mHealth

mHealth
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:及时有效地识别患有抑郁症(DS)的个体对于提供及时治疗至关重要。机器学习模型在这一领域表现出了希望;然而,研究往往不足以证明使用这些模型的实际好处,并且无法提供切实的实际应用。
    目的:本研究旨在建立一种新的方法来识别可能表现出DS的个体,通过概率测度以更可解释的方式识别最有影响力的特征,并提出可用于实际应用的工具。
    方法:该研究使用了3个数据集:PROACTIVE,2013年巴西国家健康调查(PesquisaNacionaldeSaúde[PNS])和PNS2019,包括社会人口统计学和健康相关特征。使用贝叶斯网络进行特征选择。然后使用选定的特征来训练机器学习模型以预测DS,在9项患者健康问卷中,评分≥10。与随机方法相比,该研究还分析了不同敏感性率对减少筛选访谈的影响。
    结果:该方法允许用户在灵敏度之间进行明智的权衡,特异性,减少面试次数。在通过最大化Youden指数确定的阈值0.444、0.412和0.472下,模型的灵敏度为0.717、0.741和0.718,特异性为0.644、0.737和0.766,分别为PNS2013和PNS2019。这3个数据集的接收器工作特性曲线下面积分别为0.736、0.801和0.809,分别。对于PROACTIVE数据集,最具影响力的特征是姿势平衡,呼吸急促,以及老年人的感觉。在PNS2013数据集中,特点是能够进行日常活动,胸痛,睡眠问题,和慢性背部问题。PNS2019数据集与PNS2013数据集共享3个最具影响力的特征。然而,不同的是用言语虐待代替了慢性背部问题。重要的是要注意,PNS数据集中包含的特征与PROACTIVE数据集中的特征不同。实证分析表明,使用所提出的模型可导致筛选访谈减少52%,同时保持0.80的敏感性。
    结论:这项研究开发了一种新的方法来识别患有DS的个体,展示了使用贝叶斯网络识别最重要特征的实用性。此外,这种方法有可能大大减少筛选访谈的数量,同时保持高度的敏感性,从而促进改善DS患者的早期识别和干预策略。
    BACKGROUND: Identifying individuals with depressive symptomatology (DS) promptly and effectively is of paramount importance for providing timely treatment. Machine learning models have shown promise in this area; however, studies often fall short in demonstrating the practical benefits of using these models and fail to provide tangible real-world applications.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to establish a novel methodology for identifying individuals likely to exhibit DS, identify the most influential features in a more explainable way via probabilistic measures, and propose tools that can be used in real-world applications.
    METHODS: The study used 3 data sets: PROACTIVE, the Brazilian National Health Survey (Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde [PNS]) 2013, and PNS 2019, comprising sociodemographic and health-related features. A Bayesian network was used for feature selection. Selected features were then used to train machine learning models to predict DS, operationalized as a score of ≥10 on the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire. The study also analyzed the impact of varying sensitivity rates on the reduction of screening interviews compared to a random approach.
    RESULTS: The methodology allows the users to make an informed trade-off among sensitivity, specificity, and a reduction in the number of interviews. At the thresholds of 0.444, 0.412, and 0.472, determined by maximizing the Youden index, the models achieved sensitivities of 0.717, 0.741, and 0.718, and specificities of 0.644, 0.737, and 0.766 for PROACTIVE, PNS 2013, and PNS 2019, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.736, 0.801, and 0.809 for these 3 data sets, respectively. For the PROACTIVE data set, the most influential features identified were postural balance, shortness of breath, and how old people feel they are. In the PNS 2013 data set, the features were the ability to do usual activities, chest pain, sleep problems, and chronic back problems. The PNS 2019 data set shared 3 of the most influential features with the PNS 2013 data set. However, the difference was the replacement of chronic back problems with verbal abuse. It is important to note that the features contained in the PNS data sets differ from those found in the PROACTIVE data set. An empirical analysis demonstrated that using the proposed model led to a potential reduction in screening interviews of up to 52% while maintaining a sensitivity of 0.80.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study developed a novel methodology for identifying individuals with DS, demonstrating the utility of using Bayesian networks to identify the most significant features. Moreover, this approach has the potential to substantially reduce the number of screening interviews while maintaining high sensitivity, thereby facilitating improved early identification and intervention strategies for individuals experiencing DS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:老年人吃腐烂的水果和食物中毒的风险更大,因为他们的认知功能随着年龄的增长而下降,很难区分腐烂的水果。为了解决这个问题,研究人员开发并评估了各种工具,以各种方式检测腐烂的食物。然而,很少有人知道如何创建一个应用程序来检测腐烂的食物,以支持老年人吃腐烂的食物有健康问题的风险。
    目的:这项研究旨在(1)创建一个智能手机应用程序,使老年人能够用相机拍摄食物,并将水果分类为腐烂或不腐烂的老年人和(2)评估应用程序的可用性和老年人对应用程序的看法。
    方法:我们开发了一个智能手机应用程序,该应用程序支持老年人确定本研究选择的3种水果(苹果,香蕉,和橙色)足够新鲜吃。我们使用了几个剩余深度网络来检查收集到的水果照片是否为新鲜水果。我们招募了65岁以上的健康老年人(n=15,57.7%,男性,n=11,42.3%,女性)作为参与者。我们通过调查和访谈评估了应用程序的可用性和参与者对应用程序的看法。我们分析了调查结果,包括事后调查问卷,作为应用程序可用性的评价指标,并从受访者那里收集定性数据,对调查答复进行深入分析。
    结果:参与者对使用应用程序通过拍摄水果照片来确定水果是否新鲜感到满意,但不愿意使用付费版本的应用程序。调查结果显示,参与者倾向于有效地使用该应用程序拍摄水果并确定其新鲜度。对应用程序可用性和参与者对应用程序的看法的定性数据分析表明,他们发现应用程序简单易用,他们拍照没有困难,他们发现应用程序界面在视觉上令人满意。
    结论:这项研究表明开发一款支持老年人有效和高效地识别腐烂食品的应用程序的可能性。未来的工作,使应用程序区分各种食品的新鲜度,而不是选择的3个水果仍然存在。
    BACKGROUND: Older adults are at greater risk of eating rotten fruits and of getting food poisoning because cognitive function declines as they age, making it difficult to distinguish rotten fruits. To address this problem, researchers have developed and evaluated various tools to detect rotten food items in various ways. Nevertheless, little is known about how to create an app to detect rotten food items to support older adults at a risk of health problems from eating rotten food items.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to (1) create a smartphone app that enables older adults to take a picture of food items with a camera and classifies the fruit as rotten or not rotten for older adults and (2) evaluate the usability of the app and the perceptions of older adults about the app.
    METHODS: We developed a smartphone app that supports older adults in determining whether the 3 fruits selected for this study (apple, banana, and orange) were fresh enough to eat. We used several residual deep networks to check whether the fruit photos collected were of fresh fruit. We recruited healthy older adults aged over 65 years (n=15, 57.7%, males and n=11, 42.3%, females) as participants. We evaluated the usability of the app and the participants\' perceptions about the app through surveys and interviews. We analyzed the survey responses, including an after-scenario questionnaire, as evaluation indicators of the usability of the app and collected qualitative data from the interviewees for in-depth analysis of the survey responses.
    RESULTS: The participants were satisfied with using an app to determine whether a fruit is fresh by taking a picture of the fruit but are reluctant to use the paid version of the app. The survey results revealed that the participants tended to use the app efficiently to take pictures of fruits and determine their freshness. The qualitative data analysis on app usability and participants\' perceptions about the app revealed that they found the app simple and easy to use, they had no difficulty taking pictures, and they found the app interface visually satisfactory.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests the possibility of developing an app that supports older adults in identifying rotten food items effectively and efficiently. Future work to make the app distinguish the freshness of various food items other than the 3 fruits selected still remains.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:需要采取干预措施,以解决服用甲基苯丙胺的人寻求治疗的延误和治疗覆盖率低的问题。
    目的:我们的目标是确定基于智能手机的自我管理干预措施是否,“S-Check应用程序”可以增加寻求帮助和改变甲基苯丙胺使用的动机,并确定与应用参与度相关的因素。
    方法:这项研究是一项随机的,28天候补名单控制试验。居住在澳大利亚的同意成年人在上个月至少使用过一次甲基苯丙胺,有资格从Android或iOS应用程序商店免费下载该应用程序。那些随机分配到干预组的人可以立即访问S-Check应用程序,对照组在获得访问之前等待了28天,然后所有人都可以进入,直到第56天。实际寻求帮助和寻求帮助的意图通过修改后的实际寻求帮助问卷(MAHSQ)进行评估,修改后的一般帮助寻求问卷,以及修改后的准备统治者改变甲基苯丙胺使用的动机。对MAHSQ的阳性反应比例的χ2比较,修改后的一般帮助寻求问卷,两组之间进行了修改的准备标尺。Logistic回归模型比较了实际求助的几率,寻求帮助的意图,以及在第28天两组之间改变的动机。次要结果是应用程序最常访问的功能,甲基苯丙胺的使用,应用程序的可行性和可接受性,以及S-Check应用程序参与度与参与者人口统计和甲基苯丙胺使用特征之间的关联。
    结果:总计,560名参与者下载了应用程序;259名(46.3%)完成了eConsent和基线;84名(32.4%)在第28天提供数据。与对照组相比,即时访问组的参与者在第28天更有可能寻求专业帮助(MAHSQ)(n=15,45.5%vsn=12,23.5%;χ21=4.42,P=.04)。实际寻求帮助的几率没有显着差异,寻求帮助的意图,在主要逻辑回归分析中,或改变两组之间甲基苯丙胺使用的动机,而在辅助分析中,估算的数据集显示,与等候组对照组相比,即时访问组参与者寻求专业帮助的几率存在显著差异(调整后比值比2.64,95%CI1.19-5.83,P=.02).对于未在基线寻求帮助的参与者,应用中的每一分钟都会使第28天寻求专业帮助的可能性增加8%(比率1.08,95%CI1.02-1.22,P=.04).在干预组中,应用参与时间增加10分钟与甲基苯丙胺使用天数减少0.4天相关(回归系数[β]-0.04,P=.02).
    结论:对于消耗甲基苯丙胺的澳大利亚成年人,S-Check应用程序是一种可行的低资源自我管理干预措施。研究人员很高,虽然在移动健康干预中很常见,保证对S-Check应用程序进行更大规模的研究。
    背景:澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心ACTRN12619000534189;https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=377288&isReview=true。
    BACKGROUND: Interventions are required that address delays in treatment-seeking and low treatment coverage among people consuming methamphetamine.
    OBJECTIVE: We aim to determine whether a self-administered smartphone-based intervention, the \"S-Check app\" can increase help-seeking and motivation to change methamphetamine use, and determine factors associated with app engagement.
    METHODS: This study is a randomized, 28-day waitlist-controlled trial. Consenting adults residing in Australia who reported using methamphetamine at least once in the last month were eligible to download the app for free from Android or iOS app stores. Those randomized to the intervention group had immediate access to the S-Check app, the control group was wait-listed for 28 days before gaining access, and then all had access until day 56. Actual help-seeking and intention to seek help were assessed by the modified Actual Help Seeking Questionnaire (mAHSQ), modified General Help Seeking Questionnaire, and motivation to change methamphetamine use by the modified readiness ruler. χ2 comparisons of the proportion of positive responses to the mAHSQ, modified General Help Seeking Questionnaire, and modified readiness ruler were conducted between the 2 groups. Logistic regression models compared the odds of actual help-seeking, intention to seek help, and motivation to change at day 28 between the 2 groups. Secondary outcomes were the most commonly accessed features of the app, methamphetamine use, feasibility and acceptability of the app, and associations between S-Check app engagement and participant demographic and methamphetamine use characteristics.
    RESULTS: In total, 560 participants downloaded the app; 259 (46.3%) completed eConsent and baseline; and 84 (32.4%) provided data on day 28. Participants in the immediate access group were more likely to seek professional help (mAHSQ) at day 28 than those in the control group (n=15, 45.5% vs n=12, 23.5%; χ21=4.42, P=.04). There was no significant difference in the odds of actual help-seeking, intention to seek help, or motivation to change methamphetamine use between the 2 groups on the primary logistic regression analyses, while in the ancillary analyses, the imputed data set showed a significant difference in the odds of seeking professional help between participants in the immediate access group compared to the waitlist control group (adjusted odds ratio 2.64, 95% CI 1.19-5.83, P=.02). For participants not seeking help at baseline, each minute in the app increased the likelihood of seeking professional help by day 28 by 8% (ratio 1.08, 95% CI 1.02-1.22, P=.04). Among the intervention group, a 10-minute increase in app engagement time was associated with a decrease in days of methamphetamine use by 0.4 days (regression coefficient [β] -0.04, P=.02).
    CONCLUSIONS: The S-Check app is a feasible low-resource self-administered intervention for adults in Australia who consume methamphetamine. Study attrition was high and, while common in mobile health interventions, warrants larger studies of the S-Check app.
    BACKGROUND: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12619000534189; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=377288&isReview=true.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:人工智能(AI)具有增强身体活动(PA)干预的潜力。然而,人为因素(HF)在将AI成功集成到移动健康(mHealth)解决方案中以促进PA的发展中发挥着关键作用。理解和优化个人与AI驱动的mHealth应用程序之间的交互对于实现预期结果至关重要。
    目的:本研究旨在回顾和描述AI驱动的数字解决方案中用于增加PA的HF的当前证据。
    方法:我们通过搜索包含与PA相关的术语的出版物进行了范围审查,HFs,和AI在3个数据库中的标题和摘要-PubMed,Embase,和IEEEXplore-和谷歌学者。如果这些研究是描述基于AI的解决方案旨在提高PA的主要研究,并报告了测试溶液的结果。不符合这些标准的研究被排除在外。此外,我们在收录的文章中检索了相关研究的参考文献。从纳入的研究中提取以下数据,并将其纳入定性综合:书目信息,研究特点,人口,干预,比较,结果,与AI相关的信息。纳入研究的证据的确定性采用GRADE(建议评估分级,发展,和评估)。
    结果:2015年至2023年共发表了15项研究,涉及899名年龄在19至84岁之间的参与者。60.7%(546/899)是女性参与者,包括在这次审查中。在纳入的研究中,干预持续了2到26周。推荐系统是PA数字解决方案中最常用的AI技术(10/15研究),其次是对话代理(4/15研究)。用户可接受性和满意度是最频繁评估的HF(每个研究有5/15),其次是可用性(4/15研究)。关于个性化和推荐的自动数据收集,大多数系统涉及健身追踪器(5/15研究)。证据分析的确定性表明AI驱动的数字技术在增加PA方面的有效性具有中等的确定性(例如,步数,远距离行走,或在PA上花费的时间)。此外,人工智能驱动的技术,特别是推荐系统,似乎对PA行为的变化产生积极影响,尽管证据的确定性很低。
    结论:当前的研究强调了AI驱动技术增强PA的潜力,但证据仍然有限。需要进行更长期的研究来评估人工智能驱动的技术对行为改变和习惯形成的持续影响。虽然AI驱动的PA数字解决方案具有重要的前景,进一步探索优化AI对PA的影响并有效整合AI和HF对于更广泛的利益至关重要。因此,对创新管理的影响涉及进行长期研究,优先考虑多样性,确保研究质量,专注于用户体验,并了解AI在PA推广中不断发展的作用。
    BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to enhance physical activity (PA) interventions. However, human factors (HFs) play a pivotal role in the successful integration of AI into mobile health (mHealth) solutions for promoting PA. Understanding and optimizing the interaction between individuals and AI-driven mHealth apps is essential for achieving the desired outcomes.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to review and describe the current evidence on the HFs in AI-driven digital solutions for increasing PA.
    METHODS: We conducted a scoping review by searching for publications containing terms related to PA, HFs, and AI in the titles and abstracts across 3 databases-PubMed, Embase, and IEEE Xplore-and Google Scholar. Studies were included if they were primary studies describing an AI-based solution aimed at increasing PA, and results from testing the solution were reported. Studies that did not meet these criteria were excluded. Additionally, we searched the references in the included articles for relevant research. The following data were extracted from included studies and incorporated into a qualitative synthesis: bibliographic information, study characteristics, population, intervention, comparison, outcomes, and AI-related information. The certainty of the evidence in the included studies was evaluated using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation).
    RESULTS: A total of 15 studies published between 2015 and 2023 involving 899 participants aged approximately between 19 and 84 years, 60.7% (546/899) of whom were female participants, were included in this review. The interventions lasted between 2 and 26 weeks in the included studies. Recommender systems were the most commonly used AI technology in digital solutions for PA (10/15 studies), followed by conversational agents (4/15 studies). User acceptability and satisfaction were the HFs most frequently evaluated (5/15 studies each), followed by usability (4/15 studies). Regarding automated data collection for personalization and recommendation, most systems involved fitness trackers (5/15 studies). The certainty of the evidence analysis indicates moderate certainty of the effectiveness of AI-driven digital technologies in increasing PA (eg, number of steps, distance walked, or time spent on PA). Furthermore, AI-driven technology, particularly recommender systems, seems to positively influence changes in PA behavior, although with very low certainty evidence.
    CONCLUSIONS: Current research highlights the potential of AI-driven technologies to enhance PA, though the evidence remains limited. Longer-term studies are necessary to assess the sustained impact of AI-driven technologies on behavior change and habit formation. While AI-driven digital solutions for PA hold significant promise, further exploration into optimizing AI\'s impact on PA and effectively integrating AI and HFs is crucial for broader benefits. Thus, the implications for innovation management involve conducting long-term studies, prioritizing diversity, ensuring research quality, focusing on user experience, and understanding the evolving role of AI in PA promotion.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:自杀是全球死亡的主要原因。新闻报道准则旨在遏制不安全报道的影响;然而,在新闻报道中自杀的框架可能因情况和死者的性别等重要特征而有所不同。
    目的:本研究旨在研究新闻媒体对自杀报道使用污名化或荣耀化的语言进行陷害的程度,以及性别和自杀情况在这种陷害方面的差异。
    方法:我们分析了200篇有关自杀的新闻文章,并应用经过验证的自杀污名量表来识别污名化和荣耀化的语言。我们用2个广泛使用的指标来评估语言相似性,余弦相似性和互信息得分,使用基于机器学习的大型语言模型。
    结果:男性自杀的新闻报道比女性自杀的报道更类似于污名化(P<.001)和美化(P=.005)语言。考虑到自杀的情况,互信息得分表明,在使用污名化或美化语言的性别差异最明显的文章归因于法律(0.155),关系(0.268),或心理健康问题(0.251)为原因。
    结论:语言差异,按性别,在报告自杀时使用污名化或美化语言可能会加剧自杀差异。
    BACKGROUND: Suicide is a leading cause of death worldwide. Journalistic reporting guidelines were created to curb the impact of unsafe reporting; however, how suicide is framed in news reports may differ by important characteristics such as the circumstances and the decedent\'s gender.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the degree to which news media reports of suicides are framed using stigmatized or glorified language and differences in such framing by gender and circumstance of suicide.
    METHODS: We analyzed 200 news articles regarding suicides and applied the validated Stigma of Suicide Scale to identify stigmatized and glorified language. We assessed linguistic similarity with 2 widely used metrics, cosine similarity and mutual information scores, using a machine learning-based large language model.
    RESULTS: News reports of male suicides were framed more similarly to stigmatizing (P<.001) and glorifying (P=.005) language than reports of female suicides. Considering the circumstances of suicide, mutual information scores indicated that differences in the use of stigmatizing or glorifying language by gender were most pronounced for articles attributing legal (0.155), relationship (0.268), or mental health problems (0.251) as the cause.
    CONCLUSIONS: Linguistic differences, by gender, in stigmatizing or glorifying language when reporting suicide may exacerbate suicide disparities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:包括锻炼在内的生活方式行为,睡眠,饮食,压力,精神刺激,和社会互动会显著影响患痴呆症的可能性。移动健康(mHealth)应用程序已成为解决这些生活方式行为以实现总体健康和福祉的宝贵工具。人们越来越认识到它们在大脑健康和预防痴呆症方面的潜在用途。有效的应用程序必须以证据为基础,并保护用户数据,解决与痴呆症相关的mHealth应用程序当前状态的差距。
    目的:本研究旨在描述用于预防痴呆症和危险因素的可用应用程序的范围,突出差距,为未来发展提出前进道路。
    方法:对移动应用商店的系统搜索,同行评议的文献,痴呆症和阿尔茨海默氏症协会网站,浏览器搜索从2022年10月19日至2022年11月2日进行。共检索到1044个mHealth应用程序。筛选后,152个应用程序符合纳入标准,并通过配对进行编码,使用提取框架的独立审阅者。该框架改编自西尔伯格尺度,针对类似人群的mHealth应用程序的其他范围审查,和可改变的痴呆危险因素的背景研究。编码要素包括循证和专家可信度,应用程序功能,关注的生活方式元素,隐私和安全。
    结果:在满足最终选择标准的152个应用程序中,88(57.9%)解决了与降低痴呆症风险相关的可改变的生活方式行为。然而,其中许多应用程序(59/152,38.8%)只解决了一种生活方式行为,精神刺激是最常见的。超过一半(84/152,55.2%)在Silberg量表上获得9分中的2分,平均得分为2.4分(SD1.0分)。152个应用中大部分没有披露重要信息:120个(78.9%)没有披露专家咨询,125(82.2%)没有披露基于证据的信息,146(96.1%)没有披露作者证书,134人(88.2%)没有透露他们的信息来源。此外,105个(69.2%)应用程序未披露遵守数据隐私和安全措施的情况。
    结论:mHealth应用程序有机会支持个人从事与降低痴呆风险相关的行为。虽然这些产品有市场,缺乏专注于多种生活方式行为的痴呆症相关应用程序。关于证据库的应用程序开发的严谨性差距,信誉,必须解决遵守数据隐私和安全标准的问题。遵循已建立和验证的指南对于痴呆症相关的应用程序有效并成功推进是必要的。
    BACKGROUND: Lifestyle behaviors including exercise, sleep, diet, stress, mental stimulation, and social interaction significantly impact the likelihood of developing dementia. Mobile health (mHealth) apps have been valuable tools in addressing these lifestyle behaviors for general health and well-being, and there is growing recognition of their potential use for brain health and dementia prevention. Effective apps must be evidence-based and safeguard user data, addressing gaps in the current state of dementia-related mHealth apps.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to describe the scope of available apps for dementia prevention and risk factors, highlighting gaps and suggesting a path forward for future development.
    METHODS: A systematic search of mobile app stores, peer-reviewed literature, dementia and Alzheimer association websites, and browser searches was conducted from October 19, 2022, to November 2, 2022. A total of 1044 mHealth apps were retrieved. After screening, 152 apps met the inclusion criteria and were coded by paired, independent reviewers using an extraction framework. The framework was adapted from the Silberg scale, other scoping reviews of mHealth apps for similar populations, and background research on modifiable dementia risk factors. Coded elements included evidence-based and expert credibility, app features, lifestyle elements of focus, and privacy and security.
    RESULTS: Of the 152 apps that met the final selection criteria, 88 (57.9%) addressed modifiable lifestyle behaviors associated with reducing dementia risk. However, many of these apps (59/152, 38.8%) only addressed one lifestyle behavior, with mental stimulation being the most frequently addressed. More than half (84/152, 55.2%) scored 2 points out of 9 on the Silberg scale, with a mean score of 2.4 (SD 1.0) points. Most of the 152 apps did not disclose essential information: 120 (78.9%) did not disclose expert consultation, 125 (82.2%) did not disclose evidence-based information, 146 (96.1%) did not disclose author credentials, and 134 (88.2%) did not disclose their information sources. In addition, 105 (69.2%) apps did not disclose adherence to data privacy and security practices.
    CONCLUSIONS: There is an opportunity for mHealth apps to support individuals in engaging in behaviors linked to reducing dementia risk. While there is a market for these products, there is a lack of dementia-related apps focused on multiple lifestyle behaviors. Gaps in the rigor of app development regarding evidence base, credibility, and adherence to data privacy and security standards must be addressed. Following established and validated guidelines will be necessary for dementia-related apps to be effective and advance successfully.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    心率变异性生物反馈(HRVB)是一种经过充分研究的干预措施,以其对情绪的积极影响而闻名。认知,和生理健康,包括缓解抑郁症状.然而,它的实际使用受到高成本和缺乏训练有素的专业人员的阻碍。基于智能手机的HRVB,这消除了对外部设备的需求,提供了一个有希望的替代方案,尽管研究有限。此外,经前症状在经期个体中非常普遍,需要低成本,可获得的干预措施,副作用最小。通过这项试点研究,我们的目标是测试,第一次,基于智能手机的HRVB对抑郁和经前症状的影响,以及焦虑/压力症状和注意力控制。
    27名具有高于平均水平的经前或抑郁症状的参与者使用等待列表控制设计进行了为期4周的基于智能手机的光电体积描记术HRVB干预。在干预前后进行了实验室会议,相隔4周。评估包括静息性迷走神经介导的心率变异性(vmHRV),通过修订的注意力网络测试(ANT-R)进行注意力控制,用BDI-II问卷评估抑郁症状,和使用DASS问卷测量的压力/焦虑症状。如果适用,通过PAF问卷记录经前症状。数据分析采用线性混合模型。
    我们观察到经前的改善,抑郁,和焦虑/压力症状,以及ANT-R在干预期间的执行功能评分,而不是在等待列表阶段。然而,我们没有发现vmHRV或ANT-R的定向评分有明显变化。
    这些发现很有希望,无论是基于智能手机的HRVB的有效性还是其缓解经前症状的潜力。然而,提供关于使用HRVB改善经前症状的可靠建议,需要更大样本量的进一步研究来复制这些效应.
    UNASSIGNED: Heart rate variability biofeedback (HRVB) is a well-studied intervention known for its positive effects on emotional, cognitive, and physiological well-being, including relief from depressive symptoms. However, its practical use is hampered by high costs and a lack of trained professionals. Smartphone-based HRVB, which eliminates the need for external devices, offers a promising alternative, albeit with limited research. Additionally, premenstrual symptoms are highly prevalent among menstruating individuals, and there is a need for low-cost, accessible interventions with minimal side effects. With this pilot study, we aim to test, for the first time, the influence of smartphone-based HRVB on depressive and premenstrual symptoms, as well as anxiety/stress symptoms and attentional control.
    UNASSIGNED: Twenty-seven participants with above-average premenstrual or depressive symptoms underwent a 4-week photoplethysmography smartphone-based HRVB intervention using a waitlist-control design. Laboratory sessions were conducted before and after the intervention, spaced exactly 4 weeks apart. Assessments included resting vagally mediated heart rate variability (vmHRV), attentional control via the revised attention network test (ANT-R), depressive symptoms assessed with the BDI-II questionnaire, and stress/anxiety symptoms measured using the DASS questionnaire. Premenstrual symptomatology was recorded through the PAF questionnaire if applicable. Data analysis employed linear mixed models.
    UNASSIGNED: We observed improvements in premenstrual, depressive, and anxiety/stress symptoms, as well as the Executive Functioning Score of the ANT-R during the intervention period but not during the waitlist phase. However, we did not find significant changes in vmHRV or the Orienting Score of the ANT-R.
    UNASSIGNED: These findings are promising, both in terms of the effectiveness of smartphone-based HRVB and its potential to alleviate premenstrual symptoms. Nevertheless, to provide a solid recommendation regarding the use of HRVB for improving premenstrual symptoms, further research with a larger sample size is needed to replicate these effects.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:移动健康(mHealth)在远程评估创伤性牙齿损伤(TDI)和支持急诊护理方面具有新兴的潜力。本研究旨在从智能手机获取的照片中确定TDI检测的诊断准确性。方法:使用智能手机相机应用程序对153名年龄≥6岁的上前牙和下前牙进行拍照。148名符合条件的参与者的照片由牙科专家独立审查,两个普通牙医,还有两个牙科治疗师,使用预定的TDI分类和标准。敏感性,特异性,准确度,正预测值,负预测值,和评估者间的可靠性进行了评估,以评估照相方法相对于牙科专家建立的参考标准的诊断性能。结果:在筛选的1,870颗牙齿中,三分之一的参与者显示TDI;七分之一的参与者有原发性或混合性牙列.比较专家的参考标准和四个牙科专业人员的评论,TDI与非TDI的诊断敏感性和特异性分别为59-95%和47-93%,分别,对于紧急类型的TDI(78-89%和99-100%,单独)。原发性/混合性牙列的诊断一致性也优于永久性牙列。结论:这项研究为远程评估TDI提供了有效的mHealth实践。还报告了在检测紧急类型的TDI和检查原发性/混合性牙列方面的更好诊断性能。未来的方向包括涉及牙科摄影和摄影评估的专业发展活动,结合机器学习技术来辅助摄影评论,和多个临床环境中的随机对照试验。
    Background: Mobile health (mHealth) has an emerging potential for remote assessment of traumatic dental injuries (TDI) and support of emergency care. This study aimed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of TDI detection from smartphone-acquired photographs. Methods: The upper and lower anterior teeth of 153 individuals aged ≥ 6 years were photographed using a smartphone camera app. The photos of 148 eligible participants were reviewed independently by a dental specialist, two general dentists, and two dental therapists, using predetermined TDI classification and criteria. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and inter-rater reliability were estimated to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the photographic method relative to the reference standard established by the dental specialist. Results: Of the 1,870 teeth screened, one-third showed TDI; and one-seventh of the participants had primary or mixed dentitions. Compared between the specialist\'s reference standard and four dental professionals\' reviews, the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity for TDI versus non-TDI were 59-95% and 47-93%, respectively, with better performance for urgent types of TDI (78-89% and 99-100%, separately). The diagnostic consistency was also better for the primary/mixed dentitions than the permanent dentition. Conclusion: This study suggested a valid mHealth practice for remote assessment of TDI. A better diagnostic performance in the detection of urgent types of TDI and examination of the primary/mixed dentition was also reported. Future directions include professional development activities involving dental photography and photographic assessment, incorporation of a machine learning technology to aid photographic reviews, and randomized controlled trials in multiple clinical settings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本综述旨在探讨mHealth支持的积极运动干预对降低髋关节或膝关节OA患者疼痛强度和残疾水平的有效性。
    方法:三个数据库(PubMed、科克伦图书馆,和Webofscience)进行了系统搜索,以获取2012年1月1日至2023年31月7日之间发表的随机对照试验(RCT)。本次审查的PROSPERO注册号为CRD42023394119。
    方法:我们只纳入了由两名独立评审员(JM和GN)鉴定和筛选的RCT。此外,我们对已确定研究的参考列表进行了手动检查,以便进一步纳入.纳入的研究必须为髋关节或膝关节OA患者提供mHealth支持的积极锻炼,并使用问卷调查和性能测试评估疼痛强度和残疾。
    方法:从纳入的研究来看,两位独立作者使用预定的Excel表格提取数据。描述了干预措施的特点,并进行了荟萃分析。
    结果:包括12个RCT,代表1,541名患者,平均年龄58.7±5岁,BMI为28.8±3.1;女性比男性更占优势,女性/男性的总比例为2.2。在75%的研究中,纳入研究的方法学质量为中等质量。与没有mHealth的干预措施相比,mHealth支持的主动运动在减轻疼痛方面没有统计学上的显着差异(SMD=-0.42[95CI-0.91;0.07],p=0.08)和残疾缓解(SMD=-0.36[95CI-0.81;0.09],p=0.10)。然而,在疼痛方面,与单纯的患者教育相比,患者教育与mHealth支持的积极运动之间存在统计学上的显着差异(SMD=-0.42[95CI-0.61;-0.22],p<0.01)和残疾(SMD=-0.27[95CI-0.46;-0.08],p<0.01)减少。
    结论:mHealth支持的运动被发现是有效的,尤其是结合患者教育,减轻髋关节或膝关节OA患者的疼痛和残疾。
    OBJECTIVE: This review aimed to investigate the effectiveness of mHealth-supported active exercise interventions to reduce pain intensity and disability level in persons with hip or knee OA.
    METHODS: Three databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of science) were systematically searched for randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) published between 01-01-2012 and 31-07-2023. PROSPERO registration number of this review was CRD42023394119.
    METHODS: We included only RCTs that were identified and screened by two independent reviewers (JM and GN). In addition, the reference lists of the identified studies were manually checked for further inclusion. Included studies had to provide a mHealth-supported active exercises for persons with hip or knee OA, and evaluate pain intensity and disability using both questionnaires and performance tests.
    METHODS: From the included studies, the two independent authors extracted data using a predetermined Excel form. Characteristics of the interventions were described and a meta-analysis was performed.
    RESULTS: Twelve RCTs were included, representing 1,541 patients with a mean age of 58.7±5 years, and a BMI of 28.8±3.1; females being more predominant than males with a total ratio female/male of 2.2. The methodological quality of the included studies was of moderate quality in 75% of the studies. There was no statistically significant difference between mHealth-supported active exercises compared to the interventions without mHealth in terms of pain reduction (SMD= -0.42 [95%CI -0.91; 0.07], p = 0.08) and disability mitigation (SMD = -0.36 [95%CI -0.81; 0.09], p = 0.10). However, a statistically significant difference was found between patient education combined with mHealth-supported active exercises compared to patient education alone in terms of pain (SMD= -0.42 [95%CI -0.61; -0.22], p<0.01) and disability (SMD= -0.27 [95%CI -0.46; -0.08], p < 0.01) reduction.
    CONCLUSIONS: mHealth-supported exercises were found to be effective, especially when combined with patient education, in reducing pain and mitigating disability in patients with hip or knee OA.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尽管提出了强有力的建议,但减肥手术后对随访(FU)护理的依从性较差。在我们的贝拉飞行员审判中,我们证明,对于减肥手术后的患者,通过智能手机进行完全远程随访是可行且安全的.在这个基础上,我们的目标是在多中心验证我们的结果,随机对照设置。
    方法:本试验计划招募410名在德国7个减肥中心接受原发性减肥手术的参与者。参与者被随机分为两组:对照组根据减肥中心的标准接受当面FU,和使用智能手机应用程序(app)监测的介入组。该应用程序发送有关常规维生素摄入量和锻炼的标准化问卷和提醒。内置的消息传递功能使患者能够与医疗专业人员进行远程通信。一年后,所有参与者均在其主要减肥中心接受评估.主要结果是手术后12个月的体重减轻。次要结果包括肥胖相关的合并症,生活质量,维生素和矿物质的血清值,身体阻抗分析,去急诊室或重新入院,患者依从性,和医务人员的工作量。
    结论:当前的研究是第一个前瞻性的,单独随机对照,多中心试验,其中移动应用程序完全取代传统的当面访问,用于减肥中心的减肥手术后随访。
    BACKGROUND: Adherence to follow-up (FU) care after bariatric surgery is poor despite strong recommendations. In our pilot Bella trial, we demonstrated that a completely remote follow-up program via smartphone is feasible and safe for patients after bariatric surgery. Building on this, we aim to verify our results in a multicenter, randomized controlled setting.
    METHODS: This trial plans to enroll 410 participants undergoing primary bariatric surgery in seven German bariatric centers. Participants are randomized into two groups: a control group receiving in-person FU according to the standard in the bariatric centers, and an interventional group monitored using a smartphone application (app). The app sends standardized questionnaires and reminders regarding regular vitamin intake and exercises. The built-in messaging function enables patients to communicate remotely with medical care professionals. After one year, all participants are evaluated at their primary bariatric centers. The primary outcome is weight loss 12 months after surgery. The secondary outcomes include obesity-related comorbidities, quality of life, serum values of vitamins and minerals, body impedance analysis, visits to the emergency department or readmission, patient compliance, and medical staff workload.
    CONCLUSIONS: The current study is the first prospective, individually randomized-controlled, multicenter trial where a mobile application completely replaces traditional in-person visits for post-bariatric surgery follow-ups in bariatric centers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号