PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
BACKGROUND: There has been an increased interest in understanding social anxiety (SA) and SA disorder (SAD) antecedents and consequences as they occur in real time, resulting in a proliferation of studies using ambulatory assessment (AA). Despite the exponential growth of research in this area, these studies have not been synthesized yet.
OBJECTIVE: This review aimed to identify and describe the latest advances in the understanding of SA and SAD through the use of AA.
METHODS: Following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, a systematic literature search was conducted in Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science.
RESULTS: A total of 70 articles met the inclusion criteria. The qualitative synthesis of these studies showed that AA permitted the exploration of the emotional, cognitive, and behavioral dynamics associated with the experience of SA and SAD. In line with the available models of SA and SAD, emotion regulation, perseverative cognition, cognitive factors, substance use, and interactional patterns were the principal topics of the included studies. In addition, the incorporation of AA to study psychological interventions, multimodal assessment using sensors and biosensors, and transcultural differences were some of the identified emerging topics.
CONCLUSIONS: AA constitutes a very powerful methodology to grasp SA from a complementary perspective to laboratory experiments and usual self-report measures, shedding light on the cognitive, emotional, and behavioral antecedents and consequences of SA and the development and maintenance of SAD as a mental disorder.
OBJECTIVE: This review aimed to identify and describe the latest advances in the understanding of SA and SAD through the use of AA.
METHODS: Following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, a systematic literature search was conducted in Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science.
RESULTS: A total of 70 articles met the inclusion criteria. The qualitative synthesis of these studies showed that AA permitted the exploration of the emotional, cognitive, and behavioral dynamics associated with the experience of SA and SAD. In line with the available models of SA and SAD, emotion regulation, perseverative cognition, cognitive factors, substance use, and interactional patterns were the principal topics of the included studies. In addition, the incorporation of AA to study psychological interventions, multimodal assessment using sensors and biosensors, and transcultural differences were some of the identified emerging topics.
CONCLUSIONS: AA constitutes a very powerful methodology to grasp SA from a complementary perspective to laboratory experiments and usual self-report measures, shedding light on the cognitive, emotional, and behavioral antecedents and consequences of SA and the development and maintenance of SAD as a mental disorder.
摘要：
背景：对实时发生的社交焦虑（SA）和SA障碍（SAD）的前兆和后果的理解越来越感兴趣，导致使用动态评估（AA）的研究激增。尽管这一领域的研究呈指数级增长，这些研究尚未合成。
目的：这篇综述旨在确定和描述通过使用AA对SA和SAD的理解的最新进展。
方法：遵循PRISMA（系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目）指南，在Scopus进行了系统的文献检索，PubMed,和WebofScience。
结果：共有70篇文章符合纳入标准。这些研究的定性综合表明，AA允许对情感的探索，认知，以及与SA和SAD经验相关的行为动力学。与SA和SAD的可用型号一致，情绪调节,坚持不懈的认知，认知因素，物质使用,互动模式是纳入研究的主要主题。此外,将AA纳入研究心理干预措施，使用传感器和生物传感器的多模态评估，和跨文化差异是一些确定的新兴主题。
结论：AA构成了一种非常强大的方法，可以从实验室实验和通常的自我报告措施的补充角度来掌握SA，照亮认知，情感,以及SA的行为前兆和后果以及SAD作为精神障碍的发展和维持。
目的：这篇综述旨在确定和描述通过使用AA对SA和SAD的理解的最新进展。
方法：遵循PRISMA（系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目）指南，在Scopus进行了系统的文献检索，PubMed,和WebofScience。
结果：共有70篇文章符合纳入标准。这些研究的定性综合表明，AA允许对情感的探索，认知，以及与SA和SAD经验相关的行为动力学。与SA和SAD的可用型号一致，情绪调节,坚持不懈的认知，认知因素，物质使用,互动模式是纳入研究的主要主题。此外,将AA纳入研究心理干预措施，使用传感器和生物传感器的多模态评估，和跨文化差异是一些确定的新兴主题。
结论：AA构成了一种非常强大的方法，可以从实验室实验和通常的自我报告措施的补充角度来掌握SA，照亮认知，情感,以及SA的行为前兆和后果以及SAD作为精神障碍的发展和维持。
