背景:包括锻炼在内的生活方式行为,睡眠,饮食,压力,精神刺激,和社会互动会显著影响患痴呆症的可能性。移动健康(mHealth)应用程序已成为解决这些生活方式行为以实现总体健康和福祉的宝贵工具。人们越来越认识到它们在大脑健康和预防痴呆症方面的潜在用途。有效的应用程序必须以证据为基础,并保护用户数据,解决与痴呆症相关的mHealth应用程序当前状态的差距。
目的:本研究旨在描述用于预防痴呆症和危险因素的可用应用程序的范围,突出差距,为未来发展提出前进道路。
方法:对移动应用商店的系统搜索,同行评议的文献,痴呆症和阿尔茨海默氏症协会网站,浏览器搜索从2022年10月19日至2022年11月2日进行。共检索到1044个mHealth应用程序。筛选后,152个应用程序符合纳入标准,并通过配对进行编码,使用提取框架的独立审阅者。该框架改编自西尔伯格尺度,针对类似人群的mHealth应用程序的其他范围审查,和可改变的痴呆危险因素的背景研究。编码要素包括循证和专家可信度,应用程序功能,关注的生活方式元素,隐私和安全。
结果:在满足最终选择标准的152个应用程序中,88(57.9%)解决了与降低痴呆症风险相关的可改变的生活方式行为。然而,其中许多应用程序(59/152,38.8%)只解决了一种生活方式行为,精神刺激是最常见的。超过一半(84/152,55.2%)在Silberg量表上获得9分中的2分,平均得分为2.4分(SD1.0分)。152个应用中大部分没有披露重要信息:120个(78.9%)没有披露专家咨询,125(82.2%)没有披露基于证据的信息,146(96.1%)没有披露作者证书,134人(88.2%)没有透露他们的信息来源。此外,105个(69.2%)应用程序未披露遵守数据隐私和安全措施的情况。
结论:mHealth应用程序有机会支持个人从事与降低痴呆风险相关的行为。虽然这些产品有市场,缺乏专注于多种生活方式行为的痴呆症相关应用程序。关于证据库的应用程序开发的严谨性差距,信誉,必须解决遵守数据隐私和安全标准的问题。遵循已建立和验证的指南对于痴呆症相关的应用程序有效并成功推进是必要的。
BACKGROUND: Lifestyle behaviors including exercise, sleep, diet, stress, mental stimulation, and social interaction significantly impact the likelihood of developing dementia. Mobile health (
mHealth) apps have been valuable tools in addressing these lifestyle behaviors for general health and well-being, and there is growing recognition of their potential use for brain health and dementia prevention. Effective apps must be evidence-based and safeguard user data, addressing gaps in the current state of dementia-related
mHealth apps.
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to describe the scope of available apps for dementia prevention and risk factors, highlighting gaps and suggesting a path forward for future development.
METHODS: A systematic search of mobile app stores, peer-reviewed literature, dementia and Alzheimer association websites, and browser searches was conducted from October 19, 2022, to November 2, 2022. A total of 1044
mHealth apps were retrieved. After screening, 152 apps met the inclusion criteria and were coded by paired, independent reviewers using an extraction framework. The framework was adapted from the Silberg scale, other scoping reviews of
mHealth apps for similar populations, and background research on modifiable dementia risk factors. Coded elements included evidence-based and expert credibility, app features, lifestyle elements of focus, and privacy and security.
RESULTS: Of the 152 apps that met the final selection criteria, 88 (57.9%) addressed modifiable lifestyle behaviors associated with reducing dementia risk. However, many of these apps (59/152, 38.8%) only addressed one lifestyle behavior, with mental stimulation being the most frequently addressed. More than half (84/152, 55.2%) scored 2 points out of 9 on the Silberg scale, with a mean score of 2.4 (SD 1.0) points. Most of the 152 apps did not disclose essential information: 120 (78.9%) did not disclose expert consultation, 125 (82.2%) did not disclose evidence-based information, 146 (96.1%) did not disclose author credentials, and 134 (88.2%) did not disclose their information sources. In addition, 105 (69.2%) apps did not disclose adherence to data privacy and security practices.
CONCLUSIONS: There is an opportunity for
mHealth apps to support individuals in engaging in behaviors linked to reducing dementia risk. While there is a market for these products, there is a lack of dementia-related apps focused on multiple lifestyle behaviors. Gaps in the rigor of app development regarding evidence base, credibility, and adherence to data privacy and security standards must be addressed. Following established and validated guidelines will be necessary for dementia-related apps to be effective and advance successfully.