PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
RESULTS: After excluding 4 patients with an anesthesia duration of < 2 hours, data from 34 patients (1163 sets of tracheal and esophageal temperatures) were analyzed. Concordance correlation coefficient was 0.78. The overall mean bias (95% limits of agreement) between the tracheal and esophageal temperatures was -0.16°C (-0.65°C to 0.34°C). The percentage of temperature differences within ± 0.25°C was 73.5% ± 32.3, with a median of 89.4% [0,100]. The linear mixed-effects model revealed that the estimated intercept was 0.17°C with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.13°C to 0.22°C. The duration of anesthesia and the number of temperature measurements were associated with higher concordance between the tracheal and esophageal temperatures in univariate analysis.
摘要：
结果：排除4名麻醉持续时间<2小时的患者后，分析了34例患者的数据（1163套气管和食管温度）。一致性相关系数为0.78。气管和食管温度之间的总体平均偏差（95％的一致性界限）为-0.16°C（-0.65°C至0.34°C）。在±0.25°C内的温差百分比为73.5%±32.3,中位数为89.4%[0,100]。线性混合效应模型显示，估计截距为0.17°C，95%置信区间(CI)为0.13°C至0.22°C。在单变量分析中，麻醉持续时间和温度测量次数与气管和食管温度之间的较高一致性相关。
