkers). Furthermore, we quantify the effects of NEOs on different species of soil animals. Results show that NEOs inhibit the survival, growth rate, behavior, and reproduction of soil animals, and alter biochemical biomarkers. Both the survival rate and longevity of individuals decreased by 100 % with NEO residues. The mean values of juvenile survival, cocoon number, and egg hatchability were reduced by 97 %, 100 %, and 84 %, respectively. Both individual and cocoon weights were reduced by 82 %, while the growth rate decreased by 88 % with NEO residues. Our meta-analysis confirms that NEOs pose significant negative impacts on soil animals.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:基于虚拟现实(VR)的诊断和治疗干预为解决识别和治疗自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)个体的挑战开辟了新的可能性。
    目的:对随机对照试验进行系统评价和荟萃分析,以研究沉浸式VR技术对认知功能的影响,社会,18岁以下儿童和青少年ASD的情绪技能。
    方法:按照“系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目”指南系统地检索了四个数据库,并评估了六个随机对照试验以进行进一步分析。Cochrane偏差风险工具用于评估研究的方法学质量。
    结果:汇总结果有利于VR,并且在社交技能方面实验组和对照组之间存在显着差异(SMD:1.43;95%CI:0.01-2.84;P:0.05),情绪技能(SMD:2.45;95%CI:0.21-4.18;P:0.03)和认知技能。
    结论:VR提供了一系列好处,使其成为ASD儿童和青少年改善认知的有希望的工具,在安全和支持性环境中的社交和情感技能。然而,可访问性,负担能力,自定义,在开发和实施基于VR的ASD干预措施时,成本也是需要考虑的重要方面。
    BACKGROUND: Virtual Reality (VR) based diagnostic and therapeutic interventions have opened up new possibilities for addressing the challenges in identifying and treating individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD).
    OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials to investigate the impact of Immersive VR techniques on the cognitive, social, and emotional skills of under-18 children and adolescents with ASD.
    METHODS: Four databases were systematically searched as per \"Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses\" guidelines and assessed six RCTs for further analysis. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used to assess the methodological quality of the studies.
    RESULTS: Pooled results favoured VR and reported significant differences between experimental and control groups concerning social skills (SMD:1.43; 95 % CI: 0.01-2.84; P: 0.05), emotional skills (SMD: 2.45; 95 % CI: 0.21-4.18; P: 0.03) and cognitive skills.
    CONCLUSIONS: VR offers an array of benefits that make it a promising tool for children and adolescents with ASD to improve their cognitive, social and emotional skills in a safe and supportive setting. However, accessibility, affordability, customization, and cost are also significant aspects to consider when developing and implementing VR-based interventions for ASD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:免疫疗法联合化疗已被批准为不可切除的晚期胃癌(GC)的初始治疗策略。然而,在局部晚期可切除的胃或胃食管交界部腺癌(GC/GEJC)的围手术期化疗中加入免疫治疗的疗效仍不确定.因此,我们对随机对照试验(RCTs)进行了荟萃分析,比较了围手术期免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)加化疗与单纯化疗在局部晚期可切除GC/GEJC患者中的有效性.
    方法:对在线数据库进行了全面搜索,以确定直到2023年11月30日发布的RCT。计算主要结局的几率(OR)和95%置信区间(CI),包括R0切除率,D2淋巴结清扫术,病理完全缓解(pCR),和治疗相关不良事件(TRAEs)。
    结果:共纳入5份RCTs(6份报告)的2718例患者纳入分析。R0切除率和D2淋巴结清扫术的合并OR表明,与ICIs联合治疗与单独化疗相比没有显着差异。然而,ICIs的添加显著提高了pCR率(OR=3.43,95%CI2.61-4.50,p<0.0001)。在任何等级的TRAE和3-4等级的TRAE的发生率中没有观察到显著差异。然而,ICIs联合治疗与任何等级irAE的发生率显着升高相关(OR=4.03,95%CI:2.70-6.00,p<0.0001),以及3-4级IRAE(OR=4.51,95%CI:2.27-8.97,p<0.0001)。
    结论:本研究是首次荟萃分析,证明与化疗相比,局部晚期GC/GEJC患者围手术期联合治疗ICIs可产生更高的pCR率。
    BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy in combination with chemotherapy has been approved as an initial treatment strategy for unresectable advanced gastric cancer (GC). However, the efficacy of adding immunotherapy to perioperative chemotherapy in locally advanced resectable gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GC/GEJC) remains uncertain. Therefore, a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed to compare the effectiveness of perioperative immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in patients with locally advanced resectable GC/GEJC.
    METHODS: A comprehensive search of online databases was conducted to identify RCTs published until November 30, 2023. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated for primary outcomes, including R0 resection rate, D2 lymphadenectomy, pathologic complete response (pCR), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs).
    RESULTS: A total of 2718 patients from five RCTs (six reports) were included in the analysis. The pooled ORs of R0 resection rate and D2 lymphadenectomy demonstrated that combination therapy with ICIs showed no significant difference compared to chemotherapy alone. However, the addition of ICIs significantly improved pCR rates (OR = 3.43, 95 % CI 2.61-4.50, p < 0.0001). There were no significant differences observed in the incidence of any grade TRAEs and grade 3-4 TRAEs. However, ICIs combination therapy was associated with significantly higher incidences of any grade irAEs (OR = 4.03, 95 % CI: 2.70-6.00, p < 0.0001), as well as grade 3-4 irAEs (OR = 4.51, 95 % CI: 2.27-8.97, p < 0.0001).
    CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the first meta-analysis to demonstrate that perioperative combination therapy with ICIs yields superior pCR rates for patients with locally advanced GC/GEJC compared to chemotherapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号