PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
BACKGROUND: Community-based participatory research (CBPR) is a collaborative research approach that equally engages researchers and community stakeholders throughout all steps of the research process to facilitate social change and increase research relevance. Community advisory boards (CABs) are a CBPR tool in which individuals with lived experience and community organisations are integrated into the research process and ensure the work aligns with community priorities. We seek to (1) explore the best practices for the recruitment and engagement of people with lived experiences on CABs and (2) identify the scope of literature on minimising power dynamics between organisations and community members with lived experience who work on CABs together.
METHODS: This scoping review will follow the Arksey and O\'Malley methodological framework, informed by Levac et al, and will be reported using a PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) diagram. Detailed and robust search strategies have been developed for Embase, Medline and PsychINFO. Grey literature references and reference lists of included articles published between 1 January 1990 and 30 March 2023 will be considered. Two reviewers will independently screen references in two successive stages of title/abstract and full-text screening. Conflicts will be decided by consensus or a third reviewer. Thematic analysis will be applied in three phases: open coding, axial coding and abstraction. Extracted data will be recorded and presented in a tabular format and/or graphical summaries, with a descriptive overview discussing how the research findings relate to the research questions. At this time, a preliminary search of peer-reviewed and grey literature has been conducted. Search results for peer-reviewed literature have been uploaded to Covidence for review and appraisal for relevance.
BACKGROUND: Formal ethics approval is not required for this review. Review findings will inform ongoing and future CBPR community advisory board dynamics.
BACKGROUND: The protocol has been registered prospectively on the Open Science Framework (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/QF5D3).
METHODS: This scoping review will follow the Arksey and O\'Malley methodological framework, informed by Levac et al, and will be reported using a PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) diagram. Detailed and robust search strategies have been developed for Embase, Medline and PsychINFO. Grey literature references and reference lists of included articles published between 1 January 1990 and 30 March 2023 will be considered. Two reviewers will independently screen references in two successive stages of title/abstract and full-text screening. Conflicts will be decided by consensus or a third reviewer. Thematic analysis will be applied in three phases: open coding, axial coding and abstraction. Extracted data will be recorded and presented in a tabular format and/or graphical summaries, with a descriptive overview discussing how the research findings relate to the research questions. At this time, a preliminary search of peer-reviewed and grey literature has been conducted. Search results for peer-reviewed literature have been uploaded to Covidence for review and appraisal for relevance.
BACKGROUND: Formal ethics approval is not required for this review. Review findings will inform ongoing and future CBPR community advisory board dynamics.
BACKGROUND: The protocol has been registered prospectively on the Open Science Framework (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/QF5D3).
摘要：
背景：基于社区的参与式研究（CBPR）是一种合作研究方法，可在研究过程的所有步骤中平等地吸引研究人员和社区利益相关者，以促进社会变革并增加研究相关性。社区咨询委员会（CAB）是一个CBPR工具，其中具有生活经验和社区组织的个人被纳入研究过程，并确保工作与社区优先事项保持一致。我们寻求（1）探索招聘和参与具有CAB生活经验的人的最佳实践，以及（2）确定有关最小化组织和社区成员之间的动力动力动力的文献范围，这些成员具有在CAB上一起工作的生活经验。
方法：此范围审查将遵循Arksey和O\'Malley方法框架，由Levac等人通知，并将使用PRISMA（系统审查和荟萃分析的首选报告项目）图进行报告。已经为Embase开发了详细和强大的搜索策略，Medline和PsychINFO。将考虑在1990年1月1日至2023年3月30日之间发表的灰色文献参考文献和参考文献列表。两名审稿人将在标题/摘要和全文筛选的两个连续阶段中独立筛选参考文献。冲突将由协商一致或第三审稿人决定。主题分析将分三个阶段应用:开放编码、轴向编码和抽象。提取的数据将以表格格式和/或图形摘要记录和显示，描述性概述，讨论研究结果与研究问题的关系。此时,已经对同行评审和灰色文献进行了初步搜索。同行评审文献的搜索结果已被上传到Covidence进行回顾和相关性评估。
背景：本次审查不需要正式的伦理批准。审查结果将为正在进行和未来的CBPR社区咨询委员会动态提供信息。
背景：该协议已在开放科学框架（https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF）上进行了前瞻性注册。IO/QF5D3）。
方法：此范围审查将遵循Arksey和O\'Malley方法框架，由Levac等人通知，并将使用PRISMA（系统审查和荟萃分析的首选报告项目）图进行报告。已经为Embase开发了详细和强大的搜索策略，Medline和PsychINFO。将考虑在1990年1月1日至2023年3月30日之间发表的灰色文献参考文献和参考文献列表。两名审稿人将在标题/摘要和全文筛选的两个连续阶段中独立筛选参考文献。冲突将由协商一致或第三审稿人决定。主题分析将分三个阶段应用:开放编码、轴向编码和抽象。提取的数据将以表格格式和/或图形摘要记录和显示，描述性概述，讨论研究结果与研究问题的关系。此时,已经对同行评审和灰色文献进行了初步搜索。同行评审文献的搜索结果已被上传到Covidence进行回顾和相关性评估。
背景：本次审查不需要正式的伦理批准。审查结果将为正在进行和未来的CBPR社区咨询委员会动态提供信息。
背景：该协议已在开放科学框架（https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF）上进行了前瞻性注册。IO/QF5D3）。
