背景:美国海军陆战队(USMC)的招募培训是为期13周的男女兵役预备期。两性之间绝对表现能力的差异可能会影响对新兵训练需求的身体和生理反应。这项研究的目的是在整个新兵培训过程中监控美国海军陆战队的新兵,以比较评估工作量,睡眠,压力,以及男性和女性的表现反应。
方法:共监测并测试了281名新兵(男性=182名,女性=99名;年龄=19±2岁)。工作量,睡眠,压力评估发生在训练的第2周,第7/8周和第11周。工作量(每公斤体重的能量消耗[EEREL],距离[DIS],步骤)和睡眠(连续性和持续时间)在72小时内使用可穿戴式加速度计和心率技术进行跟踪。通过唾液皮质醇分析确定应激反应。性能测试,由相对于体重的反向运动垂直跳跃(CMJ)和等距大腿中部拉力(IMTP)性能组成,发生在第2周和第11周。线性混合模型用于测试性别,时间,和性别-时间互动(α<0.05)。
结果:平均而言,新兵每天行驶13.0±2.7公里,消耗3,762±765卡路里/天,睡6.2±1.1小时/晚。在DIS中发现了按性别划分的互动,steps,睡眠持续时间,皮质醇,和CMJREL性能(P<0.05)。计划对比显示,在第7/8周,男性的DIS覆盖率高于女性(P<.001)。与男性相比,女性在第11周经历了更多的步数(P=.004)。女性的睡眠时间没有明显变化(P>0.05),而男性从第2周到第7/8周增加睡眠时间(P=0.03)。与男性相比,女性在第2周(P=0.03)和第11周(P=0.02)的睡眠时间更长。在第2周(P<.001)和第11周(P<.001),女性的皮质醇水平高于男性。与第2周相比,第7周的女性皮质醇下降(P<.001)。男性在任何时间点都没有经历皮质醇反应的变化(P>.05)。从第2周到第11周,男女CMJREL均出现下降(P>.001)。对EEREL观察到性别主要影响,DIS,CMJREL,和IMTPREL(P<.05),男性经历更大的整体工作量,产生更大的力量和力量指标。睡眠连续性和皮质醇对性别的主要影响(P<0.05)。与女性相比,男性经历了更低的价值观。对EEREL进行了时间主效应观察,DIS,steps,皮质醇,CMJREL,和IMTPREL(P<0.05)。
结论:这项研究不仅突出了男女已知的性别差异,而且还揭示了每个性别对军事训练的不同身体和生理反应。有趣的是,在训练周期早期发生的最大的身体需求。尽管工作量在减少,在整个训练过程中保持了应激反应,这可能会对适应和性能产生影响。此外,平均睡眠持续时间明显低于优化健康和恢复的建议.在招募训练期间有效监控需求和表现结果对于确定个人健身能力至关重要,以及建立培训计划的有效性。个人绩效评估和适当的工作量可能有助于优化男女招募培训。
BACKGROUND: The U.S. Marine Corps (USMC) recruit training is a 13-week preparatory period for military service men and women. Differences in absolute performance capabilities between sexes may impact physical and physiological responses to the demands of recruit training. The purpose of this study was to monitor U.S. Marine Corps recruits throughout recruit training to comparatively assess workload, sleep, stress, and performance responses in men and women.
METHODS: A total of 281 recruits (men = 182 and women = 99; age = 19 ± 2 years) were monitored and tested. Workload, sleep, and stress assessments occurred at week 2, week 7/8, and week 11 of training. Workload (energy expenditure per kg body mass [EEREL], distance [DIS], steps) and sleep (continuity and duration) were tracked over 72-hour periods using wearable accelerometry and heart rate technology. Stress responses were determined through salivary cortisol analyses. Performance testing, consisting of countermovement vertical jump (CMJ) and isometric mid-thigh pull (IMTP) performance relative to body mass, occurred at weeks 2 and 11. Linear mixed models were used to test for sex, time, and sex-by-time interactions (α < .05).
RESULTS: On average, recruits covered 13.0 ± 2.7 km/day, expended 3,762 ± 765 calories/day, and slept 6.2 ± 1.1 hours/night. Sex-by-time interactions were found for DIS, steps, sleep duration, cortisol, and CMJREL performance (P < .05). Planned contrasts revealed that men covered more DIS than women at week 7/8 (P < .001). Women experienced greater step counts compared to men at week 11 (P = .004). Women experienced no significant change in sleep duration (P > .05), whereas men increased sleep duration from week 2 to week 7/8 (P = .03). Women experienced greater sleep duration at week 2 (P = .03) and week 11 (P = .02) compared to men. Women exhibited higher cortisol levels than men at week 2 (P < .001) and week 11 (P < .001). Women experienced declines in cortisol at week 7 compared to week 2 (P < .001). Men experienced no changes in cortisol response at any timepoint (P > .05). Both sexes experienced declines in CMJREL from week 2 to week 11 (P > .001). Sex main effects were observed for EEREL, DIS, CMJREL, and IMTPREL (P < .05) with men experiencing greater overall workloads and producing greater strength and power metrics. Sex main effects were also found for sleep continuity and cortisol (P < .05), for which men experienced lower values compared to women. Time main effects were observed for EEREL, DIS, steps, cortisol, CMJREL, and IMTPREL (P < .05).
CONCLUSIONS: This study not only highlights the known sex differences between men and women but also sheds light on the different physical and physiological responses of each sex to military training. Interestingly, the greatest physical demands incurred earlier in the training cycle. Despite declining workloads, the stress response was maintained throughout the training, which may have implications for adaptation and performance. In addition, average sleep duration fell notably below recommendations for optimizing health and recovery. Effectively monitoring the demands and performance outcomes during recruit training is essential for determining individual fitness capabilities, as well as establishing the effectiveness of a training program. Individual performance assessments and adequately periodized workloads may help to optimize recruit training for both men and women.